Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

6. Viney

5.Gawn

4. Oliver

3. Petracca 

2. Lever

1. Chandler 

 


6.  Viney

5.  Oliver

4.  Gawn  *

3.  Petracca

2.  Lever  *

1.  Hibberd  *

Special mention to Nibbler.  I couldn’t quite squeeze him into my votes, but I thought he was an important contributor all game ………. and wow, haven’t his field and goal kicking have improved enormously this year?

*  how important it is to have these three back!

 

 

 

6: Viney

5: Gawn

4: Petracca 

3: Chandler

2: Oliver

1: Van Rooyen

 

6. Jack Viney 

5. Clayton Oliver 

4. Christian Petracca 

3. Max Gawn 

2. Kade Chandler

1. Ed Langdon


Was at the game last night and haven't seen a replay yet.  In terms of overall influence on the result, Gawn and Viney were the difference all the game and JVR was the match winner.  Chandler is coming along very nicely, ANB played the sort of game that really suits his strengths, Hibberd did well controlling what looked like our biggest danger in the first quarter and Lever was poised. I'll agree with the ANZAC medal judges and go:

6. Viney

5. Gawn

4. Chandler

3.Lever

2. Hibberd

1. Petracca

1 hour ago, Swooper1987 said:

6. Viney

5. Gawn

4. Chandler

3.Lever

2. Hibberd

1. Petracca

I agree with Swooper.

Much as I loved JVR’s final quarter and especially his goals, he was all at sea the other dozen times the ball came his way. 

 

6 - Jack Viney

5 - Max Gawn

4- Christian Petracca 

3 - Clayton Oliver

2 - Kade Chandler 

1 - Jacob van Rooyen 

I gave votes to the two kids that kept us in the game and eventually won it for us. Lever, Brayshaw and Langdon all deserved a vote, a great team effort in the end it was an exhilarating and tense game to watch at the G and boy did we get behind them it was so loud in the second half.!!!

6 Jack Viney

5  Max Gawn

4 Christian Petracca

3 Angus Brayshaw

2 Thomas Sparrow

1 Edward Langdon

Honourable mentions;

Alex Neal-Bullen

Kade Chandler

Brody Grundy

Clarence Olivier

Jake Lever

Jacob van Rooyen

From the Director's chair;

Happenstance, JVR took flight in the last quarter just before being subbed off. His three goal burst was a match winning contribution. In a tense closely fought battle for supremacy of the hallowed MCG turf. The Demons overcame fierce resistance from the Tigers, to send them back to their Punt Road lair, to lick their wounds.

Adjudication;

According the DL post-game thread the condemnation of the umpiring performance was almost at universal pariah status. Surprisingly, the difference was only four more frees in favour of the Tigers. The total number of free kicks given was fifty-one. Is the fourth umpire necessary? Supposedly the extra gives greater scrutiny, but fairness goes both ways. The amount of infringements going 'unnoticed' particularly in packs is a blight on the game.

Broadcasters;

Preferred setting now during the game is a low rumble of crowd noise. Tiring of the oft partisan inanities and vacuousness of many the 'ex'pert commentators.


  • Author

Clarrie extends his lead to 24:-

78. Clayton Oliver 
54. Christian Petracca
32. Brodie Grundy 
29. Jake Lever Jack Viney 
26. Max Gawn 
18. Lachie Hunter
16. Ed Langdon  
13. Kysaiah Pickett  
11. Trent Rivers
9. Ben Brown 
7. Charlie Spargo 
7. Judd McVee
5. Jake Bowey Tom McDonald 
4. Angus Brayshaw Bayley Fritsch Tom Sparrow
3. James Jordon Alex Neal-Bullen
2. Jacob van Rooyen 
1. Kade Chandler Michael Hibberd Harry Petty Steven May 

Staggering the lack of love for Grundy’s game. His second half was huge and if you listened to Hardwick’s press conference you’d learn that he was becoming the difference for us and that they were forced to move Balta into the ruck which led to JVR clunking some. 


6 Gawn

5 Viney

4 Chatanooga Choo Choo

3 Langdon

2 Chandler

1 ANB

Hon mention Traac, Grundy

6 minutes ago, picket fence said:

 

4 Chatanooga Choo Choo

Pardon me boy?

4 hours ago, Tarax Club said:

...

Adjudication;

According the DL post-game thread the condemnation of the umpiring performance was almost at universal pariah status. Surprisingly, the difference was only four more frees in favour of the Tigers. The total number of free kicks given was fifty-one. Is the fourth umpire necessary? Supposedly the extra gives greater scrutiny, but fairness goes both ways. The amount of infringements going 'unnoticed' particularly in packs is a blight on the game.

...

It was 10-17 Tigers way at half time, meaning we got 13-10 after that point.

Its a correlation/causation question in that sometimes you lead the free kicks because you are first to the ball and win the frees for holding the man, too high, etc. and other times you lead the game because the umpires are giving you all the momentum.

In that kind of case, momentum from free kicks is often about ground position and who had the ball at the time.

I thought in the first half they definitely helped Richmond's momentum.

1 hour ago, At the break of Gawn said:

Staggering the lack of love for Grundy’s game. His second half was huge and if you listened to Hardwick’s press conference you’d learn that he was becoming the difference for us and that they were forced to move Balta into the ruck which led to JVR clunking some. 

I do agree with this. I wanted to fit him in my 6 but couldn't. But Grundy into the ruck, freeing up Max to go forward had a big influence on the game.


20 hours ago, Demonland said:

Clayton Oliver leads the Demonland Player of the Year after 5 rounds from Christian Petracca & Brody Grundy. Who gets your 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 2 votes please?

IMG_6055.jpeg

6) Gawn

5) Viney 

4) Grundy 

3) Chandler 

2) JVR

1) Lever

 

Edited by Nudge

3 hours ago, dee-tox said:

6. Petracca

5. Viney.

4. Lever

3. Oliver.

2. Gawn

1. Langdon.

Thought Petracca was fumbly, one paced & altogether off-boil LN

Edited by Nudge

6 hours ago, Tarax Club said:

 

Adjudication;

According the DL post-game thread the condemnation of the umpiring performance was almost at universal pariah status. Surprisingly, the difference was only four more frees in favour of the Tigers. The total number of free kicks given was fifty-one. Is the fourth umpire necessary? Supposedly the extra gives greater scrutiny, but fairness goes both ways. The amount of infringements going 'unnoticed' particularly in packs is a blight on the game.

 

The free kicks awarded/denied in the early part of the game contribute to momentum.  Taking Fritsch's kick off him is a cruel blow, worth more than just one kick.  The umpires do appear to have a script to assist, as they can - and they often tidy that up statistically late in the game when the damage has been done.  Last night was too one-sided to be just the run of the green or whatever.  It was loaded in favour of the Tigers until later, when credibility dictated evening up the frees as far as could be harmlessly done.  Crying shame this happens, and without regulation.  Why, for example, has there never been an inquiry into how West Coast does so much better at home compared to interstate, etc etc?  Last night was a tough game, fought hard, except for the one-sided interventions of the part-timers.

 
2 hours ago, Nudge said:

Thought Petracca was fumbly, one paced & altogether off-boil LN

Not sure there were any absolute standouts to be fair. We tend to mark Oliver, Petracca and Gawn too critically. 30, a goal at 80 percent ain't bad going.

I was ferocious about several umpiring decisions at the ground on Anzac Eve. After watching the replay, I have to concede that the blocking for Fritta's high mark was there. The free against May for rough contact on the members wing was there. However, the non 50 to ANB for being bear-hugged to the ground seconds after marking was an umpiring screamer, as was the non-free for a push-out in a marking contest to Grundy at the Punt Road end. I could go on to mention at least three blatant incorrect Richmond disposals that the umps turned a blind eye to etc. etc. The lesson for me is that my own red & blue glasses cause some irrationality where umpiring is concerned, however, we are correct to suggest the standard of umpiring in our game sucked!


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 45 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 287 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies