Jump to content

Featured Replies

I'll be very disappointed if we dont win this, Sydney still have half their side out and look very short all over the ground where we are at full strength

 
4 hours ago, jackaub said:

Viney in Sharp out Spargo out Brown in

i really like Sharp he competes and get into great positons and chases

could have kicked 3 unfortunately a serial offender in front of goals

agree 100%, he just lacks alot of polish with the ball

I'm surprised this isn't well known. The centre square is 50m by 50m. That's a policy.

The 50m arc is a guideline. I believe it is under 45m at SCG.

As I tell newbies at work a policy is just a posted guideline that has been laminated.

 
18 hours ago, jaydenh10 said:

if turner gets dropped we riot, was in our best 3 on sunday

It would be unacceptable and getting way too cute at selection if we drop Turner. He’s already harshly been dropped once this year.

either:

1) rest one of T Mac or May and retain Turner down back.

2) drop AJ and send Turner forward. I would have a second ruck committee of Turner and Petty and concede a few hit outs to Ladhams which won’t be the end of the world.

Prefer option 2.

Sharp the other player to be dropped.

Edited by Bring-Back-Powell


Ranking our team v lions in order of importance (in terms of impact if they were injured/unavailable)

Gawn

Petracca

Oliver Pickett

Rivers Bowey Langdon

Tmcd May Turner Petty Melksham

Salem Mcvee Chandler Sparrow Windsor Langford Lindsay

AJ Fritsch

Sharp Spargo

(Disclaimer imv )

4 hours ago, picket fence said:

Spargo would struggle to get a game at any other club including Richmond, Norf and West Coast!

this reminds when most of when demonland were giving it to chandler early this year after a couple of poor performances. not taking into account any injury concerns, game plan etc. they have shut up now.

19 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Ranking our team v lions in order of importance (in terms of impact if they were injured/unavailable)

Gawn

Petracca

Oliver Pickett

Rivers Bowey Langdon

Tmcd May Turner Petty Melksham

Salem Mcvee Chandler Sparrow Windsor Langford Lindsay

AJ Fritsch

Sharp Spargo

(Disclaimer imv )

no Melksham is up the top of that list. his asset is our biggest weakness.

 
1 hour ago, Damo said:

The 50m arc is a guideline. I believe it is under 45m at SCG.

According to Mr Google this was perhaps one of those urban myths but I do agree that unlike some other lines it can have a little give and take

3 hours ago, D Rev said:

You know how dimensions work, yeah?

I do. 155 metres is only five metres shorter than 160 metres.

That's a difference of a mere 2.5 metres in each direction from the centre circle. (Imagine Max Gawn with his arms up ... about that distance)

The SCG is almost the same length as the MCG. Any further queries should be directed to my Captain.

8M8QFOc.jpg


16 hours ago, Adam The God said:

A score involvement means his disposal hasn't broken down in a chain that results in a score.

If you go back to my original rebuttal, it was to be debunk the idea that Charlie was a poor kick.

Agree. Not sure how anyone thinks he is a poor kick. Spargo is not back to his 2018-23 kicking level yet but he will get there. His kicking is as good as anyone playing in the forward half. His career goal average is 0.6 v Miers at 0.7. Miers has spent 17% more time on ground in his career as well. He needs more kicks but maybe we just need to accept he will be 7 kicks a game and they will be impactful. As long as he combines that with pressure he shouldn’t be dropped.

IMG_1322.jpeg

28 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

I do. 155 metres is only five metres shorter than 160 metres.

That's a difference of a mere 2.5 metres in each direction from the centre circle. (Imagine Max Gawn with his arms up ... about that distance)

The SCG is almost the same length as the MCG. Any further queries should be directed to my Captain.

8M8QFOc.jpg

Get your Captain to measure it on google maps with their handy distance measuring tool and report back. Looks more like 150m (which would mean an honest 50m arc would touch the mandated centre square.)

I note the ABC stated that they had lengthened the ground since 2007. Not sure how they did that.

Edited by sue

23 hours ago, roy11 said:

Agree we need more goals from Spargs, but worth noting there's only 5 players at the club with more Goal Assists. So wouldn't crucify him for that one too much.
Chuck also 3rd highest tackles inside F50 for the Dees.
He's never going to light a match on fire, so the spot is his until someone comes along with better attributes. Uncertain if that is K.Brown or not.
Would like us to draft/trade another small forward who has more 'elite' stats than 'average'.



Would prefer Spargo, who some excuse as coming back from injury, playing a few weeks at Casey with K Brown herring a decent seniors run in the same role.

Come list management time we will have the likes of Brown and Woey without sufficient exposure from which to make a hard call.

18 hours ago, Garbo said:

So tmac then?

or May (managed)?

18 hours ago, Adam The God said:

A score involvement means his disposal hasn't broken down in a chain that results in a score.

If you go back to my original rebuttal, it was to be debunk the idea that Charlie was a poor kick.

so does that mean that every player in a chain from deep defence to a goal of uninterrupted would get a goal assist? Just asking.

2 hours ago, Bay Riffin said:

this reminds when most of when demonland were giving it to chandler early this year after a couple of poor performances. not taking into account any injury concerns, game plan etc. they have shut up now.

Recovering from a long injury layoff with half a dozen senior games doesn’t seem logical to me. Lever came back (or will be coming back) via Casey so why not Spargo?

58 minutes ago, sue said:

Get your Captain to measure it on google maps with their handy distance measuring tool and report back. Looks more like 150m (which would mean an honest 50m arc would touch the mandated centre square.)

I note the ABC stated that they had lengthened the ground since 2007. Not sure how they did that.

Maybe the usual ABC “fact checker”?🤔

1 hour ago, Demonstone said:

I do. 155 metres is only five metres shorter than 160 metres.

That's a difference of a mere 2.5 metres in each direction from the centre circle. (Imagine Max Gawn with his arms up ... about that distance)

The SCG is almost the same length as the MCG. Any further queries should be directed to my Captain.

8M8QFOc.jpg

I think your missing drevs point ds - as I noted it's also 5 metres narrower.

Which means there's less area.

Which us why over the last 10 seasons the average score there is aprox 10 points less than at the g, which statistically is very significant.

It's a [censored] ground that's too small for modern AFL footy.

Ditto kardinia Park for exactly the same reason.

11 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Would prefer Spargo, who some excuse as coming back from injury, playing a few weeks at Casey with K Brown herring a decent seniors run in the same role.

Come list management time we will have the likes of Brown and Woey without sufficient exposure from which to make a hard call.

or May (managed)?

so does that mean that every player in a chain from deep defence to a goal of uninterrupted would get a goal assist? Just asking.

Recovering from a long injury layoff with half a dozen senior games doesn’t seem logical to me. Lever came back (or will be coming back) via Casey so why not Spargo?

Maybe the usual ABC “fact checker”?🤔

I do wonder if Tmac is not in better shape than May .

Perhaps it's Lever and May who need managing.

Leave Disco and Tommy alone unless otherwise.. .

I'm not Spargypants greatest fan but he does have footy smarts. Certainly an enigma to me. Goody has mucho faith in him 🤔🤷‍♂️


1 hour ago, sue said:

Get your Captain to measure it on google maps

My Captain sent me to see Private Parts who referred me up the chain to Corporal Punishment and I eventually ended up with a Major Headache.

5 minutes ago, binman said:

I think your missing drevs point ds - as I noted it's also 5 metres narrower.

Which means there's less area.

Which us why over the last 10 seasons the average score there is aprox 10 points less than at the g, which statistically is very significant.

A smaller ground (with shorter distances to cover) should result in higher scores.

1 minute ago, Demonstone said:

A smaller ground (with shorter distances to cover) should result in higher scores.

Sure.

If it was 1977 and zones weren't a thing.

3 minutes ago, binman said:

I think your missing drevs point ds - as I noted it's also 5 metres narrower.

Which means there's less area.

Which us why over the last 10 seasons the average score there is aprox 10 points less than at the g, which statistically is very significant.

It's a [censored] ground that's too small for modern AFL footy.

Ditto kardinia Park for exactly the same reason.

Kittylitter Park is the most offensive ground. Practically missing a wing ffs ( Moorabool St side ), that peatfield is an abomination. Refuse to go there.

I truly think the SCG thing is more a mental thing imo. Get a tape measure and mark off 5m and 9m .. ( resp len and width diff ) ..it's not that much. I don't think so anyways.

Other grounds have greater discrepancies.

Ours perfect..... of course 😉

33 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

My Captain sent me to see Private Parts who referred me up the chain to Corporal Punishment and I eventually ended up with a Major Headache.

Who totally lost the plot with the ensuring General Mayhem.


On 21/05/2025 at 13:33, D Rev said:

tap it from the centre to inside 50 for a 30m kick to goal

Binman: I think your missing drevs point ds - as I noted it's also 5 metres narrower. Which means there's less area.

@D Rev is clearly talking about going straight to goal from the centre bounce. Nothing to do with the width of the ground or overall dimensions.

4 hours ago, Damo said:

As I tell newbies at work a policy is just a posted guideline that has been laminated.

a bit like speed signs and road rules in Italy

Advisable only

 

No Vines is a right shame, must not have passed the latest concussion test.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 11

    Round 11, the second week of The Sir Doug Nicholls Round, kicks off on Thursday night with the Cats hosting the Bulldogs at Kardinia Park. Geelong will be looking to to continue their decade long dominance over the Bulldogs, while the Dogs aim to take another big scalp as they surge up the ladder. On Friday night it's he Dreamtime at the 'G clash between Essendon and Richmond. The Bombers will want to avoid another embarrassing performance against a lowly side whilst the Tigers will be keen to avenge a disappointing loss to the Kangaroos. Saturday footy kicks off as the Blues face the Giants in a pivotal clash for both clubs. Carlton need to turn around their up and down season while GWS will be eager to bounce back and reassert themselves as a September threat. At twilight sees the Hawks taking on the Lions at the G. Hawthorn need to cement themselves in the Top 4 but they’ll need to be at their best to challenge a Brisbane side eager to respond after last week’s crushing loss to the Dees on their home turf. The first of the Saturday night double headers opens with North Melbourne up against the high-flying Magpies. The Roos will need a near-perfect performance to trouble a Collingwood side sitting atop the ladder.

      • Like
    • 189 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Sydney

    The two teams competing at the MCG on Sunday afternoon have each traversed a long and arduous path since their previous encounter on a sweltering March evening in Sydney a season and a half ago. Both experienced periods of success at various times last year. The Demons ran out of steam in midseason while the Swans went on to narrowly miss the ultimate prize in the sport. Now, they find themselves outside of finals contention as the season approaches the halfway mark. The winner this week will remain in contact with the leading pack, while the loser may well find itself on a precipice, staring into the abyss. The current season has presented numerous challenges for most clubs, particularly those positioned in the middle tier. The Essendon experience in suffering a significant 91-point loss to the Bulldogs, just one week after defeating the Swans, may not be typical, but it illustrates the unpredictability of outcomes under the league’s present set up. 

      • Haha
    • 7 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Brisbane

    “Max Gawn has been the heart and soul of the Dees for years now, but this recent recovery from a terrible start has been driven by him. He was everywhere again, and with the game in the balance, he took several key marks to keep the ball in the Dees forward half.” - The Monday Knee Jerk Reaction: Round Ten Of course, it wasn’t the efforts of one man that caused this monumental upset, but rather the work of the coach and his assistants and the other 22 players who took the ground, notably the likes of Jake Melksham, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kozzie Pickett but Max has been magnificent in taking ownership of his team and its welfare under the fire of a calamitous 0-5 start to the season. On Sunday, he provided the leadership that was needed to face up to the reigning premier and top of the ladder Brisbane Lions on their home turf and to prevail after a slow start, during which the hosts led by as much as 24 points in the second quarter. Titus O’Reily is normally comedic in his descriptions of the football but this time, he was being deadly serious. The Demons have come from a long way back and, although they still sit in the bottom third of the AFL pack, there’s a light at the end of the tunnel as they look to drive home the momentum inspired in the past four or five weeks by Max the Magnificent who was under such great pressure in those dark, early days of the season.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Southport

    The Southport Sharks came to Casey. They saw and they conquered a team with 16 AFL-listed players who, for the most part, wasted their time on the ground and failed to earn their keep. For the first half, the Sharks were kept in the game by the Demons’ poor use of the football, it’s disposal getting worse the closer the team got to its own goal and moreover, it got worse as the game progressed. Make no mistake, Casey was far and away the better team in the first half, it was winning the ruck duels through Tom Campbell’s solid performance but it was the scoreboard that told the story.

      • Haha
    • 3 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Sydney

    Just a game and percentage outside the Top 8, the Demons return to Melbourne to face the Sydney Swans at the MCG, with a golden opportunity to build on the momentum from toppling the reigning premiers on their own turf. Who comes in, and who makes way?

      • Like
    • 457 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Brisbane

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a famous victory by the Demons over the Lions at the Gabba.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 35 replies
    Demonland