Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

B: Lever, May, Bowey

HB: Salem, Turner, Brayshaw

C: Langdon, Petracca, Hunter

HF: Viney, McDonald, Neal-Bullen

F: Fritsch, van Rooyen, Chandler

FOLL: Gawn, Oliver, Pickett

IC: Grundy, Sparrow, Jordon, Rivers

SUB: Melksham

 
28 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

B: Lever, May, Bowey

HB: Salem, Turner, Brayshaw

C: Langdon, Petracca, Hunter

HF: Viney, McDonald, Neal-Bullen

F: Fritsch, van Rooyen, Chandler

FOLL: Gawn, Oliver, Pickett

IC: Grundy, Sparrow, Jordon, Rivers

SUB: Melksham

No Petty???

Gone very early!

 Harmes, bbb, petty, schache, spargo and several others say ‘hi’!

think there will be some interesting changes this year. 

 
25 minutes ago, buck_nekkid said:

Gone very early!

 Harmes, bbb, petty, schache, spargo and several others say ‘hi’!

think there will be some interesting changes this year. 

If Schache starts round 1 we are in serious injury trouble for the start of the season.  Same with Melksham.

 

B: Lever,  May,  Bowey

HB: Salem,  Petty,  Brayshaw

C: Langdon,  Petracca,  Hunter

HF: Harmes, McDonald, Neal-Bullen

F: Fritsch, van Rooyen, Pickett       

FOLL: Gawn, Oliver, Viney

IC: Grundy, Sparrow, Spargo, Rivers

 

EMG Sestan, Jordon, Brown, Turner


Bowey for Hibberd

Interesting... not impossible

Petty obviously needs to be included.

I'd question Melksham as the sub baring in mind that there is no longer a medical requirement for substitution. The old mantra when there was a similar sub rule was young fresh legs for the last quarter. Chandler fits that description but you already have him in the side.

Not sure ANB is a lock.

Given only one official practice match and no VFL games until Round 3 the intra club scratch matches assume some significance in determining the make up of the team.

Going to be an interesting battle for 4-5 spots

3 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

B: Lever, May, Bowey

HB: Salem, Turner, Brayshaw

C: Langdon, Petracca, Hunter

HF: Viney, McDonald, Neal-Bullen

F: Fritsch, van Rooyen, Chandler

FOLL: Gawn, Oliver, Pickett

IC: Grundy, Sparrow, Jordon, Rivers

SUB: Melksham

Substitute Van Royen for Jordan, add BBB. Petty obviously takes Turners place ! Tactical Sub Harmesy and thats my team also for round 1 2023!

Edited by picket fence

 

INs & OUTs from finals to R1 2023

OUT: Hunt, Melksham, Jackson, Sparrow, ANB
IN: Bowey, van Rooyen, Grundy, Jordon, Hunter

McDonald for BBB another possibility....

11 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Substitute Van Royen for Jordan, add BBB Tactical Sub Harmesy and thats my team also for round 1 2023!

I like Turner but surely Petty has to be in the team. Either way, we look well placed to be a huge threat this year.....

 

l0HefZY0mFfLS9AFa (2).gif


All righty then, let's see...

B:         Bowey      Petty        Lever

HB:      Salem       May        Rivers

C:        Langdon  Petracca   Brayshaw

HF:      Grundy   [BBB/TMC]     Hunter

F:         Pickett    Van Rooyen    Fritsch

Foll:      Gawn       Oliver            Viney

and your favourites of Tomlinson, Harmes, Jordon, Neal-Bullen, Spargo, Smith, Sparrow, Laurie, Dunstan, Melksham.

I'm tipping only one of Brown and McDonald will be in the round one team and that Van Rooyen will be ahead of the other.

Grundy will be playing the traditional role of rucking half-forward/third tall!

Langdon will have a wing left as open as possible while Brayshaw will take a wing-to-defence and Hunter will take a wing-to-attack role on the more congested side (i.e., the side May always kicks out to!)

I think Laurie might sneak in if his practice games are good enough, becoming a dedicated small defender and pushing Rivers to the bench as another reasonably flexible runner.

I think we may yet see Tomlinson string a chunk of games together as Goodwin has a go at positional moves, trying to confuse opponents and test out the best way to use Gawn/Grundy and maybe induct Petty as a swingman option.

  • Author

Yeah I forgot Petty

B: Lever, May, Bowey

HB: Salem, Turner, Brayshaw

C: Langdon, Petracca, Hunter

HF: Viney, McDonald, Neal-Bullen

F: Fritsch, van Rooyen, Petty

FOLL: Gawn, Oliver, Pickett

IC: Grundy, Sparrow, Chandler, Rivers

SUB: Melksham

B - (24) Rivers, (1) May, (8) Lever
HB - (3) Salem, (35) Petty, (10) Brayshaw
C: (12) Hunter, (13) Oliver, (15) Langdon
HF - (9) Spargo, (2) van Rooyen, (30) Neal-Bullen
F - (31) Fritsch, (25) McDonald, (36) Pickett
RU - (11) Gawn, (5) Petracca, (7) Viney
IC - (6) Grundy, (32) Sparrow, (17) Bowey, (4) Harmes
SUB - (22) Howes

  • Author

Reserves

B: McVee, Adams, D.Smith

HB: Rivers, Tomlinson, Hibberd

C: Howes, Dunstan, Woewodin

HF: Laurie, Schache, Melksham

F: Spargo, Brown, Jefferson

FOLL: Verrall, Harmes, Hunter

IC: Sestan, Moniz-Wakefield, Farris-White, K.Turner or Burgoyne

Edited by WERRIDEE


  • Author

I've changed the side again

B: Lever, May, Bowey

HB: Salem, D.Turner, Brayshaw

C: Langdon, Petracca, Jordon

HF: Viney, McDonald, Neal-Bullen

F: Fritsch, van Rooyen, Petty

FOLL: Gawn, Oliver, Pickett

IC: Grundy, Sparrow, Chandler, J.Smith

SUB: Melksham

Bowey May Lever

Salem Petty Brayshaw

Langdon Oliver Howes

Pickett Mcdonald Neal-Bullen

Gawn Van Rooyen Fritsch

Grundy Viney Petracca

Harmes Sparrow Rivers Chandler

My best 23 are :

B: Rivers May Lever,

HB: Salem Petty Hibberd

C: Hunter Oliver Langdon

HF: Fritsch Gawn  T.Mac

FF: Pickett   Brown  Chandler 

R: Grundy Petracca  Viney,

I: Van Rooyen , Sparrow, J.Smith, Harmes, Brayshaw

 

1 hour ago, Wilson7 said:

B - (24) Rivers, (1) May, (8) Lever
HB - (3) Salem, (35) Petty, (10) Brayshaw
C: (12) Hunter, (13) Oliver, (15) Langdon
HF - (9) Spargo, (2) van Rooyen, (30) Neal-Bullen
F - (31) Fritsch, (25) McDonald, (36) Pickett
RU - (11) Gawn, (5) Petracca, (7) Viney
IC - (6) Grundy, (32) Sparrow, (17) Bowey, (4) Harmes
SUB - (22) Howes

Appreciate that you included the numbers, Wilson.

I'm trying to think whether there's ever been a Melbourne  player debuting with ''Van" in their name but Ray Carr is all l can come up with...


12 hours ago, drdrake said:

If Schache starts round 1 we are in serious injury trouble for the start of the season.  Same with Melksham.

 

With 5 interchange I don't necessarily agree. You don't always select the 19th to 23rd best player for the interchange positions.

Much can depend upon form injury a horses for courses need and heaven forbid Goody and Selection Committee opening their eyes to our top 30 players and not the 23 heroes that famously won our 13th flag. Let's hope this is the direction all season where players are rewarded with AFL selection and our depth proves that our list is 32 deep rather than 23!!

5 hours ago, jayceebee31 said:

My best 23 are :

B: Rivers May Lever,

HB: Salem Petty Hibberd

C: Hunter Oliver Langdon

HF: Fritsch Gawn  T.Mac

FF: Pickett   Brown  Chandler 

R: Grundy Petracca  Viney,

I: Van Rooyen , Sparrow, J.Smith, Harmes, Brayshaw

 

Change Gawn on HF line to FPocket and Chandler to FFlank in Tmacs possie and Tmac is CH F. Much better balanced 

5 hours ago, Simon Port said:

Bowey May Lever

Salem Petty Brayshaw

Langdon Oliver Howes

Pickett Mcdonald Neal-Bullen

Gawn Van Rooyen Fritsch

Grundy Viney Petracca

Harmes Sparrow Rivers Chandler

One more needed for 23. 

 
4 hours ago, Fanatique Demon said:

Appreciate that you included the numbers, Wilson.

Love the selection of Howes. 

5 hours ago, Simon Port said:

Bowey May Lever

Salem Petty Brayshaw

Langdon Oliver Howes

Pickett Mcdonald Neal-Bullen

Gawn Van Rooyen Fritsch

Grundy Viney Petracca

Harmes Sparrow Rivers Chandler

23 not 22 needed. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: North Melbourne

    Can you believe it? After a long period of years over which Melbourne has dominated in matches against North Melbourne, the Demons are looking down the barrel at two defeats at the hands of the Kangaroos in the same season. And if that eventuates, it will come hot on the heels of an identical result against the Gold Coast Suns. How have the might fallen? There is a slight difference in that North Melbourne are not yet in the same place as Gold Coast. Like Melbourne, they are currently situated in the lower half of the ladder and though they did achieve a significant upset when the teams met earlier in the season, their subsequent form has been equally unimpressive and inconsistent. 

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: Adelaide

    The atmosphere at the Melbourne Football Club at the beginning of the season was aspirational following an injury-plagued year in 2024. Coach Simon Goodwin had lofty expectations with the return of key players, the anticipated improvement from a maturing group with a few years of experience under their belts, and some exceptional young talent also joining the ranks. All of that went by the wayside as the team failed to click into action early on. It rallied briefly with a new strategy but has fallen again with five more  consecutive defeats. 

    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Coburg

    The Casey Demons returned to their home ground which was once a graveyard for opposing teams but they managed to gift the four points on offer to Coburg with yet another of their trademark displays of inaccuracy in front of goals and some undisciplined football that earned the displeasure of the umpires late in the game. The home team was welcomed by a small crowd at Casey Fields and looked right at home as it dominated the first three quarters and led for all bar the last five minutes of the game. In the end, they came away with nothing, despite winning everywhere but on the scoreboard and the free kick count.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 18 vs North Melbourne

    After four weeks on the road the Demons make their long awaited return to the MCG next Sunday to play in a classic late season dead rubber against the North Melbourne Kangaroos. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 269 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demons were wasteful early before putting the foot down early in the 2nd quarter but they chased tail for the remainder of the match. They could not get their first use of the footy after half time and when they did poor skills, execution and decision making let them down.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 246 replies
  • PODCAST: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 7th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Crows.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thumb Down
      • Clap
    • 28 replies