Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

IN: Lever, Brown, Gawn, Jordon
OUT: Tomlinson, McDonald, Spargo, Sparrow
 

SUB: Melksham

spargo definitely out

we don't make wholesale changes but tomlinson, mcdonald have 'don't come monday' vibes about them...that said, i'm epecting a few!

Edited by whatwhat say what

 

IN:  actual effort against an opposition, whether or not they're long term contenders

OUT:  complacency against sides we perceive should be low

In. Gawn, Lever, Hibberd, Brown, Jordan.

Out. Tomlinson, TMAC, Spargo, Melksham ( sub ) JVR ???


In: Brown, Lever, Turner, JJ

Out: T Mc, Tomlinson, Melksham, Spargo

FB: Turner May McVee
HB: Rivers Lever Brayshaw
C; Langdon Petracca Hunter
HF: ANB Petty Pickett
FF: JVR Brown Fritsch
Foll: Grundy Oliver Viney
Int: Bowey, Sparrow, JJ, Chandler

Lets not panic and pick Gawn too early 

Just now, Redlagged said:

Casey game tomorrow is important. If Harmes plays well, he is in.  Laurie? Howes? 

Howes and Turner are both competing for the 3rd tall defender if Petty goes forward and we want a Hibbo replacement. Turner more ready for that job. But would love to see Howes start to demand a go.

We’re yet to give JJ a second full game, I don’t see Harmes or Laurie jumping him. Unless Laurie is just blistering and they want him in Spargo’s role.

Schache a small chance if they want to keep Petty back. 

Moniz-Wakefield? I’d love to see it 

 

Tigers main ruckman is out so TMac may not be essential. BBB back in his place

Lever for Tomlinson

Hibberd for Bowey perhaps

Laurie for Spargo

Not panicking yet but we need to beat Richmond

Hard to see another poor performance like this next week.. but certainly some players need to go out. Petty back forward- created a contest late.

 

In- Lever, Hibberd, Brown.

Out- Spargo, McDonald and Tomlinson.

Bowey to play Spargos role. He was putrid tonight Bowser. 


4 minutes ago, Bates Mate said:

If we loose to the tigers, I'm going to be feeling worst than Neeld era

Really??? So if we are 3-3 six games in to the season, you're going to feel worse than when we were close to a laughing stock?

I find that difficult to believe. 

42 minutes ago, Redlagged said:

Casey game tomorrow is important. If Harmes plays well, he is in.  Laurie? Howes? 

Forget Laurie and Howes if Jefferson fires...... HE PLAYS!

3 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Forget Laurie and Howes if Jefferson fires...... HE PLAYS!

Are you trying to get him killed  Fence ?

 

JVR with a mature body and a full year of preparation is struggling at AFL level. 

Jeffo, for all his promise, is so spindly that his body can't even hold his head up straight 

If fit, Brown Lever and Gawn are  must ins.

If someone tears it up at Casey he plays on  Monday week. Someone has to be punished and omitted.

No problem making 3 or 4 changes. Clubs do it all the time.

No pedestrians.


21 minutes ago, Return to Glory said:

Really??? So if we are 3-3 six games in to the season, you're going to feel worse than when we were close to a laughing stock?

I find that difficult to believe. 

No expectation is less stressful

9 minutes ago, Go the Biff said:

Are you trying to get him killed  Fence ?

 

JVR with a mature body and a full year of preparation is struggling at AFL level. 

Jeffo, for all his promise, is so spindly that his body can't even hold his head up straight 

Rob Flowers Dad Al was dead against him playing as a 17year old and had to be CONVINCED by Noel Mc Mahon that he should play, But his father said no for the reasons you allude to!! His dad relented and The rest was HISTORY

I get your piont, but if, IF Merlin fires ......... PLAY HIM!!

Edited by picket fence

22 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Forget Laurie and Howes if Jefferson fires...... HE PLAYS!

Nowhere near ready.

5 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Rob Flowers Dad Al was dead against him playing as a 17year old and had to be CONVINCED by Noel Mc Mahon that he should play, But his father said no for the reasons you allude to!! His dad relented and The rest was HISTORY

I get your piont, but if, IF Merlin fires ......... PLAY HIM!!

I'm not convinced Fence. Robbie was the best I've seen in red and blue. And he played on the wing.  Not key forward getting smashed under packs by large,  nasty defenders and ruckmen dropping back. 

 

Don't think you're comparing apples with apples here.  Let the kid develop 

SEN suggesting Bolton may get suspended. Looks unlikely to me.


1 minute ago, Redleg said:

SEN suggesting Bolton may get suspended. Looks unlikely to me.

Wishful thinking

1 hour ago, dl4e said:

In. Gawn, Lever, Hibberd, Brown, Jordan.

Out. Tomlinson, TMAC, Spargo, Melksham ( sub ) JVR ???

Several injured players thown in there.

Just now, Redlagged said:

Wishful thinking

Why would SEN wish him suspended?

I said it looked unlikely.

 
1 hour ago, picket fence said:

Forget Laurie and Howes if Jefferson fires...... HE PLAYS!

Isn’t April 1 is it?

No way will he get a game 2023 without catastrophic injury list.  

image.thumb.jpeg.9fe82ff58cd4ddb22f88cd9b2c0da27e.jpeg
At the very least we need BBB and Lever back plus a hell of a lot of work on our brand. Dimma just given a blueprint on how to put us in a spliff by Scott if he plays talls.

Edited by OhMyDees


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

    • 54 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies