Jump to content

Featured Replies

Just now, CHF said:

Agree that is a move I would like to see. I think he would really have an impact there.

The move I have heard is related toΒ  key position.

Ben Brown to FB πŸ˜‚

Β 
16 minutes ago, defuture15 said:

What would you do if Jesus came to Hawthorn?

Move Dunstall to CHF.

23 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

And we have no idea if Gus is going to play on or not.Β 
A midfield sans Clarry and Gus is no more than a middle of the road midfield. It isn’t winning you flags.

To be fair, I don’t think the side as it stands is winning another flag.Β 
Β 

Trading Clarry is a bold call, but I think the club recognises a level of reinvigoration is needed and weighed that against the impeding arrival of the compromised Tasmanian drafts; if the trade eventuates that is.Β 

Edited by BLWNBA

 
1 minute ago, BLWNBA said:

To be fair, I don’t think the side as it stands is winning another flag.Β 
Β 

Trading Clarry is a bold call, but I think the club recognises a level of reinvigoration is needed and weighed that against the impeding arrival of the compromised Tasmanian drafts; if the trade eventuates that is.Β 

I don’t disagree, but Clarry isn’t the reason we aren’t winning another flag.Β 

Personally I think it’s all [censored] and Nudge claiming to have been in the know smells like that [censored] but hey, I’m upfront that I know nothing.Β 


7 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

I don’t disagree, but Clarry isn’t the reason we aren’t winning another flag.Β 

We are over invested in insiders. I think we can all agree to this and the need for outside class.Β 

If you look at potential trade options excluding Clarry it’s really only Trac as the alternative that can attract the draft capital. And if the alleged behavioural issues are true to the extent they are having an impact on culture, then it’s possible that he has punched his own ticket.Β 

Β 

Β 

It could turn out to be a master stroke get a god offer for clarry or it’s the warning shot he needs and he grows up a bit and gets back to the player we know, interesting couple of weeks coming upΒ 

we couldnt actually do it could weΒ 

Β 

also hearing since then its doggies interested,Β 

for macrae, lobb and picks.

Edited by Turner

Β 
4 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

Not overs. For every good pick 2 and 3, there are dozens very ordinary ones who will never come close to being as good as Clarry.Β 

Harley Reid has a more well rounded game than Clarry as it stands.Β 

Clarry hasn't improved his week areas, regardless of how good his contest work is.

Many people are blinded by their love for one individual.Β 

Might just be the best thing for Clayton and us long term.Β 

Everyone thought a Collingwood would fall off a cliff once Treloar left and Stephenson (to a lesser degree).Β 

We've shown that we actually function better as a side without another inside specialist in the side.Β 

Why don't we wait and see, eh?Β 

Edited by JimmyGadson

2 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

I don’t disagree, but Clarry isn’t the reason we aren’t winning another flag.Β 

No, but the same setup has seen us bundle out in straight sets two years running.

Anddddd we were a better functioning side without Oliver in the side this year.Β 

His value to as functioning well as a TEAM is at odds with the value he holds as an elite specialist inside INDIVIDUAL.Β 

People are confusing the two for some reason....


3 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

No doubt Jason Taylor is a gun recruiter. I don’t doubt for a minute he will do well with any picks he’s given. But it’s still all a lottery.

History has shown us that many highly rated juniors go on to have average careers.Β 
You absolutely cannot guarantee that any player drafted this year will be as good or better than Clarry. Very few first round picks since his draft have achieved what he has in terms of accolades.Β 

You also can't guarantee that Clayton will continue to improve parts of his game that need improving? Or that his behaviour will get better? Or that he won't get a long-term injury?

We get it, you're an unabashed fan of the individual above all else.Β 

2 hours ago, BLWNBA said:

To be fair, I don’t think the side as it stands is winning another flag.Β 
Β 

Trading Clarry is a bold call, but I think the club recognises a level of reinvigoration is needed and weighed that against the impeding arrival of the compromised Tasmanian drafts; if the trade eventuates that is.Β 

So we lost to pies with bad kicking by 7 points, Gus getting knocked out and a fwd line tapped together and some how we are out of the window, pull another one. A few less injuries and some further development and maybe a smart trade and we are more than in the hunt

3 hours ago, In Harmes Way said:

If Jesus reincarnated and presented in the draft, I wouldn’t be trading Clarry to bring him in

They’re BOTH just very naughty boys!

1 hour ago, Turner said:

also hearing since then its doggies interested,Β 

for macrae, lobb and picks.

Imagine the fun Libba would have with Clayton’s tattoo gunΒ 


The only way you'd lose out on this is if it were to cause unrest within the group, club and individual.Β 

That would be a disaster.Β 

But if everyone was okay with it and we received what we should in way of picks, which would see us land Reid and and a McKertcher...Β 

We'd be better off as a team whether people want to hear that or not.Β 

Reid can play everywhere and displays exactly the same level of competitiveness and contested ball winning ability as Clayton. He's further advanced than Clayton at the same age and already possesses traits that Clayton doesn't.Β 

McKertcher is the class, user and runner we need so desperately for that link and connection.Β 

I'll be content if Clayton stays and can get help and endeavour to improve other aspects of his game. But I definitely won't be upset if all parties come to an agreement and believe it's best for club and individual.Β 

Edited by JimmyGadson

5 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

And we have no idea if Gus is going to play on or not.Β 
A midfield sans Clarry and Gus is no more than a middle of the road midfield. It isn’t winning you flags.

As far as I have heard subject to medical checks Gus is intending to play on. Β So far he has received positive news fromΒ all medical tests. Needs another last result only now from a team of experts or such like.Β 

8 hours ago, Nudge said:

Nope, we put word out amigoΒ 

Then that.... would be the someone

Ok so let me try and see if i’m getting this straight.Β 

1./ oliver self tattoos foot and misses games with infectionΒ 

2./ falls out with conditioning coach

3./ breaks up with girlfriend and loses his [censored].Β 

4./ rocks up late and wasted to post season interviewΒ 

None of that is terminal fr a generational player like Oliver football clubs move past [censored] like this all the time. But his attitude meets a period where we’ve just lost 4 finals in a row, Goody is taking no prisoners, Β  harley reid is sitting right there and Tasmania is coming.Β 

Im going to have to take a deep breath and sit with it.Β 


7 hours ago, BLWNBA said:

To be fair, I don’t think the side as it stands is winning another flag.Β 
Β 

Trading Clarry is a bold call, but I think the club recognises a level of reinvigoration is needed and weighed that against the impeding arrival of the compromised Tasmanian drafts; if the trade eventuates that is.Β 

Astute observations.Β 

The shadow of the devil creeps closer indeed. Going to have effects many don't see coming.

Qld could fall off a precipice...the footy world would hardly blink....Β  but when the horn sounds for the "islanders" to march home....indeed many will heed the call.

Agree also that the current team/coaching isn't winning another flag.

Lots of changes and recasting to come.

I'm fascinated.Β 

Will there be flames where only smoke exists now ?Β 

As they say... Who Dares Wins.

Go Dees

Edited by beelzebub

7 hours ago, In Harmes Way said:

If Jesus reincarnated and presented in the draft, I wouldn’t be trading Clarry to bring him in

6 day turnarounds would not present a problem.

4 hours ago, JimmyGadson said:

Harley Reid has a more well rounded game than Clarry as it stands.Β 

Clarry hasn't improved his week areas, regardless of how good his contest work is.

Many people are blinded by their love for one individual.Β 

Might just be the best thing for Clayton and us long term.Β 

Everyone thought a Collingwood would fall off a cliff once Treloar left and Stephenson (to a lesser degree).Β 

We've shown that we actually function better as a side without another inside specialist in the side.Β 

Why don't we wait and see, eh?Β 

I genuinely thought GWS were going to be bottom 4 this year after losing their midfield brutes Tarranto and Hopper..

Β 
8 hours ago, Norm Smith's Curse said:

Honestly if this club is now shopping semi-publically a once-in-a-generation talent because of 'attitude issues' twelve months after signing him for seven years our list management foresight is laughably bad.

In recent times we have been good at the draft but the decades before that were at best mixed in terms of drafting and at times appallingly bad. Why gamble what is for what might be?


Or have we just managed to maintain the value of our β€œasset” by having it under contract?

I also doubt we would have been able to foresee tattoo-gate or a relationship breakdown.

2 minutes ago, Mach5 said:


Or have we just managed to maintain the value of our β€œasset” by having it under contract?

I also doubt we would have been able to foresee tattoo-gate or a relationship breakdown.

Totally valid qualifiers.Β 

Trees survive because they bend and adapt..Β  Rocks can fall or crack.Β 

I would think it bodes well to be adeptly adaptive.

Whatever is best holistically for the club.... IS the BEST outcome imo.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 89 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.Β Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds.Β 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?Β Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?Β 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 328 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies