Jump to content

Featured Replies

https://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/1477323/melbourne-commences-caulfield-feasibility-study

Hooray!!! Good to see something happening.....finally!

Didn't former Melbourne President and legendary player Stuart Spencer talk about the possibility of Caulfield Racecourse in 1990?! It's only taken 33 years!

Anyway, looking forward to seeing what this feasibility study entails and how much a Demons Home Base will actually cost?

 
7 minutes ago, Wells 11 said:

I’m a total nuff on this kind of thing. But what exactly does an announcement about the go ahead for a feasibility study mean in real terms? explain it like i’m 5.

Or, explain it in relational terms.  i’m dating someone new. …. where am I at in this relationship? 

 

It means the current board is trying to sway a few swing voters in the current board election. Probably garbage

11 minutes ago, old dee said:

Thank you guys for the info on Caulfield. I don't see us holding our first training session there anytime this decade. It's a long way off ladies and gentlemen. 

Which part of by 2028 in the news report did you ignore?

Such a Hanrahan

 
5 minutes ago, Wells 11 said:

I’m a total nuff on this kind of thing. But what exactly does an announcement about the go ahead for a feasibility study mean in real terms? explain it like i’m 5.

Or, explain it in relational terms.  i’m dating someone new. …. where am I at in this relationship? 

 

You're in your 50's and have never been in a committed relationship but are desperate to meet someone and and build a life together. Every prospective partner in the past 20 years has turned you down after your high school sweetheart Amy Parks wanted a relationship but you were afraid to commit and she moved on with your nemesis. Your mum has now arranged for you to meet a girl through a family connection through lack of any other options but you have very little in common and have started to work out what you have to offer her and her family before you actually meet each other.


Thank Christ the MCG pipedream has been put to bed.

Sounds like as long as we keep the Melbourne Racing Club sweet this should get done. 

From a selfish point of view Caulfield is a great option. I'm just 3 stops away on the train or 10 mins drive away.

Get it done Kate.

 

36 minutes ago, chookrat said:

You're in your 50's and have never been in a committed relationship but are desperate to meet someone and and build a life together. Every prospective partner in the past 20 years has turned you down after your high school sweetheart Amy Parks wanted a relationship but you were afraid to commit and she moved on with your nemesis. Your mum has now arranged for you to meet a girl through a family connection through lack of any other options but you have very little in common and have started to work out what you have to offer her and her family before you actually meet each other.

that dismal huh… 😞

This press release is the equivalent of asking for an extension for your homework. Disappointing that we wasted 5 years on the MCG precinct. 

 
1 hour ago, Dannyz said:

Exclusive from Mr Pert tonight that I told you all on on November 25. 

😂

Not to blow my own trumpet, but a few months before that, I said that Caulfield would happen, after a number of issues like length of lease/licence, community involvement and finance etc, were worked out.

But more importantly than who is breaking the news is of course the news itself.

Go Dees.


1 hour ago, Wells 11 said:

I’m a total nuff on this kind of thing. But what exactly does an announcement about the go ahead for a feasibility study mean in real terms? explain it like i’m 5.

Or, explain it in relational terms.  i’m dating someone new. …. where am I at in this relationship? 

 

Both sides have seen a mutually beneficial opportunity, so now they study just what it entails.

Dees will say we need an oval, an office building, change rooms, a pool, a gym etc.

Caulfield say we’d love to have an oval in the infield if it doesn’t disrupt racing, we can sell or rent you land for your building for x amount of cost.

Both sides then present a case to the local council (and any government that will have them) on funding for the oval in exchange for allowing public access and community sport. Perhaps the same for the gym and pool. If the numbers line up for everyone involved we’ve got a deal.

The best case for Caulfield is they’ve already got or need a lot of things:

- hospitality and catering, we don’t need to spend on a cafe or members function space, we can use theirs.

- the oval - every local council needs more and they have a heap of space at Caulfield

- pool and gym - if we are willing to share they’re about to have 5,000 new residents who’ll need somewhere to swim and work out 

- medical facilities can be shared with the community similar to the Saints at Moorabbin 

There’s a lot of potential for something to work here.

 

Edited by DeeSpencer

27 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Both sides have seen a mutually beneficial opportunity, so now they study just what it entails.

Dees will say we need an oval, an office building, change rooms, a pool, a gym etc.

Caulfield say we’d love to have an oval in the infield if it doesn’t disrupt racing, we can sell or rent you land for your building for x amount of cost.

Both sides then present a case to the local council (and any government that will have them) on funding for the oval in exchange for allowing public access and community sport. Perhaps the same for the gym and pool. If the numbers line up for everyone involved we’ve got a deal.

The best case for Caulfield is they’ve already got or need a lot of things:

- hospitality and catering, we don’t need to spend on a cafe or members function space, we can use theirs.

- the oval - every local council needs more and they have a heap of space at Caulfield

- pool and gym - if we are willing to share they’re about to have 5,000 new residents who’ll need somewhere to swim and work out 

- medical facilities can be shared with the community similar to the Saints at Moorabbin 

There’s a lot of potential for something to work here.

 

Good run down thanks. As another bonus perhaps everyone who joins the gym has a Melbourne membership built in. 

34 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Both sides have seen a mutually beneficial opportunity, so now they study just what it entails.

Dees will say we need an oval, an office building, change rooms, a pool, a gym etc.

Caulfield say we’d love to have an oval in the infield if it doesn’t disrupt racing, we can sell or rent you land for your building for x amount of cost.

Both sides then present a case to the local council (and any government that will have them) on funding for the oval in exchange for allowing public access and community sport. Perhaps the same for the gym and pool. If the numbers line up for everyone involved we’ve got a deal.

The best case for Caulfield is they’ve already got or need a lot of things:

- hospitality and catering, we don’t need to spend on a cafe or members function space, we can use theirs.

- the oval - every local council needs more and they have a heap of space at Caulfield

- pool and gym - if we are willing to share they’re about to have 5,000 new residents who’ll need somewhere to swim and work out 

- medical facilities can be shared with the community similar to the Saints at Moorabbin 

There’s a lot of potential for something to work here.

 

Yep this is about right but I’d say the feasibility study is more about creating an independent business case for government funding.  Caulfield want $$ (lots, apparently) so they’ve both agreed that a feasibility study to ‘determine the benefits to the community’ is a great way to lobby the government for said $$. Smart.

17 minutes ago, The Jackson FIX said:

Yep this is about right but I’d say the feasibility study is more about creating an independent business case for government funding.  Caulfield want $$ (lots, apparently) so they’ve both agreed that a feasibility study to ‘determine the benefits to the community’ is a great way to lobby the government for said $$. Smart.

Yeah the one thing I had really wrong was that we’re actually dealing with the Caulfield Rec Reserve Trust who oversee the site and the MRC are tenants. We’d obviously need a symbiotic relationship with the MRC too but really it’s dealing with a Trust who from what I can tell are short of cash and very keen to get development going.

And a local council that’s serious short on sporting facilities. 

Here’s their Dec 2023 strategic management plan.

https://www.crrt.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/CRRT-Strategic-Management-Plan-December-2023.pdf
 

Go to page 14/15 to see the ‘recreation administration precinct’ that looks a lot like a code for Dees base!

57 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Not to blow my own trumpet, but a few months before that, I said that Caulfield would happen, after a number of issues like length of lease/licence, community involvement and finance etc, were worked out.

But more importantly than who is breaking the news is of course the news itself.

Go Dees.

Congrats…yes, you told us so. Do you believe it is the best move possible for us?

it is reasonably close to CBD, we will still call MCG home .And most probably keep relationship with Casey.


2 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Yeah the one thing I had really wrong was that we’re actually dealing with the Caulfield Rec Reserve Trust who oversee the site and the MRC are tenants. We’d obviously need a symbiotic relationship with the MRC too but really it’s dealing with a Trust who from what I can tell are short of cash and very keen to get development going.

And a local council that’s serious short on sporting facilities. 

Here’s their Dec 2023 strategic management plan.

https://www.crrt.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/CRRT-Strategic-Management-Plan-December-2023.pdf
 

Go to page 14/15 to see the ‘recreation administration precinct’ that looks a lot like a code for Dees base!

 

3 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Yeah the one thing I had really wrong was that we’re actually dealing with the Caulfield Rec Reserve Trust who oversee the site and the MRC are tenants. We’d obviously need a symbiotic relationship with the MRC too but really it’s dealing with a Trust who from what I can tell are short of cash and very keen to get development going.

And a local council that’s serious short on sporting facilities. 

Here’s their Dec 2023 strategic management plan.

https://www.crrt.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/CRRT-Strategic-Management-Plan-December-2023.pdf
 

Go to page 14/15 to see the ‘recreation administration precinct’ that looks a lot like a code for Dees base!

Thanks for insight.Very interesting indeed….seems like they may have been speaking for a period of time.

Love this opportunity and the fact the Dees board feel comfortable advertising the possibility would suggest they’ve already jumped quite a few hurdles to get to this point and are happy with the direction it’s heading. We’re not homeless so let’s get it right and we’ll be happy for 50+ years while other inner city clubs are now running out of space.

4 minutes ago, jayceebee31 said:

 

Thanks for insight.Very interesting indeed….seems like they may have been speaking for a period of time.

This was from April.

https://amp.theage.com.au/national/victoria/battle-over-caulfield-racecourse-access-as-trust-runs-out-of-money-20230413-p5d03m.html
 

Short version is: trust is broke, race course hasn’t cleaned up some of their junk, environmentalists sniffing around trying to save a dam that isn’t worth pissing in.

The new plan seems to cater for everyone without being as ambitious as what they first planned when the racecourse redevelopment was announced.

Trust wants some cash invested. Council wants ovals. We want facilities room. MRC probably want some goodwill and someone to order some coffees and sandwiches.

25 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

This was from April.

https://amp.theage.com.au/national/victoria/battle-over-caulfield-racecourse-access-as-trust-runs-out-of-money-20230413-p5d03m.html
 

Short version is: trust is broke, race course hasn’t cleaned up some of their junk, environmentalists sniffing around trying to save a dam that isn’t worth pissing in.

The new plan seems to cater for everyone without being as ambitious as what they first planned when the racecourse redevelopment was announced.

Trust wants some cash invested. Council wants ovals. We want facilities room. MRC probably want some goodwill and someone to order some coffees and sandwiches.

Cheers…


2 hours ago, chookrat said:

You're in your 50's and have never been in a committed relationship but are desperate to meet someone and and build a life together. Every prospective partner in the past 20 years has turned you down after your high school sweetheart Amy Parks wanted a relationship but you were afraid to commit and she moved on with your nemesis. Your mum has now arranged for you to meet a girl through a family connection through lack of any other options but you have very little in common and have started to work out what you have to offer her and her family before you actually meet each other.

Are you telling me it's an arranged wedding

Bollywood.... here we come

3 hours ago, chookrat said:

You're in your 50's and have never been in a committed relationship but are desperate to meet someone and and build a life together. Every prospective partner in the past 20 years has turned you down after your high school sweetheart Amy Parks wanted a relationship but you were afraid to commit and she moved on with your nemesis. Your mum has now arranged for you to meet a girl through a family connection through lack of any other options but you have very little in common and have started to work out what you have to offer her and her family before you actually meet each other.

This is one of the wittiest and best written posts I've read on Demonland.  Thanks for making me laugh out loud!  

3 hours ago, BDA said:

Thank Christ the MCG pipedream has been put to bed.

Sounds like as long as we keep the Melbourne Racing Club sweet this should get done. 

From a selfish point of view Caulfield is a great option. I'm just 3 stops away on the train or 10 mins drive away.

Get it done Kate.

 

I'm only one station away and could walk there.

 
1 hour ago, jayceebee31 said:

Congrats…yes, you told us so. Do you believe it is the best move possible for us?

it is reasonably close to CBD, we will still call MCG home .And most probably keep relationship with Casey.

Personally I can’t see any better alternative and the possibilities there are enormous.

Exciting times ahead.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

    • 0 replies
  • REPORT: North Melbourne

    I suppose that I should apologise for the title of this piece, but the temptation to go with it was far too great. The memory of how North Melbourne tore Melbourne apart at the seams earlier in the season and the way in which it set the scene for the club’s demise so early in the piece has been weighing heavily upon all of us. This game was a must-win from the club’s perspective, and the team’s response was overwhelming. The 36 point win over Alastair Clarkson’s Kangaroos at the MCG on Sunday was indeed — roovenge of the highest order!

    • 4 replies
  • CASEY: Werribee

    The Casey Demons remain in contention for a VFL finals berth following a comprehensive 76-point victory over the Werribee Tigers at Whitten Oval last night. The caveat to the performance is that the once mighty Tigers have been raided of many key players and are now a shadow of the premiership-winning team from last season. The team suffered a blow before the game when veteran Tom McDonald was withdrawn for senior duty to cover for Steven May who is ill.  However, after conceding the first goal of the game, Casey was dominant from ten minutes in until the very end and despite some early errors and inaccuracy, they managed to warm to the task of dismantling the Tigers with precision, particularly after half time when the nominally home side provided them with minimal resistance.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Carlton

    The Demons return to the MCG as the the visiting team on Saturday night to take on the Blues who are under siege after 4 straight losses. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 222 replies
  • PODCAST: North Melbourne

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees glorious win over the Kangaroos at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 29 replies
  • POSTGAME: North Melbourne

    The Demons are finally back at the MCG and finally back on the winners list as they continually chipped away at a spirited Kangaroos side eventually breaking their backs and opening the floodgates to run out winners by 6 goals.

    • 253 replies