Jump to content

Featured Replies

Ā 

The AFL: over-complicating simple ideas since 1990.Ā 

 

I might be a simple man but believe in a simple fix. 10 teams. 9 games and a final four. Extend season by one or two weeks. NO more teams for a year or two as talent is not there.

I was scratching my head when they listed 2 'conferences,' only to find we played teams in both.

What exactly is the point of them?

Why are they called conferences?

I always thought a conference was a company sponsored junket where, if you made an appearance, it was only at the bar.

Dumb name for aĀ  botched competition


Daisy was spot on with her ā€˜gimmicky tournament’ comment all those months ago. The season should have been extended after the introduction of two new teams. Everyone plays each other once and be done.Ā Can’t imagine what will happenĀ next year when more teams come in.Ā 

The AFLW doesn’t need to compete with the mens game, it needs to become the most popular female competition in the country and this isn’t the way the AFL should be goingĀ about growing the gameĀ in my opinion.Ā The players sacrifice a lot for a 7 week season in the hottest month of the year.Ā 

Our Demons have been very enjoyable to watch this season, probably more so than the previous two and we as fansĀ should be peeved if we missĀ finals due to this botched system.

Scrap it and just play the top teams.

They have botched the two groups, Ā Given the system they chose it seems odd it has happened. Ā Basically One pool is dominating the other pool, look at the percentage between the two. Ā So the opposition in the GF will be a weak team by default. Ā 

Though Freo has been a surprise, stye only just pipped Ā us, reckon if we played them week 2 or 3 we would have beaten them. Ā We always seem to start slow. Ā North I haven't seen but they seem to have joined very strong?

Ā 

Ā 

Ā 

Ā 

Ā 

'Optics' be damned!!

I'm sure the AFL ran many fixtures until they got what they wanted ie 7 games (that would help the AFL's 'favourite' teams; the big Melb clubs, Pies and Blues).Ā  So, fake Conferences were born and they then found weasel words to justify them.Ā  I say 'fake' because 'real' conferences do not have 'crossover' games.Ā  The concept of 'crossover' games may be 'innovative' but makes no sense.Ā 

The AFL compounded the problem by having one very strong conference (A) and a weak one (B).Ā 

I believe it is no coincidence that Pies and Blues are in the weaker B.Ā  Note:Ā  Blues play only one of the two prior premiers (both in Conf A) and Pies play neither while other Conf B teams play both.Ā  The cynic in me thinks this is tailor made for them to make the finals - the old story:Ā  good for tv ratings!!Ā  If either team does make the finals the AFL can really start worrying about the 'optics' as those finals are bound to be scrappy, one-sided affairs.

What about Home Ground for finals?Ā  With the current ladder Freo would play Blues and because Blues are on top of the Conf B ladder they would be the Home team.Ā  Enormous disadvantage for Freo, especially as they will most likely have to come back to the east cost for the GF.

If the AFL focus on what is good for the game and developing a worthwhile competition the 'optics' will take care of themselves and there will be no need to be 'innovative'.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

Everyone could see from the get-go that it was a terrible idea, even if they managed to guess well enough to make even conferences - and yes, it would be a guess! It's nigh on impossible to know who will rise and fall from season to season, with expansion teams, the rate of improvement, the significant movement between clubs, the immediate influence of draftees. Having said that, they sure did make some weird choices based on teams' standings in the first 2 seasons.

Regardless, it's not a true competition if all teams don't play each other once. It just isn't.

The number 1 thing the AFL can do to improve the standard is to give teams the chance to play together for as many games as possible.


Nicole Livingstone say the ladders will sort themselves out because there are a lot more in-conference games coming up.Ā  https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/aflw-boss-calls-for-patience-on-conference-system-20190219-p50ypm.htmĀ  That is true but it doesn't man the top teams in conf B will rise above the lower teams in conf A.Ā 

Conf B teams need to win a lot of games to bridge the W/L gap with conf A.Ā  Equally as important they need to win by big margins to bridge the %'age gap with Conf A.Ā 

I fully expect the combined ladder at end of rnd 7 will be much the same as now ie top conf B teams will be below most if not all the conf A teams.Ā  Livingstone is just delaying the day of reckoning and praying for some miracles.Ā  Time will tell...

Don't let me get started on this stupid idea.

1 hour ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Nicole Livingstone say the ladders will sort themselves out because there are a lot more in-conference games coming up.Ā 

We all know the ladders mean nothingĀ in the current system where 4 or more of the best teams are in one conference...

The ladders might look better but the lopsided finals will tell the true picture.

No matter how much she tries to SPIN it, it is an epic stuff up...

They use conferences in America because they have like 30 teams in the competition... AFLW has 10.

Gill is just in love with american sports and has dollar signs in his eyes. We aren't America, lets have our own style and systems based on what Australian's want.

How do we vote this guy out? Surely as members we can have a say in who runs the AFL?

Make AFL great again!

Is it possible that the AFL did this on purpose so as to confuse us re their next move?

Edited by chookrat


Plough Wallace was onto this a couple of weeks back on SEN. Gave the AFL a right spray.

His solution was for the AFL to admit their mistake and have cross over semis - ie the team that finishes top on each conference plays the team that finished second in the other. Seems logical, easy to do, fairĀ andĀ would require no logistical changes.Ā 

As he pointedĀ out the conference B teams would still get their chance to make the GF - and would do if good enough. But in all likelihood neither would win, leaving the A sides to play off. Either way the GF has the two top sides. Simples.

Edited by binman

Ā IĀ  believe it was a trial for doing this in the mens game. It looked terrible this year for the woman buut mainly as new teams came in that were powerful straight away and made grading difficult. Gil, for all his faults would like to make the draw more equitable in the mens game. Im behind that. if conferences is the way to get there then so be it.Ā 

Ā 

19 minutes ago, binman said:

Plough Wallace was onto this a couple of weeks back on SEN. Gave the AFL a right spray.

His solution was for the AFL to admit their mistake and have cross over semis - ie the team that finishes top on each conference plays the team that finished second in the other. Seems logical, easy to do, fairĀ andĀ would require no logistical changes.Ā 

As he pointedĀ out the conference B teams would still get their chance to make the GF - and would do if good enough. But in all likelihood neither would win, leaving the A sides to play off. Either way the GF has the two top sides. Simples.

Sounds like Plough has misunderstood as the solution he proposes is what is proposed hence the problem.Ā  The problem is on a 10 team ladder the top two teams of Conf B are below most or all of the Conf A teams so two bad teams would play in the finals dislodging two better teams.Ā 

The solution is for the AFL to admit their mistake and to combine the ladder for the two conferences so the 4 best teams play in the finals regardless of which team.Ā Ā 

Imagine the outcry if teams 9 and 10 with inferior W/L and inferior percentages played in AFL finals over teams finishing 7 and 8.Ā 

19 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Ā 

Sounds like Plough has misunderstood as the solution he proposes is what is proposed hence the problem.Ā  The problem is on a 10 team ladder the top two teams of Conf B are below most or all of the Conf A teams so two bad teams would play in the finals dislodging two better teams.Ā 

The solution is for the AFL to admit their mistake and to combine the ladder for the two conferences so the 4 best teams play in the finals regardless of which team.Ā Ā 

Imagine the outcry if teams 9 and 10 with inferior W/L and inferior percentages played in AFL finals over teams finishing 7 and 8.Ā 

I think Plough is right on this. If you finish third in your conference then you dont deserve the right to think about hypotheticals that you dont get to play a grand final because there are at least two teams that finished the regular season above you in your own conference. The farce we have now is that you could be the second top team in wins and percentage yet miss out on finals to Carlton with a win rate of 1/3 and percentage below 80%. The crossover finap would mean that Carlton would need to beat the second team in Conference A to play GF.Ā 

34 minutes ago, Wells 11 said:

Ā IĀ  believe it was a trial for doing this in the mens game. It looked terrible this year for the woman buut mainly as new teams came in that were powerful straight away and made grading difficult. Gil, for all his faults would like to make the draw more equitable in the mens game. Im behind that. if conferences is the way to get there then so be it.Ā 

All they've proved is that conferences are just as, if not more inequitable than the current mens system...the only way for an almost truly equitable system would be to play each team twice & that's not going to happen. Danger would have a fit.


1 hour ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Ā 

Sounds like Plough has misunderstood as the solution he proposes is what is proposed hence the problem.Ā  The problem is on a 10 team ladder the top two teams of Conf B are below most or all of the Conf A teams so two bad teams would play in the finals dislodging two better teams.Ā 

The solution is for the AFL to admit their mistake and to combine the ladder for the two conferences so the 4 best teams play in the finals regardless of which team.Ā Ā 

Imagine the outcry if teams 9 and 10 with inferior W/L and inferior percentages played in AFL finals over teams finishing 7 and 8.Ā 

No, it must be me who is confused.You're right the system i proposed is what will happen. I'll try and find the audio and see what Plough's fix was

Edited by binman

51 minutes ago, rjay said:

All they've proved is that conferences are just as, if not more inequitable than the current mens system...the only way for an almost truly equitable system would be to play each team twice & that's not going to happen. Danger would have a fit.

In the AFL the real solution is each team play's each other only once. it is the only fair system. Sure it means much fewer games but there you go.

They could expand the finals system potentially to offset (a bit) the issue of reduced games. Perhaps have a wildcard.Ā 

But that's not going to happen with the AFL's thirst or TV revenue

1 hour ago, chookrat said:

I think Plough is right on this. If you finish third in your conference then you dont deserve the right to think about hypotheticals that you dont get to play a grand final because there are at least two teams that finished the regular season above you in your own conference. The farce we have now is that you could be the second top team in wins and percentage yet miss out on finals to Carlton with a win rate of 1/3 and percentage below 80%. The crossover finap would mean that Carlton would need to beat the second team in Conference A to play GF.Ā 

The issue isn't who plays in the GF, it is who plays in the 2 prelims.Ā  To my mind, the prelims should be based on the 4 best teams overall not who may make it thru to the GF (and the Home Ground advantage should go to the higher placed team overall not the highest placed in each conf).Ā 

imo Carlton/Geelong (as the ladder currently stands) have less right to play in the prelims than any team that finishes above them on W/L and %'age regardless of where the higher teams finished in conf A.Ā 

Will wait and see how it pans out.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

Ā 
16 hours ago, Docs Demons said:

I might be a simple man but believe in a simple fix. 10 teams. 9 games and a final four. Extend season by one or two weeks. NO more teams for a year or two as talent is not there.

Logical more like it.

52 minutes ago, binman said:

In the AFL the real solution is each team play's each other only once. it is the only fair system. Sure it means much fewer games but there you go.

It could still lead to possible inequities. You could play all the good teams at home and all the weak teams away.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 39 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.Ā Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds.Ā 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?Ā Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?Ā 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 255 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies