Jump to content

Featured Replies

everyone knew gawn was crocked; it's why he missed a succession of games towards the end of the year, and he clearly couldn't jump properly

gawn on one knee >>>>>> any other ruckman in the competition

 
2 hours ago, old dee said:

Story in today's hun saying Gawn played last 6 games with knee problems and may need surgery. If we let Preuss go for anything less than a great deal we are nuts. Gawns knees are always a risk we should have good cover for him.

https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/max-gawn-melbourne-captain-inner-sanctum-29th-september/id1240150172?i=1000492872386

2 hours ago, old dee said:

Story in today's hun saying Gawn played last 6 games with knee problems and may need surgery. If we let Preuss go for anything less than a great deal we are nuts. Gawns knees are always a risk we should have good cover for him.

I'm getting a little nervous about the 'talls' being touted as on the table:  Oscar, Preuss and TMac.

That is nearly all our tall depth!! 

We need a genuine back up for Max.  Kids or make shift stand ins are fine for a game or two but not if Max has a lengthy injury. 

We also need an experienced tall fwd to help Sam during games and to learn from.

A solid case can be made for any of Oscar, Preuss or TMac being traded but we still need depth and experience.  The talls we have waiting in the wings:  Bradtke (Rookie 0 games), Jackson (6 games), Petty (6 games), Brown (Rookie 75 games).   Hardly sufficient or appropriate depth.

I haven't heard us being linked to any 'talls' but will wait for the trade period to see which talls we have on the list.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

 
23 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

A solid case can be made for any of Oscar, Preuss or TMac being traded but we still need depth and experience.  The talls we have waiting in the wings:  Bradtke (Rookie 0 games), Jackson (6 games), Petty (6 games), Brown (Rookie 75 games).   Hardly sufficient or appropriate depth.

 

We've only had 1 round of delistings from a bunch of clubs that missed finals and I'd have no issues if we replaced the 3 you mentioned with Shaun McKernan, Wylie Buzza and Majak Daw.

The rucks and key defenders in particular should bring better names than that as well. 

26 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

We've only had 1 round of delistings from a bunch of clubs that missed finals and I'd have no issues if we replaced the 3 you mentioned with Shaun McKernan, Wylie Buzza and Majak Daw.

The rucks and key defenders in particular should bring better names than that as well. 

Majak Daw is worse than any of that trio. He has been at North for years and could not get a Regular game in this A terrible year for North. His game stats are terrible.

Edited by old dee


3 minutes ago, old dee said:

Majak Daw is worse than any of that trio. He has been at North for years and could not get a Regular game in this A terrible year for North. 

I'd be in no hurry to sign him but he did become a half decent key defender prior to his you know what, which is the reason he barely played this year. If he passed a medical and could train with the club to prove his health I'd have him as key defensive depth ahead of Oscar on the basis that he's not Oscar. There will be other key defenders available in the state leagues or once good sides start cutting their lists.

1 hour ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

I'm getting a little nervous about the 'talls' being touted as on the table:  Oscar, Preuss and TMac.

That is nearly all our tall depth!! 

We need a genuine back up for Max.  Kids or make shift stand ins are fine for a game or two but not if Max has a lengthy injury. 

We also need an experienced tall fwd to help Sam during games and to learn from.

A solid case can be made for any of Oscar, Preuss or TMac being traded but we still need depth and experience.  The talls we have waiting in the wings:  Bradtke (Rookie 0 games), Jackson (6 games), Petty (6 games), Brown (Rookie 75 games).   Hardly sufficient or appropriate depth.

I haven't heard us being linked to any 'talls' but will wait for the trade period to see which talls we have on the list.

That's not depth that's [censored]. Trade them all. We need talent not hacks. Regarding Preuss we have Weideman, Brown and Tomlinson as capable depth ruckman along with Bradtke. The chances of both Gawn and Jackson going down are remote.

10 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

That's not depth that's [censored]. Trade them all. We need talent not hacks. Regarding Preuss we have Weideman, Brown and Tomlinson as capable depth ruckman along with Bradtke. The chances of both Gawn and Jackson going down are remote.

You've named 3 guys who aren't ruckmen as capable depth ruckmen - 2 of which don't even like contact or contested aerial situations, the other is our full forward - and a 20 year old basketballer. Unless we think Bradtke has come a fair way we'll need to replace Preuss. Rucks get injured, especially older and younger ones. A 3rd proper ruckman being required to play is not remote.

 
4 hours ago, deebug said:

What?:o

Why the hell did we play him this year, of all years?

I can just imagine Demonland if we didn't play him and announced finals were not our goal in 2020.

