Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, adonski said:

Oliver 85% CBA attendances (R 1-4) (-5% on 2022 numbers)
Trac 66% (-9%)
Viney 65% (-10%)

Can't expect them to attend many more I wouldn't have thought..

 

Oliver yes.  Not sure about the other two Adonski.  I'd like to see the CBA of this season (averages) so far vs that of the 2021 season averages. 

However, 9% & 10% drop off for Tracc and Viney is substantial IMV (vs 2022).  Nearly 20% drop off between them.

My theory is....its the combination of the CBA plus how many extras  you are rolling through there.... and how far the quality of those extra drops away IF you end up rolling one (or maybe more) too many for the sake of looking for extra assists.

Quality is fine but if that quality drops away too far and add to that the CBA of say Tracc & Viney dropping off significantly, then that might impact on their form (CB form/effectiveness i mean).  Emphasis on might.

The absence of Max is also a major factor of course.  Lack of continuity (with the main crew) and also his own clearances are no doubt hurting us at times.

Edited by Demon Dynasty
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Oliver yes.  Not sure about the other two Adonski.  I'd like to see the CBA of this season (averages) so far vs that of the 2021 season averages.  Need to compare it against that or even last season for comparative relevance.

My theory is....its the combination of the CBA plus how many extras  you are rolling through there.... and how far the quality of those extra drops away IF you end up rolling one (or maybe more) too many for the sake of looking for extra assists.  Quality is fine but if that quality drops away too far AND the CBA of say Tracc & Viney have dropped away in a significant way from the last two seasons ... that might impact on their form.  Emphasis on might.

The absence of Max is also a major factor of course.  Lack of continuity (with the main crew) and also his own clearances are no doubt hurting us at times.

2021
Oliver 87%
Trac 79% 
Viney 71% 

I don't think they're meaningful enough differences

We need guys like Rivers & Pickett in there as a point of difference (and for development)

Jordon is serviceable as a defensive mid, too

I don't like seeing Sparrow & ANB in there though, they're ineffectual 

Edited by adonski
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Just now, adonski said:

2021
Oliver 87%
Trac 79% 
Viney 71% 

I don't think they're meaningful enough differences

We need guys like Rivers & Pickett in there as a point of difference (and for development)

Jordon is serviceable as a defensive mid, too

I don't like seeing Sparrow & ANB in there though, they're ineffectual 

Thanks mate....

So Viney is marginal vs 2021 but substantial vs last season (IMO).

Tracc's abscence is substantial vs 2022 & slightly more so vs 2021

I disagree re rivers being a point of diff.  If he shows he is capable sure.  But i've yet to witness it.  There's no point having a "point of difference" if he's a much weaker "point of diff".  All you're doing is giving the oppo a bit of a break every time he spends a fair chunk of time there.

Kozzy's still learning but as an outside option and/or pick pocket with silky skills he is showing something on occasions.  Unfortunately today wasn't one of those occasions but worth persevering with (in very small doses) IMV.

I'd be seriously considering sending Gus back in there rather than say Rivers or Sparrow.  Speaking of Gus, any CBA stats on him for this season + 2022 & 2021 by any chance pls?

Wondering if it's worth giving Dunstan a bit of time through the middle as a filler for Viney when he's on the bench (in place of Sparrow)??

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we learnt that last year isn’t a sustainable model. Not giving our 2nd tier and junior mids more time in CBA last year has stagnated their development - perhaps they are now playing catch-up. I think they will definitely be the better for it as the season progresses and the teams that roll lesser numbers through will likely tire as we have done previously. Well that is the hope anyway.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Round 5, 2023 Adelaide Oval - Bombers vs Demons
 

There's so much that could be said about today but hey... it's super easy from here to say a whole lot of stuff.  Alot tougher to do than to say.

Bottom line though, we seem to be in a wee bit of doggy doo.  Hopefully Goody & the boys can scrape the [censored] off our boots and quickly!

He might also want to hand out some Grippo to each of the boys.  Talk about a case of the fumbles in slippery or wet conditions.  That happens to a number of players at times of course, but it seems to be very contagious for so many at the moment.

2 bog ordinary performances out of 5 ....alarm bells should now be ringing at a decent SPL.  If they aren't then we can kiss any chance of a prelim in 2023 goodbye!  That was too easy for that mob today, way too easy.

Clarry & Tracc the only two players to crack the 4.0 plus rating which is roughly the area you need at least 6 or more players to be to have a good chance of winning IMV.  Too much left to way too few (again!!).

Team rating this week  a massive 13.5% off Season 2022's rating (68.89)

Player Rating Rank
C Oliver 6.050 1
C Petracca 5.375 2
H Petty 3.525 3
Ed Langdon 3.475 4
T Rivers 3.400 5
B Grundy # 3.350 6
Jack Viney 3.350 7
A Tomlinson 3.175 8
J Bowey 3.125 9
L Hunter 2.850 10
B Fritsch 2.750 11
A N-Bullen 2.425 12
Steven May 2.400 13
T Sparrow 2.350 14
A Brayshaw 2.250 15
K Pickett 2.100 16
J V Rooyen # 1.950 17
K Chandler 1.750 18
Judd McVee 1.225 19
J Melksham 1.125 20
J Jordon > 33% 1.025 21
T McDonald # 0.625 22
C Spargo < 38% -0.050 23
Team Score 59.65  
Top 6 25.18  
Bottom 6 7.70  

# Hit outs to advantage not counted

< Subbed out / TOG %

> Subbed in / TOG %

Stats courtesy of footwire.com

Edited by Demon Dynasty
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tommo near the top of the table?  Man, that really says something about our day… 8th best according to stats.  Huge negative impact on the match. Those numbers are awful across the board.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DD those numbers really bare out what we witnessed last night apart from Tracc and Clarry we were pretty ordinary across the board.TMac and Spargs before being concussed were both poor whereas the stats make Tommo and Bowey appear better than they were. Melk started ok but can’t play out a game.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

 

11 hours ago, buck_nekkid said:

Tommo near the top of the table?  Man, that really says something about our day… 8th best according to stats.  Huge negative impact on the match. Those numbers are awful across the board.

 

8 hours ago, DeeZone said:

DD those numbers really bare out what we witnessed last night apart from Tracc and Clarry we were pretty ordinary across the board.TMac and Spargs before being concussed were both poor whereas the stats make Tommo and Bowey appear better than they were. Melk started ok but can’t play out a game.

I would say the ratings for Bowey & Tommo were influenced a fair bit by intercepts and rebounds.  Some of it made up from effective disposals also.  But when you watch effective disposals from the AFL highlights package on individual players, some of these are not all that effective IMO.  Some of them just end up somewhere up the field to a 50/50 contest that doesn't always favour the team at all.

Aside from that the actual impact of what they brought on the day wasn't the greatest from what i witnessed as well.  I had both of them in my bottom rung of players on the day but they had a few mates!  Our defenders were under the pump quite a bit sadly.  Not many wins in many areas at all.

Edited by Demon Dynasty
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Weighted Average Ratings up to & including Rnd 5, 2023 vs H&A Season 2022

May a bit of a worry vs his season 2022 form.  Bowey, Gus & Viney also dropping away a little, albeit not quite as severe.

Haven't watched or seen the results from Casey yet (about to do watch now) but surely it's time to start putting more time into Laurie and/or Moniz (Moniz might be a bit further away) in order to bring them up to the speed & intensity of AFL as Melk's eventual replacement/s?  That's not to say Melk shouldn't be played where match ups / circumstances and form suggest.  However, it just feels to me like now is the time to start putting more time into alternatives from here.

Player 2023 Rating 2023 Rank 2022 Rating % Change vs 2022 2022 Rank Change in Rank vs 2022
C Oliver 5.760 1 5.320 8.27 1 0
C Petracca 4.655 2 4.456 4.47 2 0
Max Gawn # < * 4.125 3 3.215 28.30 8 5
J Jordon > * 4.092 4 3.164 29.33 9 5
T Rivers 4.005 5 2.423 65.29 18 13
K Pickett 3.533 6 2.118 66.81 21 15
B Grundy # 3.505 7 - - - -
A Brayshaw 3.475 8 3.839 -9.48 5 -3
Jack Viney 3.456 9 3.971 -12.97 3 -6
Jake Lever 3.369 10 2.703 24.64 14 4
A Tomlinson 3.233 11 2.079 55.51 22 11
Ed Langdon 3.120 12 3.109 0.35 11 -1
Steven May 3.075 13 3.971 -22.56 3 -10
L Hunter 3.025 14 - - - -
Alex N-Bullen 2.865 15 2.688 6.58 15 0
H Petty # 2.695 16 2.392 12.67 19 3
T Sparrow 2.690 17 2.665 0.94 16 -1
J V Rooyen # 2.683 18 - - - -
Bayley Fritsch 2.563 19 1.936 32.39 27 8
K Chandler 2.545 20 3.128 -18.64 10 -10
Jake Bowey 2.520 21 2.856 -11.76 13 -8
T McDonald # 2.344 22 1.939 20.89 26 4
J Harmes 2.225 23 3.082 -27.81 12 -11
Judd McVee 2.210 24 - - - -
Ben Brown # < 2.033 25 1.759 15.58 29 4
C Spargo 1.935 26 1.981 -2.32 24 -2
M Hibberd * 1.788 27 2.613 -31.57 17 -10
J Melksham > 1.437 28 1.947 -26.19 25 -3
B Laurie < * 1.150 29 - - - -
Team Rating 73.33   68.89 6.45    

* Played less than two full matches (in total) - player rating compromised

# Hit outs to advantage not counted

< Subbed Out at least once or more

> Subbed In at least once or more

Stats courtesy of footwire.com

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/17/2023 at 8:35 PM, buck_nekkid said:

Any idea how this is calculated?

Yeah I think these guys are the Mathematicians who assist in the calculations!!😁

 Image result for Original Three Stooges

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/17/2023 at 8:35 PM, buck_nekkid said:

Any idea how this is calculated?

What are the Power Rankings?
This is our attempt to rank every AFL club from best to worst. We take wins and losses into account, but also the quality of opposition faced and whether teams are likely to get healthier or improve going forward. It’s a little bit ‘who’s hot and who’s not’; part predictive, part analysis of what’s happened. If Team A is above Team B, we’d probably tip A to win if they were playing at a neutral venue this weekend.

Source: https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-2023-power-rankings-after-round-5-analysis-highlights-every-club-ranked-ladder-predictions-contenders-latest-news/news-story/4f9d285140f1064353234930b2d313a4


Several of the Squiggle models have similar  "Power Rankings" here, each with its own methodology:

https://squiggle.com.au/power-rankings/

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, binman said:

Wheelo, any chance you can add time in forward half and total team metres gained to your brilliant stats?

@WheeloRatings

I'm looking at adding the overall team stats for individual matches to the Match Stats page, and this would include total team metres gained.  Although unfortunately I don't think I have access to the time in forward half stats. If I get it, I'll include it on the site.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, WheeloRatings said:

@binman FYI, team stats for individual matches are now available on the Match Stats page:

https://www.wheeloratings.com/afl_match_stats.html?ID=20230505

image.thumb.png.0e48147efa08a8c927191a8388db54b6.png

That's great wheelo. .

I looked at the dees bombers game and it's got the key stats to get a sense of the game and a good layout to review the info quickly.

On time in forward half, combining inside 50 and metres gained differentials is a pretty good proxy I would have thought.

Bombers ahead, albeit by not a huge amount, in both AND contested ball. That's the game right there

The other stat it would be great to have is scores from turnovers.

Any chance that stat could be added (conscious it might be another Champion data stat that is not available)?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Round 6, 2023 Anzac Eve MCG - Demons vs Tigers

Player Rating Rank
Jack Viney  5.400 1
C Petracca 4.550 2
Ed Langdon 4.225 3
Steven May 4.225 3
M Hibberd  4.050 5
J Jordon 3.800 6
T Sparrow 3.700 7
C Oliver 3.575 8
L Hunter 3.575 8
A Brayshaw 3.450 10
Jake Lever 3.125 11
T Rivers < 74% 3.100 12
K Chandler 2.650 13
J Van Rooyen 2.525 14
Judd McVee  2.425 15
B Grundy # 2.225 16
B Fritsch 1.925 17
A N-Bullen 1.700 18
Max Gawn # 1.500 19
H Petty 1.425 20
J Bowey 1.250 21
K Pickett 0.550 22
B Laurie > 9% 0.150 23
        Team Score 64.95  
            Top 6 26.25  
         Bottom 6 8.35  

# Hit outs to advantage not counted

< Subbed out / TOG %

> Subbed in / TOG %

Stats courtesy of footwire.com

Edited by Demon Dynasty
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/22/2023 at 5:25 PM, binman said:

That's great wheelo. .

I looked at the dees bombers game and it's got the key stats to get a sense of the game and a good layout to review the info quickly.

On time in forward half, combining inside 50 and metres gained differentials is a pretty good proxy I would have thought.

Bombers ahead, albeit by not a huge amount, in both AND contested ball. That's the game right there

The other stat it would be great to have is scores from turnovers.

Any chance that stat could be added (conscious it might be another Champion data stat that is not available)?

I found out that the time in forward half stats are published in the Herald Sun, so I have subscribed to that and I'll see if it's worth keeping the subscription. I have added time in forward half and pressure for last night below. Also, I am able to calculate the score sources from one of my datasets so I have included that information below.

Melbourne v Richmond

https://www.wheeloratings.com/afl_match_stats.html?ID=20230608

Note: first number below is Melbourne, higher value is bold.

Pressure

Q1: 173 - 187
Q2: 159 - 162
Q3: 154 - 171
Q4: 188 - 157
Tot: 168 - 169

Time in forward half

47% - 53%

Score sources

Centre bounce
2.0.12 - 1.3.9

Ball up
0.0.0 - 3.0.18

Throw in
2.0.12 - 1.0.6

Turnover
11.6.72 - 6.9.45

Kick-in
0.0.0 - 0.0.0

Expected scores

77 - 85

 

 

Score sources, Rounds 1 - 6

Centre bounce
v WB: 2.0.12 - 0.1.1
v Bris: 1.0.6 - 2.1.13
v Syd: 3.3.21 - 2.4.16
v WC: 1.1.7 - 1.1.7
v Ess: 2.3.15 - 4.2.26
v Rich: 2.0.12 - 1.3.9

Ball up
v WB: 0.3.3 - 1.1.7
v Bris: 1.0.6 - 3.0.18
v Syd: 2.1.13 - 2.1.13
v WC: 4.4.28 - 1.1.7
v Ess: 1.1.7 - 1.1.7
v Rich: 0.0.0 - 3.0.18

Throw in
v WB: 2.1.13 - 2.0.12
v Bris: 3.0.18 - 4.1.25
v Syd: 3.0.18 - 2.1.13
v WC: 4.1.25 - 2.1.13
v Ess: 1.1.7 - 0.2.2
v Rich: 2.0.12 - 1.0.6

Turnover
v WB: 11.9.75 - 5.9.39
v Bris: 7.4.46 - 5.7.37
v Syd: 13.4.82 - 5.6.36
v WC: 10.6.66 - 4.5.29
v Ess: 5.6.36 - 10.9.69
v Rich: 11.6.72 - 6.9.45

Kick-in
v WB: 2.0.12 - 1.0.6
v Bris: 1.0.6 - 0.0.0
v Syd: 0.0.0 - 1.0.6
v WC: 0.0.0 - 1.1.7
v Ess: 2.0.12 - 0.0.0
v Rich: 0.0.0 - 0.0.0

Edited by WheeloRatings
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WheeloRatings said:

I found out that the time in forward half stats are published in the Herald Sun, so I have subscribed to that and I'll see if it's worth keeping the subscription. I have added time in forward half and pressure for last night below. Also, I am able to calculate the score sources from one of my datasets so I have included that information below.

Melbourne v Richmond

https://www.wheeloratings.com/afl_match_stats.html?ID=20230608

Pressure

Q1: 173 - 187
Q2: 159 - 162
Q3: 154 - 171
Q4: 188 - 157
Tot: 168 - 169

Time in forward half

47% - 53%

Score sources

Centre bounce
2.0.12 - 1.3.9

Ball up
0.0.0 - 3.0.18

Throw in
2.0.12 - 1.0.6

Turnover
11.6.72 - 6.9.45

Kick-in
0.0.0 - 0.0.0

Expected scores

77 - 85

 

 

Score sources, Rounds 1 - 6

Centre bounce
v WB: 2.0.12 - 0.1.1
v Bris: 1.0.6 - 2.1.13
v Syd: 3.3.21 - 2.4.16
v WC: 1.1.7 - 1.1.7
v Ess: 2.3.15 - 4.2.26
v Rich: 2.0.12 - 1.3.9

Ball up
v WB: 0.3.3 - 1.1.7
v Bris: 1.0.6 - 3.0.18
v Syd: 2.1.13 - 2.1.13
v WC: 4.4.28 - 1.1.7
v Ess: 1.1.7 - 1.1.7
v Rich: 0.0.0 - 3.0.18

Throw in
v WB: 2.1.13 - 2.0.12
v Bris: 3.0.18 - 4.1.25
v Syd: 3.0.18 - 2.1.13
v WC: 4.1.25 - 2.1.13
v Ess: 1.1.7 - 0.2.2
v Rich: 2.0.12 - 1.0.6

Turnover
v WB: 11.9.75 - 5.9.39
v Bris: 7.4.46 - 5.7.37
v Syd: 13.4.82 - 5.6.36
v WC: 10.6.66 - 4.5.29
v Ess: 5.6.36 - 10.9.69
v Rich: 11.6.72 - 6.9.45

Kick-in
v WB: 2.0.12 - 1.0.6
v Bris: 1.0.6 - 0.0.0
v Syd: 0.0.0 - 1.0.6
v WC: 0.0.0 - 1.1.7
v Ess: 2.0.12 - 0.0.0
v Rich: 0.0.0 - 0.0.0

Can i assume bolded numbers are MFC?

thanks for collating and sharing!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    SISTER ACT by Meggs

    In the twilight at Frankston Oval, for the first ever match between Melbourne and Hawthorn, the Demons were clinical winning by 59 points and remain undefeated in Season Eight.   The Melbourne team ran out to a wonderful #DeeArmy banner paying tribute to Ron Barassi, ‘a football legend, the greatest Demon’.     So true!   Meggs was super excited to see Irish recruit Aimee Mackin playing her first game.  Aimee quickly showed us that she belongs out there with composure, ga

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    ON SONG by Meggs

    Meggs asks is it time to heave ho the melodies and words of yesteryear and update Club theme songs with some Australian composers and singers?     What prompted this reflection was the discovery that this week’s combatants’ themes were written by the same early 20th century American composer, George M. Cohan.     Cohan’s melodies The Yankee Doodle Boy and You’re a Grand Old Flag have been used by Hawthorn since 1956 and Melbourne since 1912.   Even earlier, the clu

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews 1

    RUN UNBEATEN by Meggs

    The Demons withstood a spirited challenge from the Western Bulldogs in the 10th anniversary of the Hampson-Hardeman Cup to run away with it in the last quarter and take their unbeaten run to 12 wins on the trot, an AFLW record.   The Doggies were tenacious and their losing score of 6.5.41 was the highest score against Melbourne since their last loss against Brisbane in Round 4 on 18 September 2022.   With the sad passing of AFL football legend Ronald Dale Barassi, champion player

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    LEARNINGS OR BURNINGS by GOTO

    Well, the 2023 season is over for the Demons after a two point loss to the Blues in the First Semi Final. All season WE have been hearing about the “learnings” that the team needed to make after each loss, but how much have we actually learnt when they:   1. Lost four successive finals at our own home ground;   2. Fell in five of their last six losses despite having more shots at goal and in the sixth, they had an equal number of shots;   3. Lost seven games by under two

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    PODCAST: SF vs Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 19th September @ 8:30pm. Join George, Binman & I as we analyse the Demons devastating loss to the Blues in the Semi Final. You questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human. Listen & Chat

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 77

    POSTGAME: SF vs Carlton

    Once again inaccuracy cost the Demons as they are bundled out in straight sets for the 2nd consecutive final series going down to the Blues by 2 points in front of 96,000 people at the MCG. Bring on 2024.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 859

    VOTES: SF vs Carlton

    Congratulations to Christian Petracca for taking out his 2nd Demonland Player of the Year Award. With a 59 votes lead over Jack Viney he cannot be overtaken. Your votes please for today’s loss against the Blues. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 …

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 40

    GAMEDAY: SF vs Carlton

    It's Game Day and the Demons take on the Blues in a sudden death final at the MCG. A win for the Dees will see them face Brisbane at the Lions' fortress at the Gabba and a loss will see them bundled out of the finals in straight sets for the second season in a row.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 1176

    LOST DOGS by Meggs

    The Western Bulldogs and the Demons have history. Prior to the creation of the AFLW league, the AFL ran four years of exhibition matches featuring our two teams between 2013 and 2016. The winner holds the Hampson-Hardeman Cup, in honour of two women who were founders of the national women’s football competition. After 13 games the Demons hold nine wins, four losses record and currently hold the Cup after trouncing the Dogs last year by 64 points. The exhibition games were a precursor t

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews 3
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...