Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 hours ago, Redleg said:

Examples please of 2018 changes he predicted.

Will attempt a search, might take a while though.

 

I'm still hoping to hear O'Brien named.  He's another very good runner, can take a mark and has kicked a bag against us.  The Hawks are looking to shed some players to make room for another big play, so that could fit. 

 
16 minutes ago, RalphiusMaximus said:

I'm still hoping to hear O'Brien named.  He's another very good runner, can take a mark and has kicked a bag against us.  The Hawks are looking to shed some players to make room for another big play, so that could fit. 

GettyImages-622520384-1024x684.jpg

Edit: Not trying to disparage O'Brien. Just that other clubs are making plays on big key forwards, even a year out, and we're looking to feed on all of their off cuts. Bloody hope Tmac & Weid step up this year.

Edited by John Demonic

Was mentioned on SEN this afternoon we were looking at Bruce.


4 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Is that suppose to be art? Anything can be art these days, have you seen those people that go around New York putting sprinkles onto dog faeces? Apparently it’s art as well. 

After all, you can't polish a turd, but you can roll it in sprinkles!

 
17 hours ago, Yokozuna said:

I would like it to be membrey or Bruce, as I know they always beat us, but it isn’t. 

As I said, you will be surprised!!

Those two have regularly contributed to MFC losses, so would they continue to do so?

15 hours ago, deeology said:

Charlie Curnow ?

Or Harry McKay. Surely with McGovern, Martin Papley and Betts they can't fit then all in

Edit: just read some old posts and see he's been ruled out

Edited by ArtificialWisdom


37 minutes ago, red and blue forever said:

If we don't get who ever it is I you will tell us who we were after right yokozuna?

Yes, I will tell all after.

28 minutes ago, ArtificialWisdom said:

Or Harry McKay. Surely with McGovern, Martin Papley and Betts they can't fit then all in

Edit: just read some old posts and see he's been ruled out

I thought another reply had come through, but my phone has been playing up! Sorry.

we are still into the player I previously spoke about (and his name has been mentioned on this topic, I just didn’t want to confirm it).

However, we are also into some others as we are keen for a tall, marking, goal kicking forward. I wasn’t given any other specific names, but judging by everything, I wouldn’t be surprised if it is players such as Jenkins and Brice that we are speaking too, along with the other unnamed player.

I wouldn’t be surprised if we brought in a tall forward and a crumbed, along with Tomlinson and Langdon!

1 minute ago, Yokozuna said:

I thought another reply had come through, but my phone has been playing up! Sorry.

we are still into the player I previously spoke about (and his name has been mentioned on this topic, I just didn’t want to confirm it).

However, we are also into some others as we are keen for a tall, marking, goal kicking forward. I wasn’t given any other specific names, but judging by everything, I wouldn’t be surprised if it is players such as Jenkins and Brice that we are speaking too, along with the other unnamed player.

I wouldn’t be surprised if we brought in a tall forward and a crumbed, along with Tomlinson and Langdon!

Do you know why it's taking so long?

14 minutes ago, deebug said:

Do you know why it's taking so long?

I can only assume it is because the main target is someone under contract who they are trying to pry from his current club, and then the others are secondary options.

And, all trades are drawn out unfortunately, even most of the ones where teams have been nominated, so I guess we can understand why the more secretive ones may take longer.

1 minute ago, Yokozuna said:

I can only assume it is because the main target is someone under contract who they are trying to pry from his current club, and then the others are secondary options.

And, all trades are drawn out unfortunately, even most of the ones where teams have been nominated, so I guess we can understand why the more secretive ones may take longer.

Thank You


6 minutes ago, Yokozuna said:

I can only assume it is because the main target is someone under contract who they are trying to pry from his current club, and then the others are secondary options.

And, all trades are drawn out unfortunately, even most of the ones where teams have been nominated, so I guess we can understand why the more secretive ones may take longer.

could you indicate whether its a key position forward?

 

Don't be Hawkins Don't be Hawkins Don't be Hawkins Don't be Hawkins Don't be Hawkins Don't be Hawkins 

Image result for breathing into paper bag gif

7 minutes ago, Lace Out said:

 

Don't be Hawkins Don't be Hawkins Don't be Hawkins Don't be Hawkins Don't be Hawkins Don't be Hawkins 

Image result for breathing into paper bag gif

Surely if we are targeting a Cat it is more likely to be Ratugolea.

Young. We could offer a good contract with a few years on it. A big presence up forward but crucially can go into the ruck. A tacit admission the Preuss experiment has failed (and maybe acknowledgment that weeds is fair way off?)?

Hawkins is too one dimensional and doesn't provide any chop out for Maxy.

Edited by binman

11 minutes ago, binman said:

Surely if we are targeting a Cat it is more likely to be Ratugolea.

Young. We could offer a good contract with a few years on it. A big presence up forward but crucially can go into the ruck. A tacit admission the Preuss experiment has failed (and maybe acknowledgment that weeds is fair way off?)?

Hawkins is too one dimensional and doesn't provide any chop out for Maxy.

Darcy Fogarty (he’s not at a Vic club so it’s not him) or Ratugolea would be the two i’d be keen to target and would suit our list profile. 

15 minutes ago, binman said:

Surely if we are targeting a Cat it is more likely to be Ratugolea.

Young. We could offer a good contract with a few years on it. A big presence up forward but crucially can go into the ruck. A tacit admission the Preuss experiment has failed (and maybe acknowledgment that weeds is fair way off?)?

Hawkins is too one dimensional and doesn't provide any chop out for Maxy.

I agree with everything you've said, we share the same view 100%.

However, based on the description provided, not sure Ratugolea qualifies, unlike Hawkins. 


13 minutes ago, Lace Out said:

I agree with everything you've said, we share the same view 100%.

However, based on the description provided, not sure Ratugolea qualifies, unlike Hawkins. 

Yokozuna did specify he/she was excited by the prospect. Is that enough to rule out Hawkins?

Edited by ArtificialWisdom
English

6 minutes ago, Lace Out said:

I agree with everything you've said, we share the same view 100%.

However, based on the description provided, not sure Ratugolea qualifies, unlike Hawkins. 

I don't think the clues rule the big fella out. Could our pick 3 come into play somehow? The cats did mention they would be keen to get up the draft order.

If we got the big rat and their first round pick (14?) and maybe a 3rd  rounder (which we could use for Butler) that might work?

This game is fun.

 

TIM O'BRIEN - YOKO ONO's Man

Opponent   P (W-D-L)   KI   MK   HB   DI   DA   GL   BH   HO   TK   RB   IF   CL   CG   FF   FA   BR   CP   UP   CM   MI   1%   BO   GA  
Adelaide 2 (2-0-0) 10 3 5 15 7.50 3   4 4 1 3   2   2   7 8 2   4    
Brisbane Lions 5 (3-0-2) 25 16 17 42 8.40 4 1 4 7 9 3 1 9 6 5   23 22 4 3 15    
Carlton 4 (3-0-1) 25 15 13 38 9.50 1 1 2 10   8 1 1 3     12 24   2 13    
Collingwood 3 (3-0-0) 32 16 13 45 15.00 2 2 2 4 6 5 1 8 4 4   16 29 2 4 13   2
Essendon 4 (3-0-1) 28 10 18 46 11.50 2 1 6 5 2 4 1 9 7 5   27 22 3 3 8   1
Fremantle 4 (3-0-1) 19 12 14 33 8.25 3 3 4 13   6   2 3     21 14 8 4 6   2
Geelong 4 (2-0-2) 20 11 11 31 7.75 4 2 12 6 2 3 2 3 2 2   11 22 3 3 4   3
Gold Coast 4 (3-0-1) 35 24 17 52 13.00 5 6 10 9 1 5   5 3     19 33 4 10 5    
Greater Western Sydney 5 (2-1-2) 34 20 20 54 10.80 3 2 7 4 8 4   9 5 2   19 37 3 2 21   2
Melbourne 5 (3-0-2) 40 25 13 53 10.60 8 2 8 14 4 4   8 2 4   21 30 9 7 20    
North Melbourne 4 (2-0-2) 23 9 16 39 9.75 2 2 7 5 2 2 3 4 4     22 18 4 3 9   1
Port Adelaide 2 (2-0-0) 17 3 6 23 11.50   1   3 4 2   5 5 3   12 9 1 1 6   1
Richmond 5 (2-0-3) 33 15 16 49 9.80     8 12 2 5   6 7 2   22 26 2 2 6   1
St Kilda 3 (2-0-1) 22 11 10 32 10.67 3 2 13 9 4 4 1 6 6 3   18 13 4 4 9   2
Sydney 4 (1-0-3) 32 15 20 52 13.00 1 2 7 5 3 3   9 3 4   17 32 4 2 10   1
West Coast 3 (2-0-1) 24 12 10 34 11.33 7 2 13 7 3 4 2 3 5   2 14 16 5 6 17   1
Western Bulldogs 1 (1-0-0) 14 10 4 18 18.00 1   2   1 2 2 1 2     6 12 2 1 5    

Edited by Bring-Back-Powell

 
31 minutes ago, binman said:

Surely if we are targeting a Cat it is more likely to be Ratugolea.

Young. We could offer a good contract with a few years on it. A big presence up forward but crucially can go into the ruck. A tacit admission the Preuss experiment has failed (and maybe acknowledgment that weeds is fair way off?)?

Hawkins is too one dimensional and doesn't provide any chop out for Maxy.

Really? Preuss was recruited as a back up for Gawn, with the understanding he'd learn from the best in the game and maybe take over from him in a few years. Perhaps get a few games with or without Gawn in the mean time. Not sure i'd call that a failure 12 mths down the track

St Kilda are going to have to unload some players if they want to get all the new blokes they're supposedly after.

Has anyone mentioned Paddy McCartin as a possibility to us ...and would we want him with his concussion issues?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 276 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Haha
    • 137 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 33 replies
  • POSTGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons simply did not take their opportunities when they presented themselves and ultimately when down by 25 points effectively ending their finals chances. Goal kicking practice during the Bye?

      • Like
    • 252 replies