Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

windsor, tholstrup, langford, lindsay

it will be their first afl match together tomorrow

my question is - do we expect them all to be future midfielders, or will one, two, or more of them end up being different types?

fwiw, i see langford as the only 'pure' midfielder of the bunch

windsor and lindsay can play outside as well

and tholstrup is more of a question mark in terms of his main role

Edited by whatwhat say what

 
53 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

windsor, tholstrup, langford, lindsay

it will be their first afl match together tomorrow

my question is - do we expect them all to be future midfielders, or will one, two, or more of them end up being different types?

fwiw, i see langford as the only 'pure' midfielder of the bunch

windsor and lindsay can play outside as well

and tholstrup is more of a question mark in terms of his main role

I feel like long term Kolt will play that hybrid Chad Warner type of roll where it kind of depends on game state, hit the nail on the head for the rest of it though. Could also see Leb playing a fair bit of time inside as well once the body matures.

 

My 2 cents

Langford can be a pure mid....or play extended minutes forward (Trac)

Tholstrup to succeed Viney as a physical defensive mid, but with a bit more footy IQ and versatility

Lindsay reminds me a bit of Walsh but with a neater kick, think he will play everywhere including inside, had massive tackle numbers in his draft year

Windsor more likely to remain a winger/flanker

8 minutes ago, adonski said:

My 2 cents

Langford can be a pure mid....or play extended minutes forward (Trac)

Tholstrup to succeed Viney as a physical defensive mid, but with a bit more footy IQ and versatility

Lindsay reminds me a bit of Walsh but with a neater kick, think he will play everywhere including inside, had massive tackle numbers in his draft year

Windsor more likely to remain a winger/flanker

Windsor should definitely play in the middle. Need his speed and class to burst away from stoppage. Completely wasted at half back right now.


50 minutes ago, KozzyCan said:

Windsor should definitely play in the middle. Need his speed and class to burst away from stoppage. Completely wasted at half back right now.

Seems to be as/more important to have the speed off the backline these days but time will tell

Bit concerning he isn't getting more of the ball in defence at the moment but we don't know how much his recurrent foot infections have hindered him

Langford will be a pure inside mid with some time resting forward as an aerial threat.

Lindsay will be an inside/outside midfielder, has more versatility and can play wing and half back. His u18 year as a centre square mid was outstanding.

Tholstrup I see as a hybrid mid/half forward.

I'm not convinced Windsor will be a centre square player but will be an elite winger in my view.

Love the idea of these guys playing together and being the future, some great talent and characters in there, Kolt in particular for character.

Hope we can keep them all and they invest in the club, I think they are a great exciting future prospect and to be there for a bit with a few of the greats of our current team, albeit finding some form, would be very tasty.

 

I haven’t seen him play but hope Culley can play a physical role there as well. Windsor is a winger , leave him there, make the MCG wing his.


Kolt looks a little like a deer in the headlights. He just needs to calm that energy as he’s a pretty good disposer of the ball.

Edited by Roost it far

Kolt provides a manic level of energy around the ball that we don’t currently have.

I envisage him taking Sparrow’s spot, I’d love it to happen quite quickly.

Lindsay reminds me a little of Luke Hodge, just go wherever he’s needed at the time - not quite as good aerially but more agile at ground level. Could have a lot of impact through the middle and at Half Back. He’s also a very keen tackler which is a huge bonus.

Windsor could potentially play a very attacking, old school, centreman role. Be the linking man between the arcs with lots of burst.

Langford will end up with a Cripps type role I think, just burst forward with a deadly left foot. He’ll get sharper over time and we will absolutely love him

I guess there is always time for some dreaming of the future.

Langford - faster, better-looking Riccutio

Windsor - Shaun Burgoyne

Lindsay - Kade Simpson

Tholstrup - Paul Chapman

So we still need maybe a Simon Black and a Lenny Hayes to fill it out, but should go alright.

29 minutes ago, Little Goffy said:

I guess there is always time for some dreaming of the future.

Langford - faster, better-looking Riccutio

Windsor - Shaun Burgoyne

Lindsay - Kade Simpson

Tholstrup - Paul Chapman

So we still need maybe a Simon Black and a Lenny Hayes to fill it out, but should go alright.

Or

Langford - Morton

Windsor - Blease

Lindsay - Gysberts

Tholstrup - Tapscott


It really will be an interesting watch tomorrow - how the next gen stack up. Hopefully not a Watts on Queens B’day scenario - but there is some talent on display. Suspect we will still get smashed, but just maybe this will be a day we look back on and say this is when it all began. A bit like that Hawthorn game in the rain 8 or 9 years ago. Go Dees.

Been a while since I’ve seen his draft highlights, but I remember at the time thinking Kolt was giving Paul Chapman vibes (role / impact wise).

I’m excited with our four youngsters Windsor, Tholstrup, Langford and Lindsay all offer a point of difference for the team and could indeed be our four musketeers when you add ,Spaz (in a different role), Kozzie, Rivers, Bowey, McVee, Van Rooyen, Disco and Jefferson that is a solid start to a regeneration of the team. I’m looking forward to seeing how this group play out plus we have another 6-8 young players that may or not make it.

All 4 show a lot of promise but we need to develop them well

Currently they've walked into an environment where our senior players and experienced players can't (or won't) adopt a new game plan (offense)

So my concern is that unless our senior players lift their game (pronto) these 4 kids could end up in a minefield trying to establish themselves

A big part of developing youngsters is having the right type of environment ... so our experienced players need to lift their game and start working hard for success. Starting from tomorrow against Freo

Set a good example for the youth coming through rather than work-to-rule

Edited by Macca

We'll get some picks and players this year that we can add to this mix.

I'd also take Jackson back if that became an option.

Edited by Adam The God


On Kolt, he looks to be a great athlete, very powerful and explosive but did lack composure last year. He'll play half forward and will be able to pinch hit in the midfield.

In a team where everyone looks they have eaten sour grapes before the game, his high energy and team focus will be so important.

We need a bit of spark and he can provide it.

3 hours ago, Adam The God said:

We'll get some picks and players this year that we can add to this mix.

I'd also take Jackson back if that became an option.

I’d take Jackson in a heartbeat, if they want Koz he’d be my starting point.

23 hours ago, Wizard of Koz said:

Or

Langford - Morton

Windsor - Blease

Lindsay - Gysberts

Tholstrup - Tapscott

Boooooo! Booooo!

🤣

 

Lindsay is making me feel a lot better about not having our top pick this year.

They all look like very good players that you can structure your team around.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 528 replies