Jump to content

Featured Replies

It won't happen of course, but shouldn't Moore be cited for pushing Melksham into that contest with Howe?

 
1 minute ago, Red and Bluebeard said:

It won't happen of course, but shouldn't Moore be cited for pushing Melksham into that contest with Howe?

Of course it won’t happen. That would be admitting that the ump’s got it wrong.

On 10/06/2025 at 17:47, Neil Crompton said:

Of course it won’t happen. That would be admitting that the ump’s got it wrong.

Which is why you might assume the MRO ignored the blatant Kozzie trip, or was instructed to, so as not to keep the issue in the public eye.

 
On 10/06/2025 at 17:47, Neil Crompton said:

Of course it won’t happen. That would be admitting that the ump’s got it wrong.

More like the MRO is a totally one eyed intellectually challenged Collingwood hack.

How long do the clubs tolerate this absolute disgrace?

Pushing an opponent into a dangerous situation, like Moore did to Melksham, was at the start of the season deemed to warrant a suspension. But that halfwit Christian didn’t see that. He urgently needs to be replaced.


It’s old news , but I’m still flabbergasted at Kozzie ‘s three week ban for accidentally brushing Moore’s head in round 23 last season( which has grossly disrupted our 25 season).

Compare that to Durham’s brutal assault on Cerra last week … 2 weeks!!! Durham was so lucky he didn’t break Cerra’s neck. (Reminiscent of Long in the 2000 GF, for which he should still be suspended.)

Can’t wait to see what happens to Butters for that off the ball strike to Kozzie’s head, causing our BOG at the time to have a concussion test, miss nearly a quarter and effectively end his contribution to the game.

Notice the way the media is ignoring Butters’ act?

Star player though, so we will see. When do Port play the Pies?

Edited by Redleg

On 16/06/2025 at 07:49, Redleg said:

Can’t wait to see what happens to Butters for that off the ball strike to Kozzie’s head, causing our BOG at the time to have a concussion test, miss nearly a quarter and effectively end his contribution to the game.

Notice the way the media is ignoring Butters’ act?

Star player though, so we will see. When do Port play the Pies?

No surprise, not even a fine, not even the slightest mention.

Kozzy would have got a minimum of 3 weeks for that.

 
1 minute ago, Redleg said:

No surprise, not even a fine, not even the slightest mention.

Kozzy would have got a minimum of 3 weeks for that.

McVee got off unscathed as well.. I suppose it could have been worse.

Butters has lots of form in this space and am absolutely astonished he got off without a fine. Maybe the AFL feel sorry for him?

21 minutes ago, GS_1905 said:

McVee got off unscathed as well.. I suppose it could have been worse.

Butters has lots of form in this space and am absolutely astonished he got off without a fine. Maybe the AFL feel sorry for him?

I think that’s why McVee got off so there wouldn’t be any publicity.

Same as Hardwick getting off Kozzie trip.

Orders from up high maybe?


8 hours ago, GS_1905 said:

McVee got off unscathed as well.. I suppose it could have been worse.

Butters has lots of form in this space and am absolutely astonished he got off without a fine. Maybe the AFL feel sorry for him?

If I was AJ, I'd feel pretty had done by as well.

Very glad McVee did get off though, he has been getting back towards his best footy in recent weeks and a really important contributor. Want to get yet more development into him and of course extend his contract to 2035.

8 hours ago, Redleg said:

I think that’s why McVee got off so there wouldn’t be any publicity.

Same as Hardwick getting off Kozzie trip.

Orders from up high maybe?

Is it any wonder that some suggest that the AFL, and its one man prosecutor, judge and jury, the MRO, could be regarded as corrupt. Like the IOC and FIFA.

You can't tell me there's no bias.

Poor little champ had a tough night.

Fox Sports
No image preview

‘Step too far’: Why Daicos tag could prompt AFL call afte...

‘Step too far’: Why Daicos tag could prompt AFL call after fiery duel with Saint

2 hours ago, Brownie said:

You can't tell me there's no bias.

Poor little champ had a tough night.

Fox Sports
No image preview

‘Step too far’: Why Daicos tag could prompt AFL call afte...

‘Step too far’: Why Daicos tag could prompt AFL call after fiery duel with Saint

The fine for striking is over the top given it happens 272 times a game. Fine them all or none.

Naw poor Nick is copping what Clarry for years

WAAAAAAA


Fiorini KOs Petty in a contest, very similar or even more culpable than Kozzie v Moore last year, except that Moore was not concussed.

Kozzie gets 3 weeks, Fiorini nothing to see.

And some ask if the MRO is corrupt, inept, or both.

Looks like Viney and May Ok as well, lot of fines though for Melee commentators will be disappointed. No longer worried about head high contact??

Finally some good news from the MRO

I was sure Viney would get a week

36 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Fiorini KOs Petty in a contest, very similar or even more culpable than Kozzie v Moore last year, except that Moore was not concussed.

Kozzie gets 3 weeks, Fiorini nothing to see.

And some ask if the MRO is corrupt, inept, or both.

What are you talking about?

Fiorini was trying to pick the ball up, and Petty went in head first.

Pickett chose to bump. Yes, he got unlucky that Moore went to ground, and I didn’t like the suspension, but the two are nothing at all alike.

If you think im going to try and make sense of all the MRO work from our game then you have the wrong guy and you need to get out more.

  • 3 weeks later...

I wish they add weeks to his suspension, in no way was he going for the ball.

4 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

I wish they add weeks to his suspension, in no way was he going for the ball.

that only happens to mfc players; reckon anb was the ONLY player to contest a 3 week ban and come out of the tribunal with 4

 
8 minutes ago, Random Task said:

What's below careless? Because it's not like they could argue against severe impact or high contact.

According to the AFL's guide, there is nothing else

Not sure what their argument will be, because as you say there is no arguing the severe impact or the high contact.
No doubt there are some dodgy loopholes for Carlton players they'll try and use.

image.png


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 110 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 30 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 22 replies
  • POSTGAME: Carlton

    A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 313 replies