Jump to content

Featured Replies

9 hours ago, Cranky Franky said:

There's only one relevant question. 

Over the past 3 years did the list managers improve our list or make it worse ?

The answer is obvious.

It's Yes.

We've concentrated on the draft:

2021 - JVR, Howes, Woewodin 

2022 - Jefferson, Adams

2023 - Windsor, Tholstrup 

We've had some low cost experienced players join that haven't had much impact but that's because we've been focussing on using early picks, not trading them.

 
1 hour ago, Colm said:

We played with 2 rucks for the two season before we traded Jackson. We were able to convince Grundy a million dollar AA ruck that we would continue to play two rucks. 
You don’t think we could have convinced Meek- come and win and flag and learn from the greatest ruck man ever?! Who’s in his 30s.  I mean surely we could have convinced him. 
 

Arces was - F3rd pick on a three year deal for $350k. I think we could easily have brought in Meek and Arces for less than Grundy and Hunter. 
 

Edit- both these players were moved on to make Jackson deal possible. We were in the box seat if we had of made the moves. 


Surely you can see Jackson is a much different mobile ruckman to Meek and is capable of playing in other positions? 
No, I don’t think we could have convinced Meek. If you think we could, I’d say you’re living in dream land. He was after a number 1 ruck role.

Acres has proved to be a better wingman than expected at Carlton. I’d say his output has definitely been better than Hunter’s. Having said that I don’t think adding a wingman was a priority but as the opportunity presented itself late in the trade period we elected to take it. Carlton had done their work early on Acres. No chance Hunter is on more $ than Acres though. 

In the scheme of things these are relatively minor “misses” that were not critical needs and we were probably never even in the running for. We’re not lamenting the lack of another wingman as a key deficiency. And a backup ruckman is a priority, but it needs to be one happy to play predominantly at Casey unless the worst happens.
Do you really just want to take potshots every instance of another team getting a slightly better outcome than us?

On 24/09/2024 at 08:56, Axis of Bob said:

We wanted Grundy out. Geelong wanted Stengle out. Gold Coast wanted Chol out. Port Adelaide wanted Teakle out. Gold Coast wanted Bowes out. Hawthorn wanted Mitchell out. 

It's not a good argument.

We have paid peanuts to get depth players to complement the strong list we already had. Hawthorn paid a lot of money because they had salary cap to burn due to their terrible performances whilst we had a list with the contracts of Petracca, Oliver, Gawn, May, Lever, Brayshaw, Salem, Langdon etc on it. You're comparing apples with oranges. 

But we have bought in Players who are not even depth. When a spot opened up for a Senior game, they were not selected. 
That is incredibly poor trading, considering who we let go

 
1 hour ago, Sir Why You Little said:

But we have bought in Players who are not even depth. When a spot opened up for a Senior game, they were not selected. 
That is incredibly poor trading, considering who we let go

Who like? You mention "players" plural, but the only player we've traded in of late who hasn't played a game is Fullarton.

If you're only trading lower/cheap picks and offering salaries to match, to only have one amongst a number who didn't get an AFL game is actually good trading.

10 hours ago, old55 said:

It's Yes.

We've concentrated on the draft:

2021 - JVR, Howes, Woewodin 

2022 - Jefferson, Adams

2023 - Windsor, Tholstrup 

We've had some low cost experienced players join that haven't had much impact but that's because we've been focussing on using early picks, not trading them.

That's a load of carp. 

Drafting has been great. Trading & list management has been total garbage.

Hawks have drafted well AND have managed to trade in Amon, Dambrosio, Ginnivan & Meek compared to Fullarton, Dunstan, Shache & McAdam

 


11 hours ago, old55 said:

We've had some low cost experienced players join that haven't had much impact but that's because we've been focussing on using early picks, not trading them.

Also because we've been focused on keeping the list together and re-signing players, which is also list management.

56 minutes ago, Cranky Franky said:

That's a load of carp. 

Drafting has been great. Trading & list management has been total garbage.

Hawks have drafted well AND have managed to trade in Amon, Dambrosio, Ginnivan & Meek compared to Fullarton, Dunstan, Shache & McAdam

 

yr looking at the equivalent of 2016-19 for the mfc for the likes of amon, d'ambrosio, ginnivan, and meek, plus barras and battle as a free agent at the end of this year

in the equivalent time period we brought in lewis, melksham, hibberd, lever, may, and langdon

let's see how dingley goes recruiting players after they've won a premiership and had to re-contract their equivalents of gawn, petracca, oliver, brayshaw, viney et al

1 hour ago, bing181 said:

Who like? You mention "players" plural, but the only player we've traded in of late who hasn't played a game is Fullarton.

If you're only trading lower/cheap picks and offering salaries to match, to only have one amongst a number who didn't get an AFL game is actually good trading.

The cheap lower picks we got rid of played in this year Finals Series, whilst Fullarton, Schache, McAdam and Hunter have done bugger all.

Can you not see the Massive imbalance created?

 
2 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

The cheap lower picks we got rid of played in this year Finals Series, whilst Fullarton, Schache, McAdam and Hunter have done bugger all.

Can you not see the Massive imbalance created?

You're wasting your breath.

