Jump to content

Featured Replies

I'd rather play me at full back. The bloke is so overrated. Big bloke but soft.

 

He’s dropped off big time in the past 1-2 years. Whether that’s the poor environment he’s stuck in or him as player losing struggling I’m not sure. 

Not sure he’s the best target for us now, despite our inexperienced key defensive depth.

 
1 hour ago, Demon Disciple said:

no way the suns would do that deal SONS.

Would have to be Tyson, Frost and a 2nd or 3rd round pick i'd imagine? But maybe we're still raffling duds in their eyes. I think we'd then go in with MAY on the best forwards, OMAC on 2nd best and Lever on the third man like with Adelaides defence in 2017. And play Oscar in the VFL if no matchup. Lewis retires and makes way for Salem or sticks it out on rotation. Jetta on crumber. Hibberd and Hunt off half back. I like it.

Edited by John Demonic


6 hours ago, John Demonic said:

Would have to be Tyson, Frost and a 2nd or 3rd round pick i'd imagine? But maybe we're still raffling duds in their eyes. I think we'd then go in with MAY on the best forwards, OMAC on 2nd best and Lever on the third man like with Adelaides defence in 2017. And play Oscar in the VFL if no matchup. Lewis retires and makes way for Salem or sticks it out on rotation. Jetta on crumber. Hibberd and Hunt off half back. I like it.

Would it be fair to say that a final decision needs to be made on Frosty once and for all before that happens? And by that I mean, play him for the rest of the year. Give him a chance.

1 hour ago, timbo said:

Would it be fair to say that a final decision needs to be made on Frosty once and for all before that happens? And by that I mean, play him for the rest of the year. Give him a chance.

Give Frost a chance? 

He's been given a chance in almost every position possible on the football field. 

Unfortunately for him, (and fortunately for us watching) his weaknesses won't allow him to be a consistent AFL player. 

5 minutes ago, stevethemanjordan said:

Give Frost a chance? 

He's been given a chance in almost every position possible on the football field. 

Unfortunately for him, (and fortunately for us watching) his weaknesses won't allow him to be a consistent AFL player. 

Sure, but he has by some accounts acquitting himself reliably in the 2s.

So...do we take the view he may have improved.

In any case, what's the other option....

 
On 5/22/2017 at 12:07 PM, Dr. Gonzo said:

Didn't Hurley recommit to the Bombers last year? Pretty sure he's tied up 

There is something interesting in that discussion on Hurley. Very interesting. Almost a left-wing conversation.

Now we have Lever, I think May would be a good get. GC would want too much though. They cannot afford to lose May. Their franchise hinges on being competitive at some point (soon). They need to sign Lynch and keep May.


May is a contracted captain of another club. We just overpaid for Lever as though it would fix all our defensive issues and now can't burn a 3rd first rounder on May. Our midfield is terribly unbalanced and we can't spend another 1st rounder on the backline.

Jordan Roughead as a free agent would provide a 200cm 105kg key defensive option and genuine ruck depth if Gawn went down. I appreciate he's not quite a full back and not quite a ruckman, but we desperately need some mature bodies and extra height back there. Oscar is always 2 years away from having the necessary strength, and it seems there is no competition for his spot given the club has banished Frost. Roughead would be a much better free hit for us than coughing up a first rounder for May.

 

Edited by Watts Jurrah Dunn?

22 minutes ago, Watts Jurrah Dunn? said:

We just overpaid for Lever

 

No, we didn't.  Seriously, we didn't.  

Does this mean the end of Oscar? He's had a couple of ordinary weeks but overall he has had a good year. Persist with Oscar and hope Lever can comeback somewhere near his best we need a running half back or 2 any out there?

3 hours ago, KingDingAling said:

Now we have Lever, I think May would be a good get. GC would want too much though. They cannot afford to lose May. Their franchise hinges on being competitive at some point (soon). They need to sign Lynch and keep May.

I think they're in a position to have to trade unhappy players,,,, for some 'mature leaders', and other mature GOF's...

They need leaders, like we need pace.

What they'd give for a Nathan Jones up there.

They need leaders...  quality.

 


1 hour ago, WERRIDEE said:

Does this mean the end of Oscar? He's had a couple of ordinary weeks but overall he has had a good year. Persist with Oscar and hope Lever can comeback somewhere near his best we need a running half back or 2 any out there?

A few people have difficulty with Oscar and Oskar !

6 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

Does this mean the end of Oscar? He's had a couple of ordinary weeks but overall he has had a good year. Persist with Oscar and hope Lever can comeback somewhere near his best we need a running half back or 2 any out there?

No, obviously not. He is a young and developing player. 

However, it's the only line we have that lacks depth, quality and experience. And it's remained that way since Dunn left. 

Frost, Keilty and Petty are not depth yet as we saw with Petty. Two of them are untried and Frost is a mistake ridden athlete who is the furthest thing from the word 'consistency' one could think of. 

The fact we don't have a mature body with either experience at AFL level or the level under is a serious oversight by Goodwin and the recruiting team. 

You look at Weideman VS Oscar McDonald and compare the way in which they've been handled over their careers. One has been made to play out of necessity rather than form. The other one is in his third year and has been dropped again after one poor game due to depth and talent. Weideman was a top end pick. Oscar a pick in the 50's.

It doesn't make sense to me. It should be our priority over the off season along with diversifying our midfield mix. 

You get rid of Frost, Tyson and Bugg over the off season and bring in May, Gaff and a half forward who is quick, skilled and pressures and watch our team transform. 

 

 

 

9 hours ago, Wiseblood said:

No, we didn't.  Seriously, we didn't.  

We gave up two first rounders for him and they say this years top 20 is exceptional.

We have gaping holes in the midfield, which is where games are won and lost.

Lever nominated the Dees so we held the power.

We massively overpaid for a guy that does not fix our problems.  He is a 'nice to have'.  Midfielders that can run and kick are a 'need'.

4 minutes ago, chook fowler said:

Last time I watched him play he looked lost and lazy - and very slow

The whole side does, they don't want to be there.


1 hour ago, Watts Jurrah Dunn? said:

We gave up two first rounders for him and they say this years top 20 is exceptional.

We have gaping holes in the midfield, which is where games are won and lost.

Lever nominated the Dees so we held the power.

We massively overpaid for a guy that does not fix our problems.  He is a 'nice to have'.  Midfielders that can run and kick are a 'need'.

He does fix our problems.  Our backline was on fire before he went down, and that was due in large part to his leadership, footy IQ and footy skills.  You are selling the bloke short.

As for this years top 20 being 'exceptional' - we've all heard that before.  Our first rounder this year still has every chance of being around about the 11-12 mark, which isn't superb by any stretch.  The last 'super draft' that everyone refers to from 2001 had far more misses than hits.

If you take out Judd, Ball and Hodge as the Top 3, an area we wouldn't have been picking in anyway, from picks 4 through to 30 only Bartel (#8), Dal Santo (#13), James Kelly (#17) and Steve Johnson (#24) could be considered gun picks.  There are a heap of no name players who did nothing with their careers.  After pick 30 you had guys like Sam Mitchell, Leigh Montagna, Dane Swan (pick #58!), Jarrad Waite andBrian Lake (#71) all taken in the second round and beyond.  They can talk it all up all you like, but I think having what is considered a strong Top 20 works in our favour.  Jason Taylor has a proven track record of securing talent later in the draft and I'd back him in to do so again.

We didn't overpay at all for Lever.  We paid market value for a bloke with 50 games under his belt and almost AA selection in his first few seasons in the game.

17 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

He does fix our problems.  Our backline was on fire before he went down, and that was due in large part to his leadership, footy IQ and footy skills.  You are selling the bloke short.

As for this years top 20 being 'exceptional' - we've all heard that before.  Our first rounder this year still has every chance of being around about the 11-12 mark, which isn't superb by any stretch.  The last 'super draft' that everyone refers to from 2001 had far more misses than hits.

If you take out Judd, Ball and Hodge as the Top 3, an area we wouldn't have been picking in anyway, from picks 4 through to 30 only Bartel (#8), Dal Santo (#13), James Kelly (#17) and Steve Johnson (#24) could be considered gun picks.  There are a heap of no name players who did nothing with their careers.  After pick 30 you had guys like Sam Mitchell, Leigh Montagna, Dane Swan (pick #58!), Jarrad Waite andBrian Lake (#71) all taken in the second round and beyond.  They can talk it all up all you like, but I think having what is considered a strong Top 20 works in our favour.  Jason Taylor has a proven track record of securing talent later in the draft and I'd back him in to do so again.

We didn't overpay at all for Lever.  We paid market value for a bloke with 50 games under his belt and almost AA selection in his first few seasons in the game.

Spot on

  • 4 weeks later...
 
On 7/5/2018 at 11:17 PM, Wiseblood said:

No, we didn't.  Seriously, we didn't.  

Right now we did Wiseblood he cannot play till mid next year.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Vomit
      • Like
    • 39 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Haha
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 257 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Sad
    • 47 replies