Jump to content

Featured Replies

22 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Johnson has reached his ceiling as a player and will be handy on occasions, Jeffo.... The Sky is his to take!

His non-selection for the Freo hit out says it all.

Jeffo will need a couple of decent Casey games. Would be handy if he could ruck.

 
33 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Johnson has reached his ceiling as a player and will be handy on occasions, Jeffo.... The Sky is his to take!

He best bust out of the box he’s in soon.

49 minutes ago, adonski said:

 

Screenshot_20250311_094325_X.jpg

has he?

i would have thought that aj has been playing in the 'a' forward line while jefferson was earlier in the off-season training program

 
1 minute ago, chook fowler said:

need someone to make Taylor accountable - AJ more likely IMO

as a former defender, i think turner is more likely to be tried to engineer that match-up 


15 hours ago, DubDee said:

We had 26 for the practice match so we need to drop 4 in addition to Petty coming in for Kozzi. 

then pick a sub

No chance of Sharp or AJ being dropped imo

Chandler ??? 

Turner really shouldn't play considering his performance in the practice match and the conditions.

57 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Johnson has reached his ceiling as a player and will be handy on occasions, Jeffo.... The Sky is his to take!

In all fairness, Johnson had reached his ceiling at VFL level, something that Jefferson may not have done yet (and I want him to get AFL games this year), so the sky is still the limit for Johnson at AFL level.

 
1 minute ago, hardtack said:

In all fairness, Johnson had reached his ceiling at VFL level, something that Jefferson may not have done yet (and I want him to get AFL games this year), so the sky is still the limit for Johnson at AFL level.

Absolutely, with a professional program helping him there’s quite some improvement likely. His one wood is his fierce competitive streak. Can someone tell me what Jefferson’s one wood is?

4 minutes ago, KozzyCan said:

Turner really shouldn't play considering his performance in the practice match and the conditions.

Are you referring to the freo game? If so, whilst he was pretty quiet he kept working had and ended up kicking two goals.

What do you mean about the conditions?

Both games were played in very hot and windy conditions- particularly the roos practice game.

Hardly ideal conditions for a big key forward.


The idea of Jefferson is brilliant considering we're crying out for a key forward to assist JVR who is going to be expected to take the number 1 key forward week in week out.

However, Jeffo doesn't look ready aside from a 5 minute cameo in the second quarter of the North praccy match.

AJ will debut on Sunday IMO and be subbed late in the third quarter to allow a smaller type player to play out the remainder when the game's broken open.  

 

2 minutes ago, binman said:

Are you referring to the freo game? If so, whilst he was pretty quiet he kept working had and ended up kicking two goals.

What do you mean about the conditions?

Both games were played in very hot and windy conditions- particularly the roos practice game.

Hardly ideal conditions for a big key forward.

 

Strong chance of rain on Sunday.

 

We're absolutely kidding ourselves if we select JVR/Turner/Jefferson in the wet. Flashbacks of Goody picking Brown against the Giants in Alice where it was a bloody monsoon.

22 minutes ago, 58er said:

Chandler ??? 

Chandler will be in the starting 18.

Has enough credits in the bank to forgo a poor pre-season game. 

7 minutes ago, binman said:

Are you referring to the freo game? If so, whilst he was pretty quiet he kept working had and ended up kicking two goals.

What do you mean about the conditions?

Both games were played in very hot and windy conditions- particularly the roos practice game.

Hardly ideal conditions for a big key forward.

I'm saying that we shouldn't play three tall forwards against the Giants in the wet and I think Johnson and JVR are ahead of him.

2 minutes ago, binman said:

Are you referring to the freo game? If so, whilst he was pretty quiet he kept working had and ended up kicking two goals.

What do you mean about the conditions?

Both games were played in very hot and windy conditions- particularly the roos practice game.

Hardly ideal conditions for a big key forward.

Definitely open minded about Turner and he's the type of player that can turn a game due to his above average goal kicking and ability to take a mark.

However, his pre season series was underwhelming  (maybe due to the conditions as you've pointed out) and further to that he was never really commended in any training/match sim reports over summer which was interesting after an encouraging season.

Maybe we lower our expectations with him, in terms of him being a young player still learning his craft.

This is where I see Petty being important to our forward line if Disco doesn't work out early days.

 


Of the available players and based on pre season form, my 23 for the GWS game would be:

Howes May Lever

Salem Petty Windsor

Sharp Oliver Billings

Sparrow AJ Petracca 

Fritta JVR Viney 

Gawn Rivers Langdon

Langford Chandler Bowey Lindsay

Sub. Henderson 

3 minutes ago, Adam The God said:

Of the available players and based on pre season form, my 23 for the GWS game would be:

Howes May Lever

Salem Petty Windsor

Sharp Oliver Billings

Sparrow AJ Petracca 

Fritta JVR Viney 

Gawn Rivers Langdon

Langford Chandler Bowey Lindsay

Sub. Henderson 

I agree with this team mostly but think Turner will be in the best 22.

I'm also really not sold on Howes personally and if it was me, would play Rivers more down back until McVee is back from injury.

3 minutes ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

I agree with this team mostly but think Turner will be in the best 22.

I'm also really not sold on Howes personally and if it was me, would play Rivers more down back until McVee is back from injury.

I think that back 6 need to play with each other a bit to grow synergy. Windsor will be green through there, but have good leadership around him in Salo, Lever and May. Howes will feature this year, potentially even when McVee is in the team, so he needs some continuity at AFL level IMV.

Play Tom Campbell and Max, FCS yes we’re coming up against one of the most mobile teams in the competition let’s try and increase the lack of mobility and wonder why they walk it out of our F50 at a rate of knots 

52 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

Can someone tell me what Jefferson’s one wood is?

Apparently his marking ability & set shot conversion.


Derksen won't be seeing any gametime soon

 

Max Gruzewski will be 2nd ruck behind Keefe

1 hour ago, Roost it far said:

Absolutely, with a professional program helping him there’s quite some improvement likely. His one wood is his fierce competitive streak. Can someone tell me what Jefferson’s one wood is?

He uses an iron or hybrid. Not sure he even posesses a 1 wood.

22 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

He uses an iron or hybrid. Not sure he even posesses a 1 wood.

I fear it’s a chip n run kind of club.

 
14 hours ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

You're saying we're going to lose on Sunday?

We win and we're '0', therefore, I guess. You know; the one before '1'(*)

 

(* AFL patent pending)

So if we win the flag we are zero, the runners up are first? Now I get it. 

The lunatics are running the asylum!

2 hours ago, 58er said:

Chandler ??? 

My pick (to miss out) on the back of an ordinary performance v Freo, but I think the FD likes his defensive work.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 101 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
      • Love
      • Like
    • 373 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies