CHANGES: Rd 08 vs Sydney

[adonski 12,903]

Weid to play full back

[binman 44,513]

8 minutes ago, Purple77 said:

You'd suspect Sparrow would have come in for Viney if his injury was known Thursday. The most like for like IMO. 

So out Baker, in Sparrow. Toughness is a must given the swans mids. 

Out Tomlinson, in Petty. It's his time. 

TMac was only one wayward kick away out of defence today for the sentiment to be entirely different haha. 

Nailed it. 

Sparrow was a class above in the vfl.

I don't think baker will make it.

Petty is a lock for Tomlinson's role. And we won't lose anything either. Petty is a gun and will slot in beautifully.

Heartbreaking for thommo.

[dazzledavey36 55,853]

I'm torn on the Petty or McDonald down back.

I honestly thought the reason we got back into the game was Tom McDonald going back and strengthening our structures back to its norm. Not only that, he defended quiet well and it actually released Lever off Campbell to play his natural 3rd man role. 

The other aspect is Petty needs games as well because we need to see if he's got what it takes down back. He's inexperienced, so supporters will need to be patient because he'll make some mistakes that'll tear your hair out. But I rate him highly and think that after a good block of games he'll settle into the role perfectly. I'm also a big fan of his intercept marking. You can never have enough of them down back who read the play well.

I think they'll bring Petty in and potentially move McDonald to a wing to take Bakers spot. 

Baker goes out and Sparrow comes in.

I'm also really big in getting Sam Weideman in there somehow. How we structure that up I have no idea.

[Nasher 33,617]

Out: Tomlinson, Baker, (Jones)

In: Petty, Sparrow

If Viney is good then he plays instead of Sparrow.

No doubt for me we need another tall to cover Tommo, and Petty is obviously next in line. I’d be just as happy to move TMac back now and bring Weid in, I’m just nervous about moving too far away from what’s been working.

Oskar Baker a way off I think. His tackles don’t stick, his defensive efforts are lacking and his ball use doesn’t have the hurt factor to compensate. I’ve got much more trust in Sparrow to deliver in that regard.

[don cordner 204]

5 hours ago, Cheesy D. Pun said:

To be honest, I'm a little unsure of where to go with our lineup.

I sense that a Brown/Weed combo might make us too sluggish for our game style, but I'm going to run with it anyway on the back of the Tomlinson injury.

Out: Baker, Melksham, Tomlinson

In: Weideman, Sparrow, Bedford

TMac to stay back.

I wouldn't have a clue whether this works or not. Gee, it's a tough job picking the team at the moment.

Nibbler was very poor today but has some credits in the bank.

ANB is a spud, he played ok against Richmond, 2 weeks ago against the Hawks he did nothing, had about 10 clangers in a row, today he was usless, he’s horrible 

Edited May 2, 2021 by don cordner

[waynewussell 6,881]

24 minutes ago, don cordner said:

ANB is a spud, he played ok against Richmond, 2 weeks ago against the Hawks he did nothing, had about 10 clangers in a row, today he was usless, he’s horrible 

So, you take the name of one of our all-time greats then come on here and call a player a "spud"; classy act you've got going there in your marathon contribution of 143 posts!

[waynewussell 6,881]

The negativity around Melksham is bordering on War of The Worlds mass hysteria. If you took the time to watch the second half replay you might notice that Melksham played a key link-up role in our recovery... Nah! you wouldn't notice! 

[titan_uranus 25,174]

IMO the path we take will depend on whether Fritsch gets suspended.

If he does, I suspect TMac will stay forward. Too much change to the forward line. In that event, Petty comes in for Tomlinson.

If he doesn't get suspended, then the question is whether we feel comfortable with TMac in defence. I'm very, very unsure about it. But I can see why they'll want to do it, as it opens a spot for Weideman without having to drop someone.

Sparrow should replace Baker. Should never have played Baker today, he was terrible and just isn't improving. Go back to what has been working for us with Brayshaw on the non-Langdon wing predominantly, and get Sparrow into Viney's role whilst Viney's out.

Jones probably deserves to return to the 22 but that means someone else has to come out. Could be ANB, who was poor. Could be Melksham, but his 18 pressure acts are probably what the FD wants to see so I'd be surprised.

[waynewussell 6,881]

Weideman for Tomlinson (McDonald to continue down back)

Chandler if Fritsch gets weeks

Harmes if Baker is dropped

[Cheesy D. Pun 1,765]

41 minutes ago, don cordner said:

ANB is a spud, he played ok against Richmond, 2 weeks ago against the Hawks he did nothing, had about 10 clangers in a row, today he was usless, he’s horrible 

Suffice to say, I disagree. He is a big part of the reason we are having some early season success. Along with Spargo and Kozzy, he applies huge pressure on the opposition.

If you judge him against his job description, today was his first poor game of the season.

[TeamPlayedFine39 8,525]

I’m still not sold on Petty; his reputation over the last 12 months has grown and grown the longer he hasn’t played.  He’s the new Joel Smith.  He may be a gun, but he’s not the first in line imho.

I think a spot in the 22 is TMac's to lose, so I’d look to have him play CHB and bring in the Weideman to CHF.

Jones out, to be replaced by Harmes and Sparrow in for Viney.

I doubt Goodwin would want to see more changes than that, but if Melksham or Baker was in the gun, I’d be happy to see what a more mature Bedford has to offer.

 

HIBBERD.          MAY.                      LEVER. 
SALEM.             MCDONALD.        RIVERS. 
LANGDON.       OLIVER.         BRAYSHAW. 
HARMES.          WEIDEMAN.       SPARGO.  
PICKETT.           BROWN.             FRITSCH. 
GAWN.               PETRACCA.       JORDON. 

INTERCHANGE: 
HUNT.  JACKSON.  SPARROW.  ANB.
And one of the following as sub:
MELKSHAM.   BEDFORD.   BAKER. 

 

Edited May 2, 2021 by TeamPlayedFine39
Left out ANB.

[Ted Lasso 19,549]

I don't think this is what will happen but if it were up to me the changes would be 

OUT: Tommlinson, Baker 

iN:   Harmes, Weideman. 

McDonald goes back. we maintain 3 key talls up forward. Brayshaw stays in Vineys role on the inside, Harmes out on the wing. 

 

[Cheesy D. Pun 1,765]

3 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

I’m still not sold on Petty; his reputation over the last 12 months has grown and grown the longer he hasn’t played.  He’s the new Joel Smith.  He may be a gun, but he’s not the first in line imho.

I think a spot in the 22 is TMac's to lose, so I’d look to have him play CHB and bring in the Weideman to CHF.

Jones out, to be replaced by Harmes and Sparrow in for Viney.

I doubt Goodwin would want to see more changes than that, but if Melksham or Baker was in the gun, I’d be happy to see what a more mature Bedford has to offer.

 

HIBBERD.          MAY.                      LEVER. 
SALEM.             MCDONALD.        RIVERS. 
LANGDON.       OLIVER.         BRAYSHAW. 
HARMES.          WEIDEMAN.       SPARGO.  
PICKETT.           BROWN.             FRITSCH. 
GAWN.               PETRACCA.       JORDON. 

INTERCHANGE: 
HUNT.    JACKSON.    SPARROW.
And one of the following:
MELKSHAM.   BEDFORD.   BAKER. 

 

I'm thinking pretty similarly but I'd be giving ANB another crack.

I'm with you on Bedford but unfortunately, Melksham is somehow the golden child and can't be removed.

[TeamPlayedFine39 8,525]

3 minutes ago, Cheesy D. Pun said:

I'm thinking pretty similarly but I'd be giving ANB another crack.

I'm with you on Bedford but unfortunately, Melksham is somehow the golden child and can't be removed.

God!  How did I miss him!?

No, ANB is definitely in.

Even with some injuries, selection is very, very tough.

[CBDees 3,167]

13 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

I’m still not sold on Petty; his reputation over the last 12 months has grown and grown the longer he hasn’t played.  He’s the new Joel Smith.  He may be a gun, but he’s not the first in line imho.

I think a spot in the 22 is TMac's to lose, so I’d look to have him play CHB and bring in the Weideman to CHF.

Jones out, to be replaced by Harmes and Sparrow in for Viney.

I doubt Goodwin would want to see more changes than that, but if Melksham or Baker was in the gun, I’d be happy to see what a more mature Bedford has to offer.

 

HIBBERD.          MAY.                      LEVER. 
SALEM.             MCDONALD.        RIVERS. 
LANGDON.       OLIVER.         BRAYSHAW. 
HARMES.          WEIDEMAN.       SPARGO.  
PICKETT.           BROWN.             FRITSCH. 
GAWN.               PETRACCA.       JORDON. 

INTERCHANGE: 
HUNT.    JACKSON.    SPARROW.
And one of the following:
MELKSHAM.   BEDFORD.   BAKER. 

 

Nailed it IMHO. Nibbler on the interchange, Bedford to replace Fritsch (if suspended), Jones to be medical sub again (which adds to his tally). Baker, Petty & Melksham as emergencies.

Edited May 2, 2021 by CBDees

[WERRIDEE 5,572]

15 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

I’m still not sold on Petty; his reputation over the last 12 months has grown and grown the longer he hasn’t played.  He’s the new Joel Smith.  He may be a gun, but he’s not the first in line imho.

I think a spot in the 22 is TMac's to lose, so I’d look to have him play CHB and bring in the Weideman to CHF.

Jones out, to be replaced by Harmes and Sparrow in for Viney.

I doubt Goodwin would want to see more changes than that, but if Melksham or Baker was in the gun, I’d be happy to see what a more mature Bedford has to offer.

 

HIBBERD.          MAY.                      LEVER. 
SALEM.             MCDONALD.        RIVERS. 
LANGDON.       OLIVER.         BRAYSHAW. 
HARMES.          WEIDEMAN.       SPARGO.  
PICKETT.           BROWN.             FRITSCH. 
GAWN.               PETRACCA.       JORDON. 

INTERCHANGE: 
HUNT.    JACKSON.    SPARROW.
And one of the following:
MELKSHAM.   BEDFORD.   BAKER. 

 

Best 23 I love it.

B: HIBBERD, MAY, LEVER

HB: SALEM, MCDONALD, RIVERS

C: LANGDON, PETRACCA, BRAYSHAW

HF: NEAL-BULLEN, WEIDEMAN, PICKETT

F: SPARGO, B.BROWN, FRITSCH

FOLL: GAWN, OLIVER, JORDON

IC: JACKSON, HUNT, SPARROW, HARMES

SUB: JONES

EMERG: PETTY, MELKSHAM, BAKER

Edited May 2, 2021 by WERRIDEE

[Paulo 285]

Out

Fritz,  Baker, Tomlinson, ANB, B Brown

In

Weid, Sparrow, Petty, Bowey, M Brown

 

[Pates 9,667]

Something to consider with the replacement of Tommo is that this isn’t a temporary 1-2 week deal, this is very likely a season deal. So whoever we replace him with this week we should be considering to be the permanent replacement. 

So of the options available who do we think would be the best option not just for now but first week of finals? Much as I said Petty before, and I’ll clarify I still haven’t seen the match yet, it sounds like TMac slotted into the role quite well. He is more experienced and simply I would say a better footy player. Tom has earned a position in the team and this gives that to him with Weid being able to come in to play CHF. TMac also has flexibility about him and the tank to play multiple roles. 

I’m on board with the Weid for Tommo, TMac back to defence. 

Edited May 2, 2021 by Pates

[58er 6,809]

3 hours ago, bluey said:

Big stuff up get ridding of Hannan, about to pay the price.

Really ???,  loved hIm  in  2018 But too injured and never the same.

Frankly saved him from delisting by going to Dogs.

Maybe you also want Lent back!!!!'

Seriously Chandler should get call up for Baker.

[58er 6,809]

Just now, 58er said:

Really ???,  loved hIm  in  2018 But too injured and never the same.

Frankly saved him from delisting by going to Dogs.

Maybe you also want Lent back!!!!'

Seriously Chandler should get call up for Baker.

Kent not Lent !!! 

[olisik 4,060]

Out: Tomlinson, Baker

In: Weiderman, Chandler

[phuket demon 79]

10 hours ago, DeeZee said:

Weed for Thommo 

Harmes for Melksham 

Chandler for Jones

Bedford for Baker

Looks about right. Maybe Sparrow for Baker who was in for Viney

[Adam The God 30,602]

9 hours ago, Dr.D said:

he was bloody horrific!!! he was weak on the lead. he never got separation and he gave a costly free kick away in the last quarter which resulted in a north goal. He also dropped the easiest of marks that would've sealed the game. he is a must drop. 

Such incredible intellect. I really feel like I'm reading greatness.

[Garbo 1,559]

Ben Brown if he is to play fwd in place of Tmac (on the the assumption he is going back) needs to get up the ground more and be a link man, the real strength of tmac this year was his work round the ground not the goals he kicked. He gets a pass today being his first week in but going forward he needs to contribute more. The same for Weid when he gets his chance. Unless they can kick 3-4 a week the talls need to do more in other ways. 2 goals and 5 touches won’t cut it

Edited May 2, 2021 by Garbo

[John Demonic 5,900]

8 hours ago, adonski said:

Weid to play full back

Sam Weidering?