Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, willmoy said:

Melksham has re energised our insync forward movement and potency.

Full credit to him, one of the more unexpected storylines of the year.

 
13 hours ago, mo64 said:

Spargo clearly started on the wing, but it's hard to gauge what percentage of time he spent there because he was largely unsighted after the 1st qtr.

And we have a ready made wingman in Jordon, so we don't have to turn a backman into a wingman. 

Stop making excuses for Spargo's lack of output.

Langdon played 100% wing, I don’t think he’s ever played anywhere else for us.

I didn’t see Harmes play anywhere but wing. He didn’t attend a centre bounce and I didn’t see him start forward at any time.

We aren’t going to bring JJ in to play 21% game time on a wing. He’d have to split the wing with Harmes and they would both have to play significant time forward to make that happen and we don’t want that.
 

We want a small forward who makes excellent position, hits targets inside 50 and always gets in the right defensive positions.

Brisbanes game plan relies upon Rich and Kiddy Coleman bouncing from half back and hitting up running mids - Clugg, Bailey, Neale etc who then get it in quick to dangerous forwards. Spargo did his job stopping those quick bounces from half back. He plays in the hardest and least rewarding spot on the ground and that has to be accounted for when measuring his output.

19 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Spargo did his job stopping those quick bounces from half back. He plays in the hardest and least rewarding spot on the ground and that has to be accounted for when measuring his output.

He'll have his hands full with the Lizard, but he's up for it.

 

I would not drop Bowey makes the right decisions and better user of the Ball also tackles stick the unlucky one would be Nibbler he needs to work on his decision making with Ball in hand also gets caught make him earn his spot Back Bowey can play on Talls and Smalls the Swans have a very good group of Both

Why do a very small number of posters say Nibbler should be dropped. 
it will never happen. Every Dees player has a specific role. I’ve no doubt the FD are happy that ANB is playing his role every week.


2 minutes ago, M_9 said:

Why do a very small number of posters say Nibbler should be dropped. 
it will never happen. Every Dees player has a specific role. I’ve no doubt the FD are happy that ANB is playing his role every week.

Are you saying the poor disposal and decision making is built into his role

On 8/21/2022 at 7:53 AM, Redleg said:

Do they cheer at Casey?

Good point, might have got ahead of myself there…

On 8/21/2022 at 7:53 AM, Redleg said:

Do they cheer at Casey?

I wonder if the gates will be opened to let us in??

 

Can we forgo the Spargo as the third/relief winger experiment? Brayshaw would be a better option.

Salem for Bowey will be the only change.

On 8/22/2022 at 8:22 AM, Jaded No More said:

Salem comes in. Someone goes out. 
JJ is sub. 
Close thread. 

The usual change thread for a "no change" week goes for an average of 12 pages.Given the 2 week hiatus we might get to 20 pages


If we play Geelong, I think Jake Melksham will be handy for Tom Stewart.

T Mac trained well today according to Kev Martin.

He'll be a lock to come in. question is who comes out?  and are we happy to go taller?  

5 hours ago, Fat Tony said:

Can we forgo the Spargo as the third/relief winger experiment? Brayshaw would be a better option.

Salem for Bowey will be the only change.

Salem is unavailable for two weeks Groin!!

1 minute ago, Kent said:

Salem is unavailable for two weeks Groin!!

?????????

source

His not playing last weekend was said to be a precautionary move only

1 minute ago, Diamond_Jim said:

?????????

source

His not playing last weekend was said to be a precautionary move only

My mail had a 3 week groin issue not major but needs rest. Has had 1 week off

See if he is training this week?

 


4 minutes ago, Kent said:

My mail had a 3 week groin issue not major but needs rest. Has had 1 week off

See if he is training this week?

It will be one day shy of three weeks when we play the QF so will he not be ok?

22 minutes ago, old55 said:

If we play Geelong, I think Jake Melksham will be handy for Tom Stewart.

Good point. He needs a smart player on him, who can also damage if not manned up. Melk is probably the ideal one for him.

16 minutes ago, Kent said:

My mail had a 3 week groin issue not major but needs rest. Has had 1 week off

See if he is training this week?

 

Trained in rehab with Moniz-wakefield, mainly kicking to each other, though they did several 150 meters, 1/2 to 3/4 pace runs along the boundary and behind the goals. Nothing with exertion. 

Edited by kev martin

Just now, kev martin said:

Trained in rehab with Moniz-wakefield, mainly kicking to each other, though they did several 150 meters 1/2 to 3/4 pace runs along the boundary and behind the goals. Nothing with exertion. 

Thanks Kev for the update! May be touch and Go

I'm happy for either Salem or Bowey but I don't think Salem has been 100% all year!

No change with Salem still on the sidelines. Nibbler would almost be first name on team sheet. Unless a better user comes along who can do the gut running of ANB, he will be a 200+ gamer for us. A true, underrated star.


If there is a hint of doubt you would rest Salem again.. we are playing minimum 2 finals, and in truth its a position we can cover, Bowey has more pace as well so against a quick side like Swans might be a good in.

Papley is the key - does Hibberd go to him - has to i assume.

 

Edited by Demon3

Salem in for Bowey if fit, otherwise no change.

I don’t expect TMac to get up. It would be a big risk to name him and change the structure of the team with another tall based off 3 quarters in the VFL this weekend. He’s missed a lot of footy and as an endurance athlete I struggle to see him coming in and having an impact. He usually takes time to find form when returning from injury too.

46 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

Salem in for Bowey if fit, otherwise no change.

I don’t expect TMac to get up. It would be a big risk to name him and change the structure of the team with another tall based off 3 quarters in the VFL this weekend. He’s missed a lot of footy and as an endurance athlete I struggle to see him coming in and having an impact. He usually takes time to find form when returning from injury too.

I don't know if I subscribe to this view. But if we accept the premise, we're running out of time and matches for him to play in. For that reason, should he play as soon as possible to "find form" ASAP? Against that view is (1) who would come out for him? and (2) is it too much of a risk to play him if we're not confident he will contribute sufficiently? 

They're not easy questions to answer.

 
On 8/20/2022 at 4:09 PM, layzie said:

Two weeks to think about it.

I'm sure I won't know after that so I'm out.

On 8/21/2022 at 12:00 PM, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Spargo has played the last 48 or 49 games in a row. That's win, lose or draw. What makes him the talisman? Are you saying that when he plays well we win? I'm struggling with that given his performance in the last two games. 

When Fritsch and Pickett kick four goals each, MFC wins due to an obvious causal link.  I have formed the opinion that when I see on the TV that Spargo is regularly on the defensive 50, MFC wins.  I use the word, Talisman, indicating magic or the lack of an obvious causal link.  And I like the word itself.  Largely, I just want to join in.  Also see my stinging retort to Mo64.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Shocked
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Sad
      • Clap
    • 47 replies