4 hours ago, old dee said:

Story in today's hun saying Gawn played last 6 games with knee problems and may need surgery. If we let Preuss go for anything less than a great deal we are nuts. Gawns knees are always a risk we should have good cover for him.

If this is the case he should have NOT played.

Presuss should have been in and played his role. This is why we got him to the club in the first plance FFS.

Goodwin was desparate during the season with multiple player selection changes and now  seems he is still desparate with players leaving.

Goodwin prob knows his job is on the line big time and is acting like it.

This could be a massive fail for the club and yet again we the supporters suffer as other clubs go past us.


35 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

 The chances of both Gawn and Jackson going down are remote.

You had to say it Werridee.

So first off let’s not panic about Max saying that he’s seeing the surgeon, there are many levels of severity when it comes to knee issues and surgery taking place. It could be a clean up or something equivalent to him not training for a week. 

Having said that it does show the precarious nature of trading out ruck depth that can perform well enough to compete (even beat) opposing number 1’s. 

I still say we play a little hardball, if other clubs want him then they should offer us a good trade deal. 

This was in the article regarding OMac today: “Preuss has two years to run on a contract at Melbourne” so that means we have him signed for 21/22? If so definitely play hardball, it’s maybe a little unfair to Preuss who would want regular senior footy but if GWS want him they will have to come up with a decent trade. 

Interesting tweet by Fantasy Freako:

Hitout-to-advantage rates in the past two seasons:

Gawn 34.0%
Preuss 34.0%

Ranks =2nd in the AFL behind Andrew Phillips (34.6%).

2 minutes ago, xman97 said:

Interesting tweet by Fantasy Freako:

Hitout-to-advantage rates in the past two seasons:

Gawn 34.0%
Preuss 34.0%

Ranks =2nd in the AFL behind Andrew Phillips (34.6%).

Average hitouts over the last 2 years:

Gawn 36.1 (12.3 to advantage)

Preuss 20.2 (6.9 to advantage)


Pruess will go, no doubt about it, be interesting to see how tough we are in negotiations. He is a wanted commodity, i genuinely hope we dont give him away. 

Then go and get the best ruckman in a state league or country league as back up, get them with a late pick or PSD pick. Its not rocket science, there are some great prospects out there.

Edited by Demon3

11 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Average hitouts over the last 2 years:

Gawn 36.1 (12.3 to advantage)

Preuss 20.2 (6.9 to advantage)

Yeh, interesting. So hit out rate to advantage is the same. Preuss spends more time forward than Gawn it seems. I have a feeling Preussy boy might have a few suitors.

Ruck Contests:

Gawn 2020: 57.9

Gawn 2019: 68.2

Preuss 2020: 33.7

Preuss 2019: 31.9

19 minutes ago, xman97 said:

Yeh, interesting. So hit out rate to advantage is the same. Preuss spends more time forward than Gawn it seems. I have a feeling Preussy boy might have a few suitors.

Ruck Contests:

Gawn 2020: 57.9

Gawn 2019: 68.2

Preuss 2020: 33.7

Preuss 2019: 31.9

Yeah for sure, there will definitely be no shortage of options for him and his ruckwork has been quite good. He's now done an apprenticeship under two of the best rucks around so could be a real asset. I don't blame him at all if he moves on now to get more of a shot. Doesn't seem to have the agility or tank to be that 2nd ruck or ruck/forward so can really carve out a good career as primary ruckman.

Good call on the ruck contest numbers too.

Edited by Lord Nev

Can't remember which article but they mentioned GWS have doubts about his endurance and ability to cover the ground. Reads to me that they're trying to downplay his trade value. With Hately requesting a trade to the Crows today, I can't see them willingly including Caldwell or O'Halloran in any form of trade.  We should be pushing for a second round pick in my opinion.


What does Preuss have to do with smith, who is an unrestricted free agent. Not like we'd have to trade for him. Hope we don't go for a 32yo anyway.

Edited by TheoX
Sp

16 minutes ago, TheoX said:

What does Preuss have to do with smith, who is an unrestricted free agent. Not like we'd have to trade for him. Hope we don't go for a 32yo anyway.

Just quoting the article mate:

"Making Hawthorn's interest in Preuss more intriguing is that Melbourne is courting triple premiership Hawk Isaac Smith, an unrestricted free agent, to fill the wing role opposite Ed Langdon."

 

Hawks trade Sam Frost for Preuss. ?????. Sorry !! 
 

What can they offer?? 
 

Isaac Smith might get a 2 year deal with MFC and walks as an unrestricted free agent.  Screw the dorks !

 
4 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

What can they offer?? 

Pick 4?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies