Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
 

Definitely got some X-factor about him. Has a little bit of mongrel about him too.


Just watched his post match interview in the rooms after yesterdays win - impressive 💙♥️

2 hours ago, Nicko said:

Just watched his post match interview in the rooms after yesterdays win - impressive 💙♥️

Amazing outlook for 19.  Good stuff from the Kolt

6 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Love this kid, was unlucky to get dropped after his debut, glad he's getting a run at it now

Didn’t look up to it on debut. Looks a full preseason or two away from it. We rushed him on debut, and he didn’t look up to scratch, and subsequently, was dropped. Shown good signs on the weekend. But he’ll derive a lot of benefit from a proper preseason. Then it will be easier to see how good he is. He’s a young player who needs core work, strength, and pace work. Could be something in a couple years.

Edited by KingDingAling

 
11 hours ago, Gawndy the Great said:

Also Kolt has to get the rising star nom this week. 

Darcy Jones from GWS got it this round. But Kolt still has time to snare one.


6 minutes ago, demosaw said:

Darcy Jones from GWS got it this round. But Kolt still has time to snare one.

Screenshot_20240708_214700_AFL.thumb.jpg.70f7b6019148f0f06841afc36b7bd476.jpgScreenshot_20240708_214809_AFL.thumb.jpg.cb1331a8401cf3cd1c654278ef32da12.jpg

What bollocks, AFL. Kolt had more goals, disposals, kicks, marks and tackles on the weekend.

1 minute ago, gs77 said:

Screenshot_20240708_214700_AFL.thumb.jpg.70f7b6019148f0f06841afc36b7bd476.jpgScreenshot_20240708_214809_AFL.thumb.jpg.cb1331a8401cf3cd1c654278ef32da12.jpg

What bollocks, AFL. Kolt had more goals, disposals, kicks, marks and tackles on the weekend.

I think those stats might not be updated, Jones had 18 touches

5 minutes ago, gs77 said:

Screenshot_20240708_214700_AFL.thumb.jpg.70f7b6019148f0f06841afc36b7bd476.jpgScreenshot_20240708_214809_AFL.thumb.jpg.cb1331a8401cf3cd1c654278ef32da12.jpg

What bollocks, AFL. Kolt had more goals, disposals, kicks, marks and tackles on the weekend.

Not defending this, but explaining: Rising star nominations mid/later in the season are effectively on a ‘body of work’ rather than a single game. Darcy likely came very close to a nomination in earlier rounds and missed, and has now ‘accumulated’ one. Kolt can still get one, 2-3 more decent games may do it.

47 minutes ago, Longsufferingnomore said:

Looking at you WCW😁

No need to lock me up, LSNM. I’m the last person the boys need to worry about.

Suspicious Monkey GIF by MOODMAN
 

17 minutes ago, demosaw said:

Not defending this, but explaining: Rising star nominations mid/later in the season are effectively on a ‘body of work’ rather than a single game. Darcy likely came very close to a nomination in earlier rounds and missed, and has now ‘accumulated’ one. Kolt can still get one, 2-3 more decent games may do it.

That’s unfair though because it shouldn’t matter what round it is, it should be even ie. every round it’s based on just that game. Otherwise the player who wins it in round 1 is the only player for the year who’s been judged on that one game, unlike subsequent winners. 


7 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

That’s unfair though because it shouldn’t matter what round it is, it should be even ie. every round it’s based on just that game. Otherwise the player who wins it in round 1 is the only player for the year who’s been judged on that one game, unlike subsequent winners

Worse, the round 0 winner was out of 4 games….

But, doesn’t  really compromise the award though. Yes you need to be nominated to win, but an early/sneaky nomination won't win you the whole thing.

9 hours ago, binman said:

Yep.

I have seen some posts calling for Sparrow to be dropped.

I think what his critics perhaps don't factor in is that he is given specific roles.

And far from goody playing favourites he's a best 22 lock because he does the jobs goody asks him to do.

Sparrow has always been playing the same role since he came into the team. I would doubt that people don't factor it in. A lot of people expect a player to have a 'break out' game where they magically improve by 20% and continue at that level forever.

Sparrow has slowly progressed each year until this year. He hasnt got better this year, and thats fine as every team would have Sparrow on their list as that defensive 4th inside mid.

I think most people see his potential and want him to progress past that role. It's right there for the taking with Oliver playing below his best and Petracca out. With his speed and power he could push to an A grade player, but he isn't. Rivers is pushing into that role as he is a smoother, smarter player.

Sparrow is a foot soldier. Albeit a good one. I want more from him. I'm hoping he continues his 5% increment improvement next year and this year is just a plateau.

 

8 minutes ago, BAMF said:

Sparrow has always been playing the same role since he came into the team. I would doubt that people don't factor it in. A lot of people expect a player to have a 'break out' game where they magically improve by 20% and continue at that level forever.

Sparrow has slowly progressed each year until this year. He hasnt got better this year, and thats fine as every team would have Sparrow on their list as that defensive 4th inside mid.

I think most people see his potential and want him to progress past that role. It's right there for the taking with Oliver playing below his best and Petracca out. With his speed and power he could push to an A grade player, but he isn't. Rivers is pushing into that role as he is a smoother, smarter player.

Sparrow is a foot soldier. Albeit a good one. I want more from him. I'm hoping he continues his 5% increment improvement next year and this year is just a plateau.

 

The guy will leave nothing on the table. Some kids have impressive talent and don’t get the most out of it, others achieve success through sheer grit and determination. Sparrow is in the later group. He is still skilful but I’d say he is average in decision making and ball use and that’s ok - there is a role for him to play. 

2 hours ago, KingDingAling said:

Didn’t look up to it on debut. Looks a full preseason or two away from it. We rushed him on debut, and he didn’t look up to scratch, and subsequently, was dropped. Shown good signs on the weekend. But he’ll derive a lot of benefit from a proper preseason. Then it will be easier to see how good he is. He’s a young player who needs core work, strength, and pace work. Could be something in a couple years.

He didn't set the world in fire on debut but he wasn't alone in that game as we were smashed by the Lions. Pretty hard for a kid to come in and look up to it when the team was smacked from pillar to post. I don't like bringing kids in and then dropping them (not really a fan of how they've managed Brown either to be honest) I'd like them to get a block of games unless they are only brought in to cover short term injuries and there is no spots available.

Anyhow he's getting his chance now and I think showing he can contribute despite being such a youngster. No doubt he will only improve/become more consistent with a couple of preseasons under his belt.

25 minutes ago, Gawndy the Great said:

The guy will leave nothing on the table. Some kids have impressive talent and don’t get the most out of it, others achieve success through sheer grit and determination. Sparrow is in the later group. He is still skilful but I’d say he is average in decision making and ball use and that’s ok - there is a role for him to play. 

His decision making can leave me annoyed at times. I think we are on the the same page. I'm not bagging him out. I've said all teams would have him. I've been happy with his slow but steady progress, but it hasn't progressed this year and I'm worried it won't. I get the impression that others think the same but just can't articulate their point of view.

I would like him to move into a full time inside midfielder and use his speed and strength to attack and accelerate away from the contest. Stop being the negator and start being the threat.

Its right there for him. He has the tank now. He has the power. He has the speed. He doesn't have the elite disposal but with the other things he is more than enough. He has got inside midfield time over others in the team.

I want more from him. 


2 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

No need to lock me up, LSNM. I’m the last person the boys need to worry about.

Suspicious Monkey GIF by MOODMAN
 

Don't they say strangers aren't really the danger, it's those we know?  😜

Loved the aggro at half-time, young fella was walking around like he had watermelons under each arm after a few push and shoves 😂

I like this kid

7 hours ago, gs77 said:

Screenshot_20240708_214700_AFL.thumb.jpg.70f7b6019148f0f06841afc36b7bd476.jpgScreenshot_20240708_214809_AFL.thumb.jpg.cb1331a8401cf3cd1c654278ef32da12.jpg

What bollocks, AFL. Kolt had more goals, disposals, kicks, marks and tackles on the weekend.

Jones set up a lot of very good GWS plays. If you watched the game he was great and well deserved. And as another mentioned he ended with 18 and a goal, 2 goal assists, 7 score involvements. And vs a much better opponents than Kolt did.

Not taking anything from Kolt, but Jones deserved the nod.

 
10 hours ago, KingDingAling said:

Didn’t look up to it on debut. Looks a full preseason or two away from it. We rushed him on debut, and he didn’t look up to scratch, and subsequently, was dropped. Shown good signs on the weekend. But he’ll derive a lot of benefit from a proper preseason. Then it will be easier to see how good he is. He’s a young player who needs core work, strength, and pace work. Could be something in a couple years.

He will certainly be a different player next year with strength and endurance. I can see him and Trac swapping positions as 50/50 mid forwards. 
One thing I am really pleased with the last few months has been Goodwins willingness to give kids a taste of senior footy. This has been my knock on Goody for years that he hasn’t expanded the playing group. 
All of Kolt, Brown, AMW, Howes, Turner and Windsor will be regulars next year. 

15 hours ago, demosaw said:

Not defending this, but explaining: Rising star nominations mid/later in the season are effectively on a ‘body of work’ rather than a single game. Darcy likely came very close to a nomination in earlier rounds and missed, and has now ‘accumulated’ one. Kolt can still get one, 2-3 more decent games may do it.

The Rising Star is a BS award

Virtually no one nominated after rd 10 has won the award.

It was originally the 1st yr player most likely to become a star and somewhere it morphed into a best first year player award. Two different things.

Why have an award where over half of the nominations cant win it?

Or where a potentially great player is not even nominated because on each particular week some rookie had an outstanding game.

And furthermore the suspension to Reid is a joke that he is ineligible. He is head and shoulders above the others. 

 

Edited by jnrmac


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Like
    • 38 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies