Re: Memberships. MFC were beaten up by the press at all levels so badly from the end of ‘23 throughout ‘24. The lack of support from the AFL and media fools regarding the Gus Brayshaw thuggery shook us to the core and this was followed by continual attack right through 2024. That wasn’t helped by Tracc’s injury and a lot of other negative activity around the club. No wonder members fled in their droves, it was hard enough for us rusted on members to continue on despite the constant criticism from inside and out. If we make 55,000 I will be pleasantly surprised.😢🥲

3 hours ago, Flowergirl said:

If the rumours about Jackson are true, one of the reasons why he might like to come back is because he maintains a good relationship with Goody.

Spot on, FG 👍🏽

7 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

The 7 Hawthorn players that would easily play in Hawthorn's first final that didn't play on Saturday are:

Day, Scrimshaw, Nash, Lewis, Dear, McKenzie and Barrass.

I've asked Hawthorn supporting friends and colleagues and then checked on the Hawks Bigfooty Forum. They were all in furious agreement that all those players are clear best 23, or in Lewis's case best 23 when fit.

Ok yep so that’s 5 (Day, Scrimshaw, Barrass, Nash, McKenzie).

There’s no way Dear and Lewis play in the same side, with Gunston’s form and Chol doing the ruckwork. Lewis is never on the park and Dear’s a second year unknown quantity. I’ll give you 6 combined.

We still had 4 out and that’s not including AMW or McAdam who had strong pre-seasons but went down on the eve of the season.

IMO hardly a hanging offence.

On 06/04/2025 at 14:31, Fork 'em said:

In a nutshell ....
To turn the game into an ugly rugby scrum in order to limit the opposition from scoring heavily against us.
Scoring ourselves is a distant afterthought but it usually involves more rugby scrum till we can get it within' range of a snapshot under pressure from a pocket.
And when in doubt, kick it on Gawns head and hope we can create a stoppage for a ball up so we can start another scrum.

Hope this helps.

Pretty much sums it up. Tx.

On 13/05/2025 at 22:27, Demonstone said:

No matter how disappointing our season has been to date and no matter how toxic this site has become, it's comforting to know that we can always rely on turning on each other to help us cope with the tough times.

Toxic ???

All I see are thoughtful, considered opinions expressed in a logical manner.

Just now, Cranky Franky said:

Toxic ???

All I see are thoughtful, considered opinions expressed in a logical manner.

You’re clearly not reading your own posts! 😂

After Sunday, the conclusion will be closer and closer to reality!

On 14/05/2025 at 15:07, DeeZone said:

Re: Memberships. MFC were beaten up by the press at all levels so badly from the end of ‘23 throughout ‘24. The lack of support from the AFL and media fools regarding the Gus Brayshaw thuggery shook us to the core and this was followed by continual attack right through 2024. That wasn’t helped by Tracc’s injury and a lot of other negative activity around the club. No wonder members fled in their droves, it was hard enough for us rusted on members to continue on despite the constant criticism from inside and out. If we make 55,000 I will be pleasantly surprised.😢🥲

This

Our non response to Gus turned me right off funding a membership and turned me off the AFL more generally

That has continued with nonsense like not scheduling games due in 6-7 weeks like the Melb GC game. How is anyone supposed to book flights etc . Nonsense

But the way Maynard got off and our absolute NON response put me right off

Emailed Roffey saying as much. No response. Not owed one obviously but I imagine I’m not alone

16 minutes ago, Superunknown said:

This

Our non response to Gus turned me right off funding a membership and turned me off the AFL more generally

That has continued with nonsense like not scheduling games due in 6-7 weeks like the Melb GC game. How is anyone supposed to book flights etc . Nonsense

But the way Maynard got off and our absolute NON response put me right off

Emailed Roffey saying as much. No response. Not owed one obviously but I imagine I’m not alone

You won't get a response from anyone at the club other than the membership hotline crew.

Might be the same at most or all clubs but we are a closed shop and have been for years now.

The AFL lives in its own bubble. Invitation only!

On 14/05/2025 at 11:26, Adam The God said:

Precisely.

I'd be letting Goody see out his contract to the end of 2026.

The pass mark next year is finals.

I haven't given up on this year yet either.

The pass mark is finals this year as a bare minimum.

1 hour ago, Superunknown said:

Emailed Roffey saying as much. No response. Not owed one obviously but I imagine I’m not alone

Roffey and accountability never went hand in hand during her presidency, at least not when it was anything negative.

Goody staying or going is inconsequential as far as I'm concerned, in the sense that he is not going to stop the persecution mindset of the AFL.

I actually think the AFL want to take over the MCG holus bolus and make it their Mecca and their own show piece.

On 14/05/2025 at 13:08, BLWNBA said:

How do you view the culmination of the post flag-era and the role of Goodwin? Do you lean towards that the culmination of failings, coupled with a likely bottom four finish this year, mean Goodwin’s position is untenable? Or do you think we tread water until a suitable replacement is found, even if that means Goodwin coaches next year too?

Genuine question, this isn’t a smartass reply.

I think we let him coach out his contract, he will know when to go too.

A lot of comments along the lines of “starting to see glimpses of the new game plan / how we want to play”. If it was 2023 or even 2024 I could cop that but it’s not. He’s 12 - 18 months too late and we’ve been well and truly passed by.

1 hour ago, rpfc said:

I think we let him coach out his contract, he will know when to go too.

U are kidding. Needs to go Pronto!

8 hours ago, Bombay Airconditioning said:

A lot of comments along the lines of “starting to see glimpses of the new game plan / how we want to play”. If it was 2023 or even 2024 I could cop that but it’s not. He’s 12 - 18 months too late and we’ve been well and truly passed by.

Glimpses .... reminds me of "with bay views " translating to .. if you climb on the roof with a ladder you can just make out the water between the trees if you squint.

I seriously think people think this game is harder and more complicated than it really is. We are not asking players to embark upon Mission Impossible like espionage excursions. It's footy.

We just make it look hard

20 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Glimpses .... reminds me of "with bay views " translating to .. if you climb on the roof with a ladder you can just make out the water between the trees if you squint.

I seriously think people think this game is harder and more complicated than it really is. We are not asking players to embark upon Mission Impossible like espionage excursions. It's footy.

We just make it look hard

So right Bb !The game plan is not right and we have the wrong list to play modern running footy

The decision in 22 and 3 to play contested stoppage footy because it worked and our list was built for it was delusional

6 minutes ago, jackaub said:

So right Bb !The game plan is not right and we have the wrong list to play modern running footy

The decision in 22 and 3 to play contested stoppage footy because it worked and our list was built for it was delusional

That contested footy won us the flag in 21. Hardly delusional to think in would work in 22 and 23. And we finished top 4 both those years. The game has moved on now and we have to adapt, which we are attempting to do.

1 minute ago, BDA said:

That contested footy won us the flag in 21. Hardly delusional to think in would work in 22 and 23. And we finished top 4 both those years. The game has moved on now and we have to adapt, which we are attempting to do.

Beat me to it as I was typing a reply. We did seem to also somewhat pivot during 23; however, we lacked the cattle to move towards a less contested game-plan (and still largely do lack, IMO).

Our major deficiency with classy outside runners who actually have pace and can hit a target from multiple angles is what hurts us.

16 minutes ago, BDA said:

That contested footy won us the flag in 21. Hardly delusional to think in would work in 22 and 23. And we finished top 4 both those years. The game has moved on now and we have to adapt, which we are attempting to do.

The game moved on in 23 that's the point! WE didnt adapt instead we gave long term high cost contracts to our bulls that wont win us a premiership

My take is completely different. Defence and contest are ALWAYS the key to winning flags. Or problem was not that we stuck to that plan, it was that we attempted to move from it.

1 minute ago, jackaub said:

The game moved on in 23 that's the point! WE didnt adapt instead we gave long term high cost contracts to our bulls that wont win us a premiership

Trac deserved a long term contract

Hindsight says clarry shouldn’t have been signed to a long deal

2 minutes ago, jackaub said:

The game moved on in 23 that's the point! WE didnt adapt instead we gave long term high cost contracts to our bulls that wont win us a premiership

As much as I’m a knocker of some our decisions, in no world do Oliver and Petracca not get signed up on long-term deals; it would’ve happened at any club in the AFL. The Viney extension was the one that wasn’t necessary, but that came later.

I think more central to our issue has been recruitment, although we’ve at least tried to correct that via the draft in 2022 - 2022.

2 minutes ago, BLWNBA said:

As much as I’m a knocker of some our decisions, in no world do Oliver and Petracca not get signed up on long-term deals; it would’ve happened at any club in the AFL. The Viney extension was the one that wasn’t necessary, but that came later.

I think more central to our issue has been recruitment, although we’ve at least tried to correct that via the draft in 2022 - 2022.

How many 5+ year contracts do Pies and Cats have?

Just now, jackaub said:

How many 5+ year contracts do Pies and Cats have?

Collingwood - Perryman, J Daicos, Houston, Quaynor, Nick Daicos, Bobby Hill*

Geelong - Stengle, Jack Henry

That’s just off the top of my head. Richmond are another prime example.

*Four year extension on top of this year takes him through to 2030.

Edited Thursday at 22:063 days by BLWNBA
Added Hill