Jump to content

Featured Replies

5 hours ago, Mach5 said:

 

Mate, you'd be surprised what I'm privy to. The sad fact is that we're severely underperforming off-field, culture has taken a downward turn under Pert, and the excuses of under-resourcing due to budget-cutting won't wash as the same issues were present last year.

The place needs more good people and operators, and to stop making amateurish decisions.

 

2 hours ago, Mach5 said:

Not willing to, no need to. You can try to bait me into it but won’t work.

It’s all opinion anyway regardless of the basis.

Nice contradiction there. If you say something is fact and then say it is an opinion and refuse to elaborate further then what's the point in bringing it up?

1 hour ago, I'va Worn Smith said:

I have heard very similar things, from very reliable sources, which express concerns about the off field culture of the club

Either provide info about this or why say anything?

 
6 minutes ago, nacnud said:

 

Nice contradiction there. If you say something is fact and then say it is an opinion and refuse to elaborate further then what's the point in bringing it up?

Either provide info about this or why say anything?

Because it is worrying.

My opinion of the above has more to do with the President than Pert. I have always been concerned that a Western Australian who played for Meth Coke is the President of the MFC

I am sure Glenn is a fine businessman, who networks with the “Right” people, but i wonder whether he is the President we need

it wasn’t just injuries that crashed us out last year, how deep did it go?

If Mach 5 is close enough to know that all is not well off field, then it better be sorted out quickly

Just my thoughts...

 
  • Author
43 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

My opinion of the above has more to do with the President than Pert. I have always been concerned that a Western Australian who played for Meth Coke is the President of the MFC

I am sure Glenn is a fine businessman, who networks with the “Right” people, but i wonder whether he is the President we need

it wasn’t just injuries that crashed us out last year, how deep did it go?

If Mach 5 is close enough to know that all is not well off field, then it better be sorted out quickly

Just my thoughts...

You may hear just as much along these lines as you do about the coach if the year doesn't go well.

Grenade throwers feeding the sky is falling brigade, just like the Ricky Nixon/Tony Sheehan tweet thread

What a surprise 


Frankly you would expect a few rumblings in the off field area after 2019. Their budgeted figures were massacred and it is not too much to think that their sponsor KPI's were far from maximised (ratings and finals just to mention two).

The blame quite rightly fell on the coaching staff and in the main they are now gone save for number 1.

Running a club with the downs and relatively occasional ups of the MFC must be hell.... (but of course the puff piece said we are now back from hell.)

No one saw the possibility of 17th in 2019 nor did they see that the season would be effectively finished after so few rounds.

Next time you are at a medium level MFC match count the number of super boxes that are open. We've a long way to go.

Edited by Diamond_Jim

5 minutes ago, Pennant St Dee said:

Grenade throwers feeding the sky is falling brigade, just like the Ricky Nixon/Tony Sheehan tweet thread

What a surprise 

Some people just can't help themselves Pennant. Full of it

1 hour ago, Lord Nev said:

You may hear just as much along these lines as you do about the coach if the year doesn't go well.

I would expect it. We cannot allow 2019 to happen again

 

Whether his is true or not I tell ya if we go through major off and or on field dramas again like pre Roos days I reckon that would just about do my head in with this club. 
 

FFS they just need to get there [censored] together and KEEP it together for longer than 5 mins. 
 

Is that so hard to ask for. 

Edited by DemonOX

8 hours ago, Mach5 said:

 

Mate, you'd be surprised what I'm privy to. The sad fact is that we're severely underperforming off-field, culture has taken a downward turn under Pert, and the excuses of under-resourcing due to budget-cutting won't wash as the same issues were present last year.

The place needs more good people and operators, and to stop making amateurish decisions.

So who are these company's that you know the club are missing out on. Sounds like you are are well connected person so lets see what you got. Also what the assets that the club are  not over-commercialising?  Your  comments of me not knowing what you are privy to is just keyboard hero stuff. What I am saying as a fact is that in the current economic  environment, Sh#t 2019, reduced free to air coverage, this current Partnership team "NOT PERT" is doing a very good job. 


2 hours ago, I'va Worn Smith said:

Because it is worrying.

If it is worrying  you    Do something about it,                    And if anyone is so well connected they hear things    Do something about it.

 

Like the Police ads    If you see something,   Do something 

 

 Don't sit on your arze whistling dixie.   It doesn't help you or the rest of the keyboard souls on Demonland.

Most of us here want Melbourne to do well, even those others like me who have been through a number of Dark Ages.

2020 Go Dees !!

14 hours ago, Bucket list said:

So who are these company's that you know the club are missing out on. Sounds like you are are well connected person so lets see what you got. Also what the assets that the club are  not over-commercialising?  Your  comments of me not knowing what you are privy to is just keyboard hero stuff. What I am saying as a fact is that in the current economic  environment, Sh#t 2019, reduced free to air coverage, this current Partnership team "NOT PERT" is doing a very good job. 

 

You’re interpreting my words slightly incorrectly but I think that’s moreso due to a shallow understanding of some of the concepts involved.

I’m not going to reveal details because I don’t want to reveal sources or identities. But they definitely are NOT doing a good job and I’m concerned about how much damage will be done if things are left to continue.

I wish I were in a position to do and say more myself, but for now all I can do is say more scrutiny is required.

16 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Frankly you would expect a few rumblings in the off field area after 2019. Their budgeted figures were massacred and it is not too much to think that their sponsor KPI's were far from maximised (ratings and finals just to mention two).

The blame quite rightly fell on the coaching staff and in the main they are now gone save for number 1.

Running a club with the downs and relatively occasional ups of the MFC must be hell.... (but of course the puff piece said we are now back from hell.)

No one saw the possibility of 17th in 2019 nor did they see that the season would be effectively finished after so few rounds.

Next time you are at a medium level MFC match count the number of super boxes that are open. We've a long way to go.

 

To be fair, and credit where it is due, Pert himself did foresee 2019, albeit not in such severity. 

This is not so much about the footy side, but the overall culture and inner workings.

My biggest concerns are that we’ll squander our time in the sun like the Bulldogs, or that we’ll condemn ourselves to missing those opportunities altogether through our own ineptitude.

Edited by Mach5

16 hours ago, Pennant St Dee said:

Grenade throwers feeding the sky is falling brigade, just like the Ricky Nixon/Tony Sheehan tweet thread

What a surprise 

 

So your solution would be..?

Observe something concerning, observe something even more worrying, then another, then another... say nothing? Head in the sand?

Don’t be so naive as to think that because you’re not aware means it hasn’t happened.

Otherwise, what exactly do you think the motive is for “grenade throwing”?

16 hours ago, Pennant St Dee said:

Grenade throwers feeding the sky is falling brigade, just like the Ricky Nixon/Tony Sheehan tweet thread

What a surprise 

'Mach' isn't a grenade thrower 'Pennant' and his info is generally pretty good.

I would take some notice of what he is saying in this instance...maybe the source has an axe to grind, this must always be considered in these things but the messenger is ok.


1 hour ago, Mach5 said:

 

So your solution would be..?

Observe something concerning, observe something even more worrying, then another, then another... say nothing? Head in the sand?

Don’t be so naive as to think that because you’re not aware means it hasn’t happened.

Otherwise, what exactly do you think the motive is for “grenade throwing”?


Obviously there will be people here claiming varying degrees of connection to the club. Some of it legitimate, some of it rather lofty. But regardless of the poster’s authenticity,  innuendo and allusion seldom serves to enlighten others in any genuine sense. I read through your posts, and all I could take away from them was that you’re not happy with the sponsorship department of the club, but you’re unwilling to state exactly why. 

I’m not sure if this constitutes  “saying something?”

You can’t expect people to just take your word for it on what is, for the most part, an anonymous Internet forum. And you certainly can’t get frustrated when they don’t. 

I’m not happy with the entirety of the club off-field, and they definitely don’t deserve praise. There needs to be a lot of change for us to have any real success, and some are downright derelict in their duty or negligent.

I’m not willing to say more at this time other than to call for much more scrutiny.

3 minutes ago, Mach5 said:

I’m not happy with the entirety of the club off-field, and they definitely don’t deserve praise. There needs to be a lot of change for us to have any real success, and some are downright derelict in their duty or negligent.

I’m not willing to say more at this time other than to call for much more scrutiny.

I say blow some whistles. Spill some beans. Emancipate a feline from a sack. 
 

You’re not exactly revealing the identities of undercover operatives in war-torn territories, and you probably won’t suffer a Chelsea Manning-like fate if you actually tell us something useful. Until then, nobody here is going to share your specific concerns, because they literally have no idea what those concerns are. 

2 hours ago, Mach5 said:

 

So your solution would be..?

Observe something concerning, observe something even more worrying, then another, then another... say nothing? Head in the sand?

Don’t be so naive as to think that because you’re not aware means it hasn’t happened.

Otherwise, what exactly do you think the motive is for “grenade throwing”?

Mach don't state opinions as fact firstly

52 minutes ago, Mach5 said:

I’m not happy with the entirety of the club off-field, and they definitely don’t deserve praise. There needs to be a lot of change for us to have any real success, and some are downright derelict in their duty or negligent.

I’m not willing to say more at this time other than to call for much more scrutiny.

Have these problems arisen since Pert took over, or did the problems exist under Jackson?


1 hour ago, Mach5 said:

I’m not happy with the entirety of the club off-field, and they definitely don’t deserve praise. There needs to be a lot of change for us to have any real success, and some are downright derelict in their duty or negligent.

I’m not willing to say more at this time other than to call for much more scrutiny.

I'll take you at your word m5, but the question I have is what does 'more scrutiny actually mean in practice. Particularly as it relates to the context of a football forum.

Lets say your concerns are valid. More scrutiny might mean more unfounded criticism, gossip and potshots at the club, rather than balanced crtique. Particularly in tve absence of any real information. 

And that sort of white noise can cause damage and actually make matters worse. Which is the opposite of what i assume you are hoping to achieve.

2 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Have these problems arisen since Pert took over, or did the problems exist under Jackson?

Generally exacerbated under Pert. Multitude of issues however.

M5: How exactly are we supposed to do more scutiny (or any scutiny for that matter) other than reading annual reports and going to AGMs? Genuine question.

 
3 hours ago, Mach5 said:

I’m not happy with the entirety of the club off-field, and they definitely don’t deserve praise. There needs to be a lot of change for us to have any real success, and some are downright derelict in their duty or negligent.

I’m not willing to say more at this time other than to call for much more scrutiny.

well you NEED to say more, otherwise the perception is you are doing nothing

if demonland is not a good enough forum then why bring it up here and say nothing?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 104 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies