Jump to content

  • Podcast:      

  • Podcast:     

Hawks Review Reveals Shock Allegations Against Former Coaches


Demonland
 Share


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Each story Print, Radio or TV is either cleared to Broadcast or it is withheld, when it is sent to Legal 

So is it fair to say if there was one bit of doubt in the facts presented it would probably still be with legal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

Probably, but did he want a response? Or just want to be able to say he tried to get one...?

He could go to press without an attempt...

If there was more time, I think the pre-emptive legal route may have been pursued

Maybe the old 'Thank God this call went through to voicemail' trick?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


4 minutes ago, layzie said:

So is it fair to say if there was one bit of doubt in the facts presented it would probably still be with legal?

Were any "facts" presented? I'm not sure

There were quotes presented, from unnamed sources, who alleged events happened, without much context

Don't for a minute think that I doubt the allegations, I simply don't know anything. Just calling out the word "facts"

Edited by Graeme Yeats' Mullet
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, layzie said:

So is it fair to say if there was one bit of doubt in the facts presented it would probably still be with legal?

Absolutely Correct when I worked in News. I had a few stories pulled after spending a lot of hours working on them. Sometimes because circumstances changed, but other times because the risk was too high

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

Were any "facts" presented? I'm not sure

There were quotes presented, from unnamed sources, who alleged events happened, without much context

Don't for a minute think that I doubt the allegations, I simply don't know anything. Just calling out the word "facts"

The people who gave the “facts” would know the consequences of lying. That would have been made very clear. 
This article was not one case, but 3 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't think there was much legal risk when you are just reporting on accusations by others. as long as he can prove the accusations were made (e.g. audio etc) that would suffice.

the reporter wasn't writing a personal opinion piece and by technically (even if contrived) offering a right of reply he covers himself further.

the legal approval to print in no way is an indication that any of the accusations are accurate

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

i don't think there was much legal risk when you are just reporting on accusations by others. as long as he can prove the accusations were made (e.g. audio etc) that would suffice.

the reporter wasn't writing a personal opinion piece and by technically (even if contrived) offering a right of reply he covers himself further.

the legal approval to print in no way is an indication that any of the accusations are accurate

I don’t think the story would be printed if the journalist thought that any of the 3 cases were lying. This is the same journalist that broke the story about Rod Owen. 
What the Legal Department do to verify a story I cannot say. In my case we were just given a Yes or No

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

i don't think there was much legal risk when you are just reporting on accusations by others. as long as he can prove the accusations were made (e.g. audio etc) that would suffice.

the reporter wasn't writing a personal opinion piece and by technically (even if contrived) offering a right of reply he covers himself further.

the legal approval to print in no way is an indication that any of the accusations are accurate

Exactly 

The report is of allegations made by third parties, which the reporter can establish were made

So the "facts" are those people made those allegations

Much of the opinion on here is based on the substance of the allegations - which have now been categorically denied by the accused parties

The legal avenue I think more time for responses may have resulted in was injunction to prevent the story going to press, not the reporter being sued

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites


3 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I don’t think the story would be printed if the journalist thought that any of the 3 cases were lying. This is the same journalist that broke the story about Rod Owen. 
What the Legal Department do to verify a story I cannot say. In my case we were just given a Yes or No

what the reporter "thought" is really irrelevant and besides you or i don't actually know what he thought. It was a story....full stop.

now, if he had said in the article that he personally thought their story was true, legal would probably have told him to remove that statement.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, daisycutter said:

what the reporter "thought" is really irrelevant and besides you or i don't actually know what he thought. It was a story....full stop.

now, if he had said in the article that he personally thought their story was true, legal would probably have told him to remove that statement.

 

His reputation is on the line by writing the story. So far his reputation is Top Shelf.

If Russell Jackson “thought” his subjects were lying i don’t think the story would have been written. 
When i saw who wrote the article yesterday, I immediately read it with more interest. 
Balls have been put on the line here…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

His reputation is on the line by writing the story. So far his reputation is Top Shelf.

If Russell Jackson “thought” his subjects were lying i don’t think the story would have been written. 
When i saw who wrote the article yesterday, I immediately read it with more interest. 
Balls have been put on the line here…

i never said he didn't believe them (i don't even know) but what I did say is that it is irrelevant in the scheme of things.

I don't just believe a story is true just because i think the reporter "probably" thinks it is true.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, daisycutter said:

i never said he didn't believe them (i don't even know) but what I did say is that it is irrelevant in the scheme of things.

I don't just believe a story is true just because i think the reporter "probably" thinks it is true.

 

DC the Journalist put his name to the story. That means a lot. 
Many stories on the internet do not have a Journalists name. This one did. 
It is very relevant in this case whether the journalist believes he is writing facts or fiction. His job is on the line

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, old dee said:

What we now have is the two coaches having to prove themselves innocent. ⁴ Makes me wonder why we bother with courts. Much quicker and cheaper to just accept the accusers view and be done with it.

Ok no worries, what kind of media censorship sounds good to you then?

 

Do you want journalists to self censor in favour of the accused and the powerful?

Or

Would you like there to be a governing body determining what can be published?

 

Which absolute nightmare scenario sounds better to you than the current one?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

DC the Journalist put his name to the story. That means a lot. 
Many stories on the internet do not have a Journalists name. This one did. 
It is very relevant in this case whether the journalist believes he is writing facts or fiction. His job is on the line

i'm sure the journo is smart enough to know he hasn't got nearly all the "facts" yet and certainly not all the context.

he's dug up some allegations that he has no reason yet to doubt and gone with it. he's done nothing wrong and got a good scoop. i'm sure he realises there will be many more twists and turns to come and he'll have many more stories to publish.

no need to read anymore than that into it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


5 hours ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

Were any "facts" presented? I'm not sure

There were quotes presented, from unnamed sources, who alleged events happened, without much context

Don't for a minute think that I doubt the allegations, I simply don't know anything. Just calling out the word "facts"

No but you're right, they didn't provide the full report in PDF form or anything like that so shouldn't have said 'facts'. The one fact is that there are allegations I guess

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, daisycutter said:

i'm sure the journo is smart enough to know he hasn't got nearly all the "facts" yet and certainly not all the context.

he's dug up some allegations that he has no reason yet to doubt and gone with it. he's done nothing wrong and got a good scoop. i'm sure he realises there will be many more twists and turns to come and he'll have many more stories to publish.

no need to read anymore than that into it. 

Stories like these are always a risk, but the Legal Department has gone through it with a fine tooth comb. 
So i will be interested to hear the other side. 
It’s on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, daisycutter said:

i'm sure the journo is smart enough to know he hasn't got nearly all the "facts" yet and certainly not all the context.

he's dug up some allegations that he has no reason yet to doubt and gone with it. he's done nothing wrong and got a good scoop. i'm sure he realises there will be many more twists and turns to come and he'll have many more stories to publish.

no need to read anymore than that into it. 

Just curious, the journalists that brought up the Jimmy Saville case also just ‘dug up some allegations’ and went ‘with it’.

They had even less to go on considering Saville was dead, so in terms of ‘facts’, it’s easily arguable that Saville was the victim of a smear campaign, yes? Considering his side of the story never had the chance to be heard?

Just want to hear your reasoning considering the ‘facts’ are in question (in which they definitely were in the Saville case too). 

Edited by BoBo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, sue said:

Sorry OldDee I can’t stay quiet any longer. Hearsay is one word. 
 

@Demonstonewould be very proud of this post🙂

But OldDee is two words with lower case o and d😉

Edited by Lucifers Hero
  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've followed the discussion about the the fairness of the publication of the allegations etc and overnight I came to the following conclusions which satisfy me, if no one else.

1. It was perfectly reasonable for the Hawthorn review to only question those making allegations.  That review was not charged with establishing the truth of the allegations by interviewing the alleged offenders.  That should be done by a seperate investigation by the club or the AFL.  A bit like the Crown prosecution service may decide there is a case to answer which then goes to trial where everyone gets to present their case.

2. So the next question then is, should  the review (or its effective contents) have been made public.  Surely it could not be kept secret until the 'trial' of the matter was concluded.  We don't do that for criminal trials. Keeping such things secret undermines public confidence that justice is being done. It's what you expect to happen in totalitarian countries.

3. So the next question is, could have it been made public without naming names?  That is, the AFL announces an enquiry into these allegations without naming the senior coach, other coaches or club.  But that wouldn't wash.  First for those who are concerned about Malthouse etc being besmirched, if it wasn't clear who was being accused, every coach at every club would be under an unfair cloud.  Anyway, it would soon become clear which club it was, so they just as well have been named at the start.

4. To me that leaves only the question of should the coaches have been given more time to respond.  I really can't see what would be achieved by that. Very unlikley that they would 'confess' or say there is some truth in some of the less obnoxious allegations and offer to assist any investigation.  Very much more likely, they'd either dodge responding to a journo or just deny the allegations and offer to support any investigation the AFL makes.  And that is what they did.  Whether they had 24 hours or a week, I can't see them doing anything else. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    EYES ON RED & BLUE by Wilma from West Perth

    It was a great weekend for the Red and the Blue on this side of the Nullarbor.   On Saturday, West Perth bested Claremont by two goals after leading all day with the exception of a few early minutes to take out the WAFL Premiership and on Sunday, Melbourne scored a five goal win over Fremantle with a stunning four goals to zip in the final term.   Again, it was the red and the blue leading nearly all day to record their fifth win from six games.   The ou

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    THE TRADING CHRONICLES by The Oracle

    Part One - ZERO HOUR, 9AM The AFL Trade Period begins in earnest at 9.00am amid the announcement of a bombshell by North Melbourne’s 2021 Number 1 draft pick Jason Horne-Francis that he wants to leave the club and return to his home state to play for Port Adelaide.  The Herald Sun is reporting that “Horne-Francis will cite the instability at North Melbourne this year in his first season“ along with a likely continuation of chaos as a result of the uncertainty surrounding coach Alastair

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Special Features 1

    BLUE VIBE AT IKON by Meggs

    It was such a nice vibe at Ikon on Friday night.     Princes Park looked in excellent condition, a relaxed but modest crowd and President Kate Roffey and CEO Gary Pert in attendance, greeting fans and shaking hands.     It was an evening with little to complain about for Dees supporters, save for some drizzling rain, a few missed scoring opportunities and the fact that the Dees as raging favourites duly took the four points.   Carlton was always going to struggle to cover

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    BLUES AWAY by Meggs

    This Round 5 clash against the Blues at Princes Park (officially known as Ikon Park) is a great chance for the Dees to bounce back to the winning circle following our top-of-the-table loss to Brisbane last week.     Carlton will be missing several key players with the pundits calling 10 to nil.  Raging favouritism is never a comfortable thing for Melbourne supporters but we simply must deliver on Friday night.   History has seen these teams play four times since 2017 with the Dee

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    LIONS POUNCE by Meggs

    Early Sunday afternoon Meggs was coffeeing in Mornington and witnessing hail, thunder, lightning, rain, wind and feeling the freezing temperatures and knowing all these elements were heading towards Casey Fields.  Oh dear.  The Brisbane coach had said during the week that he wanted the game moved to Marvel because “if you're going to have two of the better teams in the comp playing, (it warrants) a venue and deck that suits the occasion”.  However, Casey Fields was uncharacteristi

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    RAINING PREMIERS by KC from Casey

    If the threatening dark grey skies that loomed above Ikon Park before the VFL Grand Final didn’t provide a sufficiently inhospitable reception for our visitors from sunny Queensland, the rains that bucketed down after quarter time certainly did. For years, the Casey Demons have welcomed opposing teams at their home fortress with rain, hail, wind and frosty conditions and it was just Southport’s luck that they met those conditions head on in the VFL’s big dance. They suited Casey’s skillful

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    PRIDE OF VICTORIA by KC from Casey

    When Casey Demons coach Mark Corrigan talks about his charges putting their “best foot forward” on Sunday when they take on the Southport Sharks in the 2022 VFL Grand Final, it’s a signal that his team is on a mission not only for themselves but in  the name of their forebears, the Springvale Scorpions, and indeed for the pride and honour of the entire State of Victoria. The VFL club now known as the Casey Demons last won a premiership flag under the name of the Springvale Scorpions but tha

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    NARRM AT HOME by Meggs

    For the fourth consecutive week, and the second week as the mighty Narrm, we take on a Top 8 team. Could this match be a preview of the Season 7 Grand Final?   Our opponents this week, Brisbane, stand undefeated atop the AFLW ladder after slaying the struggling Freo, and the unrated Giants and Gold Coast.  After amassing 225 points for and only 56 against, for a percentage of 401.8%, the pundits are claiming the Lions have the best attack the competition has ever seen.   Brisbane

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    CHANGES 2022 by The Oracle

    Part 1: The year we stood still (or did we?).  Premiership coach David Parkin who  coincidentally turned 80 yesterday, famously used to say that even a premiership team needs to bring at least five new players into the fold in order to advance from year to year and therefore, if this adage remains true, then the Melbourne Football Club really did stand still in 2022.  Of the players recruited after the club’s premiership in September, 2021, only Luke Dunstan (5 games) managed to provid

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Special Features
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...