Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Demonland

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (โ‹ฎ) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

On 7/18/2021 at 7:40 PM, bing181 said:

One of Demonland's meaningless platitudes, trotted out every time we lose.

Thatโ€™s not entirely a knock on Goody, Clarko is a damn good coach and his players executed the game plan they came up with. Even with Clarko putting the game on his terms the cattle we had out there should have been able to get the job done.ย 

ย 

All teams are predictable and everyone knows how everyone plays.

These coaching groups are all fairly smart and will have an understanding of how to beat sides.

Sides back their structures to beat the opposition. This is a tough competition and if youโ€™re slightly off it impacts your structures. But kick straight in those performances against those lower sides and we win.
ย 

However wins sometimes paper over cracks, which (despite what posters think) footy departments will identify and work to evolve. ย When sides expose a weakness it allows you to make some tweaks.

The Dogs will have a plan to counter us sitting on Libba this week

ย 
9 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

ย 

ย 

Ranked 1st out of players classed as ruckmen for hitout win %.

Ranked 16th out of players classed as ruckmen for hitout to advantage %

ย 

2 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

ย 

Ranked 1st out of players classed as ruckmen for hitout win %.

Ranked 16th out of players classed as ruckmen for hitout to advantage %

ย 

Ugly stat unfortunately.ย 


18 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

ย 

Ranked 1st out of players classed as ruckmen for hitout win %.

Ranked 16th out of players classed as ruckmen for hitout to advantage %

ย 

Watch some here try to spin that.

All the stats on "On the couch" and First Crack are damning about our pressure dropping, off, our transitioning from defence, our poor clearance work, no advantage fromย our ruck dominance (in fact the opposite)ย etc But I love how some come here and say 'gee we're still on top'

Its blindingly obvious we haven't been playing well for 6 to 8ย weeks bar some good form against Port.

ย 

4 hours ago, Lord Nev said:

ย 

Ranked 1st out of players classed as ruckmen for hitout win %.

Ranked 16th out of players classed as ruckmen for hitout to advantage %

ย 

Unfortunately that's a really poor stat and big room for improvement. It's been that way for a long time with opposition sides winning clearances despite Max's dominance in the hit outs

5 hours ago, Lord Nev said:

ย 

Ranked 1st out of players classed as ruckmen for hitout win %.

Ranked 16th out of players classed as ruckmen for hitout to advantage %

ย 

But many say clearances arenโ€™t a problem.

Itโ€™s why we canโ€™t seem to get a run-on against teams, we always keep them in the game by allowing them first-use ofย the ball at ball-ups.

ย 
2 hours ago, Clint Bizkit said:

But many say clearances arenโ€™t a problem.

Itโ€™s why we canโ€™t seem to get a run-on against teams, we always keep them in the game by allowing them first-use ofย the ball at ball-ups.

It's a good point @Clint Bizkit

So if we're working off the hypothesis, that as a FD and team, we are prepared to risk losing first use, due to pressuring the opposition and getting a dump kick, and feeling that particular option works more consistently (when it occurs,ย getting ball in d50 and working backย for a cleanerย delivery into the F50 (rather than first use and pressured kick), then the inverse for our opponents is also true, hence our back 6 performing very well throughout the season (with added bonus pressure from the mids on the kicks entering the D50).

Whilst I'd rather us blow teams out of the water - and to be fair - I'm not sure what happened after 1/4 time in the game (but as noted Hawthorns pressure gauge was well up), I'm not worried about it.

So what does this mean for Gawn and the midfield brigade for being 16th to hitouts for advantage?

Well, I'd imagine it's a reaction to 2017-2020 opposition trying to shark (and consistentlyย doing well at it) all taps to advantage from Gawn - as the assumption was made - Gawn is ultimately going to win 80-90% of taps, so lets set up that way as the opposition.

That then nullified our midfielders propensity to win the ball...ย 

As a reaction to that (as well as other factors, being beaten on the outside) ย - Goodwin and co have set up the midfielders in a way whereby if they DO get the ball from a tap - great, but also if they don't win the clearance - damage isn't huge.

I'd argue the evidence is there, we're on top of the ladder, no team has blown US out of the water, up to the bye we were on 'record' to becoming a team that had the best (least) ever % of D50 entries to conversions.

We've lost (and drawn) 4 games by a total of 29 points - that'd be 7.25 points a game.

And whilst the evidence is teams are always kept in it, which always feels uncomfortable - I believe this style will hold us in good stead for the finals over the next 3-4 years (should we make it, injuries would be my only concern).

The game always tightens up in finals, it's more attritional, systems win, not individual players, but individual players can influence - and we've got (May and Lever, Petracca and Oliver, and probably Pickett, and perhaps Brown and Tmac, as those forwards who could light it up).ย 

As bizarre as it sounds, I'm not worried about the hit outs to advantage stat, because teams have been counteracting Max for years, and we've had to find a way to counteract their positioning, rather than trying to get first use at all costs, and been blown out of the water on the outside as we've been done for ย 4-5 years.

It's not sexy, but it's smart coaching.ย 

Edited by Engorged Onion


8 hours ago, jnrmac said:

Watch some here try to spin that.

All the stats on "On the couch" and First Crack are damning about our pressure dropping, off, our transitioning from defence, our poor clearance work, no advantage fromย our ruck dominance (in fact the opposite)ย etc But I love how some come here and say 'gee we're still on top'

Its blindingly obvious we haven't been playing well for 6 to 8ย weeks bar some good form against Port.

ย 

I watched on the Couch last night and I too thought those stats were damning.ย 

At a time where it's so crucial to get wins now and stay top 4, it's probably the worst time also in not being in good form.

Some of the good premiership teams are usually now on a good run or timing their winning streak, yet we are struggling to beat a severely undermanned 17th team in the comp.

I have some genuine concerns.

20 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

I watched on the Couch last night and I too thought those stats were damning.ย 

At a time where it's so crucial to get wins now and stay top 4, it's probably the worst time also in not being in good form.

Some of the good premiership teams are usually now on a good run or timing their winning streak, yet we are struggling to beat a severely undermanned 17th team in the comp.

I have some genuine concerns.

It's all going to depend how we perform this week. Roll the Dogs and we will be flying again. If they get their ball movement going and cruise to an easy win its panic stations. A close fought game that we lose? Frustrating but not the end of the world.

The King article gives the perfect example of what a few have been banging on about for weeks. We are playing a negative brand of footy, sitting back of centre and letting the opposition come at us. It's designed to allow Lever and May to control the ball and tempo of the game, however when we are a little off or teams really come at us, it falls apart. It's utilizing a strength but an incredibly risky strategy.

I'm very confident that our mids (Gawn, Trac and Oliver) pay absolutely no attention to what the opposition are doing or are instructed that way, because we were zigging when Max was zagging at an extremely high percentage of the centre bounces on the weekend.

Hawthorn gave it everything and exposed us, they just were not good enough across the board to actually win the game. Collingwood and Adelaide did the same, but got over the line.

I don't care if our record is good against the top teams and we 'get up' for those games, it's only a matter of time before we don't and it would be heartbreaking if that were week 1 or week 1 and 2 of finals.

ย 

ย 

9 hours ago, Lord Nev said:

Ranked 1st out of players classed as ruckmen for hitout win %.

Ranked 16th out of players classed as ruckmen for hitout to advantage %

It appears in a lot of matches, and not just our ones, that the ruckmen don't seem to hit the ball anywhere in particular, it just drops to their feet or within a metre of them, then a pile-on ensues. There appear to be very few "set plays" where a ruckman can put the ball down the throat of one of his mids, which is something I would have assumed would be gold standard for a midfield coach.

15 hours ago, bingers said:

The result was described as a massive upset.

Was anyone here really surprised? I wasn't.ย 

Yawnย  Me either! Hawks fan i know wouldnt believe me that it was a danger game

Dees supporters just know Right?


7 minutes ago, BW511 said:

The King article gives the perfect example of what a few have been banging on about for weeks. We are playing a negative brand of footy, sitting back of centre and letting the opposition come at us. It's designed to allow Lever and May to control the ball and tempo of the game, however when we are a little off or teams really come at us, it falls apart. It's utilizing a strength but an incredibly risky strategy.

I'm very confident that our mids (Gawn, Trac and Oliver) pay absolutely no attention to what the opposition are doing or are instructed that way, because we were zigging when Max was zagging at an extremely high percentage of the centre bounces on the weekend.

Hawthorn gave it everything and exposed us, they just were not good enough across the board to actually win the game. Collingwood and Adelaide did the same, but got over the line.

I don't care if our record is good against the top teams and we 'get up' for those games, it's only a matter of time before we don't and it would be heartbreaking if that were week 1 or week 1 and 2 of finals.

ย 

ย 

Yes the more defensive our setups the more we lose.

Goodwin must attack from the first bounce and trust the midfield

He is still a long way from a good coach in my opinion and this is a major weakness

1 minute ago, Kent said:

Yes the more defensive our setups the more we lose.

Goodwin must attack from the first bounce and trust the midfield

He is still a long way from a good coach in my opinion and this is a major weakness

There has been very little recent talk of our game being a 'front-half game' either.

We definitely have a soccer style game plan and a very physically taxing oneย to employ for a whole year, to the level required.

ย 

24 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

It's all going to depend how we perform this week. Roll the Dogs and we will be flying again. If they get their ball movement going and cruise to an easy win its panic stations. A close fought game that we lose? Frustrating but not the end of the world.

All good and well to say we're flying if we win. We beat Port Adelaide and yet we dished up an extremely poor performance the week after?

On recent formย we could easily roll the Dogs and lose to GC and the Crows the week after.

1 hour ago, BW511 said:

There has been very little recent talk of our game being a 'front-half game' either.

We definitely have a soccer style game plan and a very physically taxing oneย to employ for a whole year, to the level required.

ย 

You make a good point. Our game is soccer style but more like the defensive style Italians used to play. The Catenaccio style they played translates to chaining the opposition. It worked very well against top ranked teams but often struggled against lower ranked teams. It did have success though. Italy won the 1982 andย 2006 World Cups despite struggling against weaker sides in those tournaments as well as other deep finishes.ย It wasnโ€™t a perfect game as it let the opposition freedom to make the play and move forwardย more oftenย and left a lot to chance and luck that they didnโ€™t score if the system broke down. At this stage our game plan isย still working or else we wouldnโ€™t be on top but the true test is in its resilience as we get towards the finals. That will be the definitiveย ย test. As with us the style always kept the supporters in a state of perpetual anxiety.

Edited by John Crow Batty

16 hours ago, bingers said:

The result was described as a massive upset.

Was anyone here really surprised? I wasn't.ย 

No I wasn't surprised because we've been pathetic against bottom 4 sides this year. We even conceded a half time lead to a side that would not have been able to beat the Nar Nar Goon ressies at the time (although they have since improved dramatically)

Yes, I was surprised we couldn't even slump over the victory lineย when I looked at Hawthorn's injury list. If the players haven't already yet, they deserve an absolute roasting from the coaching staff and a few home truths need to be dished out. We are playing like a 9th-12 side since the Brisbane triumph, and we will be lucky to win a final at this rate.ย 

ย 


26 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

All good and well to say we're flying if we win. We beat Port Adelaide and yet we dished up an extremely poor performance the week after?

On recent formย we could easily roll the Dogs and lose to GC and the Crows the week after.

I'd prefer to be consistently applying ourselves rather than bipolar Dees.

13 minutes ago, Superunknown said:

I'd prefer to be consistently applying ourselves rather than bipolar Dees.

100%

3 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

100%

I'm ok with losing games so long as the umpiring is reasonable (mistakes happen, but...Adelaide) and we turn up. ie if we play honest footy and are beaten by a better team, that's ok. But the losses so far have been pretty bad.

ย 
9 hours ago, jnrmac said:

Watch some here try to spin that.

All the stats on "On the couch" and First Crack are damning about our pressure dropping, off, our transitioning from defence, our poor clearance work, no advantage fromย our ruck dominance (in fact the opposite)ย etc But I love how some come here and say 'gee we're still on top'

Its blindingly obvious we haven't been playing well for 6 to 8ย weeks bar some good form against Port.

ย 

But most of these stats were the same when we were 11-1.

We've been mid-table for hit outs to advantage and clearances all season, it's not like we were dominant and have fallen away.

So the two areas that are of real concern IMO are pressure and transition, and for mine pressure takes the cake - it's elite when we're the hunters, against a strong side, etc., but it's nowhere near as good when we're the hunted and our lesser opponent throws caution to the wind. I don't consider our ball movement to be a big concern - we're generating plenty of inside 50s, marks inside 50 and shots on goal, and if we were nailing our easier set shots we'd probably have beaten GWS and Hawthorn.

By leaving 10 out of 12 premiership points on the table vs Adelaide, Collingwood and Hawthorn, we're forcing ourselves to bring elite pressure every time we play a top 8 side, including again this week. I have faith we can do it, but one slip up vs the Dogs, West Coast or Geelong and we could well lose our top 4 spot.

2 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

By leaving 10 out of 12 premiership points on the table vs Adelaide, Collingwood and Hawthorn, we're forcing ourselves to bring elite pressure every time we play a top 8 side, including again this week. I have faith we can do it, but one slip up vs the Dogs, West Coast or Geelong and we could well lose our top 4 spot.

This x 1000.

We *should* have banked Adelaide, Pies and let's say Hawks. That's top 2 locked up. Complacency/hubris.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • AFLW REPORT: Richmond

    A glorious sunny afternoon with a typically strong Casey Fields breeze favouring the city end greeted this round four clash of the undefeated Narrm against the winless Tigers. Pre-match, the teams entered the ground through the Deearmyโ€™s inclusive bannerโ€”"Narrm Football Weaving Communities Together and then Warumungu/Yawuru woman and Fox Boundary Rider, Megan Waters, gave the official acknowledgement of country. Any concerns that Collingwoodโ€™s strategy of last week to discombobulate the Dees would be replicated by Ryan Ferguson and his Tigers evaporated in the second quarter when Richmond failed to use the wind advantage and Narrm scored three unanswered goals.ย 

    • 4 replies
  • CASEY: Frankston

    The late-season run of Casey wins was broken in their first semifinal against Frankston in a heartbreaking end at Kinetic Stadium on Saturday night that in many respects reflected their entire season. When they were bad, they committed all of the football transgressions, including poor disposal, indiscipline, an inability to exert pressure, and some terrible decision-making, as exemplified by the period in the game when they conceded nine unanswered goals from early in the second quarter until halfway through the third term. You rarely win when you do this.

    • 0 replies
  • AFLW PREVIEW: Richmond

    Round four kicks off early Saturday afternoon at Casey Fields, as the mighty Narrm host the winless Richmond Tigers in the second week of Indigenous Round celebrations. With ideal footy conditions forecastโ€”20 degrees, overcast skies, and a gentle breeze โ€” expect a fast-paced contest. Narrm enters with momentum and a dangerous forward line, while Richmond is still searching for its first win. With key injuries on both sides and pride on the line, this clash promises plenty.

    • 3 replies
  • AFLW REPORT: Collingwood

    Expectations of a comfortable win for Narrm at Victoria Park quickly evaporated as the match turned into a tense nail-biter. After a confident start by the Demons, the Pies piled on pressure and forced red and blue supporters to hold their collective breath until after the final siren. In a frenetic, physical contest, it was Captain Kateโ€™s clutch last quarter goal and a missed shot from Collingwoodโ€™s Grace Campbell after the siren which sealed a thrilling 4-point win. Finally, Narrm supporters could breathe easy.

    • 2 replies
  • CASEY: Williamstown

    The Casey Demons issued a strong statement to the remaining teams in the VFL race with a thumping 76-point victory in their Elimination Final against Williamstown. This was the sixth consecutive win for the Demons, who stormed into the finals from a long way back with scalps including two of the teams still in flag contention. Senior Coach Taylor Whitford would have been delighted with the manner in which his team opened its finals campaign with high impact after securing the lead early in the game when Jai Culley delivered a precise pass to a lead from Noah Yze, who scored his first of seven straight goals for the day. Yze kicked his second on the quarter time siren, by which time the Demons were already in control. The youngster repeated the dose in the second term as the Seagulls were reduced to mere

    • 0 replies
  • AFLW PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Narrm time isnโ€™t a standard conceptโ€”itโ€™s the time within the traditional lands of Narrm, the Woiwurrung name for Melbourne. Indigenous Round runs for rounds 3 and 4 and is a powerful platform to recognise the contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in sport, community, and Australian culture. This week, suburban footy returns to the infamous Victoria Park as the mighty Narrm take on the Collingwood Magpies at 1:05pm Narrm time, Sunday 31 August. Come along if you can.

    • 9 replies

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions โ†’ Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.