2 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

This is taking even longer than a goal review after the ball has clearly hit the post or been touched behind the line.

20 minutes ago, Redleg said:

The door has been opened. Apparently the Tribunal said he was contesting the ball but should have been more careful. They didn’t say he bumped.

I smell a rat. Why wouldn’t they have simply found he bumped?

Is this a set up to get him off at the last stop, so it looks like they fought hard to suspend him.

We will see.

That rat is getting more smelly. 

2 minutes ago, Redleg said:

That rat is getting more smelly. 

We know a fish rots from the head, but it seems that a rat does too.

13 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

What a farce! Don't really care either way but gotta be a big distraction for their club and ultimately the team this whole episode. Can't wait to Smash the pretenders 

Edited August 11, 20223 yr by Bates Mate

"But it's Cripps"

"But he flattened the guy. We can't let him off."

"Yeah, I know ... but it's Cripps."

"Sh*t. It *IS* complicated, isn't it!?"

A pity this hearing wasn’t on a plane. Cripps would be a certainty to be out with DVT being up in the air for so long

Just to top things off, Carlton is to get a draft compo pick for a 30 year old retiring rather than be vaccinated under the AFL guidelines.

Give us a break. 

Edited August 11, 20223 yr by Redleg

The longer the deliberations the greater the chance of overturn the result

This is a joke 

They've made their decision, they're just sorting out where they'll be living under the witness protection scheme.

1 hour ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Probably at least twice that chook.

I better start saving for my upcoming vagrancy and public nuisance charges.

3 minutes ago, 640MD said:

The longer the deliberations the greater the chance of overturn the result

They deliberated for 40 minutes the other night. 

We’re up to 55 mins now.

Little bit less deliberating and a little more deliberdoing

9 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Just to top things off, Carlton is to get a draft compo pick for a 30 year old retiring rather than be vaccinated under the AFL guidelines.

Give us a break. 

Just wait until the AFL announces an end of first round pick as compo

1 minute ago, chook fowler said:

I better start saving for my upcoming vagrancy and public nuisance charges.

Organise a couple of false identities and receive some dud pension or dole money chook.

It's what the AFL would recommend.

Carlton Counsel argued for 1hr 45 mins

 AFL Counsel argued for 35 mins

 The Appeals Board has been deliberating for an hour so far. 

1 minute ago, Demonland said:

Carlton Counsel argued for 1hr 45 mins

 AFL Counsel argued for 35 mins

 The Appeals Board has been deliberating for an hour so far. 

Ffs, must be looking for an angle to let him off

2 minutes ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

Ffs, must be looking for an angle to let him off

Rather, I would suggest, the best way of justifying getting him off!

This whole process is taking far longer than both the bloody matches he’s missing. What a waste of time and money!

And would they waste this much time on a no name player in the interest of justice. 

1 minute ago, sue said:

And would they waste this much time on a no name player in the interest of justice. 

No but to be fair they’re trying to make the finals. He’s one of their best players. 

the fix is in

1 minute ago, daisycutter said:

the fix is in

I fear so dc