Jump to content

Featured Replies

13 hours ago, Ghostwriter said:

I didn’t shed a single tear.

Suspicious Monkey GIF by MOODMAN

yes you did you put your socks over your eyes thats why they got so wet

 
57 minutes ago, old dee said:

I am not sure why people are so critical of things from yesterday. We played with fire and confidence yesterday and lead all day. I will take that every week.

If only it happened every week

57 minutes ago, Brownie said:

I've been pondering the turnaround yesterday, especially our f50 entries.

I reckon over the last 20 years we've seen these games where we lose the key components of our forward line through injury or de-selection and we pull out a surprise win.

Just wonder if the complete change, JVR, Fritsch out and Turner back, made the team really think about their delivery forward.

Neither JVR or Fritsch seemed to do too much in the VFL, so a different setup again.

I do love the Kozzy one out alone in the f50. You'd have to back him in to win it 70 percent of the time.

The transformation has me scratching my head though.

Really great to see it turned around and will be interesting to see how we go on Thursday.

I did like his chentle push no he was holding his ground to take the mark from behind and run in to the goal, Classy Yes he can win 1 on 1 most times, scary to be on him if you are a defender, And I understand he was out for 3 matches but where has that pressure game been, missing is the answer

 
8 minutes ago, Kent said:

If only it happened every week

Exactly my point Kent. Yesterday my impression was the players played to their strengths not being told how to play. They were off the lease compared to the first 4 games. Of course it helped that they were not held back buy 2 forwards who are sadly out of form / nqr.

The only reason we kicked a high score, we played on (modern game style) most of the time which gave the forwards plenty of space.


19 hours ago, Bowserpower said:

Good win but lost the last quarter yet again. Disappointing

Harsh. They kicked 1.6.

19 minutes ago, old dee said:

Exactly my point Kent. Yesterday my impression was the players played to their strengths not being told how to play. They were off the lease compared to the first 4 games. Of course it helped that they were not held back buy 2 forwards who are sadly out of form / nqr.

You will be correct if our players strengths are to share the ball the way we did (at speed)

Along with corridor use, bringing their teammates into the game*, less boundary hugging and very few long bombs to packs. And selfless teamwork**

I'm convinced that we finally got a buy-in from the players to play the modern style

But regardless of the why's & wherefore's, the question is, can we keep it up, old dee?

*Clarrie was a great example yesterday of how he was back to his best in terms of bring his teammates into the game (the little give handpass to advantage a player streaming forward)

**The selfless teamwork was something that was noted and talked about in 2021 (so that's a real positive)

1 hour ago, Macca said:

Because our players finally threw off all the old habits of an antiquated game style

A question for anyone here ...

When was the last time we won a game playing a game style like we saw yesterday?

  • Fast paced offense

  • Use of the corridor

  • Sharing of the ball as a first option

  • Always looking for teammates

  • Minimal boundary line hugging

  • Very few long bombs to the forward pockets

  • Playing as a team

  • Handpassing forward as a weapon

Yesterday was a revelation in some ways but of course, we need to continue on the same course

We're also playing catch-up so whether we may revert to old habits remains to be seen

One pointer ... Oliver 5 kicks and 20 handpasses

Two of his hb's directly resulted in goals to Freo.. room for improvement!

 

Apologies if this repeats an earlier post, but I thought we looked really dangerous at centre bounces due to handballing through the congestion and having really good position for i50 entries. Ripped them apart a number of times.


1 hour ago, ghost who walks said:

yes you did you put your socks over your eyes thats why they got so wet

You’re right, my comrade from the afterlife. I cried like a baby. Hell, I was crying at halftime coz we’d equalled our best full-time score already.

1 minute ago, jnrmac said:

Two of his hb's directly resulted in goals to Freo.. room for improvement!

Ha!

Yeah, he made a few errors (Rusty adjusting back to how he once played?)

But we need Clarrie back to that point where he bursts into a contest and then gives off the handpass in a flash

That's his 1 Wood

2 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Two special moments:

Viney's side step before acing a goal. Great composure.

Kozzie in the goal square with his arm behind him and hand up as if to fend off a Freo player but he knew there was no one there😁. Very cheeky but the crowd loved it.

He actually flicks the Peace sign, a glorious touch.


17 hours ago, 640MD said:

My Darling decided i needed to go to the hotel and watch the second half.

So much great play and so much terrible play But what the heck we WON Go DEES

No idea of good players, Obviously big Max , thought Langford was good Bowey and TMac, Petty was a presence for a change. And Spargo and CHinny Chin Chin, 2 Schooners and my darling was apologising to the other patrons saying He thinks he is at home. Some silly errors but stil reasons to smile Go Dees

Wow cant take you anywhere by the sound of it.

Just now, old dee said:

Yes it did LH. There were more Freo fans than I expected.

Didn't notice their fans

3 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

He actually flicks the Peace sign, a glorious touch.

He was at the end of the ground so couldn't see the detail.

Fend off or Peace sign, either way it was fun to see.

Edited by Lucifers Hero

1 minute ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Didn't notice their fans

He was at the end of the ground so couldn't see the detail.

Either way it was fun to see.

That's what those big screens are for, the replays 🤪

2 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

I have maligned Petty as a fwd all last year and I think most of the time it's been justified .

But today he was a different player.

Heaps of confidence. Lease well. Kicked true. Read the play very well.

It's early days given his efforts last year but he could be the difference.

And if one of Jvr or Fritta could come good. Who knows,?

Can't remember petty playing a game like that for such a long time. That's the benchmark

Petty kicked 4.But it would have been 5 if didn’t handball a pass to Kozzie in the second quarter.HP had taken a mark on the edge of the goal square and would have kicked it for sure.Team player.


Speaking of signs, what was Harvey Langford's 'peaked roof' sign after his first goal about?

25,000… a great attendance, all things considered. I’ve yet to watch the replay but I heard that the commentators mentioned how loud the Dees fans were, and that post-match Max also mentioned it.

On that, at one point in the last quarter, Max was lining up for goal and Kolt was standing on the goal line. I was in the front row on a flogger and Kolt turned around, caught eyes with me, raised his eyebrows, very subtly nodded towards Max and discreetly did the hand action of ‘turn it up!’ I turned to Ryan, our awesome chief noise-maker and said “Kolt wants us to go nuts!” And we did.

Max kicked a behind but that’s not the point. The point is, it felt as though Kolt wanted Max to hear and see the support, which for mine is a great sign, to see a young player care about his captain like that.

It also confirmed what a cheeky bugger Kolt is. I haven’t been in the cheer squad for as long as others but I’m sure this is something a seasoned player might do, not so much a colt, if you will 😁

5 minutes ago, Ghostwriter said:

25,000… a great attendance, all things considered. I’ve yet to watch the replay but I heard that the commentators mentioned how loud the Dees fans were, and that post-match Max also mentioned it.

On that, at one point in the last quarter, Max was lining up for goal and Kolt was standing on the goal line. I was in the front row on a flogger and Kolt turned around, caught eyes with me, raised his eyebrows, very subtly nodded towards Max and discreetly did the hand action of ‘turn it up!’ I turned to Ryan, our awesome chief noise-maker and said “Kolt wants us to go nuts!” And we did.

Max kicked a behind but that’s not the point. The point is, it felt as though Kolt wanted Max to hear and see the support, which for mine is a great sign, to see a young player care about his captain like that.

It also confirmed what a cheeky bugger Kolt is. I haven’t been in the cheer squad for as long as others but I’m sure this is something a seasoned player might do, not so much a colt, if you will 😁

What I’m reading is that you were single handedly responsible for Max missing that goal.

 
2 hours ago, Hellaintabadplacetobe said:

Watched him closely at the ground.

It won't get picked up on tv but especially when we don't have the ball, the focus and enthusiasm he shows setting up zones and directing others is fantastic to see.

This - absolutely. And so was Windsor. We've got some good kids coming through.

There's 3 games to go in this round but we lead all the other teams with the most Disposals (392), Disposal Effiency (78%) and Tackles Inside 50 (27)

Do that every week and we'll win plenty of games


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 43 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 286 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies