Kent 2,920 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 1 hour ago, pineapple dee said: Honestly, this is going to seem ridiculous but probably not any more than the original penalty applied to Van Rooyen. If the penalty stood for this incident, then, in an instant, 75 % of all actions on a football field become a potential source of a suspension for every single player in the comp. And the next logical step would be to allow only one player to go for a mark to remove the possibility of any injury to any player. Perhaps the single player allowed to go for the mark should be the one who first calls out " IT'S MINE !!! " Any other player attempting to compete for it concedes a free kick and a 50 metre penalty. This might not be so far from a probable outcome as people might think With the AFL as it's currently run, anything is possible I see the future of Footy Two teams come on to the field Two teams shake hands .Two teams go off the field Game over 1 1 Quote
Bystander 903 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 1 hour ago, Superunknown said: MRO process needs to be a committee Or else Michael Christian needs a new job , or some performance management Very very harsh treatment to expect someone to leave the AFL. He/She would only be paid market rates, would not have a product that sells itself and basic competency would be expected. 1 1 Quote
sue 9,277 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 36 minutes ago, DeeZone said: I just came off AFL website, I was looking for their statement regarding JVR and you are right, Rif, Zero, Zilch nothing to see here folks, a bit churlish I think. Biggest story of the week has disappeared leaving no trace.!!! As wsw said it was there but mysteriously disappeared later - which is odd because less news-worthy articles seem to have had more staying power. I can't think why. 1 Quote
daisycutter 30,021 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 56 minutes ago, Roost it far said: Not even mentioned on the AFL site. Clearly the biggest news of the day and nada, talk about useless one must follow one's masters or give unto rome what is theirs 2 Quote
mauriesy 7,444 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 It's 24 stories down in the latest news: "Young Dee learns fate in suspension appeal". 😀 1 2 Quote
Mazer Rackham 14,972 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 51 minutes ago, Kent said: I see the future of Footy Two teams come on to the field Two teams shake hands .Two teams go off the field Game over No tiddlywinks to determine the winner? Or ... more in line with the AFL's sponsorships ... one roll each on a pokie machine. 1 1 Quote
daisycutter 30,021 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 8 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said: No tiddlywinks to determine the winner? Or ... more in line with the AFL's sponsorships ... one roll each on a pokie machine. win the toss, win the game simples 1 2 Quote
Rocknroll 1,010 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 Lawyers decide winner. Punters pay for over priced luke warm pies and weak beer. Wash and repeat. 1 1 Quote
monoccular 17,760 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 (edited) 10 hours ago, Cyclops said: Winners and losers. WINNERS Football, MFC, Jacob van Rooyen LOSERS Adrian Anderson, Will Powell. You forgot in the LOSER category - Michael Christian Edited May 12, 2023 by monoccular 2 Quote
beelzebub 23,392 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 How interesting Looking at the AFL home page on the phone just then..... no mention of Roo... no mention of having their derriere kicked !! Who'd da thunk 1 2 1 Quote
In Harmes Way 7,869 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 2 hours ago, daisycutter said: win the toss, win the game simples I don’t like that daisy, Hawthorn would be unbeatable because they’re a bunch of tossers 2 Quote
Demonland 74,431 Posted May 12, 2023 Author Posted May 12, 2023 Not bad for an injured player 1 2 Quote
Ethan Tremblay 31,388 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 16 hours ago, DistrACTION Jackson said: I'm curious to know why it took 2 hours of deliberation to come to a conclusion that 99% of people took about 2 minutes to get to. Lawyers charge in 6 minute blocks. 4 1 Quote
Kent 2,920 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 13 hours ago, Mazer Rackham said: No tiddlywinks to determine the winner? Or ... more in line with the AFL's sponsorships ... one roll each on a pokie machine. Perhaps we need some rules regarding duty of care when shaking hands The AFL will demand a set Im sure Quote
pineapple dee 2,892 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 14 hours ago, Mazer Rackham said: No tiddlywinks to determine the winner? Or ... more in line with the AFL's sponsorships ... one roll each on a pokie machine. If you ‘ tiddle’ when you should be ‘winking’ , there ought to be a free kick against your team downfield for that offence !! Quote
Demonsterative 3,021 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 8 hours ago, Demonland said: Not bad for an injured player Obviously someone knocked some sense into this kid. Good game! Quote
Rodney (Balls) Grinter 11,064 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 2 minutes ago, Demonsterative said: Obviously someone knocked some sense into this kid. Good game! Charlie didn't really need any sense knocking into him, he's a solid player. Makes me wonder if we should consider him a target to poach to shore up our key backs down the track. The GC has been a good development club for the MFC in this area in the past. 1 1 Quote
SidVicious 133 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, Kent said: Perhaps we need some rules regarding duty of care when shaking hands The AFL will demand a set Im sure People have been known to have fingers broken in a firm handshake so the AFL owes players a duty of care to ban handshaking both before and after games because of the possibility that the practice could cause injury, albeit that the contact might not be high. Edited May 12, 2023 by SidVicious 1 1 Quote
Mazer Rackham 14,972 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 8 hours ago, Demonland said: Not bad for an injured player ARE HIS EYES ON THE BALL??? 1 Quote
Mazer Rackham 14,972 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 43 minutes ago, pineapple dee said: If you ‘ tiddle’ when you should be ‘winking’ , there ought to be a free kick against your team downfield for that offence !! That was last week's interpretation of that rule. 1 Quote
old dee 24,083 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 The boy wants to be very careful the AFL will be itching to get even. Quote
daisycutter 30,021 Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 9 hours ago, Demonland said: Not bad for an injured player make that a "high impact" injured player really shows how poorly researched are such silly classifications. reminds me of the dangerfield sling tackle Quote
defuture15 902 Posted May 13, 2023 Posted May 13, 2023 On 5/12/2023 at 5:20 PM, daisycutter said: win the toss, win the game simples If the decision went against JVR i was thinking of a game where players drop to the ground and roll around clutching their heads! 1 Quote
monoccular 17,760 Posted May 13, 2023 Posted May 13, 2023 (edited) Another solid though not spectacular game in a developing tall forward. Will take time but remains ultra competitive and not deterred by the “events of the week”. Keep up the development and team things and he will go a long long way. Edited May 13, 2023 by monoccular 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.