No matter how many times you point out 3 years of trading & list management disasters there is always a conga line of apologists lining up.

Amazing because player trading & list management are pretty black & white.

 

8 hours ago, Cranky Franky said:

You're wasting your breath.

No matter how many times you point out 3 years of trading & list management disasters there is always a conga line of apologists lining up.

Amazing because player trading & list management are pretty black & white.

 

I really just loved the use of the phrase conga line. Real easy to visualise. 


13 hours ago, Cranky Franky said:

That's a load of carp. 

Drafting has been great. Trading & list management has been total garbage.

Hawks have drafted well AND have managed to trade in Amon, Dambrosio, Ginnivan & Meek compared to Fullarton, Dunstan, Shache & McAdam

 

I didn't realise that drafting isn't part of list management.

Who is responsible for trading in players vs drafting? Taylor has done a good job in getting young talent but is Chris lamb responsible for the trades as let’s be honest the last few years have been poor 

“We need to put Melbourne's list management team in the gun for what is the worst contract we have ever seen. There is $10 million left on this deal for 6-years. He has lasted one year of the 7-year deal." 

- @kanecornes on the Clayton Oliver deal.  AFL TRADE RADIO

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/9beBErUftjdj2eNc/?mibextid=D5vuiz
JJ running through draft and trades. Noted good drafting by Taylor over many years (perhaps only questioning Jefferson) but very poor trading over the past two years … zero out of 6.  

Grundy

Hunter

Schache

Fullerton

McAdam

Billings


4 minutes ago, H_T said:

Feeling for Tim Lamb. Undermined. Twice. 

He'll be lucky to be in a job after the Football Dept review.

5 minutes ago, mo64 said:

He'll be lucky to be in a job after the Football Dept review.

He’s lucky to have a job now. 

On 25/09/2024 at 11:00, Mach5 said:


Surely you can see Jackson is a much different mobile ruckman to Meek and is capable of playing in other positions? 
No, I don’t think we could have convinced Meek. If you think we could, I’d say you’re living in dream land. He was after a number 1 ruck role.

Acres has proved to be a better wingman than expected at Carlton. I’d say his output has definitely been better than Hunter’s. Having said that I don’t think adding a wingman was a priority but as the opportunity presented itself late in the trade period we elected to take it. Carlton had done their work early on Acres. No chance Hunter is on more $ than Acres though. 

In the scheme of things these are relatively minor “misses” that were not critical needs and we were probably never even in the running for. We’re not lamenting the lack of another wingman as a key deficiency. And a backup ruckman is a priority, but it needs to be one happy to play predominantly at Casey unless the worst happens.
Do you really just want to take potshots every instance of another team getting a slightly better outcome than us?

We could have convinced Meek. 

He looks up to Gawn...and guess what happened to his form this year when Gawn started mentoring him on the side? 

Lamb is just incompetent - has no idea what the squad genuinely needs, is a poor judge of footy talent, character and chemistry 

  • 2 weeks later...
On 03/10/2024 at 21:53, fr_ap said:

Lamb is just incompetent - has no idea what the squad genuinely needs, is a poor judge of footy talent, character and chemistry 

In the wash up Tim Lamb appears to have allowed ‘the magician’ Jason Taylor a free hand to do his magic come draft night. Plus totally confounded the critics.
 

 

Interesting trade period, still gutted to lost Nibbler not just for the man but his onfield leadership.

If we draft two guns well be ok but we need our senior core to be injury free and some mid tier players (and Clarry) to be more consistent. Really hope Jefferson can show something otherwise that will present a problem.


pete ryan (age journo): what did you achieve today?
tim lamb: i had three sausage rolls

he absolutely slaps 'scoops' manure down about clayton being 'desperate' to get out

Big excited kid Trac (private-)messaged him about Pick 9.

Neither (public) social media content, nor absence thereof, tell us everything. Far from it, I reckon.

Edited by Timothy Reddan-A'Blew

 

Confirmed outs:

Alex Neal-Bullen … 29yo - 3rd in B&F (Traded to Adelaide Crows) 

Pick 28 (from Adelaide), Pick 40, Pick 46 (from Adelaide), Pick 54, pick 65 …(ALL Traded to Essendon)

Future First (MFC pick. Traded to Essendon)

Future Third (MFC pick. Traded to Adelaide)

Future Third (Traded from Essendon, on-traded to Brisbane Lions)

 

Confirmed ins:

Tom Campbell 32yo. (Delisted Free Agent from St Kilda)

Harry Sharp, 21yo, traded from Lions. 

Pick 9 (Traded from Essendon)

Future Third (Tied to reigning premiers Brisbane Lions) 

——————————————

2024 draft - 1st Round 5,9

2025 draft - 2nd round MFC, 3rd round tied to Lions, 4th round MFC. 
 

———————————————

no 29 year old often injured or declining players brought in for our 2nd or 3rd round future picks 

Edited by spirit of norm smith
U

Nothing particularly new, but for the record...

https://www.melbournefc.com.au/video/1678945/trade-wrap-list-manager-review?videoId=1678945&modal=true&type=video&publishFrom=1729074848001

Edited by Timothy Reddan-A'Blew


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 29 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 237 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies