Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

Worth rolling the dice at the tribunal - but 1 game seems about right in the current scheme of things of how 2024 being adjudicated. 

 

He meant contact and he hit him in the head, it’s a week, simple as that. 

We could argue low impact since Soligo played on with no ill effects.


A week was expected.
Could be considered lucky to just be the one given his record.  
Needs to get this part of his game right; he’s too valuable to be missing games.

 

Hi impact, careless, they must have made it moderate as opposed to low contact. Could be argued either way.

Great to see the first player suspended under the Maynard Protocol is a Dee. Thanks AFL.

Edited by DeeMee

 

Can't be surprised with the 1 week on offer

Needs to be better 


Is he at risk of copping a second week or have early pleas been removed?

Roll the dice on the case of medium vs low impact to try and get him to play the Lions. Deserves a week, but Maynard deserved 2 at the very least.

Edited by Demon Disciple

The rules have changed since the Maynard incident so not point comparing the two. I think cop the week and move on. Let Kozzie stay in SA with his fam now for this week and the bye and then back to work.

kozzie was in the air and was “just  like a frisbee with arms “ , “ zero time to adjust”  … i always felt like saying how the hell do opening batsmen play any shots.geez that [censored] still burns in me. 
not a good look fr kozzie as he was in the air but it was to  stop the handball. unlucky. 

Definitely fight the grading


Just now, DutchDemons said:

 Let Kozzie stay in SA with his fam now for this week and the bye and then back to work.

No way, he should be training his [censored] off after letting the playing group down again with his mistimed physicality.

I'd like to see it go to the tribunal just to see the AFL try and justify the high impact grading which was ridiculous.

2 minutes ago, loges said:

I'd like to see it go to the tribunal just to see the AFL try and justify the high impact grading which was ridiculous.

Medium impact. It was the contact that was high (that can’t be argued)

Sick of seeing our own supporters taking shots at Kozzy. Time to back him in. Fingers crossed we make a successful challenge.

For those having a crack at Kozzie you're having a laugh. You're acting like he lined the guy up and ironed him out. We don't want him to lose his aggression, it's part of what makes him such a good player.

The 1 week suspension is garbage (just like Baker last week) but we'll cop it and move on.


Should be able to get it downgraded to low impact. But also who knows with the state of the AFL. 
A week is also not completely unreasonable 

7 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

Medium impact. It was the contact that was high (that can’t be argued)

Yes of course graded medium which is wasn't, if you're grading that medium I'd like to see what gets graded as low, a kiss on the cheek maybe?

30 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

off to the tribunal to argue it was low impact (which is what it was)

don't hire adrian anderson!

If we don't win the appeal at least expose the hipocrisy and corruption of those MRO clowns!! Makes my blood boil just remembering the thug's trial last September. 😡😡😡😡

 
22 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

Definitely fight the grading

Exactly. Find another example where medium impact caused no injury at all and the player played on. 

How did the Pendelbury love tap get graded low impact and this is medium impact? Oh I know, Michael [censored] Christiansen is how. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 104 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 376 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies