Jump to content

Featured Replies

11 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

We could have played JJ for a whole game and let Sparrow push forward more. He’s a far better and more reliable goal scorer these days than Harmes. 
I think ultimately we wanted to replace the experienced mature body of Clarry with another experienced mature big bodied player. If Dunstan was fit I reckon we would have played him ahead of Harmes. 

and Harmes only got one clearance. Gus was the only one who helped Trac with clearances

 
1 hour ago, Jaded No More said:

I told you already, he will not miss even a second of football. The best lawyers in town are suiting up to ensure that not only does he get off, the AFL pays Carlton damages for emotional distress caused. 

Can someone get the number for those Wigs !!  Fwd to MFC  😉

I wish Jackson had stayed, kids going to be epic.

And FFS, play Schache, he's the best of a poor lot.What does the kid have to do to get a game?

Edited by Roost it far

 
20 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Can someone get the number for those Wigs !!  Fwd to MFC  😉

I can see it now.

Tribunal sums up after allowing the appeal, that no reasonable person or footballer, could have foreseen, that a smaller player, dragging a bigger player to the ground, would cause the bigger player to hit his head on the ground twice and that after all, he really didn't mean to do it and he is sorry.

Edited by Redleg

I think we need some more size forward and back without sacrificing too much mobility.

Joel Smith needs to come in forward to provide some further aerial contest and we won't lose any defensive capability.  Chandler or Spargo out, probably Chandler.  I watched TMac closely and he provided a good contest in the air and pressured well on the ground.  Sure he can't win a ground ball but BBB isn't going to either.  It's a pity they have both boiled over this year, one or two more years would have been handy, but it is what it is and TMac is the best bet at present with Van Rooyen.

We also need more height in defence so we can free Lever to intercept.  We've got McKay-Curnow, Cox-Mihocek(-McStay?), Hawkins-Cameron-Henry in the next 3 matches.  Quire frankly if there were two Joel Smiths I'd bring him into the backline as well.  The alternatives we have are Tomlinson, Daniel Turner or TMac back and BBB into the forward line.  Tomlinson is not going to help with ground ball mobility in the backline, but it's a big ask for Disco to go with the array of forwards coming up.  Nevertheless, looking to the future I'd go with him even though it will be a baptism of fire, we've got to pull that trigger sooner rather than later.  McVee or Bowey comes out - I'd prefer to retain McVee of the two for size and grunt.  That's unless Hibberd needs a week off for his Achilles, but for Disco's sake it would be handy to have Hibbo in the team to add support. I'd add that Salem has hit the ground running in his return and has been great in the contest, with him there we rely less on Bowey's kicking.

Hunter will come back in - he and Langdon don't help us in the size department and that's partly why I think we need bolsters at either end.  Harmes is the logical out, but it could just as easily be Gus - one of them will have to play midfield minutes.  Gus has sacrificed his midfield game for team balance and flexibility, but now is the time to use him there with Oliver out.  Harmes becomes sub - more erratic, but more dynamic than JJ.

B: Hibberd May Lever
HB: Salem D.Turner Rivers

R: Gawn Brayshaw Viney
M: Langdon Petracca Hunter

HF: Neal-Bullen McDonald  J.Smith
F: Pickett VanRooyen Fritsch

I: McVee Grundy Sparrow Spargo
S: Harmes

In: D.Turner Hunter J.Smith (Sub: Harmes)
Out: Bowey Harmes Chandler (Sub: Jordon)

Edited by old55


Whats the forecast,  day and evening for the CBD Friday ? 

5 hours ago, SPC said:

Cerra ain’t a chance of getting off that, arms pinned and slung into the ground hitting his head. 
Even their lawyers will have problems carrying suitcases with that amount of cash into AFL HQ. 

Just wait and see…. No joke he is getting off.

4 hours ago, DubDee said:

I thought May defended pretty well and worked back into some form  (not implying you think otherwise)

So did I. In fact, I was surprised to read that he only had 8 disposals. 

 
1 hour ago, beelzebub said:

Whats the forecast,  day and evening for the CBD Friday ? 

At this stage - Possible shower - becalmed....no wind to speak of

I thinking we dont go too tall.

Many may lampoon...  and ill wear it.

Im going very left field..   bring in Milkshake.

Word him up ;) 

He has X value potential....and isnt fazed by a wettish dewy slippery ball.

Thoughts ??? 


2 hours ago, old55 said:

I think we need some more size forward and back without sacrificing too much mobility.

Joel Smith needs to come in forward to provide some further aerial contest and we won't lose any defensive capability.  Chandler or Spargo out, probably Chandler.  I watched TMac closely and he provided a good contest in the air and pressured well on the ground.  Sure he can't win a ground ball but BBB isn't going to either.  It's a pity they have both boiled over this year, one or two more years would have been handy, but it is what it is and TMac is the best bet at present with Van Rooyen.

We also need more height in defence so we can free Lever to intercept.  We've got McKay-Curnow, Cox-Mihocek(-McStay?), Hawkins-Cameron-Henry in the next 3 matches.  Quire frankly if there were two Joel Smiths I'd bring him into the backline as well.  The alternatives we have are Tomlinson, Daniel Turner or TMac back and BBB into the forward line.  Tomlinson is not going to help with ground ball mobility in the backline, but it's a big ask for Disco to go with the array of forwards coming up.  Nevertheless, looking to the future I'd go with him even though it will be a baptism of fire, we've got to pull that trigger sooner rather than later.  McVee or Bowey comes out - I'd prefer to retain McVee of the two for size and grunt.  That's unless Hibberd needs a week off for his Achilles, but for Disco's sake it would be handy to have Hibbo in the team to add support. I'd add that Salem has hit the ground running in his return and has been great in the contest, with him there we rely less on Bowey's kicking.

Hunter will come back in - he and Langdon don't help us in the size department and that's partly why I think we need bolsters at either end.  Harmes is the logical out, but it could just as easily be Gus - one of them will have to play midfield minutes.  Gus has sacrificed his midfield game for team balance and flexibility, but now is the time to use him there with Oliver out.  Harmes becomes sub - more erratic, but more dynamic than JJ.

B: Hibberd May Lever
HB: Salem D.Turner Rivers

R: Gawn Brayshaw Viney
M: Langdon Petracca Hunter

HF: Neal-Bullen McDonald  J.Smith
F: Pickett VanRooyen Fritsch

I: McVee Grundy Sparrow Spargo
S: Harmes

In: D.Turner Hunter J.Smith (Sub: Harmes)
Out: Bowey Harmes Chandler (Sub: Jordon)

Bowey was very good I thought. 18 possessions with a high efficiency. No way should he be dropped 

2 hours ago, beelzebub said:

Whats the forecast,  day and evening for the CBD Friday ? 

Light winds, showers in the morning min 11. 

36 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

I thinking we dont go too tall.

Many may lampoon...  and ill wear it.

Im going very left field..   bring in Milkshake.

Word him up ;) 

He has X value potential....and isnt fazed by a wettish dewy slippery ball.

Thoughts ??? 

You have my vote. Still the best vision in the team  

Thank God we are back to playing a team called Carlton. I didn't  know  who we have been talking about the last two weeks. And that terrible Blues jumper. 

Edited by old dee


1 hour ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

So did I. In fact, I was surprised to read that he only had 8 disposals. 

Salem has returned and took the kick ins. Mays numbers have been inflated from taking the kick ins. 

11 minutes ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

Today's injury update was less forthcoming than Dan Andrews at the Hotel Quarantine Inquiry... 🤷‍♂️

Quasimodo would have been More forthcoming at said enquiry rather than our ‘Emperor’.

Actually, they could be out of the same litter.

1 hour ago, old dee said:

You have my vote. Still the best vision in the team  

Mine too.Need good kicks.melksham. Bowey delivering into 50.


1 hour ago, beelzebub said:

I thinking we dont go too tall.

Many may lampoon...  and ill wear it.

Im going very left field..   bring in Milkshake.

Word him up ;) 

He has X value potential....and isnt fazed by a wettish dewy slippery ball.

Thoughts ??? 

I’d have Milkshake before TMac.

10 minutes ago, M_9 said:

I’d have Milkshake before TMac.

If he's reasonably mobile id have TMac in defence... he has experience and understands the game... much better than some other choices...   he can kick to a penny..   not so some others.

I like Milkshake ..on certain days conditions/games. 

We have to box clever. 

Horses for courses..    

Stop bombing.. lower eyes... a little tempo.

 

Ffs it's not that fricken hard  ..   outer suburban league coaches know this..

On 5/28/2023 at 11:28 AM, SPC said:

My feeling is he might pull a Hardwick and sign off before he gets the tap on the shoulder. Recon he looks lost again, like he did in 2020. Horrible job I’d imagine 

Looks lost when we're in the top 4? This might be the worst post of the year. Congratulations.

 
11 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Had the chance to watch the VFL replay from the weekend.

Imo Ben Brown moved as well as I have seen him since 2021. He actually didn't look as stagnant as he has for the past 12 months.

Whilst he only kicked the 1 goal, he roamed bit further up the ground and moved well.

I'd chuck him in for either Tmac or JVR if they feel he needs a rest.

Reckon he'll play against Collingwood.

What was the point of getting Schache we could have just kept Weiderman, we invest in another premier ruckman & yet win the hit outs but don’t dominate the clearances… is it structure or players not working hard enough 

Edited by Demonsone


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 64 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 304 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies