Season 2024 Over for Clayton Oliver

[Jaded No More 68,879]

Just now, dazzledavey36 said:

Stephen Rowe on SA FIVEAA radio did mention that Adelaide will be going after Oliver again this year.

I’m not surprised. They tried last year why not try again? 
Good luck convincing Clarry to move to Adelaide. 

[DEE fence 5,007]

Thanks @goodwindees who made clear it was another club asking, no harm in asking. Just take NO for an answer please. I get we are all on hair triggers ATM. People asking questions drivers perceived value up and as was said, alot more gets talked about than done in this space. There is the perfect video for this btw.

 

 

 

[Deelectable 1,043]

8 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

So you’re a liar the same way you claim everyone else here is?

 

 

Perhaps you missed the irony pal? I was asked if I seriously said you were a Collingwood plant. Perhaps you're not bright enough to differentiate between those who claim to know inside info and myself using an obviously absurd example to prove that point. Goodnight.

[2021 301]

3 hours ago, goodwindees said:

Guys, I’m hearing that Clayton is not totally off the table. 
He’s gettable for the right offer. 

Without elaborating, I would believe this.

[Deelectable 1,043]

2 minutes ago, Deelectable said:

Perhaps you missed the irony pal? I was asked if I seriously said you were a Collingwood plant. Perhaps you're not bright enough to differentiate between those who claim to know inside info and myself using an obviously absurd example to prove that point. Goodnight.

Perhaps you missed the emoji at the conclusion of my 'joke'? Not surprising.😘

[dazzledavey36 54,796]

5 minutes ago, Deelectable said:

Perhaps you missed the irony pal? I was asked if I seriously said you were a Collingwood plant. Perhaps you're not bright enough to differentiate between those who claim to know inside info and myself using an obviously absurd example to prove that point. Goodnight.

[censored] off would ya.

[layzie 33,792]

10 minutes ago, Deelectable said:

Perhaps you missed the irony pal? I was asked if I seriously said you were a Collingwood plant. Perhaps you're not bright enough to differentiate between those who claim to know inside info and myself using an obviously absurd example to prove that point. Goodnight.

What's a Collingwood plant? 

Is it a weeping willow? Poison hemlock?

[Deelectable 1,043]

5 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

[censored] off would ya.

Charming❤

[BoBo 2,941]

41 minutes ago, Deelectable said:

Perhaps you missed the irony pal? I was asked if I seriously said you were a Collingwood plant. Perhaps you're not bright enough to differentiate between those who claim to know inside info and myself using an obviously absurd example to prove that point. Goodnight.

I didn’t ask if you ‘seriously said you were a Collingwood plant’ of @Jaded No More. 

I asked you if you questioned if jaded was a Collingwood plant….. OR ….NOT A REAL MELBOURNE SUPPORTER.

And low and behold, look at what you said to jaded here:

On 31/08/2024 at 19:15, Deelectable said:

Your perception buddy. Not us true supporters. 

Now what’s the opposite of a true supporter? Maybe a fake supporter? I.e. NOT A REAL SUPPORTER.

Your words:

‘If I said it I'd readily admit it but I didn't. Said some other stuff but not that.

Soooooo you’re a liar. 

 

[Deelectable 1,043]

2 minutes ago, BoBo said:

I didn’t ask if you ‘seriously said you were a Collingwood plant’ of @Jaded No More. 

I asked you if you questioned if jaded was a Collingwood plant….. OR ….NOT A REAL MELBOURNE SUPPORTER.

And low and behold, look at what you said to jaded here:

Now what’s the opposite of a true supporter? Maybe a fake supporter? I.e. NOT A REAL SUPPORTER.

Your words:

‘If I said it I'd readily admit it but I didn't. Said some other stuff but not that.

Soooooo you’re a liar. 

 

If that makes you happy goodonya.  Care factor zero.  Go to bed. You're delusional and rambling . Im in your head.Over and out.😍

[He de mon 926]

4 hours ago, Deelectable said:

Perhaps you missed the irony pal? I was asked if I seriously said you were a Collingwood plant. Perhaps you're not bright enough to differentiate between those who claim to know inside info and myself using an obviously absurd example to prove that point. Goodnight.

The Simone Biles of mental gymnastics.

[Young Angus 790]

Can we put a little handbag symbol next to threads where the majority of replies are just members arguing with zero interest to anyone else please. 

[Dee Zephyr 19,267]

We are giving a lot of air time to someone that deserves none on this thread. 

[BDA 22,740]

I've engaged the ignore button for a certain poster. I recommend else should do the same. 

[BDA 22,740]

I hope @picket fence is holding up ok. 

[picket fence 17,130]

6 minutes ago, BDA said:

I hope @picket fence is holding up ok. 

👍

[The Jackson FIX 3,099]

8 hours ago, rpfc said:

We will be eating salary for half a decade all over the shop.

Depends who’s enquiring

[Little Goffy 14,514]

6 hours ago, layzie said:

What's a Collingwood plant? 

Is it a weeping willow? Poison hemlock?

The highest IQ member of their cheersquad.

[KozzyCan 764]

Do people actually believe there are fake supporters in this site trying to talk down the trade value of our players?

That's pretty funny.

[Ollie fan 3,370]

7 hours ago, Dee Boys said:

But it’s clearly not totally unsubstantiated. @goodwindees has a pretty impeccable track record with his mail. 

Getting the inside word on what’s happening within the four walls of the footy club is a big reason for a lot of people being on this site and the actual thing that beggars belief is why on earth anyone would want to censor that, or abuse anyone who’s providing that. Genuinely cannot for the life of me understand it.

If you don’t like it then ignore it, like people do with a bunch of other topics and posts. 

If you don't understand it, try harder! It's not rocket science. The only consequences of this posting, whether intended or not,  are to sow doubt in Clarry's mind and thus risk all the gains that have been made, to get all us supporters upset, and thus to bignotethe original poster. 
 

The post you commented on was really talking about, why post it, not whether there is any minuscule foundation.

Edited September 5 by Ollie fan

[Demonsterative 3,020]

14 minutes ago, Ollie fan said:

If you don't understand it, try harder! It's not rocket science. The only consequences of this posting, whether intended or not,  are to sow doubt in Clarry's mind and thus risk all the gains that have been made, to get all us supporters upset, and thus to bignotethe original poster. 
 

The post you commented on was really talking about, why post it, not whether there is any minuscule foundation.

I’m not so sure Clarry is that fragile. A rumour won’t lead him astray. 

[Colm 2,151]

@WalkingCivilWarand @Deelectable we have few poster on this site that have very few poster on this site who’s information is always very good and can be trusted as proven by their track record. To my knowledge there is only 3. 
Let’s not have a crack at them when they are good enough to share that information with the rest of us. If it’s not to your liking maybe put them in ignore but don’t try to stop them sharing great info with the rest of us. It’s one of the great benefits of this site. 
 

Side note has the ignore function gone? Can’t seem to be able to find it. 

Edited September 5 by Colm

[BDA 22,740]

33 minutes ago, Ollie fan said:

If you don't understand it, try harder! It's not rocket science. The only consequences of this posting, whether intended or not,  are to sow doubt in Clarry's mind and thus risk all the gains that have been made, to get all us supporters upset, and thus to bignotethe original poster. 
 

The post you commented on was really talking about, why post it, not whether there is any minuscule foundation.

If a trade rumour can knock him off kilter again then there’s no hope. 

[KozzyCan 764]

30 minutes ago, Demonsterative said:

I’m not so sure Clarry is that fragile. A rumour won’t lead him astray. 

The way some infantilise him on here is a bit much.

[BLWNBA 1,002]

28 minutes ago, Colm said:

@WalkingCivilWar @BLWNBA and @Deelectable we have few poster on this site that have very few poster on this site who’s information is always very good and can be trusted as proven by their track record. To my knowledge there is only 3. 
Let’s not have a crack at them when they are good enough to share that information with the rest of us. If it’s not to your liking maybe put them in ignore but don’t try to stop them sharing great info with the rest of us. It’s one of the great benefits of this site. 
 

Side note has the ignore function gone? Can’t seem to be able to find it. 

I haven't had a crack at a single person, not sure why this was directed at me tbh.