Jump to content


Recommended Posts



Posted
2 minutes ago, SFebes said:

AFL must be counting the Brownlow votes first 

Takes a while to steam open the envelopes

  • Haha 2


Posted

So I’m guessing knocking players into next week is back in fashion if he gets off.

Really hoping Cripps doesn’t replicate his  4 goal 30 possession game against us in the pre season, if he’s available.

  • Like 1

Posted
Just now, Bring-Back-Powell said:

So I’m guessing knocking players into next week is back in fashion if he gets off.

Really hoping Cripps doesn’t replicate his  4 goal 30 possession game against us in the pre season, if he’s available.

Well it would certainly be hilarious if Petracca ran through Cripps in a replica of the same incident in the opening minute of the game and got off next Thursday for the Brisbane match 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, John Demonic said:

Well it would certainly be hilarious if Petracca ran through Cripps in a replica of the same incident in the opening minute of the game and got off next Thursday for the Brisbane match 

Only problem is he most likely wouldn’t get off and would be given 3 weeks!

 

  • Like 1
  • Vomit 1

Posted

Only one winner in all this and its AFL.com.au racking up the hits and milking this for all its worth, they are probably drinking shots and letting it ride out @ HQ.

  • Angry 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

Only one winner in all this and its AFL.com.au racking up the hits and milking this for all its worth, they are probably drinking shots and letting it ride out @ HQ.

Absolutely shameless. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Appeals Board is ex an Supreme Court Judge and 2 former players who are lawyers.

It is now hard to read,  taking so long.

Is it to be we considered the submissions long and hard, but the appeal fails, or while we understand the reason for the AFL rule to protect heads, we have on a technicality, found this concussion was caused by a legal contest, not a bump?

Edited by Redleg


Posted

It could actually be that the “error in law” has been proven, but the AFL has a directive of definite weeks when concussion / subbed off involved 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...