Jump to content

Featured Replies

8 minutes ago, Ollie fan said:

Completely agree and I was in the verge of posting exactly the same thing. Max has to beat Xerri because all else aside, in this match he is playing for his 8th AA - well, that's how I see it anyway. So he should have been given help.

If a journeyman with a handful of games in a zillion year career is our answer..... Gawd help us!

 
8 minutes ago, chook fowler said:

It would also have enabled Roo to play as a pure forward and not be battered in the ruck. I have told the Club I am available as a selector.

starting to question if we even have a selection committee at this point? probably just drawing straws or blindly throwing darts at a dart board to pick teams

6 minutes ago, BLWNBA said:

Reportedly there’s another Melbourne based club very interested in him. Suspect he’ll get another gig.

It’s a great example of a lack of selection integrity though, on our behalf.

Bill’s been our best performer at VFL level for two years now

Regardless of whether he makes it he should have been given a sustained run at it a long time ago - and not as sub

 
1 minute ago, demoncat said:

Bill’s been our best performer at VFL level for two years now

Regardless of whether he makes it he should have been given a sustained run at it a long time ago - and not as sub

I completely agree, particularly with your point around the lack of opportunity to demonstrate if he can (or can’t) perform at AFL standard/level. It’s a pretty damning notion, especially when you compare it to other players who are played week in, week out.

Shifting the deck chairs hoping for sun… but I don’t see a lot at Casey to be bold at selection either….


don't understand why bill Laurie isn't given a run

i hope he gets a chance at another AFL club. deserves the opportunity to see if he has what it takes.

36 minutes ago, chook fowler said:

Disappointed Campbell hasn’t been selected to help Max battle Xerri. He surely would offer more than Jefferson.

Often curious why name and not select.. What's gained.

20 minutes ago, BLWNBA said:

Reportedly there’s another Melbourne based club very interested in him. Suspect he’ll get another gig.

It’s a great example of a lack of selection integrity though, on our behalf.

Thought I read somewhere Richmond might be keen. Could make sense with the Yze connection.

Really wanted us to give him a proper run at it. Just the one game as sub for 20 minutes this year after outperforming all of Tholstrup, Sharp, Billings and Henderson is ridiculous.

 
15 minutes ago, Doug Reemer said:

No what I’m getting at is. If only 1 play or 2 players are omitted on a Thursday for a Sunday. Only 1 or 2 can be bought in. Excluding late outs.

So when Sharp was the only player omitted. We could only choose one from the squad named.

Yeah nah.

Last night West Coast initially omitted 3 players last night in Tim Kelly, Bo Allan and Sandy Brock.

As of 5pm tonight after teams were finalised they omitted a fourth player in Jack Williams who was already named on the extended bench. So they ended up dropping an extra player after initial making the three omissions last night. This literally goes against your argument.

My point is you can make as many changes you want from your extended bench on Sunday games. Just because one player gets omitted doesn't mean you can't make further omissions. Teams dont fully get finalised until friday afternoon.


31 minutes ago, Random Task said:

Thought I read somewhere Richmond might be keen. Could make sense with the Yze connection.

Really wanted us to give him a proper run at it. Just the one game as sub for 20 minutes this year after outperforming all of Tholstrup, Sharp, Billings and Henderson is ridiculous.

Yeah, he’ll be at Richmond.

1 hour ago, Billy said:

What in Gods name has Tholstrup done to warrant selection

He has a mullet.

19 hours ago, Devil In Disguise said:

Staggering how Tholstrup remains in the team this week.

I would say the same, or more so, for #31BF

10 hours ago, The Taciturn Demon said:

I'd say Salem has been in people's cross-hairs since very close to the start. Understated footballer who seems to be the first on the "let's trade" list. (A long while ago, I know, but widely underrated in the GF.)

........

I will never forget - mid first quarter in the 2021 GF I thought that Salo could be well in the running for the Norm Smith, that's how good he was.

But ... that was the game the #31BF kicked 6 goals

2 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Yeah nah.

Last night West Coast initially omitted 3 players last night in Tim Kelly, Bo Allan and Sandy Brock.

As of 5pm tonight after teams were finalised they omitted a fourth player in Jack Williams who was already named on the extended bench. So they ended up dropping an extra player after initial making the three omissions last night. This literally goes against your argument.

My point is you can make as many changes you want from your extended bench on Sunday games. Just because one player gets omitted doesn't mean you can't make further omissions. Teams dont fully get finalised until friday afternoon.

My bad I never realised.

Goodwin never seems to do that.


3 hours ago, Doug Reemer said:

Selection confusion aside.

I can’t wait to watch us kick ourselves out this game!!

Yeah our accuracy has been atrocious this year and could very well cost us another game this weekend. Also, North are clearly one of the more accurate sides in the league.

I will say though that our accuracy is trending upwards since hitting rock bottom (7.21) against St Kilda.

We had more respectable scores of 10.9, 12.11 and 11.9 very late in the Pies, GC and Adelaide games.

Barring an interrupted pre season Kentfield should be lining up at FF in 26.

I've seen enough.

12 minutes ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

Barring an interrupted pre season Kentfield should be lining up at FF in 26.

I've seen enough.

We are due for another diamond in the rough!


16 hours ago, BDA said:

North outs make this a must win game.

Lose to an injury ravaged North and the club will officially be in crisis mode

that said i reckon we win by 20-30 points

definition of crisis mode?

14 hours ago, demoncat said:

Bill’s been our best performer at VFL level for two years now

Regardless of whether he makes it he should have been given a sustained run at it a long time ago - and not as sub

I agree, it’s a disgrace some very very very average players are getting a game in front of Laurie

 
4 minutes ago, Random Task said:

Presumably we will get a fine for bringing him in outside of the listed emergencies?

Unlikely if he has Covid. I think the rules changed a bit since the pandemic. Of course I’m sure those rules only apply to Collingwood and Geelong 🙄


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: West Coast

    It was bad enough that the Melbourne Football Club created yet another humiliating scenario inside its wretched season at Marvel Stadium last Sunday, but the final insult is that it has been commanded to return to the scene of the crime to inflict further punishment on its fans this week. Incidentally, if this match preview, of a game that promises to be one of the most unattractive fixtures in the history of the game, happens to cut out of your computer screen three quarters of the way through, it’s no coincidence. I’ll be mirroring the Demons’ lacklustre effort against St Kilda from last Sunday when they conceded the largest last quarter turnaround for victory in the history of the game.

    • 0 replies
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    When looking back at the disastrous end to the game, I find it a waste of time to concentrate on the final few moments when utter confusion reigned. Forget the 6-6-6 mess, the failure to mark the most dangerous man on the field, the inability to seal the game when opportunities presented themselves to Clayton Oliver, Harry Petty and Charlie Spargo, the vision of match winning players of recent weeks in Kozzy Pickett and Jake Melksham spending helpless minutes on the interchange bench and the powerlessness of seizing the opportunity to slow the tempo of the game down in those final moments.

      • Love
    • 9 replies
  • CASEY: Sandringham

    The Casey Demons rebounded from a sluggish start to manufacture a decisive win against Sandringham in the final showdown, culminating a quarter century of intense rivalry between the fluctuating alignments of teams affiliated with AFL clubs Melbourne and St Kilda, as the Saints and the Zebras prepare to forge independent paths in 2026. After conceding three of the first four goals of the match, the Demons went on a goal kicking rampage instigated by the winning ruck combination of Tom Campbell with 26 hitouts, 26 disposals and 13 clearances and his apprentice Will Verrall who contributed 20 hitouts. This gave first use of the ball to the likes of Jack Billings, Bayley Laurie, Riley Bonner and Koltyn Tholstrup who was impressive early. By the first break they had added seven goals and took a strong grip on the game. The Demons were well served up forward early by Mitch Hardie and, as the game progressed, Harry Sharp proved a menace with a five goal performance. Emerging young forwards Matthew Jefferson and Luker Kentfield kicked two each but the former let himself down with some poor kicking for goal.
    Young draft talent Will Duursma showed the depth of his talent and looks well out of reach for Melbourne this year. Kalani White was used sparingly and had a brief but uneventful stint in the ruck.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: West Coast

    The Demons return to the scene of the crime on Saturday to face the wooden spooners the Eagles at the Docklands. Who comes in and who goes out? Like moving deck chairs on the Titanic.

      • Vomit
      • Sad
    • 154 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    This season cannot end soon enough. Disgraceful.

      • Clap
      • Haha
      • Like
    • 484 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Kozzy Pickett, Jake Bowey & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 27 replies