Jump to content


Recommended Posts



Posted

Just a 35-minute submission for AFL counsel Nicholas Pane.

Not a lot to report. Pane said a player could contest with his eyes on the ball and still be in the "action of bumping an opponent", which of course was what Townshend disputed.

He said Cripps not being questioned whether it was a bump or not was irrelevant. He said based on the evidence given it was a matter for the Tribunal to determine whether the actions could be constituted as a bump.

"There has been no denial of natural justice." – Michael Whiting

  • Like 1

Posted
Just now, Superunknown said:

Too long, didn’t live?

Maybe tl_nl (too long _ not listening)

Can you imagine one of the Tribunal members putting up his hand (like a stop sign) and saying that? 

10 or 15 minutes you could understand but an hour would put some of our pollies to shame

  • Haha 1
Posted

I imagine that the protagonists are sitting amicably together sipping single malt and smoking cigars laughing at the peasants outside who are waiting with baited breath for their pronouncements.


Posted
2 minutes ago, Macca said:

Maybe tl_nl (too long _ not listening)

Can you imagine one of the Tribunal members putting up his hand (like a stop sign) and saying that? 

10 or 15 minutes you could understand but an hour would put some of our pollies to shame

30 mins in

lawyerus interruptis

chair’s hand goes up

”sorry but ya fken what?”

  • Haha 1

Posted
5 minutes ago, At the break of Gawn said:

Absolute farce if he gets off. You can’t be knocking out blokes who then miss weeks and walk away scot free.

This already happens most weeks. 

Posted

For heavens sake just let Cripps play . Carlton  is done. Who cares?   What has all this 'lawyer -ing and legal interpretation got to do with anything. This sports elite garbage happened several weeks ago with Buddy and the swans still beat us.

Let Cripps play. We'll lick em in the morrow!


Posted

The door has been opened. Apparently the Tribunal said he was contesting the ball but should have been more careful. They didn’t say he bumped.

I smell a rat. Why wouldn’t they have simply found he bumped?

Is this a set up to get him off at the last stop, so it looks like they fought hard to suspend him.

We will see.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Redleg said:

The door has been opened. Apparently the Tribunal said he was contesting the ball but should have been more careful. They didn’t say he bumped.

I smell a rat. Why wouldn’t they have simply found he bumped?

Is this a set up to get him off at the last stop, so it looks like they fought hard to suspend him.

We will see.

 

12A83A97-1C5D-4334-82CF-ECDD6DEE9D60.jpeg

  • Haha 1

Posted
1 minute ago, Redleg said:

The door has been opened. Apparently the Tribunal said he was contesting the ball but should have been more careful. They didn’t say he bumped.

I smell a rat. Why wouldn’t they have simply found he bumped?

Is this a set up to get him off at the last stop, so it looks like they fought hard to suspend him.

We will see.

The AFL is full of rats I suspect.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Redleg said:

The door has been opened. Apparently the Tribunal said he was contesting the ball but should have been more careful. They didn’t say he bumped.

I smell a rat. Why wouldn’t they have simply found he bumped?

Is this a set up to get him off at the last stop, so it looks like they fought hard to suspend him.

We will see.

i was thinking along similar lines too. also said going for ball, eyes on ball


Posted
41 minutes ago, layzie said:

The government should step in and do something about this, it's a joke.

 

  • Haha 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Redleg said:

The door has been opened. Apparently the Tribunal said he was contesting the ball but should have been more careful. They didn’t say he bumped.

I smell a rat. Why wouldn’t they have simply found he bumped?

Is this a set up to get him off at the last stop, so it looks like they fought hard to suspend him.

We will see.

This. Win win for the AFL. One of the Brownlow “favourite” gets off but the AFL don’t look week on head knocks because they tried. 

  • Vomit 1
Posted (edited)

What an absolute sham of an "organisation" the AFL has become.   Gillon can't move on soon enough.

"The head is sacrosanct" except when it isn't.  Chandler must be feeling totally flabbergasted and abandoned having made the perfect tackle and getting two weeks without even an appeal.

Edited by monoccular
  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...