Jump to content

Featured Replies

5 hours ago, BC_1718_DC said:

Disclaimer: it didnโ€™t get any better. 

 

There was one statement that I hoped would be responded to about how poor our goal kicking is/has been and it looked as if Richo was going to have a right of reply but the next part of the question started to be answered and he put the microphone down. 

Thanks BC_1718_DC I was happy with all the presentations so wonโ€™t put myself through the wringer with the Q&A session.๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜

 

Feel a few more engaged and happy  supporters might need to attend in future to heckle and de-stage these other [censored] - canโ€™t believe some people are allowed a voice just because youโ€™re a paid up member.

 
3 hours ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

Geez, I'm 11 minutes into watching the Q&A session from the other night online and it's a hard watch. Is it always complete peanuts that hog the microphone at these events? 

Sadly, yes. There were some whoppers. David Rennick and I joked afterwards that it was MFCโ€™s fault Trump got elected, the club has so much power over controlling roadworks in Cranbourne. 

11 hours ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

I found the suggestion about building a retirement village for our supporters out at Caulfield convinced me......to vote for mandatory euthanasia at the age of 70 if it ever gets to parliament. 

๐Ÿคฃ

Thereby eliminating a significant part of the DL community ๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ  !!!

 

Edited by Lucifers Hero


The quality of the questions was well below what the Demonland community could come up with.  Could we somehow address this next year - eg people with genuine questions write them on here and then the ones with the most likes / votes get asked?

Thats the problem with democracy. Every nuffie has a voice

 
18 hours ago, BC_1718_DC said:

https://www.melbournefc.com.au/video/1705616/agm-question-answers?videoId=1705616&modal=true&type=video

 

Here is the link for the Q and A. Interesting watch to put it politely. 

It was like watching LinkedIn: The Musical. 

I didn't get past 15 minutes, but I have to assume someone gave a 35-minute presentation on sun flares causing climate change and several speakers promoted their life coach credentials. 

12 hours ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

What is our stance on AI and do we think it will help or hinder our training methods

Not as stupid as it sounds.

I suspect AI analysis is already being done in sports that involve set plays such as NFL and soccer (corners, free kicks etc). AFL is far more random but someone will write a program. (Enter the moving diamond or similar)


13 hours ago, george_on_the_outer said:

Absolutely cringeworthy is it.? 


If that is the standard of the voters then we are in for a lot of pain in the future, and probably explains why we are where we are as a club.

 

Spot on George. Sadly our members have a long history (back to the mid 60s) of failing to hold elected officials to account.

 

23 hours ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

I was happy to hear there is already $10m pledged towards the home base and hopefully more to comeโ€ฆ

Great point. I attended and first half covering the clubs business position was excellent insight.

The audit report and summary of accounts worth watching just to see how strong the club is compared to most others despite not having 110k members. 

Parts summary of caulfield worked well.

Poor Brad Green was nervous but showed passion which as great to see. Election results were overwhelming in Boards favour. 

Peter Ryan of the age struggled to get a headline and moved into hack status for mine.

I left at the q and a with members asking questions who shouldn't have been allowed near a microphone. Shockers.

Steven Smith was present in an understated way. Classy . As was printer believe it or not

Good night

20 minutes ago, Cranky Franky said:

Spot on George. Sadly our members have a long history (back to the mid 60s) of failing to hold elected officials to account.

 

Read the accounts and get back to me.

For example Future Fund returned 13% last FY

14 hours ago, whatwhat say what said:

i liked the suggestion of the barassi-williams cup for dees-pear clashes

Is that some sort of food fight.


1 hour ago, Cranky Franky said:

Spot on George. Sadly our members have a long history (back to the mid 60s) of failing to hold elected officials to account.

 

Do you really think the few oddballs at the AGM really represent what has been wrong (or right) about the club and its elected officials?  Sounds more like you are just looking for any evidence, no matter how irrelevant, to support your views.

1 hour ago, Demon17 said:

Read the accounts and get back to me.

For example Future Fund returned 13% last FY

And nothing the year before! 8% p.a over the last 2 years - not too bad. Markets go up, markets go down. That warning was given to us by the COO. And how prescient he was. Dow down 3% last night...

14 minutes ago, Hawk the Demon said:

And nothing the year before! 8% p.a over the last 2 years - not too bad. Markets go up, markets go down. That warning was given to us by the COO. And how prescient he was. Dow down 3% last night...

I imagine that investment fund would have a lot of unlisted assets, which arenโ€™t so affected by the share market. Having dealt with large investment portfolios in the past, they often get access to investments not available to the average punter. This can be things like large commercial debt and infrastructure projects that pay a guaranteed rate of return. Plus they would have some fixed income assets and there are income producing assets such as Metrics that offers an 8% return pa.

While nothing is ever 100% guaranteed, you can manage the risk in different ways. For example, if it is a commercial build, for example a shopping complex, they will offer a much higher rate for initial investors while the project gets off the ground. Then in say Tranche 2 or 3, the rate will be lower but so is the risk, as they may have permits in place etc. so they now just need to get the build completed.

Edited by DistrACTION Jackson

4 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

๐Ÿคฃ

Thereby eliminating a significant part of the DL community ๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ  !!!

 

Quality not quantity LH. ๐Ÿ˜†

1 hour ago, sue said:

Do you really think the few oddballs at the AGM really represent what has been wrong (or right) about the club and its elected officials?  Sounds more like you are just looking for any evidence, no matter how irrelevant, to support your views.

He has to live up to his nickname, I believe.  


As bad as the Q&A was I'll definitely tune in next year just to see if the questions asked are even more mental that this years. 

15 minutes ago, Katrina Dee Fan said:

He has to live up to his nickname, I believe.  

I reckon your 2024 epitaph would be

"IT WAS THE YEAR FROM HELL" .....but it was all the media's fault.

49 minutes ago, Cranky Franky said:

I reckon your 2024 epitaph would be

"IT WAS THE YEAR FROM HELL" .....but it was all the media's fault.

Let me rephrase that CF, It was a Year From Hell and it was blown out of all proportion by a number of media lightweights and a number of disenchanted followersโ€ฆ.!!!!

Edited by DeeZone
Change the flow.

 
19 hours ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

Geez, I'm 11 minutes into watching the Q&A session from the other night online and it's a hard watch. Is it always complete peanuts that hog the microphone at these events? 

I went to my first MFC AGM some time in the 1960s and I can tell you that nothing's changed. You always had a few people eager to get on their soapbox and some were even inebriated before the post function drinks, sandwiches, party pies and sausage rolls were trotted out. And it wasn't confined to supporters because I remember one club president was blind shicker when he left the meeting (in our elevator). If you think this was ever just a Melbourne Football Club thing, I have friends at Carlton, Collingwood and Essendon who used to tell me the same stories about their AGMs and from their descriptions of recent such events, nothing's changed either.

My favourite person from club AGMs was the bloke who got up every year during the period late in Jim Cardwellโ€™s reign as club secretary and who was obviously from the bush and outfitted by R. M. Williams complete with boots and driza-bone and a leather face to match. I used to call him Clancy.

Clancy would ask Jim the same question every year โ€“ โ€œcan yer give us a run down on recruitinโ€™โ€. Jim would rattle off the names of prospective players including one or two who he guaranteed might become champions, we would note down the names and come March when pre-season started, we would wonder what happened  to most of the names who never came to the club. That was long before the internet when AGMs were fun.

These days I don't attend but I might have a look at the proceedings during the summer break.

3 hours ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

I imagine that investment fund would have a lot of unlisted assets, which arenโ€™t so affected by the share market. Having dealt with large investment portfolios in the past, they often get access to investments not available to the average punter. This can be things like large commercial debt and infrastructure projects that pay a guaranteed rate of return. Plus they would have some fixed income assets and there are income producing assets such as Metrics that offers an 8% return pa.

While nothing is ever 100% guaranteed, you can manage the risk in different ways. For example, if it is a commercial build, for example a shopping complex, they will offer a much higher rate for initial investors while the project gets off the ground. Then in say Tranche 2 or 3, the rate will be lower but so is the risk, as they may have permits in place etc. so they now just need to get the build completed.

My understanding is that would be like a regular Balanced superannuation fund portfolio that many of us have (a mixture of fixed interest, equities, etc..,) hence a bad year to 31 October 2023, but a good one to 31 October 2024. It's run by Morgan Stanley. What about a bit of transparency? Just let the members know what the investment guidelines are and give us quarterly updates on the performance. I mean if the Club goes bankrupt (unlikley) we all have to tip in $5 each - how hard it is to let us know how our "nest egg"is going;  more often than once a year.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie? 
    Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG. Unfortunately, performances like these went against the grain of what Melbourne has been producing from virtually midway through 2024 and extending right through to the present day. This is a game between two clubs who have faltered over the past couple of years because their disposal efficiency is appalling. Neither of them can hit the side of a barn door but history tells us that every once in a while such teams have their lucky days or come up against an opponent in even worse shape and hence, one of them will come up trumps in this match.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Essendon

    Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where theyโ€™ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 278 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 05

    Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sundayโ€™s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • Thanks
    • 19 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Geelong

    There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullartonโ€™s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Caseyโ€™s three matches and, with Melbourneโ€™s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next weekโ€™s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forwardโ€™s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasnโ€™t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Geelong

    I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the teamโ€™s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourneโ€™s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demonsโ€™ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 04

    Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the โ€˜G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sundayโ€™s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • Thanks
    • 273 replies
    Demonland