Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.
Demonland

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

The Draft Pick Upgrade Thread

Colm
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

14 minutes ago, Dockett 32 said:

Appart from being massive unders, would surely test their salary cap.

 

I suspect that 1 first round pick will be for the draft and the other used in a trade ... we will see ...

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     
    2 minutes ago, DubDee said:

    Not sure why the Hawks want to trade out of this years first round

    Seems like a strange move unless linked to trades


    Bingo.

    Hawks send F1 + change to WC for Barrass.

    WC F1 + change to Richmond for Baker.

  • Quote
    • Thanks 2
    30 minutes ago, Mach5 said:


    Bingo.

    Hawks send F1 + change to WC for Barrass.

    WC F1 + change to Richmond for Baker.

    I think the Eagles will want the Carlton first rounder (not the Hawks one) and more. Honestly it’s the perfect deal to change the rules and let the Eagles get the best of the 2 first rounders (Carl or Hawks) next year but the afl rules don’t allow that.

    Eagles would be mad to offer their own first but they’ll on send the Carl/Haw first rounder for Baker.

    It’s smart from the Hawks. They didn’t want to offer more than 14. Can now offer a future first and future 2nd. It’s worth the same thing but reads better! 

    Edited by DeeSpencer

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     
    55 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

    Honestly a little surprised we didn’t jump at that. Must be either more up in the air with other deals or a degree of confidence that we can do better. Let’s hope so 

    That pick 9 looks very attractive

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    4 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

    That pick 9 looks very attractive

    I agree, but the Hawks chucking a future first in the Eagles/Richmond pot diminishes the likelihood Freo or Richmond end up trading one out. It might be 9 or bust 

     

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Hopefully that 2025 Academy action for GC isn't White Jnr!

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     

    6 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

     

    Don't mind that. Get a couple of quality youngsters in what is considered to be a good draft to alongside Windsor and Kolt from last year. That's a good injection of young talent with hopefully Jefferson also debuting next year.

    Edited by Demon Jack

  • Quote
    • Like 5
    • Author

    If Sydney get pick 13 it means we can then go after pick 19 or 22. Either way we should be improving our draft hand this year. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Melbourne is giving GC something to think about on pick 13.
    The Demons have offered a future 1st rounder + pick 28. 
     

    I’m not sure about this.  Would like GC 13 & 41 picks for Dees future 1st rounder + pick 28. 

    What to do with pick 13 …

    1/ used as late bid for Houston or

    2/ after academy and Ashcroft picks, it’s likely to be pick “16” to be used for a youngster like Joe Berry, Ali’s Tauru or Taj Hotton or Cooper Hynes. (🤞but I think Xavier Lindsay will be gone at this pick) 

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Get pick 13 from GC

    Added bonus of screwing up the Pies plans

    Trade 13 + something for the bombers pick 9

    Go to draft with 5 and 9

    Nail them are we are back baby!

  • Quote
    • Like 5
    1 hour ago, adonski said:

     

    Sydney's offer could be attractive - 19 to cover a Lombard bid and 22 to use in the draft.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Clearly don't understand all the permutations... but I would have thought that giving up our future 1st limits our ability to get pick 9 from the bombers?

    Maybe the saints are confident they will be able to trump our offer for it - the bombers might have already told us this?

    Otherwise why would we do this now when it seems like we are in the box seat to get 9 if we (or someone else) bids on Kako?  What am I missing?

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    2 minutes ago, deelusions from afar said:

    Clearly don't understand all the permutations... but I would have thought that giving up our future 1st limits our ability to get pick 9 from the bombers?

    Maybe the saints are confident they will be able to trump our offer for it - the bombers might have already told us this?

    Otherwise why would we do this now when it seems like we are in the box seat to get 9 if we (or someone else) bids on Kako?  What am I missing?

    You'd have to think either the Dons have told us to bugger off and/or they have a better offer elsewhere, so we've turned our attention to 13

  • Quote
    • Like 5
    18 minutes ago, DubDee said:

    Get pick 13 from GC

    Added bonus of screwing up the Pies plans

    Trade 13 + something for the bombers pick 9

    Go to draft with 5 and 9

    Nail them are we are back baby!

    The Bombers will either want to get ahead of the bid for Kako, or push 9 into a 2025 f1 pick. Getting 13 doesn't help them

  • Quote
    • Like 4

    9 minutes ago, adonski said:

    You'd have to think either the Dons have told us to bugger off and/or they have a better offer elsewhere, so we've turned our attention to 13

    If I’m the Dons I’m inclined to call our bluff and see if we pick Kako at 5 (6). Could happen, but I’d say odds on it doesn’t.

    They probably have to flick St Kilda something to get 9 to 8 or guarantee a non Saints bid.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    16 minutes ago, old55 said:

    Sydney's offer could be attractive - 19 to cover a Lombard bid and 22 to use in the draft.

    You don’t match a bid for Lombard with a premium pick of 19, you do it with junk in the 30’s and 40’s.

    If they took the Swans deal they’d probably trade both those picks in different deals. 

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    3 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

    You don’t match a bid for Lombard with a premium pick of 19, you do it with junk in the 30’s and 40’s.

    If they took the Swans deal they’d probably trade both those picks in different deals. 

    Not if they value players in the top 25 or so this year they won't.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     
    6 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

    If I’m the Dons I’m inclined to call our bluff and see if we pick Kako at 5 (6). Could happen, but I’d say odds on it doesn’t.

    They probably have to flick St Kilda something to get 9 to 8 or guarantee a non Saints bid.

    True... but if you know the Don's list you know they're crying out for a small forward - so they need him.  I think they want to ensure they get him and another 1st round pick (whether that be this year or next it doesn't really matter).  I guess the saints may be more attractive - who would they see as more likely to jump up the ladder next year out of us or them?

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    2 minutes ago, old55 said:

    Not if they value players in the top 25 or so this year they won't.

    I don’t think they’re going to have a live pick in the draft. Match Lombard and that’s it. Even still, paying with peanuts and trading back in is a better option. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • Welcome to Demonland: Steven King

      The Melbourne Football Club has selected a new coach for the 2026 season appointing Geelong Football Club assistant coach Steven King to the head role.

        • Like
      • 506 replies
      Demonland

    • AFLW PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

      The undefeated Demons venture across the continent to the spiritual home of the Port Adelaide Football Club on Saturday afternoon for the inaugural match for premiership points between these long-historied clubs. Alberton Oval will however, be a ground familiar to our players following a practice match there last year. We lost both the game and Liv Purcell, who missed 7 home and away matches after suffering facial fractures in the dying moments of the game.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • AFLW REPORT: Richmond

      A glorious sunny afternoon with a typically strong Casey Fields breeze favouring the city end greeted this round four clash of the undefeated Narrm against the winless Tigers. Pre-match, the teams entered the ground through the Deearmy’s inclusive banner—"Narrm Football Weaving Communities Together and then Warumungu/Yawuru woman and Fox Boundary Rider, Megan Waters, gave the official acknowledgement of country. Any concerns that Collingwood’s strategy of last week to discombobulate the Dees would be replicated by Ryan Ferguson and his Tigers evaporated in the second quarter when Richmond failed to use the wind advantage and Narrm scored three unanswered goals. 

        • Thanks
      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Frankston

      The late-season run of Casey wins was broken in their first semifinal against Frankston in a heartbreaking end at Kinetic Stadium on Saturday night that in many respects reflected their entire season. When they were bad, they committed all of the football transgressions, including poor disposal, indiscipline, an inability to exert pressure, and some terrible decision-making, as exemplified by the period in the game when they conceded nine unanswered goals from early in the second quarter until halfway through the third term. You rarely win when you do this.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • AFLW PREVIEW: Richmond

      Round four kicks off early Saturday afternoon at Casey Fields, as the mighty Narrm host the winless Richmond Tigers in the second week of Indigenous Round celebrations. With ideal footy conditions forecast—20 degrees, overcast skies, and a gentle breeze — expect a fast-paced contest. Narrm enters with momentum and a dangerous forward line, while Richmond is still searching for its first win. With key injuries on both sides and pride on the line, this clash promises plenty.

        • Haha
      • 3 replies
      Demonland

    • AFLW REPORT: Collingwood

      Expectations of a comfortable win for Narrm at Victoria Park quickly evaporated as the match turned into a tense nail-biter. After a confident start by the Demons, the Pies piled on pressure and forced red and blue supporters to hold their collective breath until after the final siren. In a frenetic, physical contest, it was Captain Kate’s clutch last quarter goal and a missed shot from Collingwood’s Grace Campbell after the siren which sealed a thrilling 4-point win. Finally, Narrm supporters could breathe easy.

        • Haha
        • Thanks
      • 2 replies
      Demonland
    View All

    Configure browser push notifications
    Chrome (Android)
    1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
    2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
    3. Adjust your preference.
    Chrome (Desktop)
    1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
    2. Select Site settings.
    3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.