Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, picket fence said:

Anyone who would even contemplate dropping Clarry needs to sign him or herself into a Psychiatric Ward!!

Wanting to drop our leading possession getter from Sunday, who also had 8 tackles, 4 score involvements, had 23 pressure acts for 52 pressure points and was our number 1 ranked player? You’d need to be a bit nuts yes.. 

 

I think we should get both a new baby & a new bath !!!     The take a bex & have a good lie down !!

47 minutes ago, Fromgotowoewodin said:

Wanting to drop our leading possession getter from Sunday, who also had 8 tackles, 4 score involvements, had 23 pressure acts for 52 pressure points and was our number 1 ranked player? You’d need to be a bit nuts yes.. 

EXACTLY!! Hang on, get Werridee a Doctor to certify him!! Here's one that will do it... Dr Hugo Hackenbush!

Dr. Hackenbush (@DcHackenbush) / X

 

Edited by picket fence

 

In JVR, Langdon (provided he is over his jet lag)

Out Lever, BBB

Think we need another tall....

2 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

The voting was difficult. Given who we played it gives a fair reason for concern.

There are a few outs but this is a team that only just lost to the premiers last year in a final we should have won.

Sunday's game was a shocker and it's really difficult to work out what's happening. 

With all of our conjecture about who should be in the team against StKilda and who should be dropped to make way for others rightfully entitled, I feel that there is only one certainty: Goodwin will ignore all that is said by Demonlanders and brew his own cocktail of those clad in Demon colours for the day - just to reinforce the negativities he endorsed in his post-match media interview against the Weagles. 


1 hour ago, WERRIDEE said:

He only kicked 1 goal on him 4 on McDonald. May should have played. The backline was a shambles.

Waterman was taking May upto the wing and without Lever we needed May to stay back as the anchor more then normal. They made the change at 1/4 both as Waterman was all over May and to allow May to stay deep. If Waterman wanted to play high Tmac was the better match up.

Gee tough selection this week and beyond..
Petty must go back to sure up our defence, but not sure who replaces him. 
Brown out, likely for good. Might be worth Fullerton playing as Marshall is a good endurance ruck. JVR as permanent forward. 
Id give Windsor a rest and bring in Langdon. 
Not too excited with the changes, feels a bit like deckchairs on the Titanic. 

5 hours ago, Roger Mellie said:

I like the idea of AMW getting a game but not if it's in the backline.

Do you play him forward so you can run Kozy in the guts more?

 

The Full decoy has to be the plan. Fullarton’s a leading forward and has to be told to just get on his bike at CHF and drag a defender. Any kick to him has to be out in front, don’t ask him to contest long bombs.
 

Fritsch, Trac, JVR, McAdam, Pickett are the real targets. Plenty of firepower if they can function together and on the same page and the mids and forwards 

3 hours ago, Fromgotowoewodin said:

Wanting to drop our leading possession getter from Sunday, who also had 8 tackles, 4 score involvements, had 23 pressure acts for 52 pressure points and was our number 1 ranked player? You’d need to be a bit nuts yes.. 

You wouldn't drop him, but he's a shadow of his former self.

Well, not quite a shadow.  He's doing his best impersonation of Augustus Gloop.


OUT: Lever, Billings, Howes
IN: van Rooyen, Langdon, Woewodin

Petty to defence

3 hours ago, Fromgotowoewodin said:

Wanting to drop our leading possession getter from Sunday, who also had 8 tackles, 4 score involvements, had 23 pressure acts for 52 pressure points and was our number 1 ranked player? You’d need to be a bit nuts yes.. 

Agree with all (except he was our 2nd highest rated player behind maxy).

2 minutes ago, binman said:

Agree with all (except he was our 2nd highest rated player behind maxy).

I was going off DD’s table in the stats file.. 

7 hours ago, Demon Dynasty said:

 

Player Rating Rank 2023 Season Rating % Change vs 2023
C Oliver 4.700 1 5.002 -6.0
Max Gawn 4.075 2 3.350 21.6
C Petracca 4.025 3 4.707 -14.5
C Salem 3.675 4 2.993 22.8
A N-Bullen 3.275 5 2.532 29.3
T Rivers 3.025 6 3.696 -18.2
J Bowey 2.825 7 2.820 0.2
Jack Viney 2.775 8 3.707 -25.1
K Pickett 2.650 9 2.101 26.1
J McVee 2.625 10 2.320 13.1
B Howes 2.400 11 - -
T Woewodin > 61% 2.400 11 1.406 70.7
B Fritsch 2.175 13 2.324 -6.4
J Billings 2.125 14 - -
S McAdam 1.675 15 - -
K Chandler 1.650 16 2.265 -27.2
T McDonald 1.475 17 2.054 -28.2
T Sparrow 1.275 18 2.811 -54.6
C Windsor 1.100 19 - -
H Petty 0.925 20 2.718 -66.0
B Brown 0.850 21 1.941 -56.2
S May 0.750 22 3.213 -76.7
Jake Lever < 7% 0.200 23 3.131 -93.6
Team Score 52.45   69.86 -24.9
Top 6 22.78   24.43 -6.8
Bottom 6 6.38   15.17 -58.0

< Subbed out TOG

> Subbed in TOG

Stats courtesy of footwire.com & wheeloratings.com

 

3 hours ago, Fritta and Turner said:

In JVR, Langdon (provided he is over his jet lag)

Out Lever, BBB

Think we need another tall....

No jet lag for Lingers F a T. 

He ran to London and back. 

14 minutes ago, Fromgotowoewodin said:

I was going off DD’s table in the stats file.. 

 

Ta. Right you are then

(i was going off the champion data Player ratings)


47 minutes ago, Gator said:

You wouldn't drop him, but he's a shadow of his former self.

Well, not quite a shadow.  He's doing his best impersonation of Augustus Gloop.

Augustus Gloop 🤪what are u guys smokin??

28 minutes ago, Fromgotowoewodin said:

I was going off DD’s table in the stats file.. 

 

Sooo missed by a poofteeenth! CLARRY STILL A MEGA CONTRIBUTOR!

We can’t have Tommo and T Mac in the same back line imo

we can carry one, not both

cannot believe Hore and Turner are both out as well as Lever. Going to be a long month

18 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Augustus Gloop 🤪what are u guys smokin??

He looks as fat as a fool.

10 hours ago, loges said:

Unfortunately with Billings every time he is shooting for goal you can tell by his body language he is shy   ting himself

Yeah and Trac and the skipper from 30 are dead eye [censored]..geez


5 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

Clarry is the number 1 problem in the midfield. He is unfit and should be dropped. You saying he shouldn't has justified my calling but don't worry gutless Goodwin won't drop him he never makes many changes it will be van Rooyen and Langdon in Brown and Lever out. Which means I won't be going to the footy because Billings will be playing. We drop this game I'm calling for Goodwin's head.

The difficulty with Ollie is that they seem to go OK without him but then he's bog when he's in.

I think Jack hits more targets with fewer possessions myself.

Wouldn't drop him though.

 

2 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

The Full decoy has to be the plan. Fullarton’s a leading forward and has to be told to just get on his bike at CHF and drag a defender. Any kick to him has to be out in front, don’t ask him to contest long bombs.
 

Fritsch, Trac, JVR, McAdam, Pickett are the real targets. Plenty of firepower if they can function together and on the same page and the mids and forwards 

Really like this enforced fwdline idea - mids must not long-bomb but instead, lower eyes to individual leaders for the receives ... if Clarrie's kicking has been our main offender, in this regard. He wins tons of the ball for breaks into forward line opportunities, then bombs it on a wing & a prayer to no-one specifically - clearance seems his only intent. Mids and midfielders must have urgent plans for diversity in attack.

 
1 hour ago, Fromgotowoewodin said:

I was going off DD’s table in the stats file.. 

 

If the red is negative territory then it's pretty obvious where the problem lies

On 19/05/2024 at 22:23, WERRIDEE said:

B: Tomlinson, May, McVee

HB: Moniz-Wakefield, McDonald, Rivers

C: Windsor, Tholstrup, Langdon

HF: Petracca, van Rooyen, Neal-Bullen

F: McAdam, Fritsch, Pickett

FOLL: Gawn, Laurie, Viney

IC: Woewodin, Fullerton, Salem, Howes

SUB: Chandler 

Laurie instead of Oliver?  Are you kidding ?


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 126 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 381 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies