Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

With AMW making his debut this week, we will have 

AMW, JVR, Knuckles McVee, Caleb, Jake Bowey, Blake Howes, Riv, Kolt, Taj, Doggie, Disco either playing or very close. 

11 players 22y.o. and under and Matt Jefferson and Will Verrall yet to debut makes for a very youthful team profile.  No guarantee that they will all become stars but to see them coming through in this way is heartening.  I have not included #16 because he does not seem to be cutting the mustard.

Healthy signs for the future and a possible reason we seem to not be running out games the way we were last year.

 

 

By round 20 odd maybe it won't be 'stealth', but promising to see we've got a decent crop coming through

Gonna be an interesting trade period

 

Not really. We traded away all of our depth, and/or lost it to injury / retirements.

The depth we kept, or traded in, sucks.

It's not a rebuild, it's just the list we have.


17 minutes ago, seventyfour said:

Not really. We traded away all of our depth, and/or lost it to injury / retirements.

The depth we kept, or traded in, sucks.

It's not a rebuild, it's just the list we have.

yeah with Jordon and Harmes we’d be flag favs i reckon 😂

both free agents who left btw. we didn’t look to trade them

10 players 22 or under we're definitely planning for the future yet some of the experts can't see it.

 

I hope not because the elite young talent isn't there. There's no Petracca, Oliver, Brayshaw, Kozzie level talents outside of perhaps Windsor.

2 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

I hope not because the elite young talent isn't there. There's no Petracca, Oliver, Brayshaw, Kozzie level talents outside of perhaps Windsor.

Doesn’t need to be yet because bar Brayshaw they’re all still playing. On top of that you add Rivers, McVee, Windsor, JVR and potentially another top end draft pick and a good trade period and just maybe we’ve got the bones of the next Flag.

Edited by Roost it far


What stealth? 
 

I think we will be ‘on the radar’ for the rebuild tomorrow night around 10.45…

1 minute ago, Roost it far said:

Doesn’t need to be yet because bat Brayshaw they’re all still playing. 

No worries. We'll just wait until they all retire to draft the next batch of guns!

Just now, Lord Travis said:

No worries. We'll just wait until they all retire to draft the next batch of guns!

Not at all, I’ve listed the young talent and we’re likely headed for another top ender this year. We’ve been unlucky to lose Brayshaw, have Oliver have a down year and then lose Petracca all at the same time. I think we’re going better than many realise and I was leaning toward pessimism at the start of this year. 

Technically. But it doesn't actually make stack up when you look at the quality of player.

Windsor, McVee and Roo are the three that look really good.

Howes has looked solid at times, but now been dropped twice (not that this means much given who picks the team).

Turner has shown the ability to kick goals but he has a lot to do to become an AFL level player long term.

AMW is an unknown. Taj and Kynan too late-pick kids who could be okay.

Tholstrup has been bright in two first quarters and then faded fast. Found some real form at Casey recently though.

AMW we will see.

There might be a place in the team for many of these guys going forward, but they don't strike me as absolute elite talents aside from the first three who could get there. They could be ANB or they could be Stretch, to give a recent example of two late picks.

 

 

No we are not. We have taken about all we have at Casey and there’s bugger all left. If we had the quality there then Casey would be winning a lot more games this year. 
We have a lot of work to do to if we are to get both lists in better shape. 
If we don’t get out trading and picks spot on over the next couple of windows we will be in the familiar territory of being bottom dwellers when an expansion team comes in. 


A debut every week since the bye and 8 players with less than 50 games, we're a whole year younger on average than our opponent, and our entire emergency list has 10 games experience between them.

Stealthy...

 

Ideally we wouldn't have so much youth in the 23 at once, but with Gus, Trac and other injuries, I think it's been inevitable.

We don't need 23 stars, we need 5 or 6 stars (Trac, Clarry, May, Lever and Gawn) surrounded by good role players.

Trac will be fine in 2025, Clarry will hopefully get a full pre season, Lever will enter 2025 29 years of age (enough time still on his side), it's really just May and Gawn we'll have to replace in the next 2-3 years. And it's possible Max lasts even longer.

And JVR is trending in a star direction and Kozzy probably already is.

If we can land a star FA like (for example) LDU to add to the midfield or even a Callaghan; and then when Max and May go, address the Max issue by trading in a competent mature aged ruckman (does not have to be a star) and hitting the FA market for a May replacement in 2027-2028, we're not a world away.

Would be nice to add the likes of Bowey and McVee's ball use higher up the field, we also need Jefferson to take hold of the second key position spot next to JVR.

Whilst it's been a disappointing season, we could bounce back quickly next year.

Edited by Binmans PA

2 hours ago, rpfc said:

What stealth? 
 

I think we will be ‘on the radar’ for the rebuild tomorrow night around 10.45…

Tomorrow around 10.45… “Next gen Demon's maul Lions at the Gabba!”

😉😃❤️💙

1 minute ago, layzie said:

We just need some good and preferably living players. 

Season 3 Baseball GIF by The Simpsons


3 hours ago, Roost it far said:

We’ve been unlucky to lose Brayshaw

Whose leadership and experience we won't be replacing in the short term at least ...

3 hours ago, Lord Travis said:

I hope not because the elite young talent isn't there. There's no Petracca, Oliver, Brayshaw, Kozzie level talents outside of perhaps Windsor.

Kossie is only just 23 and Petty is 24. They're not too shabby and still very young

 

Less than 7months older on average than the Roos team we played last week and they’re in full rebuild mode. 

I had us probably 6-8th preseason, losing to the eagles and getting flogged by the dockers derailed that a bit and now Trac going out for the year probably has us 7-12th now with more turnover of the best 23 than was planned preseason. I think it’ll stand us in good stead for next year with some games under the belt of the kids and hopefully add a couple of guns through draft and free agency.

It’s a reset and refresh year not a burn it down and start again year. 

 
4 hours ago, Lord Travis said:

I hope not because the elite young talent isn't there. There's no Petracca, Oliver, Brayshaw, Kozzie level talents outside of perhaps Windsor.

Petty is 24, Kozzie is 23.

JVR, Windsor, Rivers and Tholstrup all have potential to be top flight players.

We are missing an under 25 centre circle mid star (unless Tholstrup morphs into that, but I suspect he'll be more like Petracca as a mid/forward). But that's not unreasonable, we haven't wanted to spend capital on that area of the list when we've have Clarry, Viney, Oliver holding those positions down.

Imagine if we'd drafted more young inside mids who couldn't get a game so left instead of drafting Windsor, Tholstrup, Jefferson, JVR, Bowey, Laurie, Luke Jackson (who left but gave us Jefferson and Windsor) or Pickett, or trading for Lever or May. That's every first round pick since we drafted Clayton Oliver in 2015...

Also the only one out of that batch who I think it a bust is Laurie.

 

5 hours ago, rpfc said:

What stealth? 
 

I think we will be ‘on the radar’ for the rebuild tomorrow night around 10.45…

Ahhh, I see you are assuming the lights will stay on this time!!


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 86 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 316 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies