1 hour ago, ENYAW said:

How about we get Jones from the swans,we give up our jones and watts. 

Wot? How about Watts (and a pick) for Z Jones.

N Jones is NOT steak knives

I want a 1st round draft pick for Watts, since he's still contracted I'd prefer to play hard ball and say two 1st round picks, or at the minimum, this years 1st round and next years 2nd round. If they set on the Lever deal, I'd use Swans/Ports 1st round pick and our 2nd round on that deal, then use our pick 10 to try and get Andrew Brayshaw. Tippet would be a complete waste.

20 minutes ago, Males said:

I want a 1st round draft pick for Watts, since he's still contracted I'd prefer to play hard ball and say two 1st round picks, or at the minimum, this years 1st round and next years 2nd round. If they set on the Lever deal, I'd use Swans/Ports 1st round pick and our 2nd round on that deal, then use our pick 10 to try and get Andrew Brayshaw. Tippet would be a complete waste.

We have laid our cards on the table with Watts, we are not in a great position to negotiate for value trades, that is my argument against Goodwin's strategy. It is not about whether we move Watts on or not, it is how we have telegraphed our opinion on his value, that is zilch, he is gone. 

3 hours ago, Males said:

I want a 1st round draft pick for Watts, since he's still contracted I'd prefer to play hard ball and say two 1st round picks, or at the minimum, this years 1st round and next years 2nd round. If they set on the Lever deal, I'd use Swans/Ports 1st round pick and our 2nd round on that deal, then use our pick 10 to try and get Andrew Brayshaw. Tippet would be a complete waste.

Two first rounds picks for Watts? Hahah. You've gotta be kidding me. Demonland's services would crash if we picked up a Watts-esque player - a talented 26 year old who's been unable to nail down a consistent senior gig - for two first rounds picks!

For some comparison, we only gave away 29 for Hibberd (and we upgraded 68 to 59).

52 minutes ago, Rogue said:

Two first rounds picks for Watts? Hahah. You've gotta be kidding me. Demonland's services would crash if we picked up a Watts-esque player - a talented 26 year old who's been unable to nail down a consistent senior gig - for two first rounds picks!

For some comparison, we only gave away 29 for Hibberd (and we upgraded 68 to 59).

I didn't say he was worth, or that we'd get, two 1st round picks for him, I said that is what I'd demand if I were the Dees. I'd then hope for at least a 1st round pick, hopefully a 2nd round pick too because he's still contracted for 2 years, if Swans/Port want him badly enough, make them pay overs. ?

If not, we keep him and hope that he pulls his finger out and plays to his potential. I'd prefer to keep him rather then throw him away for a 2nd round pick. ??

Apparently we are after a second round pick for Watts.

That’s a no from me.

 

16 hours ago, Tony Tea said:

Could make sense if Tippett wasn't Tippett.

Which Tippett  are you talking about, the one who could play or the one who can't play. Either way they are past there best.

So that's pretty well everyone NO

Kiss of Death YES

Tippett has as much value as Jack's left index fingernail. 

Laughable.

Edited October 3, 20178 yr by H_T

NO WAY. This thought makes me throw up

Tip it!!!!

No Tip! 

Apparently going in for surgery will miss the whole preseason. Not an option. 

On 10/3/2017 at 6:35 PM, Dee tention said:

No Tip! 

yeah, dump him.

I don't think we need midfielders or small forwards as we much as we need a power forward like Joe Danaher, Ben Dixon or Ben Brown.

Of course an extra mid won't go astray.

I don't believe Spencil going is a good thing, not at all, at all.

On 03/10/2017 at 5:08 PM, H_T said:

Tippett has as much value as Jack's left index fingernail. 

Laughable.

Agree. Tippett is useless. Melts like butter

On 02/10/2017 at 1:09 PM, Wiseblood said:

I'd rather Pick 14 be a part of the deal somehow.  We can do much more with that than we could do with Tippett.

Swans give up pick 14 for Watts.  You are giving a ludicrous trade idea. Are you allowed to ? Oh it’s Wuseblood again.  The one who says Watts is unprofessional and has broken standards!!

2 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Swans give up pick 14 for Watts.  You are giving a ludicrous trade idea. Are you allowed to ? Oh it’s Wuseblood again.  The one who says Watts is unprofessional and has broken standards!!

The fact you can't see this means you aren't worth wasting any more time on.  I only want to discuss this with people who have half a brain cell.

Half is more than nil.  

Crazy trade ideas from Wiseblood. Watts for pick 14. But he says Watts is unprofessional and has broken standards. 

More insults? That’s 1000 insults. Nil content. Yawn

Watts for Rohan?

1 hour ago, jackaub said:

Watts for Rohan?

Prefer Gondor.

1 hour ago, jackaub said:

Watts for Rohan?

No. If people are frustrated with Watts' inconsistency, i reckon they'd be ropeable with bringing in Rohan.

3 hours ago, jackaub said:

Watts for Rohan?

Wow wee.

Edited October 5, 20178 yr by Ethan Tremblay

1 hour ago, jackaub said:

Watts for Rohan?

I'd do it. I'd also move Hunt forward. I'd love to see Hunt, Rohan, Garlett and Hannan harassing opposition defenders. We need to create a point of difference forward of the centre to complement our strong contested ball winning midfield.