Redleg 42,143 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 Just now, DubDee said: Yep they are doing a great job at not winning the flag Not as good as us. 1 Quote
binman 44,792 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 1 minute ago, Redleg said: Not as good as us. We're elite in that stat. 1 Quote
buck_nekkid 6,100 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 Nope. Papley + later first rounder for 3. If Kelly is worth 2 top 10’s Langdon is worth about 22 Papley is closer to Langdon than Kelly Quote
Redleg 42,143 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 I love how we decide what we will give, when we aren't even being mentioned as in the race. 2 1 Quote
Young Blood 2,642 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Redleg said: I love how we decide what we will give, when we aren't even being mentioned as in the race. this ? Not sure if he's officially nominated Carlton but when a player wants to get somewhere he pretty much always gets there especially if interest is mutual. Maybe we should wait until we're in a conversation to sign/trade for a player before all the hypothetical's? Maybe thats a silly thought. Side note: The Jamie Elliot thread got to almost 2000 posts to no avail... Edited October 8, 2019 by Yung Blood Quote
hells bells 2,023 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 I fail to see how Papley is worth a Top 10 pick... 4 Quote
Deemania since 56 6,804 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 16 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said: He’s kicked 120 goals in 4 seasons after being taken as a rookie and will only get better. We have a serious lack of small forwards and one of the worst forward lines in the game. I think Papley would address our deficiencies very well. Possibly, Papley may be capable of: (1) form and consistency improvements, and (2) changing the effectiveness of our goal-scoring and forward line in general. However, what is there to say about the young 'uns that we attracted last year - a swathe of smalls each attracting comments to indicate goal-scoring aptitudes - and of these new players, surely we must have some confidence in their improvements for 2020 and beyond, and start working (developing) them into training regimens for such an outcome prior to the season beginning. A great forward is for pick 3, not for a small. Quote
whatwhat say what 23,837 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 51 minutes ago, Demonland said: Also getting rejected for that sort of money is such a Norf game thing to do. At least when we pay overs the players come to us. the theory goes that the sooner north melbourne make a big money offer for you, the sooner you are to re-sign with yr original club will papley stay at the swans rather than head to north melbourne? Quote
jnrmac 20,361 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 (edited) 12 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said: the theory goes that the sooner north melbourne make a big money offer for you, the sooner you are to re-sign with yr original club will papley stay at the swans rather than head to north melbourne? If I was a player looking to bump up my salary I would tell my manager to speak with Norf. They'll offer ridiculous money which you then take back to your club and say 'see what I am worth?' Kind of like what Elliott did to us....... Edited October 8, 2019 by jnrmac 2 Quote
Lucifers Hero 40,715 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 (edited) 4 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said: North are reported to be offering Papley 800k plus per season https://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/afl-trade-wrap-swans-star-given-monster-offer-daniher-wants-to-be-at-swans/news-story/8f232007cc6fd48a1a3ba1ab0a27a7f4 The article was written a few weeks ago. Is North's offer still on the table? They need a bit of coin to pay Keath and Bruce that they have effectively committed to. They even made Keath cancel his overseas holiday and into surgery. There are no highly paid Roos leaving so can't see them getting Papley. Edit: See Drysdale Demon post below. I have the wrong club. Keath and Bruce are on their way to the Dogs. Edited October 8, 2019 by Lucifer's Hero 1 Quote
Diamond_Jim 12,772 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 1 hour ago, A F said: The 5-10 position is irrelevancy. Only going deep in finals makes you relevant. That's not right when you are one of the also rans such as ourselves, Bulldogs Saints etc. It's all about giving your supporters both a competitive team and some hope. Whatever you may say North have done that very well over the last twenty odd years. I think most of us on this board would be quite happy to have North's record rather than our own 2 Quote
drysdale demon 4,837 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said: The article was written a few weeks ago. Is North's offer still on the table? They need a bit of coin to pay Keath and Bruce that they have effectively committed to. They even made Keath cancel his overseas holiday and into surgery. There are no highly paid Roos leaving so can't see them getting Papley. Keath and Bruce are supposedly going to the dogs 1 1 Quote
Lucifers Hero 40,715 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 6 minutes ago, drysdale demon said: Keath and Bruce are supposedly going to the dogs Thanks. So they are. My research is slipping! 1 Quote
Diamond_Jim 12,772 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 12 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said: The article was written a few weeks ago. Is North's offer still on the table? They need a bit of coin to pay Keath and Bruce that they have effectively committed to. They even made Keath cancel his overseas holiday and into surgery. There are no highly paid Roos leaving so can't see them getting Papley. must say I wondered the same thing but at the very least it gave some context to what he will be asking for and one can assume that it is in the ballpark of what the Blues are offering. 1 Quote
DeeZee 7,496 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 If they officially nominate someone they usually get there. Quote
Demons11 7,136 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 2 hours ago, buck_nekkid said: Nope. Papley + later first rounder for 3. If Kelly is worth 2 top 10’s Langdon is worth about 22 Papley is closer to Langdon than Kelly There is no point swapping 3 for Papley, when we can get Sarong. 1 Quote
Demon Disciple 12,530 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 31 minutes ago, Demons11 said: There is no point swapping 3 for Papley, when we can get Sarong. I understand that the top 2 of this years draft is head and shoulders above the rest, but there would be a few more names i'd be calling out before Serong's at this stage D11. Quote
Demons11 7,136 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said: I understand that the top 2 of this years draft is head and shoulders above the rest, but there would be a few more names i'd be calling out before Serong's at this stage D11. This is not the case. Serong and Young have massive upside. They will be just as good if not better than the top 2 Edited October 8, 2019 by Demons11 1 Quote
PaulRB 6,435 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 I think we should tease and drag it out, then reject the offer and take pick 3 to the draft. The though of it going to bombers via syd makes me a bit ill... (unless it’s an absolute ripping deal). Quote
old55 23,860 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 2 hours ago, Demons11 said: This is not the case. Serong and Young have massive upside. They will be just as good if not better than the top 2 Is that a guarantee? 1 Quote
Demon Disciple 12,530 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 1 hour ago, Fifty-5 said: Is that a guarantee? nothing is Quote
Demons11 7,136 Posted October 8, 2019 Posted October 8, 2019 2 hours ago, Fifty-5 said: Is that a guarantee? Well of course but there are no guarantees on a trader in player. Thats the beauty of the draft, the player we pick could be our greatest ever. You just never know. Quote
Wiseblood 24,637 Posted October 15, 2019 Posted October 15, 2019 Papley would be great, but haven't we already ruled him out as he is asking for, or is on, too much coin? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.