Jump to content

Featured Replies

10 minutes ago, Jack Russell said:

Are serious , he was a change agent - yes he did a great job for three yesrs but dont  make big statments unless you know the details Adminstrtor!!. he's  time was well and truely done and to be honest he was  NOT running the club last year. By the way you should talk to essendon?? BTW As the adminstrator, what are you doing. This website  seems to have a very close relationship with the club or someone in the club who aobviously sets up the podcasts that our players give their time to and I see that your website that was in past years not too flash has become some what fancy and has all this advertising thanks to I suspect to the club's involvment. So let me get this straight - your little comment is designed to inflame and is devious in its intent. Are you for real. As the Admisntrator not only are in breach of yo our own code of conduct but my friend, I think you need to think  before you as the adminstrator make comments or start a thread which is in nature ill intended

Lol. 

 
20 minutes ago, Jack Russell said:

Seriously - how stupid you all are. Why woudl be believe what some oen writes. One with logic woudl ask how would a jurno know the detsils of a confidential meeting that had nothing to do with what he is writting about. Wake people 

facts are facts, open your eyes. You should probably put some time into your spelling and grammar also.

45 minutes ago, SFebes said:

Pretty easy, aging list, no superstars or few coming through, on field, sale of pokies, revenue comes from?, a coach that is useless, a head of FD that has more lives than a cat, near certainty to lose thousands of members next year..........

we regularly fielded the youngest list of the round.  our core group that are quality are 22-25

Gawn and Clarry are stars and hopefully more will join

stay positive, we will be back

 

Probably big names players wanting out.

Petraccas manager sat down with the club recently. Wouldn’t be surprised if he wants out.

Brayshaw has looked unhappy all year. Wouldn’t be surprised if he requests a trade to WA to be with his two brothers at WA clubs and his family living over there.

People being defensive need to realize we have had a horrible year, and coming off the back of so much promise has made it even worse. Defend the club all you want, but fact is the club is currently failing. Financially, this year will be a shocker. Onfield, well best not to talk about it and thank god for basket case expansion club saving us from yet another wooden spoon.

  1. Up to three starting 22 players are set to demand trades.
  2. Club set to announce financial loss, debit to increase.
  3. Murmurs of a heated exchange between a powerful club exec and Goodwin following last week's match.

Make no mistake, the Doom Loop is now full circle. Prepare yourselves. Once the finals end, it's all going to break open.

Most important off-season in the club's history imo.


3 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

Probably big names players wanting out.

Petraccas manager sat down with the club recently. Wouldn’t be surprised if he wants out.

Brayshaw has looked unhappy all year. Wouldn’t be surprised if he requests a trade to WA to be with his two brothers at WA clubs and his family living over there.

People being defensive need to realize we have had a horrible year, and coming off the back of so much promise has made it even worse. Defend the club all you want, but fact is the club is currently failing. Financially, this year will be a shocker. Onfield, well best not to talk about it and thank god for basket case expansion club saving us from yet another wooden spoon.

I believe Petracca's concerns has been what has prompted some heated exchanges between coaching team and the board. Essentially he is unhappy, and the board is pointing the finger at the coaching team.

This all falls down to a disastrous pre-season. Goodwin and Co. have been the catalyst for this.

You will find this is more about the financial position of the club rather that a playing perspective.

Just now, drdrake said:

You will find this is more about the financial position of the club rather that a playing perspective.

Would our financial situation be as dire if not for the playing performance?

 
4 minutes ago, drdrake said:

You will find this is more about the financial position of the club rather that a playing perspective.

Of course it is. Lets say rumours of players wanting out are true they are not going to learn that at meeting with the AFL.

They might however learn that the AFL is not predisposed to giving us any financial help, which is no doubt what we are asking for. 

7 minutes ago, praha said:
  1.  
  2. Murmurs of a heated exchange between a powerful club exec and Goodwin following last week's match.

 

Good. I hope it is still being played out

Shape up or leave...


12 minutes ago, praha said:
  1. Up to three starting 22 players are set to demand trades.
  2. Club set to announce financial loss, debit to increase.
  3. Murmurs of a heated exchange between a powerful club exec and Goodwin following last week's match.

Make no mistake, the Doom Loop is now full circle. Prepare yourselves. Once the finals end, it's all going to break open.

Most important off-season in the club's history imo.

You're dead keen on the club is in crisis narrative aren't you Praha.

And dead keen of helping drive it too i might add. 

Edited by binman

14 minutes ago, praha said:
  1. Up to three starting 22 players are set to demand trades.
  2. Club set to announce financial loss, debit to increase.
  3. Murmurs of a heated exchange between a powerful club exec and Goodwin following last week's match.

Make no mistake, the Doom Loop is now full circle. Prepare yourselves. Once the finals end, it's all going to break open.

Most important off-season in the club's history imo.

please state if any of the above is fact as it is written as such (aside from the murmurs bit)

A club in turmoil on and off the field. 

“Please be patient as we return to normal programming.”

21 minutes ago, praha said:
  1. Up to three starting 22 players are set to demand trades.
  2. Club set to announce financial loss, debit to increase.
  3. Murmurs of a heated exchange between a powerful club exec and Goodwin following last week's match.

Make no mistake, the Doom Loop is now full circle. Prepare yourselves. Once the finals end, it's all going to break open.

Most important off-season in the club's history imo.

And on this, so what? 

  1.  Lets see what happens. Might go the same way as the so called 'big' announcement that was supposed to happen last Sunday that you jumped all over. But lets say it is true we don't want the tail wagging the dog and to be honest there are only 4 or 5 best 22 that i woud be shattered to lose. In any case we have most of our best 22 under contract and i suspect might be  looking to trade some anyway (eg Brayshaw, Hunt)
  2. Der. No sheet sherlock
  3. Stuff happens in a year like the one we have had in a very emotional environment like footy clubs

The Doom Loop? Most important off-season in the club's history? hyperbole much. What a load of over the top histrionics. 

The Doom loop is good name for death metal band by the way.

Edited by binman

2 minutes ago, binman said:

And on this, so what? 

  1.  Lets see what happens. But lets say it is true we don't want the tail wagging the dog and to be honest there are only 4 or 5 best 22 that i woud be shattered to lose. In any case we have most of our best 22 under contract and i suspect might be  looking to trade some anyway (eg Brayshaw, Hunt)
  2. Der. No sheet sherlock
  3. [censored] happens in year like the one we have had in a very emotional environment like footy clubs

The Doom Loop? Most important off-season in the club's history? hyperbole much. What a load of over the top histrionics. 

Agree. It’s like he’s writing the article for Barrett. 


20 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

People being defensive need to realize we have had a horrible year, and coming off the back of so much promise has made it even worse. Defend the club all you want, but fact is the club is currently failing. Financially, this year will be a shocker. Onfield, well best not to talk about it and thank god for basket case expansion club saving us from yet another wooden spoon.

Succinct and accurate comment. Post bye there was an air of desperation around the club. Sure there were more injuries but there was just zero improvement.

People underestimate what the club had budgeted to receive in those last three MCG matches which were simply disastrous. They would have also been budgeting for a slight increase in sponsorship and at least 10% increase in membership numbers in 2020. Both areas are likely to see a drop.

Our request to the AFL would have been for money so we would have painted a bleak picture.

I can see that the doomsayers have leached onto this as actual fact. The fact that I've never trusted most of Damien's articles, and that the line is so vague that it could mean absolutely anything, makes it reek of someone hoping "that the dart has hit the board" if anything does happen.

I'll wait for more concrete evidence, but I believe this is more to do with the club financially than the playing list.

21 minutes ago, praha said:

I believe Petracca's concerns has been what has prompted some heated exchanges between coaching team and the board. Essentially he is unhappy, and the board is pointing the finger at the coaching team.

This all falls down to a disastrous pre-season. Goodwin and Co. have been the catalyst for this.

I don't buy this. Petracca's actions on the field are not the actions of a disgruntled player. He's vocal, team oriented and has played his role beautifully. I'd be staggered if he requested a trade.

14 minutes ago, chookrat said:

I don't buy this. Petracca's actions on the field are not the actions of a disgruntled player. He's vocal, team oriented and has played his role beautifully. I'd be staggered if he requested a trade.

It would be pure frustration. Five years in or thereabouts and you find yourself in a team that goes dramatically backwards big time with a coach who just doesn't have the answers.

Player loyalty disappeared years ago. He wants a successful football career. Can he get it at MFC. I don't know and I am sure he and other players are wondering the same thing.

Edited by Diamond_Jim

20 minutes ago, praha said:

Would our financial situation be as dire if not for the playing performance?

52,000 members, up nearly 6000 mich would be 1.5mil additition revenue.  I'm all for selling off the Pokie venues as long as we have a business plan to replace the revenue we generate from these venues.  You take that out and it is a fair whack.

Players wanting out lets start with O McDonald he will definitely want out he is behind May, Lever, Frost and Hore, add in Stretch and JKH blokes that think they deserved more opportunity, even Hunt, you will always have players that may be considered fringe best 22 looking to get out.

Brayshaw is one that I don't know what went on with him in 2019.  Was out on the wing a lot , last few games down back to get a touch and I rate him as our best center clearance player.

No question the club has a massive 12 months facing them, we know Peter Jackson wasn't happy in the why the board appointed Pert, we haven't really seen our heard from Pert at all this season.  The Footy manager was dead keen on the CEO role, that is going to cause friction.

One thing is for sure we just can't get it wrong again.


Whatever the case, I love the use of the lazy words "up to" which is so common these days.   When you don't know, pick a number and say "up to" as in "Up to 3 starting players".  It can can mean 0,1,2 or 3 so you are safe as long as there are not 4 or more.

Tracc just wants more midfield time, and he seemed to get a fair bit last Saturday. Reckon Burgess will have him in run all day shape by JLT.

Amazing though that players would want out after one bad year.

2 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

Tracc just wants more midfield time, and he seemed to get a fair bit last Saturday. Reckon Burgess will have him in run all day shape by JLT.

Amazing though that players would want out after one bad year.

I agree. Either the players are that fickle, or they're being chased with more coin. As we've seen with Richmond, things can turn around in 1 preseason after a bad year.

 

On the money Binman! 

DB is a [censored]. 

Financial loss is certain. Low crowds late in the year would have been very costly. However, the 52k members shattered last years record so it's not doom and gloom. 

We won't have a big drop off in membership next year. It's easier to resign as a member than decline. 

As for players potentially wanting out, fine. It just presents another opportunity to improve our list, whether it be by draft picks or players. 

Credit to the club, they've acknowledged theres been a disaster but have taken steps. New director of coaching, new fitness coach and a gun under 23 year old player coming in already not even 7 days after the final game. 

Hold the course! 

50 minutes ago, praha said:
  1. Up to three starting 22 players are set to demand trades.
  2. Club set to announce financial loss, debit to increase.
  3. Murmurs of a heated exchange between a powerful club exec and Goodwin following last week's match.

Make no mistake, the Doom Loop is now full circle. Prepare yourselves. Once the finals end, it's all going to break open.

Most important off-season in the club's history imo.

We have one of those?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 53 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies