Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

It dawned on me in another thread that even though I played and coached for over 30 years I actually really dont fully understand some of the fundamentals of today's game. Basically I have no idea what are the specifics and names of the current day roles / positions on the ground.

Obviously Ruck, def wingman etc makes sense but what are the actual names of other roles? I heard power forwards and speed forward used a few weeks back. 

 

I am sure down the ground vision would explain it. Does anyone know where we can get access to that?

If anyone can enlighten me on the roles and names please do.

 

Positional names have changed over the years.

Back when I first started playing and following footy in the 60s, these were the names used:

B:  Former rover who has lost a yard in pace     Loneliest man in the world   Rock of Gibraltar

H/B:  Enforcer   Key Defender   Jack of all trades

C:  Real goer   Pivot   Racehorse

H/F:  Avenue  to goal   The hardest position   Will o' the wisp

F:  Resting ruckman   Spearhead   Goalsneak

R:  One kick behind the play   Prime mover   Borer into the bottom of the pack

19th:  Utility   20th:  Big-hearted trier

In addition, you had those that didn't make the side but were knocking on the door of selection and were running around in the seconds.  Among these were exciting young prospects, natural left-footers, honest battlers, bean-poles, big occasion players, nippy small blokes and club stalwarts.

 

Then, by the 1980s, the game and the terminology had changed to read like this:

B:  Tagger   Stopper   Sweeper

H/B:  Rebounder   Negator   Springboard

C:  Breakaway   Instigator   Linkman

H/F:  Runner   Tall option   Receiver

F:  Crumber   Converter   Finisher

R:  Tall   On-baller   Small

I/C:  Overlapper   Tag breaker

The backs and half-backs were collectively called "the back half" while the six forwards made up "the forward half".  The centre line players were in "the middle" and its intersection with the "central corridor" (previously the goal-to-goal line) constituted "the workface".

 

These days, I have to admit to having no idea.  Nor,  I suspect, does anybody else.

 

(...and looking like you're itching to get another discombobulator out there, d? Got Neil Crompton's to untangle first though!)

 

Just replace HFF with Midfielder as nearly every club pushes the HFF into the mids.  Move FP to High forwards.

The back 6 and mids haven't changed that much, how they play is a bit different but the role is similar.

 

7 minutes ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

and looking like you're itching to get another discombobulator out there, d?

I've got ten more lined up ready to go Timothy, but have held off due to puzzle overload on the site.  At this stage, I may even wait until the off season when there's not much else happening.

Crompton's poser was never solved and I had to PM him to find the answers!


These days it’s all about how you ‘self identify’.

In a work setting I identify as a ‘mercurial forward’ (which is code for I don’t do the hard stuff, and just hope the ball bounces out the back for me to kick easy goals).

This would explain why I’m on Demonland at 1pm on a Thursday.

The old position names aren't as relevant today.  For example, there's no difference between a rover, ruck-rover and centreman

 
1 hour ago, Demonstone said:

Positional names have changed over the years.

Back when I first started playing and following footy in the 60s, these were the names used:

B:  Former rover who has lost a yard in pace     Loneliest man in the world   Rock of Gibraltar

H/B:  Enforcer   Key Defender   Jack of all trades

C:  Real goer   Pivot   Racehorse

H/F:  Avenue  to goal   The hardest position   Will o' the wisp

F:  Resting ruckman   Spearhead   Goalsneak

R:  One kick behind the play   Prime mover   Borer into the bottom of the pack

19th:  Utility   20th:  Big-hearted trier

In addition, you had those that didn't make the side but were knocking on the door of selection and were running around in the seconds.  Among these were exciting young prospects, natural left-footers, honest battlers, bean-poles, big occasion players, nippy small blokes and club stalwarts.

 

Then, by the 1980s, the game and the terminology had changed to read like this:

B:  Tagger   Stopper   Sweeper

H/B:  Rebounder   Negator   Springboard

C:  Breakaway   Instigator   Linkman

H/F:  Runner   Tall option   Receiver

F:  Crumber   Converter   Finisher

R:  Tall   On-baller   Small

I/C:  Overlapper   Tag breaker

The backs and half-backs were collectively called "the back half" while the six forwards made up "the forward half".  The centre line players were in "the middle" and its intersection with the "central corridor" (previously the goal-to-goal line) constituted "the workface".

 

These days, I have to admit to having no idea.  Nor,  I suspect, does anybody else.

 

Brilliant!

 

3 hours ago, Wizard of Koz said:

It dawned on me in another thread that even though I played and coached for over 30 years I actually really dont fully understand some of the fundamentals of today's game. Basically I have no idea what are the specifics and names of the current day roles / positions on the ground.

Obviously Ruck, def wingman etc makes sense but what are the actual names of other roles? I heard power forwards and speed forward used a few weeks back. 

 

I am sure down the ground vision would explain it. Does anyone know where we can get access to that?

If anyone can enlighten me on the roles and names please do.

The modern game is pretty simple

We have tall midfielders (Ruckmen) and midfielders (everyone else)


half back flank was where you hid your worst player except in schoolboy football it was the wing. (You could stand on a wing all day and never see the ball.)

The position that has clearly disappeared is that of the "follower" or ruck rover.

TBH I coudn't tell you who plays centre for MFC these days

The runner

Talls

Smalls

Sweeper

Quarterback role - yuk

Run with

Stopper

Wicketkeeper 

The Irishman

Impact player

28 minutes ago, radar said:

The runner

Talls

Smalls

Sweeper

Quarterback role - yuk

Run with

Stopper

Wicketkeeper 

The Irishman

Impact player

Thanks Radar....I was looking for Run With...as when your champ is out of sorts play him on the opposition s best and he will be where the ball is...unfortunately in front of the opposition goal


6 hours ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

(...and looking like you're itching to get another discombobulator out there, d? Got Neil Crompton's to untangle first though!)

The original #5 Neil Crompton was a small defender / match winning goal sneak who, it is rumoured, the great late Norm Smith would have dragged for playing too far out of position had he not actually kicked our last grand final winning goal. ?

  • Author
7 hours ago, Demonstone said:

Positional names have changed over the years.

Back when I first started playing and following footy in the 60s, these were the names used:

B:  Former rover who has lost a yard in pace     Loneliest man in the world   Rock of Gibraltar

H/B:  Enforcer   Key Defender   Jack of all trades

C:  Real goer   Pivot   Racehorse

H/F:  Avenue  to goal   The hardest position   Will o' the wisp

F:  Resting ruckman   Spearhead   Goalsneak

R:  One kick behind the play   Prime mover   Borer into the bottom of the pack

19th:  Utility   20th:  Big-hearted trier

In addition, you had those that didn't make the side but were knocking on the door of selection and were running around in the seconds.  Among these were exciting young prospects, natural left-footers, honest battlers, bean-poles, big occasion players, nippy small blokes and club stalwarts.

 

Then, by the 1980s, the game and the terminology had changed to read like this:

B:  Tagger   Stopper   Sweeper

H/B:  Rebounder   Negator   Springboard

C:  Breakaway   Instigator   Linkman

H/F:  Runner   Tall option   Receiver

F:  Crumber   Converter   Finisher

R:  Tall   On-baller   Small

I/C:  Overlapper   Tag breaker

The backs and half-backs were collectively called "the back half" while the six forwards made up "the forward half".  The centre line players were in "the middle" and its intersection with the "central corridor" (previously the goal-to-goal line) constituted "the workface".

 

These days, I have to admit to having no idea.  Nor,  I suspect, does anybody else.

 

Great response. I agree with that entirely.

  • Author

So it looks as though the actual roles and the names of those roles are a mystery to us who are probably the most analytical and researched fans of all.

Surely this is the only sport in the world like this. Dr. Drake helped a touch but no names and it was pretty generalised. 

It is odd.

14 hours ago, Wizard of Koz said:

So it looks as though the actual roles and the names of those roles are a mystery to us who are probably the most analytical and researched fans of all.

Surely this is the only sport in the world like this. Dr. Drake helped a touch but no names and it was pretty generalised. 

It is odd.

I think the NBA has moved in a similar way.
Used to have point guard, shooting guard, shooting forward, power forward and center where similar shaped and skilled players filled those roles. 2 tall's for in the paint, 1 medium shooter/defender, 2 smalls - 1 for ball handling and one for shooting.

Nowadays teams play tall and small. In the USA Vs Australia game Devin Booker a point guard was playing technically as a power forward. You cant call him a power forward.

The ball handler has changed too since Lebron/Kobe took over from point guards, so its more here is our 5 individually skilled players playing a role on the court versus your 5 players. They rotate highly through only 7-8 players. 
Like Ben Simmons at the 76ers, hes built like a power forward but plays point guard. 

So I see a similarity with AFL where its more heres our 18 players with jobs and roles against your team and game plan, therefore each teams positions and labels would have some crossover but be unique to the team. 
 

Why is there a high half forward but never a low half forward?

How is a lead up forward different to a leading forward?

Why is a ruck-rover neither a ruckman or a rover?

Intercept defender? Ground ball getter midfielder? Lock in forward? Clearance specialist? Could be anyone.

It seems to me that there is a competition between expert commentators (so-called) to come up with new names that reflect the roles that players fill as well as the positions and that, whereas in the past a position came with an image that tended to define the player who filled that position, today with interchange and zone defence and chaos attacks the old rules no longer apply.

For those who can remember, what would Alf Brown have done? He used to write a match analysis in Friday's Herald (afternoon paper) based on fixed position one-on-ones eg half forward on half back.

At least the footy can still be great to watch especially if the sound is on mute and teams play in the corridor and stay away from down the line.


18 hours ago, george_on_the_outer said:

What about the coaches?  Used to be just the the one in Norm's day.......

Those were the days that we really appreciated the one umpire - with fewer mistakes, less 'showmanship', comparatively less preference for a blessed few sides and more accountable post decision-making. Footy was IMO a better, more involving game to appreciate, as well. Plus, the Dees were a top side.

 

2 hours ago, tiers said:

 

At least the footy can still be great to watch especially if the sound is on mute

If you watch on Kayo, you can stream approx 20-30 seconds behind live and it will line up with your preferred radio commentary team (SEN MMM 3AW)

On 8/5/2021 at 12:28 PM, Demonstone said:

Positional names have changed over the years.

Back when I first started playing and following footy in the 60s, these were the names used:

B:  Former rover who has lost a yard in pace     Loneliest man in the world   Rock of Gibraltar

H/B:  Enforcer   Key Defender   Jack of all trades

C:  Real goer   Pivot   Racehorse

H/F:  Avenue  to goal   The hardest position   Will o' the wisp

F:  Resting ruckman   Spearhead   Goalsneak

R:  One kick behind the play   Prime mover   Borer into the bottom of the pack

19th:  Utility   20th:  Big-hearted trier

In addition, you had those that didn't make the side but were knocking on the door of selection and were running around in the seconds.  Among these were exciting young prospects, natural left-footers, honest battlers, bean-poles, big occasion players, nippy small blokes and club stalwarts.

 

Then, by the 1980s, the game and the terminology had changed to read like this:

B:  Tagger   Stopper   Sweeper

H/B:  Rebounder   Negator   Springboard

C:  Breakaway   Instigator   Linkman

H/F:  Runner   Tall option   Receiver

F:  Crumber   Converter   Finisher

R:  Tall   On-baller   Small

I/C:  Overlapper   Tag breaker

The backs and half-backs were collectively called "the back half" while the six forwards made up "the forward half".  The centre line players were in "the middle" and its intersection with the "central corridor" (previously the goal-to-goal line) constituted "the workface".

 

These days, I have to admit to having no idea.  Nor,  I suspect, does anybody else.

 

Explains why I spent 90% of my game time at ADFA as a “former rover who has lost a yard in pace” to a “big hearted tryer” either or, I still held up the bar quite well after the game 🤣🤣🤣

 
19 hours ago, Demonstone said:

Not sure that was ever a position, radar!

We had a guy called radar, but it was more to do with the size of his ears…

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 210 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Like
    • 32 replies