Jump to content

Featured Replies

I'm just so pumped for September. How great is it being the team who is already a lock for top 4. 

Doggies would be sweating bullets all week, a loss next week and there is a high chance they drop out of the top 4. It's normally us who had the deal with that pressure. 

But I'm sure the dogs will be fine once Dunkley, Keith and trealor are back..... oh wait 😂

 
11 hours ago, Northern Summer said:

Unless we lose to Adelaide tomorrow, today's results have basically meant there won't be repeat games from Round 23 into the 1st week of the finals. Presuming we win against Adelaide tomorrow:

  • If we beat Geelong: (a) we finish 1st and play either the Bulldogs or Lions if Port beat the Bulldogs; or (b) we finish 1st and play Port if the Bulldogs beat Port.
  • If we lose to Geelong: (a) we finish 2nd if the Bulldogs beat Port, and we play the Bulldogs; or (b) we finish 3rd if Port beat the Bulldogs, and we play Port in Adelaide.

 

11 hours ago, Northern Summer said:

Impossible to play Geelong in the 1st week of the finals if we win tomorrow... see my post above.

This may not have taken Port's smashing of Carlton in to account. But if we beat Adelaide, lose to Geelong by not much and port beat dogs by enough, we can absolutely play Geelong first week. Port finish first, cats 2nd, us third and dogs or Lions 4th

21 minutes ago, GCDee said:

I'm just so pumped for September. How great is it being the team who is already a lock for top 4. 

Doggies would be sweating bullets all week, a loss next week and there is a high chance they drop out of the top 4. It's normally us who had the deal with that pressure. 

But I'm sure the dogs will be fine once Dunkley, Keith and trealor are back..... oh wait 😂

Permanent anxiety now that I have expectations of 'my' team. 🤣

 

If Geelong have the option of hosting GHMBA stadium finals because of no crowds at the MCG,  then surely we’re better off playing Port in Adelaide than Geelong in Geelong.

To my mind Geelong’s home ground advantage is more pronounced than Port’s regardless of crowds, and therefore more difficult to beat.

23 hours ago, Demonland said:

image.jpeg

All good possibles depending on %


Don't really mind who we play, think we can beat them all depending on where we play. Don't want to play at Adelaide or Geelong, would actually prefer to play the Dogs at Marvel , think we defend the ground better than at the G

By the way, how did Port Adelaide get the chance to be hosting a home final, must have had the easiest draw by far..

On 8/13/2021 at 12:03 PM, hardtack said:

I've just emailed the MFC with regards to the GF Guarantee.  They were nice enough to carry last year's GFG over to this year, but now I'm a bit concerned that they might no be so forthcoming this year, and with Sydney pretty much odds on to still be in lockdown and Sydney-siders rightly unwelcome anywhere outside of Sydney, and if Melbourne do make it to the big dance, there is zero chance we will be able to avail ourselves of the GFG again this year.

 

@hardtack we're in NSW as well so we're screwed.

I'd like the club to manage GFG re-allocation of tickets should we make it and it's in Perth or Adelaide.

I want as many true demons fans at the game as possible. It think it's really important. We can do it individually via demonland but it would be nice for the club to manage it and ensure as many supporters as possible show up for us.

Otherwise, the AFL will use the unused allocation to make money.

We could even do a donation system with Reach as well perhaps.

I'll write to the club as well.

What do others think?

P.s. I'm still considering stowing away on a Perth bound semi or hiring a demonland super Yacht and sneaking over.

What's the great Southern Ocean like this time of year?

 

Why is it called a double chance? As  i understand it if you win the QF and play the next game as the PF and lose you are out.

One chance.

Edited by Cyclops
Typo

8 minutes ago, Cyclops said:

Why is it called a double chance?

Because if you lose the QF you are not out.  You get another chance the following week in a Semi Final.

All other finals are sudden death.


1 hour ago, loges said:

By the way, how did Port Adelaide get the chance to be hosting a home final, must have had the easiest draw by far..

Bulldogs lost two winnable games:  Essendon and Hawks so it opened the door for Port to go top 2. 

But Port aren't there yet.  If we beat the Crows, their top 2 chance is all but gone.

1 hour ago, Brownie said:

@hardtack we're in NSW as well so we're screwed.

I'd like the club to manage GFG re-allocation of tickets should we make it and it's in Perth or Adelaide.

I want as many true demons fans at the game as possible. It think it's really important. We can do it individually via demonland but it would be nice for the club to manage it and ensure as many supporters as possible show up for us.

Otherwise, the AFL will use the unused allocation to make money.

We could even do a donation system with Reach as well perhaps.

I'll write to the club as well.

What do others think?

P.s. I'm still considering stowing away on a Perth bound semi or hiring a demonland super Yacht and sneaking over.

What's the great Southern Ocean like this time of year?

I'm a GFG holder here in Melbourne. If it's in SA I will definitely make the trip. 

It may all be moot though with the way the covid numbers are heading in ViC,  we simply won't be allowed in any other State. 

5 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Bulldogs lost two winnable games:  Essendon and Hawks so it opened the door for Port to go top 2. 

But Port aren't there yet.  If we beat the Crows, their top 2 chance is all but gone.

They'll finish top 2 regardless of any other result if they beat Dogs next week . 

  • Author
7 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Bulldogs lost two winnable games:  Essendon and Hawks so it opened the door for Port to go top 2. 

But Port aren't there yet.  If we beat the Crows, their top 2 chance is all but gone.

Not really. If we then lose to Geelong and they beat the Bulldogs. Then they finish 2nd and we finish 3rd. 

if they smash the Bulldogs and we just lose to Geelong they could even finish 1st. 


Bulldogs will beat Port. 

17 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Old Trafford yesterday. 

image.png

There were 32,000 cases in the UK yesterday. 

Our summer could be similar if our risk appetite changes but I believe the EPL has vaccination/negative test proof as means of entry.

The loud ‘freedom rider’ idiots will not like that…

18 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Not really. If we then lose to Geelong and they beat the Bulldogs. Then they finish 2nd and we finish 3rd. 

if they smash the Bulldogs and we just lose to Geelong they could even finish 1st. 

They've just got to best Port. Us winning or losing either of our matches becomes irrelevant if they beat Port, they'll be top 2 with home final 

13 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

Bulldogs will beat Port. 

Have rated dogs all year but I watched last qtr and a half against Hawks and they looked like miles off, no structure and a lot of 2nd guessing. 

Port are a chance. And I haven't rated them all year.

32 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Bulldogs lost two winnable games:  Essendon and Hawks so it opened the door for Port to go top 2. 

But Port aren't there yet.  If we beat the Crows, their top 2 chance is all but gone.

If dogs play like the last 2 weeks, next week, then Port will beat them easily. 

but surely dogs will wake up from their slump next week? 
 

 


My 40 plus year old son.... they couldn't engineer who they want us to play, could they?

It's all academic really as it doesn't matter which team are the runners up when Max and Goody hoist that cup.

4 minutes ago, willmoy said:

My 40 plus year old son.... they couldn't engineer who they want us to play, could they?

It is us who can engineer who we want to play, as we'll know the Friday night result ahead of us playing on Saturday night.  If it suits us to lose against Geelong in order to meet or not meet a team in a qualifying final, that option would be open to us.  I'm not suggesting it's something we should do.

 
22 minutes ago, Copuchas said:

It is us who can engineer who we want to play, as we'll know the Friday night result ahead of us playing on Saturday night.  If it suits us to lose against Geelong in order to meet or not meet a team in a qualifying final, that option would be open to us.  I'm not suggesting it's something we should do.

As I posted early play both games at same time, memories of 87 last round 


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 527 replies