Jump to content

Featured Replies

31 minutes ago, Mel Bourne said:

I love Maysie, but this was one of the more blatant stages I’ve seen in recent times, and some of the “whataboutisms” and excuses being hurled around on this thread are borderline delusional. 

They're not delusional when the AFL selectively applies their click bait outrage machine.

Seems like it has worked in your case

 
1 minute ago, jnrmac said:

They're not delusional when the AFL selectively applies their click bait outrage machine.

Seems like it has worked in your case

I’m talking about the posts trying to defend his actions, and others that are drawing an equivalence to ducking. 

Edited by Mel Bourne

Clearly Butters has already won the Brownlow - he simply cannot buy a suspension. Corrupt AFL.

 
18 hours ago, whatwhat say what said:

good; looked fake as and i was 150m away

(i'll take the free)

Agree 100%. If you can put one over the umpire and get a free, why not. Been going on for 100 years. Well done, Maysie. Small fine to pay only.

44 minutes ago, Mel Bourne said:

Friend texted me and said Kate Roffey was just interviewed on the ABC. When asked about this her response was “I haven’t seen it so I can’t comment”. 

Can someone here confirm this? If true that is an appalling response. 

Further to this, I was at the game with two Roos supporters and was genuinely embarrassed when the replays were being shown on the screen. I love Maysie, but this was one of the more blatant stages I’ve seen in recent times, and some of the “whataboutisms” and excuses being hurled around on this thread are borderline delusional. 

she's the president; what is she meant to say?


6 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

she's the president; what is she meant to say?

As President, it would be wise to not convey to the supporters of your club that you have better things to do on a Saturday night than watch the game. 
 

“We’ve copped the fine, and we’re moving on. Next question”

 

Edited by Mel Bourne

15 minutes ago, Mel Bourne said:

As President, it would be wise to not convey to the supporters of your club that you have better things to do on a Saturday night than watch the game. 
 

“We’ve copped the fine, and we’re moving on. Next question”

 

so you implied from it that she was not at the president's function, or in attendance at the game?

perhaps, like the maggot, she was blindsided and presumed from may's reaction he got knocked in the noggin

 

I would fight the fine on the grounds that physics tells us that a body travelling will continue to travel after it stops therefore the head continued to travel after the body stopped causing his head to hit the ground.

Its like when people don't wear seatbelts the continue to travel after the car stops.

Unfortunately the MRO person/s are uneducated dills.

  • Whispering_Jack changed the title to Steven May staging fine
 
19 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

so you implied from it that she was not at the president's function, or in attendance at the game?

perhaps, like the maggot, she was blindsided and presumed from may's reaction he got knocked in the noggin

 

She can’t watch a five-second replay of an incident she’s about to be asked about on national radio??

There are ways to handle a question you’d rather not answer without being dishonest  


 

 

Edited by Mel Bourne

17 minutes ago, durango said:

I would fight the fine on the grounds that physics tells us that a body travelling will continue to travel after it stops therefore the head continued to travel after the body stopped causing his head to hit the ground.

Its like when people don't wear seatbelts the continue to travel after the car stops.

Unfortunately the MRO person/s are uneducated dills.

I know the side’s form is currently in a downturn, but does the collective intelligence of Demonland have to plummet with it? 


Didn’t look great for a so called “hard man”. Take the fine, don’t do it again and move on. Next.

9 minutes ago, Mel Bourne said:

She can’t watch a five-second replay of an incident she’s about to be asked about on national radio??

There are ways to handle a question you’d rather not answer without being dishonest 

She just said what Chris Scott says. 

2 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

She just said what Chris Scott says. 

And how do we feel about Chris Scott saying such things? 

[censored] ...  he got a small fine

move on

no conspiracy here ... more important issues to waste your ip on

With Leigh Matthews on this one. It's a joke.  Sure he milked it a little. So what? Whose to say he didn't wrench his neck slightly in the tackle and holding his head was an instant response? Either way the AFL has caved to media pressure.  Highly doubt the MRO would have picked this up otherwise.  Finally, does May have a staging record? Methinks not. Multiple other culprits have gotten away with far worse. The fact that Tom ' The Tool' Morris is outraged at May's actions is all one needs to know. 


38 minutes ago, Deelectable said:

With Leigh Matthews on this one. It's a joke.  Sure he milked it a little. So what? Whose to say he didn't wrench his neck slightly in the tackle and holding his head was an instant response? Either way the AFL has caved to media pressure.  Highly doubt the MRO would have picked this up otherwise.  Finally, does May have a staging record? Methinks not. Multiple other culprits have gotten away with far worse. The fact that Tom ' The Tool' Morris is outraged at May's actions is all one needs to know. 

The only consistent attribute of the MRO and tribunal system.

 

18 hours ago, Ted Lasso said:

I am not at all defending what Steven May did because it was clearly staging, but far out, there are dozens of incidents every single game that fall into the catagory of staging ignored. blokes raising their arm to draw high contact, diving forward to draw in the back, throwing their heads back. 

if they're going to issue fines for staging i completely support it but it just looks ridiculous when there was probably 100 staging incidents this weekend and they've fined 1. 

Some blokes would probably end up in the negative by the time they paid all their fines if it was officiated consistently.

 

All for Maysie being fined as he absolutely staged a hurt head. Not a good thing.

I think it was a very poor call by May in that the Afls and umps are trying their best to protect the heads of players and this kind of thing makes it harder.

That said I get May trying to do the team thing and milk a free kick .

Players have done this since the very first bounce.

Now my only hope is for consistency. But there hardly ever is. 

And while we are fining players, can we please start emptying their pockets for all infringements.

Including the ducking of the head for milking frees. Some players at some clubs are so good at it almost seems they have been coached how.

20 hours ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

I reckon Rivaldo still has Maysie covered.

 

And Ronaldo has got him covered

Carlton has got 18 players that stage in turn for free kicks.

7 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

 

...

Including the ducking of the head for milking frees. Some players at some clubs are so good at it almost seems they have been coached how.

Fine them? hah! Didn't the AFL declare a couple of years back they would pay frees against a player who ducks his head regardless of the tackle.  This was in order to discourage ducking so as to protect the head, nothing to do with milking frees?   As usual with the AFL it is a rule/interpretation that lasts as long as a lettuce (with apologies to Liz Truss).

The only problem I have with the May's fine is he's about the 50th example this year. If the AFL was fair dinkum why not go through all the tapes and fine the other 49.


Take the general staging element out of it for a sec. Yes there's plenty of it that goes unpunished blah blah I agree.

Opening up the phone lines and specifically zeroing in on staging in a sling tackle...

A) Can you differentiate between this and say a ducked high tackle from a small forward? Was this simply easier to catch him out on as you can disguise knew dropping better than banging your head against the ground?

B) Secondly is this the first fine for staging in a sling tackle?

51 minutes ago, Willmoy1947 said:

And Ronaldo has got him covered

 

4 hours ago, Mel Bourne said:

Friend texted me and said Kate Roffey was just interviewed on the ABC. When asked about this her response was “I haven’t seen it so I can’t comment”. 

Can someone here confirm this? If true that is an appalling response. 

Further to this, I was at the game with two Roos supporters and was genuinely embarrassed when the replays were being shown on the screen. I love Maysie, but this was one of the more blatant stages I’ve seen in recent times, and some of the “whataboutisms” and excuses being hurled around on this thread are borderline delusional. 

If true..i want her head. We, as a club, are under attack. You have Buckley slamming May this morning and also pot shottinv Brayshaw on the way through. Last week it’s the medicos. More stories on Oliver. It’s a barrage, and this weak President has been nowhere for months. I’m done. Spineless

 
15 minutes ago, dice said:

 

Can't stand the bloke. 

17 hours ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

May put a heap of mayo on it, deserves the fine. However, it was not holding the ball. He had no prior and was making an attempt. The umpire should have blown a ball-up quicker, but the incessant whinging from North fans had spooked him. 
 

secondly, where was Daicos’ fine for this incident? I haven’t read the outraged media reports:

 

Was he fined? 

 

Exactly!

 

This happens 100x every week. Why is this the one to be picked out? Because some peanut on Fox pointed it out

What's more it will be ignored for the next 10 years unless its Melbourne


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 119 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 380 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies