Jump to content

MATCH PREVIEW AND TEAM SELECTION - ROUND 20

Featured Replies

26 minutes ago, sue said:

Once again I am perplexed as to why Goodwin tells the next opponent in advance who will definitely be in the team.  I have no idea what attributes Maynard has that might make an opposition coach think about him for more than a microsecond, but I bet they do.  It also gives them an idea of who we might omit, again helping their planning. 

Why give them that advantage even if it is minor?  What advantage does it give us?  Or do footy clubs leak so badly that everyone who matters will know anyway?

I dont know but it seems that the teams are known by the industry generally on a Thursday and the AFL machine likes its news to include this sort of stuff. I suspect the teams are put in to AFL on Thursday morning or late Wednesday and possibly shared confidentially. Does anyone know if this happens?

 

 
27 minutes ago, sue said:

Once again I am perplexed as to why Goodwin tells the next opponent in advance who will definitely be in the team.  I have no idea what attributes Maynard has that might make an opposition coach think about him for more than a microsecond, but I bet they do.  It also gives them an idea of who we might omit, again helping their planning. 

Why give them that advantage even if it is minor?  What advantage does it give us?  Or do footy clubs leak so badly that everyone who matters will know anyway?

Simple. Because we are in charge of our own destiny. No surprises, nothing up the sleeve. Just hard work, week in, week out.

29 minutes ago, sue said:

Once again I am perplexed as to why Goodwin tells the next opponent in advance who will definitely be in the team.  I have no idea what attributes Maynard has that might make an opposition coach think about him for more than a microsecond, but I bet they do.  It also gives them an idea of who we might omit, again helping their planning. 

Why give them that advantage even if it is minor?  What advantage does it give us?  Or do footy clubs leak so badly that everyone who matters will know anyway?

I disagree that there is any advantage of disclosure or non disclosure - can you please clarify what the advantage is from your perspective @sue. All AFL clubs plan for a myriad of options - and 12 hours early notice would mean sfa.

 
2 minutes ago, The heart beats true said:

Simple. Because we are in charge of our own destiny. No surprises, nothing up the sleeve. Just hard work, week in, week out.

Correct weight sir.


4 hours ago, hardtack said:

"It was a horrible loss, as horrible as I can remember."  Not hard to see why your words were construed the way they were. 

Given the playing conditions, the fact the Roos had a pretty much full strength team on board, their familiarity with the ground and the fact that they were coming off a strong performance the week before, the loss was probably not as surprising as many seem to think.

1 min into last qtr and scores tied.......with a gale blowing towards our goals

it was definitely a horrible loss. hardtack

 
13 minutes ago, DaveyJones'sLocker said:

Then who else then? 

Hannan ? 3 touches I prefer him in tho.

Harmes for me.

10 minutes ago, DaveyJones'sLocker said:

Then who else then? 

Hannan ? 3 touches I prefer him in tho.

Depends if Hannan is injured or not, he has enough credits in the bank.

I would say Hogan, Trengove and JKH for Jones, Vince and Maynard.  Not sure they will replace Hogan with another key forward. Having said all that, I wouldn't be surprised if Watts is dropped either.


46 minutes ago, Danelska said:

I disagree that there is any advantage of disclosure or non disclosure - can you please clarify what the advantage is from your perspective @sue. All AFL clubs plan for a myriad of options - and 12 hours early notice would mean sfa.

If they have to plan for a "myriad" of options, I agree that removing one is no great advantage.  But there is not a myriad, just a few, particularly when you name who is in.  For example, unless there is a rumour that Gawn is injured, they will not plan on how to take on Spencer.  But if you name a new bloke, I bet they do a quick review of everything they can find out about him.  On the other hand, if you argue that there are many options to consider, then an extra 12 hours for planning is a help to the opponent.

As to the hairy-chested 'we are masters of our own destiny, we can tell them the truth' argument, I suppose we'd be happy then for the phone between Goodwin and the bench to be on open mike?

1 minute ago, daisycutter said:

1 min into last qtr and scores tied.......with a gale blowing towards our goals

it was definitely a horrible loss. hardtack

Yep. As horrible as i can remember? Perhaps not but my memory is not what it was.

The two losses most horrible losses this year are the last game and the Freo game. Both times we were in positions to smash them and failed to deliver.

29 minutes ago, sue said:

If they have to plan for a "myriad" of options, I agree that removing one is no great advantage.  But there is not a myriad, just a few, particularly when you name who is in.  For example, unless there is a rumour that Gawn is injured, they will not plan on how to take on Spencer.  But if you name a new bloke, I bet they do a quick review of everything they can find out about him.  On the other hand, if you argue that there are many options to consider, then an extra 12 hours for planning is a help to the opponent.

As to the hairy-chested 'we are masters of our own destiny, we can tell them the truth' argument, I suppose we'd be happy then for the phone between Goodwin and the bench to be on open mike?

I hear what you're saying, and I see a distinct difference between detailing strategy vs naming individuals. There are no unknown quantities re personnel - however its up to the individual players from opposing teams to do their due diligence - not just the coaches feeding them info. 


Mark Stevens reporting Patton may be out with a hammy.. Absolutely massive if true

 

 

This is the game that will show us if we have progressed significantly from last year, the team is down after last weeks loss. Now they need to all step up and win against a higher class opponent than we lost to last week, if we want to make the finals this year.


22 minutes ago, RedLegs23 said:

Patton out - SEN just announced

Huge

In: Jones, Pedersen, Vince, Maynard

Out: Jesse Hogan (shoulder), Mitch Hannan (rested), Jack Trengove, Jay Kennedy-Harris

 
43 minutes ago, RedLegs23 said:

Patton out - SEN just announced

Considering what key forwards have done to us all season, them missing Patton and Cameron makes this game a lot more winnable.

Patton and Cameron out is huge for us.

We should be able to win this one!


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Like
    • 276 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

      • Clap
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 145 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 33 replies