Jump to content

Featured Replies

8 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

What trouble? She stepped aside without a fuss. She only has one year left on her term anyway.

I think a good club and a good leader does just that.

She saw us through some hard times and through some of the very best times, including 2 premierships, and financially we've never been in a better position.

I think it was the right thing to do, but she has earnt my respect for what she did when she became president, and the gracious way in which she bowed out. 

 

I think from all the people on our board, he would be the most credentialed to lead a footy department review, having played the game, and also been involved at other clubs not just our own.

At least we can be sure that he has the very best interests of our club at heart, and this is not some ego driven thing to retain his position.

Great post.  Brad should stay on Board either way, but at least be Director responsible for reporting and representing Board on footy matters.

 
6 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Just please please go quietly Kate, your reputation will be enhanced if you do!

Wtf are you talking about? Did you read the post? 

This is actually a great piece of media timing by the club, credit to them. 4.30pm on a Friday in the middle of the first week of finals. There's no better time to sweep the news under the carpet. Media and fans are focussed on the Port debacle and the game tonight.

 
10 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

So 3 new members is a possibility.

For those wanting to shake things up, now is the time.

Be interesting to see who stands.

Edited by Bitter but optimistic

3 minutes ago, Sir Windsor said:

This was all part of an elaborate plan to get back in the media cycle.

Jokes aside. Thanks for your service Kate.

So very true. I picked up a Herald Sun at my local cafe this morning and was staggered to find nothing in there from the usual snipers having a dig at our club.

At least they will have Port Adelaide, Ken Hinkley and Charlie Dixon as their whipping boys over the next week. 


18 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

The speed at which she’s bailed indicates she had no interest in digging in and actually getting something done. Very worrying.

I have no real idea what a board review will achieve, apart from highlighting they’ve not achieved much. 

The real question is who is stepping in.

Only once that’s done will someone actually start to make some changes.

Not your finest moment. Mean spirited.

22 minutes ago, Ted Lasso said:

I do hope that it's not lost on anyone the significant role she's played not only in helping win the flag in 2021, but guiding the club through a number of significant challenges off the field since she took over. While i agree it was the right time for her to go i definitely would want to acknowledge the role she's played and the positive impact she's had! 

Sadly she didn't deliver on what was her key milestone, delivering our training grounds.

 
6 minutes ago, seventyfour said:

This is actually a great piece of media timing by the club, credit to them. 4.30pm on a Friday in the middle of the first week of finals. There's no better time to sweep the news under the carpet. Media and fans are focussed on the Port debacle and the game tonight.

Reminds me I have a few quick emails to send before i log off for the day and head to the footy. 


15 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

The speed at which she’s bailed indicates she had no interest in digging in and actually getting something done. Very worrying.

I have no real idea what a board review will achieve, apart from highlighting they’ve not achieved much. 

The real question is who is stepping in.

Only once that’s done will someone actually start to make some changes.

Omfg. Are you serious???? She had no interest in digging in???? I’m staggered by your insensitivity. Ffs she’s just stepped down… isn’t this what everyone wanted?! Show a modicum of respect, if you’re able to. 

26 minutes ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Thank you Kate.

You’ll always be remembered as the President who took us out of the wilderness after 57 years.

Although I’ve been calling for change I agree with you. I  particularly  salute her role in development of our AFLW  activity 

Well done Kate. You/we got the 2021 Premiership and the ball rolling on the new facility and the future fund both which are crucial for the ongoing survival of our great club..

1 minute ago, Farmer said:

Although I’ve been calling for change I agree with you. I  particularly  salute her role in development of our AFLW  activity 

Kate is our W team’s biggest supporter by a mile. She’s gone above and beyond for the girls. I don’t know how these things work but I dearly hope she can remain involved in some capacity. It will be heartbreaking if not. 


Just now, WalkingCivilWar said:

Kate is our W team’s biggest supporter by a mile. She’s gone above and beyond for the girls. I don’t know how these things work but I dearly hope she can remain involved in some capacity. It will be heartbreaking if not. 

Unfortunately she cannot continue at board level as she's now served more terms than allowed, and was only extended as she was president. 

However it doesn't stop her from staying involved in the AFLW if she wishes, in a role that is outside of the board.

23 minutes ago, Dannyz said:

She delivered the premiership but she never delivered the new facility. 

Ultimately that is why she joined the board. 

Green will only preside over the review and will hand the reins over afterwards. 

Do you know if the review will be just of the board, or of the operational and FD side of things too?

 

27 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

The speed at which she’s bailed indicates she had no interest in digging in and actually getting something done. Very worrying.

I have no real idea what a board review will achieve, apart from highlighting they’ve not achieved much. 

The real question is who is stepping in.

Only once that’s done will someone actually start to make some changes.

It seems being president of a multi million dollar sporting organization that's been embroiled in constant legal drama for your entire tenure is a much much more difficult situation than it might seem on a fan forum. 

As i said earlier, i agree it was the right time for a change, but to suggest she's bailed out when it's gotten tough is a joke, it's been a nightmare for her entire tenure and she's kept us going through that. 

I think the highlighted section of your post sums your position up pretty well. 


3 minutes ago, Pulp Fritschon said:

Premiership odds 2025 just shortened. 

Don’t let the door hit you…..

Read the room. Even her biggest bashers are either graciously bidding her thank you and goodbye or not commenting at all. It’s called being a respectful adult. You should try it. 

16 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

“The Times, they are a changing…”

Phase one…

“The times are always changing”

Phase three billion and seventy. 
 

 

 
32 minutes ago, Demon17 said:

Brad's a class act. If you read his statement, after the review of the Board he wants the Presidency to go back to a Board vote. He's a caretaker until that time.

Steven Smith appointed then voted in as Chairman by the Board written all over this.  Nice move, and given Trac's comments that misrepresented Roffey, I hope he's happy with himself.

Well done Kate for your efforts for over a decade on the Board.

I heard the same. Brad's role likely to be an interim position with Smudge taking over in the near future. 

There have been too many mis-steps by this administration in recent times. Kate's train wreck interview was symptomatic of how some at the club operate with a siege mentality. Fairly obvious who the next domino will be.

We are lacking real leadership at the club so look fwd to seeing what Brad and hopefully Stephen Smith can do.

 

 

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 388 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies