Jump to content

Farewell Jack Watts


PaulRB

Trade Jack Watts or not?  

477 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.


Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 16/09/2017 at 08:17, trout said:

On SEN's crunch time show today Robbo suggested Watts is worth a late second round pick if traded

Expand  

General opinion seems to be second-rounder.

Hard to see the value in it for me, unless they're trying for some kind of cultural change and don't see Jack as being part of that. He finished the previous season at Casey, plus his off-season slackness (or whatever it was), and then dropped again this in the latter part of the season ... not a good look, especially for someone with his skills/talent.


Posted

Part of me thinks he is to comfortable at melbourne and just cruising along and needs to go to another club but another part of me doesnt want him to go.

I would like to see him get the rewards and play finals with us. Plus I think he is a brilliant ball user. He rarely wastes it and when he has a shot on goal I 100% know he will kick it. 


Posted

Part of me thinks he is to comfortable at melbourne and just cruising along and needs to go to another club but another part of me doesnt want him to go.

I would like to see him get the rewards and play finals with us. Plus I think he is a brilliant ball user. He rarely wastes it and when he has a shot on goal I 100% know he will kick it. 

Posted
  On 06/09/2017 at 01:28, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

Up until his injury he was having a very good year - on top of a great 2016.  Teasing is the right word for it.

A fit and firing Watts makes us a four goal better team; when he's 'off', he's a liability.

 

Expand  

I think we wear rose colored glasses with Jack.  9th year player that is unlikely to improve significantly in our team (whether he does elsewhere is irrelevant).

He had 5.7 score involvements per game this year so unless we believe we kick 80% goals per score (statistically we dont) then he doesn't add four goals.

When he goes missing he is terrible, when he plays well (maybe 10% of games) he is impressive.

If we can move Jack on and improve the overall quality of the team, I'm all for it.  There is no place for romantic notions of loyalty if we want to see a flag.

Posted
  On 16/09/2017 at 12:24, mordja said:

I think we wear rose colored glasses with Jack.  9th year player that is unlikely to improve significantly in our team (whether he does elsewhere is irrelevant).

He had 5.7 score involvements per game this year so unless we believe we kick 80% goals per score (statistically we dont) then he doesn't add four goals.

When he goes missing he is terrible, when he plays well (maybe 10% of games) he is impressive.

If we can move Jack on and improve the overall quality of the team, I'm all for it.  There is no place for romantic notions of loyalty if we want to see a flag.

Expand  

So if I were to say we're a 3 goal better team, then essentially we agree..?

 

I will add though that to say any player who is regularly picked to play AFL only plays well %10 of the time is disingenuous.  If that were actually the case, he should be delisted immediately.


Posted

Yeah right, a team replete with turnover merchants decides to trade one of its best users of the ball.

That's what is wrong with this thread...not thought through.

Posted

A high draft pick who is just about to hit his straps. 

I reckon we should keep Colin Sylvia 


Posted

We throw Watts up for trade every year .

The Queens Birthday game was fairly rewarding in itself.

Force him to never miss a tackle.

Stop the public humiliation and give him the ball.


Posted

Trade him out.Bring in new blood.Ive heard all the bleeding hearts justifying his 9 years at Melbourne.He is a bloody lazy footballer who want last in Goodwins plan.

Posted
  On 17/09/2017 at 09:00, 64" said:

Trade him out.Bring in new blood.Ive heard all the bleeding hearts justifying his 9 years at Melbourne.He is a bloody lazy footballer who want last in Goodwins plan.

Expand  

Err...what's that? 

Posted
  On 17/09/2017 at 09:00, 64" said:

Trade him out.Bring in new blood.Ive heard all the bleeding hearts justifying his 9 years at Melbourne.He is a bloody lazy footballer who want last in Goodwins plan.

Expand  

As long as you miraculously know just who to bring in and more importantly can bring in that will offer more!  Yes Jack has issues but can we possibly work on that as he has unique attributes and skills you won't pick up in the second round of any draft. A 6.5 talk player, high endurance athelete with silky kicking skills, yes they come along in every draft. If we lift our game and become genuine top 4 contenders next year, Jack can be the X factor and swing man that all finalists need. 

Posted

I would only trade him for a player who when and If we get into a grand final has the potential to deliver the ball sublimely, Kick Crunch goals and is s silky smooth ball user.

Please feel free to insert said players here ........................................................................................................................


Posted
  On 18/09/2017 at 06:12, picket fence said:

I would only trade him for a player who when and If we get into a grand final has the potential to deliver the ball sublimely, Kick Crunch goals and is s silky smooth ball user.

Please feel free to insert said players here ........................................................................................................................

Expand  

He could be used as part of a trade to get Lever, if you really wanted another like Jack then pick up Menzel as a FA, they are both dead eye kicks at goal who don't tackle, he's a better contested mark than Jack but wouldn't be able to go up the ground as much.

Posted
  On 18/09/2017 at 06:12, picket fence said:

I would only trade him for a player who when and If we get into a grand final has the potential to deliver the ball sublimely, Kick Crunch goals and is s silky smooth ball user.

Please feel free to insert said players here ........................................................................................................................

Expand  

We wont get close to a grand Final with Watts in the team. He would crumble in the heat of a final. Would be like playing with 21 men.

So your argument is invalid.

Posted
  On 18/09/2017 at 06:42, Petraccattack said:

We wont get close to a grand Final with Watts in the team. He would crumble in the heat of a final. Would be like playing with 21 men.

So your argument is invalid.

Expand  

 Disagree strongly. I believe Watts would do the opposite and play a great game in the GF. Look at the big Queens Birthday game.He certainly didn't crumble in this one. We just cannot affored to lose SKILLED foorballers. Not enough on our list.


Posted
  On 18/09/2017 at 06:42, Petraccattack said:

We wont get close to a grand Final with Watts in the team. He would crumble in the heat of a final. Would be like playing with 21 men.

So your argument is invalid.

Expand  

And your body of evidence of that is???

Seriously, even Buddy has a questionable finals record. Don't make claims which are total BS. Kicking the winner against the pies was as finals as you get.


Posted
  On 18/09/2017 at 07:05, Bobby McKenzie said:

 Disagree strongly. I believe Watts would do the opposite and play a great game in the GF. Look at the big Queens Birthday game.He certainly didn't crumble in this one. We just cannot affored to lose SKILLED foorballers. Not enough on our list.

Expand  

And not just that game. For starters  how about the 2016 gc game at the g. A must win and jw stood up wirh a clutch goal then a goal saving mark.

Posted

I don't believe we would be better of without Watts unless we bring in a Toby Greene type.

Supposedly he was poor pre-season, played round 1 and never looked back until his hamstring injury. 

I remember an almost super human effort against Geelong in round 3 after Max went down. Can anyone tell me of another MFC player that could have filled the void that day with such impact?

Queens birthday speaks for itself, the week later against the Dogs he was great, kicked an important goal on the half time siren from 50m out on a pretty tight angle to halt a slight Dogs charge.

Misses the next several weeks and comes back without any real impact.

Looking at the shot on goal in the GWS game where he took a run up of about 3 steps indicates to me there was something more than a lack of desired effort, even if i wasn't trying I would not make it that obvious.

I much prefer the I salute Jack Watts thread of several weeks ago. 

Posted

Jonesy was pretty strong on his assessment of Watts on SEN this morning. Preparation not good enough, many years in the system needs to improve it and so does "team". Compared him to Clarry after his stuff and and how far apart they were.

 

Posted

Watts unfortunately just isn't doesn't have that competitive drive.  A naturally talented person, seems like a really good bloke but the type that expects his talent will get him through and so far it has he has played 153 games.  He is one of the few players that can actually kick the football on our list and this is the main issue.  You trade Watts it doesn't leave us with many players that really have elite foot skills.  Watts and Salem are our only players that have elite foot skills.

So can Watt's fix his attitude or get someone else in that can kick the footy that has the right attitude.  The club needs to make a tough call


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...