Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Nasher said:

Heh, you always know Dean Ku..err Kent won't be far away when there's a blue on either.

I still laugh about last year against Adelaide when he completely ragdoll a crow player and just literally grabbed and threw him out of the pack with such ease.

He is living up to his name.

 
2 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

I still laugh about last year against Adelaide when he completely ragdoll a crow player and just literally grabbed and threw him out of the pack with such ease.

He is living up to his name.

Fell just short of qualifying for Rio in the hammer throw. 

5 hours ago, biggestred said:

Actually hate rance now

Is that the same Rance that Dear Bruce was orgasmic over last year despite the fact that Hogan in one of his first games took him apart?  

3 hours ago, Jesse Christ said:

Hittite someone in the back of the head is extreme dangerous. It is the true definition of a cowards punch,  deserved to be flattened by Viney- he should get an award! 

That is exactly what is all too regularly killing (and maiming) our youth.  Needs to be very solidly hit on the head (pun intended) by those in charge. 

 
5 hours ago, Petraccattack said:

Welcome to the club Alex Coward Rance

 

 

kUIOtfd.gif

Quoting to have it on this page too!

On 4/25/2016 at 2:04 PM, dazzledavey36 said:

I still laugh about last year against Adelaide when he completely ragdoll a crow player and just literally grabbed and threw him out of the pack with such ease.

He is living up to his name.

Hahaha thanks for reminding me of that! hilarious!


Very symbolic of the way we have been treated in the past, by media and opposition alike, and very symbolic of the way we are and will be from now on.

8 hours ago, daisycutter said:

i wan't to go drinking and clubbing with jv

Lol. Jack's too focused for that. The few times I have seen him in person, he just seems to be a total professional and I imagine him living and breathing football 24/7.

3 hours ago, Peter Griffen said:

Jack is currently winning the herald sun player of the year. 

and my respect for him has gone to a whole new level, threw an All Australian defender to the ground like a sack of [censored] to show him what a little [censored] he is. 

I am disgusted by the Sympathy Rance is getting, it was a dog act, needs to be totally gone from the game.

I thought the commentary watching the replay was pathetic on this. They said something like they feel sorry for Rance for being bombarded for so many years. [censored] off. That shouldn't condone his cowardly act.

 
1 hour ago, AdamFarr said:

Lol. Jack's too focused for that. The few times I have seen him in person, he just seems to be a total professional and I imagine him living and breathing football 24/7.

I

not for drinking, but as personal protection :)

  • 1 month later...

https://www.reddit.com/r/AFL/comments/4lilaq/jack_viney_hits_brad_ebert_with_the/?#DESC

Brad Ebert should get weeks for that.

He should have known that an elbow in the kidney from behind would cause this re-action.

Reckless

High impact

To the knuckle

Honestly... He even took his mouth guard out to inflict further damage! Gutless.

Bite mark.JPG


Jack was being beaten...Jack was the one crying on the weekend. They sucked him in...still a lot to learn before he becomes a true leader. What Jack did was a sign of what the team did all day.

At least he came back later in the game and did what he should have done in the first place...

2 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

Watch Lewis anf the Hawks get into him if he somehow manages to not get rubbed out.

Lewis may not play either after a head butt.


3 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

Didn't see that. Interesting. 

And he's been banned for two weeks before for headbutting (2011)

does anyone think Viney will get off?

the first two punches I reckon were insifficient force for a suspension but the third is low impact id think.   hard to see him avoid a week.

Thought Viney was off early on when he was going head to head for a ball with Robbie Gray, JV shirked and RG ran away with it, most confusing, set the tone for the day.

44 minutes ago, DubDee said:

does anyone think Viney will get off?

the first two punches I reckon were insifficient force for a suspension but the third is low impact id think.   hard to see him avoid a week.

I can't see how he escapes without a week. If it were just 1 smack then he'd just get a fine because Ebert wasn't hurt. But to do it 3 times wasn't a good look.

Hoping he just gets the one week. The rest might do him the world of good and let's face it we won't beat Hawthorn this week.

Have him fresh for Queens birthday V's Collingwood, which is a game in our weight division.  

Edited by Bring-Back-Powell


Hopefully he only gets a week, but the fact here were 3 punches doesn't make it look good. He might get 2-3 weeks if we're unlucky.

We're no hope against the Hawks, especially without him there and firing. Hopefully he is back for the the game vs the Pies.

They were slaps with the exception of the last one which is inconclusive. Ebert will do the right thing and say it was a slap. $1500 fine, move on. :)

 

Gone.  He'll be sent straight to the tribunal, three weeks down to two with an early plea, and Roos will send him to the naughty corner.

Other teams will look to provoke him until he proves he can control his temper.

Can accept a week.

sauce - Keane's Twitter account 

Actually not a disastrous result IMO. We won't win on Saturday regardless, and he can rest up for the winnable Pies game. Hopefully he has a big game as he owes the side one.

Edited by Bring-Back-Powell


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 23 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies