Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 hours ago, jnrmac said:

Gawn's multiple comments for a start

But also several players I have spoken to

Was not a happy camp in 2024

And so if the issues haven't resolved?? Then what?

 
On 28/10/2024 at 14:55, sydneydee said:

Time for goody to go with 18 months ago. I fear it is too late for this list and he will leave once we have truly hit rock bottom. My kids no longer follow AFL and I’m on the way out. 
 

i didn’t buy a family membership for the first time in decades last year and won’t buy a membership while he is at the club. 

How did you survive the Neeld years?

 
On 28/10/2024 at 01:55, Ollie fan said:

Were Sydney missing Heeney or Warner?

Sydney weren't missing Heeney until they were: in the grand final. Heeney had a stress fracture and look how that turned out for the team.

On 28/10/2024 at 14:55, sydneydee said:

Time for goody to go with 18 months ago. I fear it is too late for this list and he will leave once we have truly hit rock bottom. My kids no longer follow AFL and I’m on the way out. 
 

i didn’t buy a family membership for the first time in decades last year and won’t buy a membership while he is at the club. 

See ya


On 29/10/2024 at 08:48, Katrina Dee Fan said:

Really?  What do you base that on?  And don't say from the media.  As Clarry at the Best and Fairest himself said, "don't trust the media". 

“I really want to be around to implement the review findings and basically provide some stability because the next six months is going to be so important to effectively reunite the club,” Smith told the Herald Sun.

 

We’ve had a review of the football department and Goody has now been cleared by whatzisname of anything to do with drugs as has been falsely reported. Time to move on …

On 29/10/2024 at 09:16, Bring-Back-Powell said:

That was me who stated Brisbane's injuries and I wholeheartedly agree with you that they have a clearly better list than us with an abundance of "non top 10 draft picks" youth that stepped up big time in the likes of Lohmann and Morris.

However, they'll clearly welcome back McCarthy and Coleman next year. 

And be improved also with Doedee plus Levi Ashcroft and Sam Marshall as f/s and academy players. Not sure McCarthy will step back in as he replace Cameron or LoMan. But he will add the depth factor like Gardner also. Coleman is a bona fide A grader if he picks up from where he left playing. 

However our depth should be much improved with all the youngsters with another pre season gaining AFL fitness and bodies. Even some of our role players should have greater fitness and form as most had so so 2024 campaigns. Bowey Melksham Petty Chandler and even Salo and Maysie can all be more valuable. 

And if Trac and Clarry are back to best or near best that will make for a big difference in our midfield and Sparrow is the big question if he fulfills his potential with performances of a 5/6 year veteran! 

 
On 29/10/2024 at 15:14, He de mon said:

How did you survive the Neeld years?

How did any of us survive the Neeld years??🤯

One thing for sure it must be a great weight off Simon’s mind going forward being vindicated in a national newspaper for all to see.


2 hours ago, DeeZone said:

One thing for sure it must be a great weight off Simon’s mind going forward being vindicated in a national newspaper for all to see.

Vindicated? Over what??

30 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Vindicated? Over what??

You should read the article Picket it was printed in the Age.

On 29/10/2024 at 18:59, bing181 said:

Sydney weren't missing Heeney until they were: in the grand final. Heeney had a stress fracture and look how that turned out for the team.

He also had that the week before and was BOG

3 hours ago, DeeZone said:

You should read the article Picket it was printed in the Age.

I read the full statement & I'm not sure anyone was actually vindicated.

I'm just glad it's over & both parties can get on with their respective lives.

22 minutes ago, Cranky Franky said:

I read the full statement & I'm not sure anyone was actually vindicated.

I'm just glad it's over & both parties can get on with their respective lives.

CF they said that claims against Simon were proved to be false and that everyone was sorry for the hurt that had been caused to SG and his family.!! Pretty straight forward for mine CF.


1 hour ago, Cranky Franky said:

I read the full statement & I'm not sure anyone was actually vindicated.

I'm just glad it's over & both parties can get on with their respective lives.

Well, CF, that is just the miserly, ungenerous response I would expect. "The allegations were false and had no basis in fact". What rises could possibly be said?

3 hours ago, DeeZone said:

CF they said that claims against Simon were proved to be false and that everyone was sorry for the hurt that had been caused to SG and his family.!! Pretty straight forward for mine CF.

No not straight forward. The statement refers to one particular allegation found to have no substance however over the course of this disastrous journey  allegations were made about several behavioural issues.

1 hour ago, Cranky Franky said:

No not straight forward. The statement refers to one particular allegation found to have no substance however over the course of this disastrous journey  allegations were made about several behavioural issues.

Sorry CF not interested in heresay this was the allegation that burdened Simon and his family for four years and now it has been put to bed I realise that people who dislike him still have their axes to grind.

Edited by DeeZone

1 hour ago, Cranky Franky said:

No not straight forward. The statement refers to one particular allegation found to have no substance however over the course of this disastrous journey  allegations were made about several behavioural issues.

So specific vindication but he wasn’t a saint?

Welcome to football, honey. Even the Saints ain’t saints…

19 hours ago, DeeZone said:

You should read the article Picket it was printed in the Age.

How dare you question my age uncle, you wouldn't read about it!😂


Does he survive an 11th-13th finish / 10 to 11 wins?

I understand there are a lot factors and reasons behind a win/loss record but you’d have to say it would be a very line ball call.
 

 

1 hour ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Does he survive an 11th-13th finish / 10 to 11 wins?

I understand there are a lot factors and reasons behind a win/loss record but you’d have to say it would be a very line ball call.
 

 

Unless we have some major performance lifts from our 5-15 ranked players finishing around 10th is likely.

There won't be any sacking simply because the club has had too much bad press. A managed exit would be my guess in 2026.

Anyway let's hope 2025 delivers some fun matches

2 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Does he survive an 11th-13th finish / 10 to 11 wins?

I understand there are a lot factors and reasons behind a win/loss record but you’d have to say it would be a very line ball call.
 

 

NO and nor should he!

 
4 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Unless we have some major performance lifts from our 5-15 ranked players finishing around 10th is likely.

There won't be any sacking simply because the club has had too much bad press. A managed exit would be my guess in 2026.

Anyway let's hope 2025 delivers some fun matches

I would be surprised if we don't finish top 4 and give it a real shake in 2025...

10 minutes ago, rjay said:

I would be surprised if we don't finish top 4 and give it a real shake in 2025...

Hope you're right.

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 235 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies