Jump to content

Featured Replies

No offence to anyone but so many here were sold on other options. I'd trust the club's judgement overall so hopefully Henderson turns out brilliantly. Welcome aboard 

 
9 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

Does anybody know who the second player Jason Taylor was referring to in their briefing?

Aidan Johnson and Henderson were the two they were talking about. 
 

Henderson would’ve been picked at our last selection if we got a tall (Tauru) instead of one of Langford/Lindsay. But they went with Johnson because they selected the two mids first up.

 

Worked out in the end👍🏼

Good luck Jack,    But it’s not going to be easy.

some here get carried away, if our man Jack is going to be a walk up start best 22 replacing “anyone”.
Then he would have been picked in the draft or signed by the eagles with an incentive to stay rather than come home. 

I do think the highlights package is impressive. But that’s in a lower grade of football . 
I hope he takes his chances to show that his ceiling is somewhat higher . 
 

you can never have enough Jacks !

 

 

Some have said. he will be in the Round 1 team.  But skills aside, will he learn enough of our game plan etc in the few weeks remaining?

So we gave a future 2nd round pick for McAdam. Got that pick back from the Crows for ANB and now bring in a player in via SSP to replace both McAdam and ANB. 
Strange the way things work out sometimes. 


If we have to drop Henderson, it's gonna be tough to watch

CS54HS.gif

4 hours ago, sue said:

Some have said. he will be in the Round 1 team.  But skills aside, will he learn enough of our game plan etc in the few weeks remaining?

It might be good to have someone that hasn't learnt our game plan from the last 2-3 years!

jokes but seriously...get and bomb it long to no-one?

6 hours ago, BC_1718_DC said:

Aidan Johnson and Henderson were the two they were talking about. 
 

Henderson would’ve been picked at our last selection if we got a tall (Tauru) instead of one of Langford/Lindsay. But they went with Johnson because they selected the two mids first up.

 

Worked out in the end👍🏼

Ah... I thought the video was new. I didn't realise it was from the draft.

 
5 hours ago, sue said:

Some have said. he will be in the Round 1 team.  But skills aside, will he learn enough of our game plan etc in the few weeks remaining?

I think a smart person can learn in that time. 

However, let’s keep in mind that we will have 23 players learning a new gameplan in 2025…

58 minutes ago, rpfc said:

I think a smart person can learn in that time. 

However, let’s keep in mind that we will have 23 players learning a new gameplan in 2025…

Only 23????


On 18/02/2025 at 23:38, Supreme_Demon said:

Congratulations to Jack Henderson getting a chance at the Demons.

His former Werribee Premiership teammate in Aidan Johnson will be incredibly excited to have him join us here at the Melbourne Football Club.

Jack Henderson definitely reminds me a bit of Tom Papley from the Swans. Especially the way he moves.

Good luck to him and I hope he grabs this opportunity to play AFL at the Demons!

I hope he can be as annoying to swans supporters as that little [censored] papley has been to us. 

On 19/02/2025 at 12:32, BAMF said:

We lost by 7 points in the end. Laurie playing nearly 3 full quarters had 1 kick, 4  handballs, 1 clanger and 2 tackles.

There were so many little things that could have happened for us to win that game and our path could have been very different.

This isnt me bagging Laurie. It was the selection decision. Laurie had only played a few games that year and had no consistency. 

All spilt milk in the end.

100% agree on the Carlton game.

Super happy we got Henderson. He looks a similar player to Chandler based on highlights. Hoping he gets a crack early.

Not so much from this game, but all the talk about young Laurie being g a player going forward, I just don't see it.  Doesn't seem to have an aggressive bone in his body.  Hope I'm wrong.

Good to see we have gone back to the old way to pick recruits.

 

Step 1 is the kid called Jack 

Step 2...............  job done

 

Good luck Jack. 


4 hours ago, BAMF said:

Ah... I thought the video was new. I didn't realise it was from the draft.

The big clue is the very start of the video where the text says “Monday 18 November”!

Edited by Dee Boys

On 20/11/2024 at 15:24, demoncat said:

I’d love to get some more goals out of our small forwards not named Kozzie - so I reckon Jack would be a great get

Hopefully he’s available at our last pick 🙏

Might team up well with Chin in the penalised absence of Kozzie - the leading and support players must defend these two at the drop of the hanky when opportunities arise. 

On 19/02/2025 at 11:00, Roost it far said:

Calmly and methodically??? Like not notifying supporters of a change in start time of a preseason game even days after the time had changed. The website’s long been a joke.

Wrong again It has been done overnight to my knowledge and may have been mooted prior but no decision (rom the organisers as such. 

BTW who do you think you are demanding training reports just when you want them. Your brazen threats are simply that and I don’t

On 19/02/2025 at 13:04, Cranky Franky said:

Let's hope Jack Henderson can make the grade.

I don't think we've had much luck in "top up" and mid season draft type players. I don't recall many successes.

 

On 19/02/2025 at 13:04, Cranky Franky said:

Let's hope Jack Henderson can make the grade.

I don't think we've had much luck in "top up" and mid season draft type players. I don't recall many successes.

No you don’t celebrate successes cranky rather the failures.

Disco Turner says HI 

On 19/02/2025 at 11:32, BAMF said:

We lost by 7 points in the end. Laurie playing nearly 3 full quarters had 1 kick, 4  handballs, 1 clanger and 2 tackles.

There were so many little things that could have happened for us to win that game and our path could have been very different.

This isnt me bagging Laurie. It was the selection decision. Laurie had only played a few games that year and had no consistency. 

All spilt milk in the end.

100% agree on the Carlton game.

Super happy we got Henderson. He looks a similar player to Chandler based on highlights. Hoping he gets a crack early.

Will need to be a more rounded forward than Chandler.

From info here he seems to be a very confident ball handler with quick and good decision making. Finishes well and from 50m out on occasions. Could well go to another level in an AFL environment. Also a bit like Nibla is a determined opponent who can tag if required. 

14 hours ago, monoccular said:

Only 23????

Yes, tragically for some on here and their training reports, we can play with only 23 players at a time…

Season 8 Brooklyn 99 GIF by NBC


 

4 hours ago, 58er said:

BTW who do you think you are demanding training reports just when you want them. Your brazen threats are simply that and I don’t

I'll demand training reports when I see fit to demand them punk. Step Brothers Mf GIF by reactionseditor

 

 

 

4 hours ago, 58er said:

Wrong again It has been done overnight to my knowledge and may have been mooted prior but no decision (rom the organisers as such. 

 

Ghostwriter was already onto it on Monday: 

NOTE: Due to expected extreme weather there’s a change to start time of the practice match vs North at Arden St this Saturday February 22nd. The match is now scheduled to start at 10am

This is going to sound negative. I don't mean it to be. I saw the video of Taylor and Lamb talking about Henderson with Goodwin and others and their comments were glowing. Now, I know a club isn't going to release footage of football department members bagging newly recruited players, but I'm still intrigued:

What's the knock on him? Why isn't a player considered to have outstanding ball-handling skills, an ability to kick goals (from long-range as well as close to goal) and excellent movement and fitness not already on a list?

 
5 minutes ago, The Taciturn Demon said:

This is going to sound negative. I don't mean it to be. I saw the video of Taylor and Lamb talking about Henderson with Goodwin and others and their comments were glowing. Now, I know a club isn't going to release footage of football department members bagging newly recruited players, but I'm still intrigued:

What's the knock on him? Why isn't a player considered to have outstanding ball-handling skills, an ability to kick goals (from long-range as well as close to goal) and excellent movement and fitness not already on a list?

There’s plenty of skilled VFL players who don’t make it onto AFL lists. The reasons are numerous but my guess with Henderson is he’s a bit small to be a modern mid and doesn’t have any standout traits to be seen as a small forward. He does however have the work rate, the clean hands and the 50m drop punt which just might get him a game on our list. Remember he’s currently behind Pickett, Chandler and Spargo so he’s got his work cut out. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 50 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies