Jump to content

Featured Replies

39 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Windsor used the ball and his pace quite well yesterday, but we need more than 10 possessions if that's going to be his permanent position.

The Langdon one doesn't bother me too much. He'd only be getting minimal CBA's, you'd think, and will likely spend his other on field minutes on the wing. Anything to keep Trac and Oliver fresh and firing for the last quarter.

17 of 30 yesterday. Club are screaming from the rooftop that Langdon is playing mid. Not sure why people are ignoring it.

More likely to rotate forward for much needed pace than wing at least until Pickett is back. 

 
3 minutes ago, ManDee said:

What happened to Petty?

I'm not saying something did happen but he seems to have disappeared without a trace. 

Injured? Sore? Personal? Rested?

Nothing!

I've put him as sub as he can play forward or back. 

theres some he could replace automatically if injury and can also allow team to be shuffled around to accommodate him.

Ie could replace Jefferson or Johnson if they dont get up .

He can also replace Gawn if injured 

4 hours ago, sisso said:

I think we are a decent chance. Without Tom Green they will lack inside ball winners: provided we don’t get absolutely torched on the outside of course.

And they no longer have their grunts in Perryman and Peatling and a further 6 guys missing because of Wacky Wednesday.

Still can't believe all the "experts" in The Age have them finishing top 3 and our beloved Garry predicting them to win the premiership

Edited by dice

 
32 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

What purpose we he fill up forward alongside Fritsch, Turner and JVR?

I like him, but the answer is he’ll be a big witches hat.

This is what gets me, too. I like AJ, but he isn't playing unless we're dropping one of these three other guys.

We haven't set up all summer with JVR, Turner, AJ and Fritsch. Yesterday AJ would have been on the bench until late but came on early because JVR went off.

If we were going to play all four, we would have done so yesterday.

AJ is priming himself for Turner's spot, IMO. Turner would want to start the year well.

1 hour ago, DeeSpencer said:

17 of 30 yesterday. Club are screaming from the rooftop that Langdon is playing mid. Not sure why people are ignoring it.

More likely to rotate forward for much needed pace than wing at least until Pickett is back. 

Had no idea it was 17/30. That's a fair bit.

4 clearances is ok I suppose. Just as much as Viney had.

Edited by Bring-Back-Powell


My concern with JVR, Turner, Fritsch and no AJ or Campbell is who provides ruck support? Seems even less likely to be JVR with his back concern. 

9 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Had no idea it was 17/30. That's a fair bit.

4 clearances from is ok I suppose. Just a much as Viney had.

There are 8 players at each CBA. So anything over 1 centre clearance per 8 CBAs is above par.

Add to that that not all players are playing the role to get the clearance, some are getting first possession, blocking, etc 

And add to that players can run in off CHF, CHB and the wings and get involved in the contest pre clearance.

4 from 17 CBAs is a pretty decent return.

12 minutes ago, speed demon said:

My concern with JVR, Turner, Fritsch and no AJ or Campbell is who provides ruck support? Seems even less likely to be JVR with his back concern. 

My suggestion is AJ relieves Gawn in the ruck and JVR takes no centre rucks.

When Gawn is rucking, AJ comes on when JVR or Turner needs a spell. Then at minimal times all three play in the same forward line. 

Then AJ gets subbed out for a Melksham like player.

I get that this isn't perfect and AJ would record very little TOG minutes but I love the idea of JVR not being the second ruck.

Or alternatively as others have mentioned, Turner could play himself out of form and AJ comes into the side from round 2 or 3 onwards.

 
5 hours ago, ManDee said:

What happened to Petty?

I'm not saying something did happen but he seems to have disappeared without a trace. 

Injured? Sore? Personal? Rested?

Nothing!

Is there a secret that I'm not aware of?

Is Petty still on our list?

Why are there no details on his whereabouts?

Did not play for Casey, did not play against Freo and not on the injured list.

What is going on?

XxxxxxxxEdit

Just explained as "personal reasons"

Ok

Edited by ManDee
New info.

1 hour ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

My suggestion is AJ relieves Gawn in the ruck and JVR takes no centre rucks.

When Gawn is rucking, AJ comes on when JVR or Turner needs a spell. Then at minimal times all three play in the same forward line. 

Then AJ gets subbed out for a Melksham like player.

I get that this isn't perfect and AJ would record very little TOG minutes but I love the idea of JVR not being the second ruck.

Or alternatively as others have mentioned, Turner could play himself out of form and AJ comes into the side from round 2 or 3 onwards.

So Fritsch as sub? Don’t mind it.

Edited by DeeSpencer


12 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

So Fritsch as sub? Don’t mind it.

I've no idea what's happened to this player since the infamous Alice Springs game but he's nowhere near an A grader at the moment. A starting sub role in round 1 may light a fire under him to kick start his season.

41 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

I've no idea what's happened to this player since the infamous Alice Springs game but he's nowhere near an A grader at the moment. A starting sub role in round 1 may light a fire under him to kick start his season.

I'm not sure that sitting on the pine is the best way for Fritsch to regain form and confidence - better at Casey I think.

3 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

My suggestion is AJ relieves Gawn in the ruck and JVR takes no centre rucks.

When Gawn is rucking, AJ comes on when JVR or Turner needs a spell. Then at minimal times all three play in the same forward line. 

Then AJ gets subbed out for a Melksham like player.

I get that this isn't perfect and AJ would record very little TOG minutes but I love the idea of JVR not being the second ruck.

Or alternatively as others have mentioned, Turner could play himself out of form and AJ comes into the side from round 2 or 3 onwards.

My setup exactly.

We saw yesterday what can happen when your second ruck is a key position player and gets injured.  

You're down two key positions.

IMO (no stats to back this up) but playing in the ruck, particularly if you're undersize, must make you more prone to injury ('collision' injury).

JvR, if he's going to get injured, it'll be if he's forced to ruck.

And as for Max dropping himself in 'the hole' he's going to cop a Petracca-like injury if he doesn't stop.

Had AJ not played yesterday our back-up ruckman would have been ....?

6 hours ago, dpositive said:

OK I've considered the practise matches and looked very uncertainly at comments and GWS proposed team.

Havent read this thread yet just ready to put my thoughts here.

Theres a lot of unfortunate missesbut Im wlling to give a bit of a blend with the tried and true and the new boys.

Happy to receive condemnation or answer any relevant comments.

B:           Salem - May - Lever
HB         Sestan T MAc- Rivers
C            Langdon Petracca - - Windsor

HF:        Fritsch - Turner Chandler

FF:         Johnson van Rooyen - Jefferson

Foll:       Gawn

Mids-    Oliver - Viney
 

Int: -      Langford - Lindsay - Sharp - Sparrow 
Sub:       Petty

 

5 debuts is crazy work for one game


4 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

My suggestion is AJ relieves Gawn in the ruck and JVR takes no centre rucks.

When Gawn is rucking, AJ comes on when JVR or Turner needs a spell. Then at minimal times all three play in the same forward line. 

Then AJ gets subbed out for a Melksham like player.

I get that this isn't perfect and AJ would record very little TOG minutes but I love the idea of JVR not being the second ruck.

Or alternatively as others have mentioned, Turner could play himself out of form and AJ comes into the side from round 2 or 3 onwards.

I don't see why we wouldn't play AJ alongside Turner and JVR and then if we look to top heavy your plan would work a treat.

19 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

I've never rated him one bit to be honest.

I'm pinging my hope on Henderson becoming a handy little player and maybe Spargo gets back to form so that we see less of Chandler.

Agree!

27 minutes ago, jaydenh10 said:

5 debuts is crazy work for one game

Why not ??? as Blackadder said, " Baldrick your hairbrained scheme with a twist or two might just work"!!

53 minutes ago, M_9 said:

My setup exactly.

We saw yesterday what can happen when your second ruck is a key position player and gets injured.  

You're down two key positions.

IMO (no stats to back this up) but playing in the ruck, particularly if you're undersize, must make you more prone to injury ('collision' injury).

JvR, if he's going to get injured, it'll be if he's forced to ruck.

And as for Max dropping himself in 'the hole' he's going to cop a Petracca-like injury if he doesn't stop.

Had AJ not played yesterday our back-up ruckman would have been ....?

JVR just got injured playing forward and you’ve decided ruck is more dangerous with no stats?

Disco would’ve rucked if not for Aj and we’d have been very small up forward, that’s a risk, but not a risk compared with known outcome of being too slow if we go in too tall.

Max will never stop going back with the flight. It’s up to the other players to protect him by blocking their forwards from getting a clean run and jump. 


Round 1 here we go!

B: Lever      May    Bowey

HB: Rivers  Petty   Windsor 

C: Langdon  Viney  Lindsey 

HF: Sharp   Turner   Chandler

FF: Fritsch   JVR    Johnson

R: Gawn  Trac  Oliver

I/C: Langford Sparrow Salem Howes 

Sub Woewodin 

 

 

39 minutes ago, Demongirl35 said:

Round 1 here we go!

B: Lever      May    Bowey

HB: Rivers  Petty   Windsor 

C: Langdon  Viney  Lindsey 

HF: Sharp   Turner   Chandler

FF: Fritsch   JVR    Johnson

R: Gawn  Trac  Oliver

I/C: Langford Sparrow Salem Howes 

Sub Woewodin 

 

 

IIRC, Tmac played on Hogan most of the game when we last played them. Surely May takes Hogan this time. 

I think with our improved forward handball game, and a dominant stoppage set up, we should ultimately break them. My only concern is the talent of their tall backs. We need big games out of Fritsch and our other smalls as I think JvR and Turner are going to find it difficult.

I am a Jeffo fan, but Johnson is well ahead of him after the Freo game. I am OK with either of them for round 1.

I am so hungry for Spargo to find fitness and form. At his peak he was so important, his delivery and decision making into the F50 was a standout when so many other of our players seem to fail at this too often. Although  Chandler's gut running is a really important quality, and we have other smaller players like Laurie, only Kozzie and Spargo have that small forward touch of class and smarts around and through half forward.

Bowey at his best is a great part of our defense, but his delivery has been iffy for the better part of 18 months now. 

Not convinced Langford or Lindsay are ready for round 1. 

Howes is better than he has shown in preseason. 

Is Fritsch ready for round 1?

2 very important players for season 2025 - Salem and JVR.

Sparrow very solid.

Not sold on Sharp.

I wish Tholstrup was fit and ready.

 

Howes was terrible, must have got at least 5 goals kicked on him. He's all we have though with Moniz and McVee going down. He and Chandler would be very lucky to make the side.

2 hours ago, jaydenh10 said:

5 debuts is crazy work for one game

Yeah but i think worth  a punt to give em a taste of the big time.

Johnson and Jefferson are both very different styles. if both fail Petty can be bought on to replace one of them.  the other would be rotated off the bench.

Sharp, Langford and Lindsay would  play limited time through mid and HF rotations. All have shown a bit through practise games and  have been training well. We can reward them and find out their capacity. Probably these guys will move in and out of the ones and maybe not all play together often. 

Kozzie of course will come in to the side so we might not get a chance to do such a good comparison.

 

 


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 34 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 242 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies