Jump to content

Where Does All the Money Go?

Slartibartfast
Slartibartfast
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Posted

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/afl-season-2016-debt-down-but-losses-mount-for-afl-clubs-20160206-gmnb1h.html

An article in The Age today gives a summary of the gross income and debt position of all the Victorian clubs.

Hawthorn top the charts with just over $70 million and the poor old Saints the bottom at around $32 million.  We sit at about $44 million and have made a modest profit and we have a debt of about $5 million.  The profit and debt positions can be a little misleading because not shown are the assets of the club (Bentleigh more than offsets our debt) and of course profits can be fudged at year end and can include such things as depreciation and write off of assets which can distort the true position of a club.

But in essence the Hawks have more than twice the income of the Saints and you just wonder where all the money goes.  Once you've adjusted for profits and interest on debt there is a profound difference.  I just wonder where all the money goes.  FD spending?  Admin?  I don't know.  Pokies and the staff to run the facilities?

Does anyone know?  On face value the AFL desperately needs to even up the have and the have nots or we will fast become like the EPL.  I'm glad to see Newbold go, he struck me as an arrogant [censored] who peached equality and then did everything in his power to frustrate AFL attempts to introduce it.

Edit: And the other thing is our profit is marginal at best.  A couple of hundred thousand dollars in $44.5 million is break even at best.  Fine judgement that, but it makes you wonder about the window dressing that may go on.  Not that this administration would be the only ones to dress the result, it's been done for years.  Even with Hawthorns income they still manage to make a profit of about 5% on turnover.

  • Quote
    •  
    9 minutes ago, Baghdad Bob said:

    http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/afl-season-2016-debt-down-but-losses-mount-for-afl-clubs-20160206-gmnb1h.html

    An article in The Age today gives a summary of the gross income and debt position of all the Victorian clubs.

    Hawthorn top the charts with just over $70 million and the poor old Saints the bottom at around $32 million.  We sit at about $44 million and have made a modest profit and we have a debt of about $5 million.  The profit and debt positions can be a little misleading because not shown are the assets of the club (Bentleigh more than offsets our debt) and of course profits can be fudged at year end and can include such things as depreciation and write off of assets which can distort the true position of a club.

    But in essence the Hawks have more than twice the income of the Saints and you just wonder where all the money goes.  Once you've adjusted for profits and interest on debt there is a profound difference.  I just wonder where all the money goes.  FD spending?  Admin?  I don't know.  Pokies and the staff to run the facilities?

    Does anyone know?  On face value the AFL desperately needs to even up the have and the have nots or we will fast become like the EPL.  I'm glad to see Newbold go, he struck me as an arrogant [censored] who peached equality and then did everything in his power to frustrate AFL attempts to introduce it.

    Edit: And the other thing is our profit is marginal at best.  A couple of hundred thousand dollars in $44.5 million is break even at best.  Fine judgement that, but it makes you wonder about the window dressing that may go on.  Not that this administration would be the only ones to dress the result, it's been done for years.  Even with Hawthorns income they still manage to make a profit of about 5% on turnover.

    Hawthorn bought the Australian Paper Mills didn't they?

  • Quote

    Just on the Newbold comment, the AFL can do whatever they like can't they? The AFL runs the show, they choose not to push equalisation harder.

  • Quote
    •  

    thought hawthorn were building a war chest to fund their new proposed and ambitious training centre

  • Quote
    49 minutes ago, Baghdad Bob said:

    But in essence the Hawks have more than twice the income of the Saints and you just wonder where all the money goes.  .........................

    Does anyone know? 

    Premiership celebrations and drink drive education.... Court costs are similar between Hawks and Saints.

  • Quote

    It seems the numbers are very 'rubbery'!!!  Some just don't make sense eg MFC profit of $.562m on Rev of $44.5 while CFC figures are $.850 on $66.2m.  Carlton $2.7 loss on $54.1m.  As the core costs of running a football club are the same eg Sal cap, # of coaches/support staff etc you have to wonder what creative accounting the 'power' clubs are doing to make such small profits/big losses.  

    I'm not even sure the AFL has mandated accounting policies, practices and formats...at least none that are apparent whenever I have looked at comparing financial reports from clubs' annual reports.  It would help if we could compare 'apples with apples'.  But I fear the AFL is quite happy to have a certain opaqueness in club financials - it enables them to use their financial discretion without other clubs/club supporters saying:  'what about me'?! 

    That is just another ?mark on how the AFL operate.

  • Quote
    9 hours ago, Baghdad Bob said:

    http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/afl-season-2016-debt-down-but-losses-mount-for-afl-clubs-20160206-gmnb1h.html

    An article in The Age today gives a summary of the gross income and debt position of all the Victorian clubs.

    Hawthorn top the charts with just over $70 million and the poor old Saints the bottom at around $32 million.  We sit at about $44 million and have made a modest profit and we have a debt of about $5 million.  The profit and debt positions can be a little misleading because not shown are the assets of the club (Bentleigh more than offsets our debt) and of course profits can be fudged at year end and can include such things as depreciation and write off of assets which can distort the true position of a club.

    But in essence the Hawks have more than twice the income of the Saints and you just wonder where all the money goes.  Once you've adjusted for profits and interest on debt there is a profound difference.  I just wonder where all the money goes.  FD spending?  Admin?  I don't know.  Pokies and the staff to run the facilities?

    Does anyone know?  On face value the AFL desperately needs to even up the have and the have nots or we will fast become like the EPL.  I'm glad to see Newbold go, he struck me as an arrogant [censored] who peached equality and then did everything in his power to frustrate AFL attempts to introduce it.

    Edit: And the other thing is our profit is marginal at best.  A couple of hundred thousand dollars in $44.5 million is break even at best.  Fine judgement that, but it makes you wonder about the window dressing that may go on.  Not that this administration would be the only ones to dress the result, it's been done for years.  Even with Hawthorns income they still manage to make a profit of about 5% on turnover.

    I remember around 5yrs ago WCE and Coll were spending $300k a week more than Melbourne on their football depts. Just over $15m a year. High altitude chambers, recovery rooms, trips to Arizona , more doctors, more physios, better gyms, etc etc etc

    Pretty easy to rack up a lot more spending. Plus some of them divert money to other property plays, pubs, pokie venues etc

  • Quote

    Her are some simple numbers for a couple of clubs:

    Melbourne

    Revenue 44M

    Football expenses $22M

    Sponsorship, membership, Fundraising, marketing $8.6M

    Admin $3M

    Other $3M

    Profit 0.5M

    Hawthorn:

    Revenue $71M.  

    Employee and Staff $32M. 

    Sponsorship, marketing and membership expenses $13M

    Other? 10M

    Profit $5M

     

    Collingwood

    Revenue $66M

    Football expenses $22M

    Sponsorship, membership, matchday and commercial expenses 18M

    Gaming expenses and functions 12M

    Other? 8M

    Profit 0.8M

    Carlton

    Revenue $54M

    Football department $22M

    Marketing, membership, venue expenses $26M

    Wages and Salaries $24M

    Loss 2.7M

     

     

    Football expenses seem to be much the same ( which is what you would expect with salary cap)

    The expenses in "other staff" "wages and salaries" & "admin" is the big ticket item.  There is certainly a relationship between membership size and the number of staff you need to service them. 

     

  • Quote
    •  
    1 minute ago, george_on_the_outer said:

    I'll try to dig out some numbers in the next couple of days ( at the moment I can't find our own financials from 2015!)

    Simple numbers:

    Hawthorn:

    Revenue $71M.  

    Employee and Staff $32M. 

    Sponsorship, marketing and membership expenses $13M

    Other? 10M

    Profit $5M

    Strangely a debt of....8

  • Quote

    Apparently half the afl staff were in san Francisco today watching some superb owl.

    Not sure what owls have to do with footy but its a fair junket considering youve only gotta go down the Peninsula to see some owls

  • Quote

    Most of the clubs spend about 20mil on footy department spending, with 'the gap' not really that big in the scheme of things now there's the cap. https://au.sports.yahoo.com/afl/a/27913568/afl-football-department-spending-figures-revealed/

    I'd suggest Melbourne run the non football department staff pretty miserly. Other clubs are investing a lot more in their websites and social media presence. The bigger clubs no doubt spend more on advertising as well. 

    Our challenge is definitely to try and grow revenue behind footy success over the next few years, starting with getting 10k more members. If we do that we will be able to keep touch with the big boys.

  • Quote
    3 minutes ago, biggestred said:

    Apparently half the afl staff were in san Francisco today watching some superb owl.

    Not sure what owls have to do with footy but its a fair junket considering youve only gotta go down the Peninsula to see some owls

    As long as they can knock up a power point presentation on the insights learned from the NFL they can wholly justify their business class juncket.... 

  • Quote
    17 minutes ago, george_on_the_outer said:

    I'll try to dig out some numbers in the next couple of days ( at the moment I can't find our own financials from 2015!)

    Simple numbers:

    Hawthorn:

    Revenue $71M.  

    Employee and Staff $32M. 

    Sponsorship, marketing and membership expenses $13M

    Other? 10M

    Profit $5M

     

    Collingwood

    Revenue $66M

    Football expenses $22M

    Sponsorship, membership, matchday and commercial expenses 18M

    Gaming expenses and functions 12M

    Other? 8M

    Profit 0.8M

    http://m.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-11-26/melbourne-announces-agm-date

    Link to the 2015 financial report on the club website page on the AGM

  • Quote
    9 hours ago, Cards13 said:

    Just on the Newbold comment, the AFL can do whatever they like can't they? The AFL runs the show, they choose not to push equalisation harder.

    What else would you like to see in terms of equalisation? No doubt the draw is always a hot topic but in fairness the we only have ourselves to blame. The networks pay for the rights and they want blockbuster games in prime time slots. If we can play big game football for a consistent period we will get rewarded, regardless of who plays on a Friday night I'm normally watching because there's a fair chance the game will be entertaining. 

    I also thought each year the AFL released how much funding each club received for that year. Whilst every club was allocated the base rate, we along with the Doggies/Saints etc got extra.

    Today's announcement of a new sponsor is a sign we're heading in the right direction and that we can't just rely on handouts.

  • Quote

    10 minutes ago, Bombay Airconditioning said:

    What else would you like to see in terms of equalisation? No doubt the draw is always a hot topic but in fairness the we only have ourselves to blame. The networks pay for the rights and they want blockbuster games in prime time slots. If we can play big game football for a consistent period we will get rewarded, regardless of who plays on a Friday night I'm normally watching because there's a fair chance the game will be entertaining. 

    I also thought each year the AFL released how much funding each club received for that year. Whilst every club was allocated the base rate, we along with the Doggies/Saints etc got extra.

    Today's announcement of a new sponsor is a sign we're heading in the right direction and that we can't just rely on handouts.

    Not last season 'Bombay', I couldn't be bothered with the Carlton fest...

  • Quote
    8 minutes ago, rjay said:

    Not last season 'Bombay', I couldn't be bothered with the Carlton fest...

    You got me there, I'd forgotten about that but you get where I'm coming from. They are on the end of the Hulk fists this year getting brought back to earth with no Friday nights games however they open the season with the traditional clash against perrenial finals chokers Richmond.

  • Quote

    If they're in any way sensible then profits are invested to generate greater future profits.  Ultimately you want the club to be able to survive a slump in membership and still maintain their levels of spending on football.  The big clubs have other income streams which keep them profitable regardless of their on-field performance.  We need to be get into that league. 

  • Quote
    9 hours ago, Bombay Airconditioning said:

    What else would you like to see in terms of equalisation? No doubt the draw is always a hot topic but in fairness the we only have ourselves to blame. The networks pay for the rights and they want blockbuster games in prime time slots. If we can play big game football for a consistent period we will get rewarded, regardless of who plays on a Friday night I'm normally watching because there's a fair chance the game will be entertaining. 

    I also thought each year the AFL released how much funding each club received for that year. Whilst every club was allocated the base rate, we along with the Doggies/Saints etc got extra.

    Today's announcement of a new sponsor is a sign we're heading in the right direction and that we can't just rely on handouts.

    It isnt so much about when you play, it is about who you have home games against. The small Melbourne clubs generally only get home games against each other and interstate sides while the big ckubs get home games against each other far more. This makes it far easier for them to make money. Add to that the high profile TV slots and lufe all of a sudden gets a lot easier. 

    I say split the gate on every game 50/50 and things instantly get a lot fairer

  • Quote
    11 hours ago, rjay said:

    Not last season 'Bombay', I couldn't be bothered with the Carlton fest...

    6 Friday night games and 2 Saturday night games smashes the "you have to perform to get good TV slots" theory. On 2014's form they deserved nothing.

  • Quote

    2 hours ago, Chris said:

    It isnt so much about when you play, it is about who you have home games against. The small Melbourne clubs generally only get home games against each other and interstate sides while the big ckubs get home games against each other far more. This makes it far easier for them to make money. Add to that the high profile TV slots and lufe all of a sudden gets a lot easier. 

    I say split the gate on every game 50/50 and things instantly get a lot fairer

    Still doesn't help if you play GWS at the G and then in Sydney. Half of both of those games is very little. That theory works with EFC, Hawks, Carlton, Coll, Geel, Rich.

    And when you play WCE that fill the ground with 90% members, the revenue available to be split diminishes considerably.

  • Quote

    The real crux is to get the 18 teams playing each other once and then devise a system so there are 5 more rounds and then finals. That way there are the same number of games for TV. 

    Maybe you split the comp after 18 games into 3 segments to decide finals playoffs and draft order at the bottom to keep interest ...

    The AFL and TV won't countenance a reduction in total number of games 

  • Quote

    It's all about the Revenue.

    You have to speculate to accumulate.

    Hawthorn $13M and Collingwood $18M spend more wining and dining the sponsors than Melbourne $8.6M

    They are in the Finals and that's the rewards the sponsors want. Which means that is the Bottom line the club gets.

  • Quote
    •  
    11 hours ago, Bombay Airconditioning said:

    You got me there, I'd forgotten about that but you get where I'm coming from. They are on the end of the Hulk fists this year getting brought back to earth with no Friday nights games however they open the season with the traditional clash against perrenial finals chokers Richmond.

    We use the word 'traditional' pretty loosely these days, don't we? I guess if we keep saying it long enough people will start to believe it.

  • Quote
    11 hours ago, Bombay Airconditioning said:

    You got me there, I'd forgotten about that but you get where I'm coming from. They are on the end of the Hulk fists this year getting brought back to earth with no Friday nights games however they open the season with the traditional clash against perrenial finals chokers Richmond.

     

    Just now, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

    We use the word 'traditional' pretty loosely these days, don't we? I guess if we keep saying it long enough people will start to believe it.

    Carlton fans will realise how bad they actually are and the Tiges will again get an inflated opinion of where they sit.

    For the rest of us we will get a false start to the season...

  • Quote

    • Archived

    This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 10

      The Sir Doug Nicholls Round kicks off in Darwin with a Top 4 clash between the Suns and the Hawks. On Friday night the Swans will be seeking to rebound from a challenging start to the season, while the Blues have the Top 8 in their sights after their sluggish start. Saturdays matches kick off with a blockbuster between the Collingwood and Kuwarna with the Magpies looking to maintain their strong form and the Crows aiming to make a statement on the road. The Power face a difficult task to revive their season against a resilient Cats side looking to make amends for their narrow loss last week. The Giants aim to reinforce their top-eight status, while the Dockers will be looking to break the travel hoodoo. The sole Saturday game is a critical matchup for both teams, as the Bulldogs strive to cemet their spot in the top six and the Bombers desperately want break into the 8. Sundays start with a bottom 3 clash between the Tigers and Kangaroos with both teams wanting to avoid the being in wooden spoon contention. The Round concludes with the Eagles still searching for their first win of the season, while the Saints look to keep their finals hopes alive with a crucial away victory. Who are you tipping and what are the best results for the Demons?

      • 165 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Brisbane

      And just like that, we’re Narrm again. Even though the annual AFL Sir Doug Nicholls Round which commemorates the contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture to our game has been a welcome addition to our calendar for ten years, more lately it has been a portent of tough times ahead for we beleaguered Narrm supporters. Ever since the club broke through for its historic 2021 premiership, this has become a troubling time of the year for the club. For example, it all began when Melbourne rebranded itself as Narrm across the two rounds of the Sir Doug Nicholls Round to become the first club to adopt an Indigenous club name especially for the occasion. It won its first outing under the brand against lowly North Melbourne to go to 10 wins and no losses but not without a struggle or a major injury to  star winger Ed Langdon who broke his ribs and missed several weeks. In the following week, still as Narrm, the team’s 17 game winning streak came to an end at the hands of the Dockers. That came along with more injuries, a plague that remained with them for the remainder of the season until, beset by injuries, the Dees were eliminated from the finals in straight sets. It was even worse last year, when Narrm inexplicably lowered its colours in Perth to the Waalit Marawar Eagles. Oh, the shame of it all! At least this year, if there is a corner to turn around, it has to be in the direction of something better. To that end, I produced a special pre-game chant in the local Narrm language - “nam mi:wi winnamun katjil prolin ambi ngamar thamelin amb” which roughly translated is “every heart beats true for the red and the blue.” >y belief is that if all of the Narrm faithful recite it long enough, then it might prove to be the only way to beat the Brisbane Lions at the Gabba on Sunday. The Lions are coming off a disappointing draw at Marvel Stadium against a North Melbourne team that lacks the ability and know how to win games (except when playing Melbourne). Brisbane are, however, a different kettle of fish at home and have very few positional weaknesses. They are a midfield powerhouse, strong in defence and have plenty of forward options, particularly their small and medium sized players, to kick a winning score this week after the sting of last week’s below par performance.

        • Haha
      • 11 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Hawthorn

      There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Footscray

      At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Brisbane

      The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Clap
        • Like
      • 284 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Hawthorn

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

        • Thanks
      • 53 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All