Tony Tea 2,816 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 Just now, In Harmes Way said: Like all good lawyers, he’s paid by the sentence QCs are paid by the syllable. 5 Quote
chook fowler 19,778 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 (edited) 1 minute ago, In Harmes Way said: Like all good lawyers, he’s paid by the sentence No by the syllable Edited August 11, 2022 by chook fowler 1 Quote
chook fowler 19,778 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 Just now, chook fowler said: No by the syllable 1 minute ago, Tony Tea said: QCs are paid by the syllable. Great minds think alike Tony 1 2 Quote
Mr Steve 3,820 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 Just a 35-minute submission for AFL counsel Nicholas Pane. Not a lot to report. Pane said a player could contest with his eyes on the ball and still be in the "action of bumping an opponent", which of course was what Townshend disputed. He said Cripps not being questioned whether it was a bump or not was irrelevant. He said based on the evidence given it was a matter for the Tribunal to determine whether the actions could be constituted as a bump. "There has been no denial of natural justice." – Michael Whiting 1 Quote
Tony Tea 2,816 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 1 minute ago, chook fowler said: Great minds think alike Tony We're just realists, Chooky. Quote
At the break of Gawn 4,515 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 Absolute farce if he gets off. You can’t be knocking out blokes who then miss weeks and walk away scot free. 2 2 Quote
Macca 17,127 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 Just now, Superunknown said: Too long, didn’t live? Maybe tl_nl (too long _ not listening) Can you imagine one of the Tribunal members putting up his hand (like a stop sign) and saying that? 10 or 15 minutes you could understand but an hour would put some of our pollies to shame 1 Quote
monoccular 17,760 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 I imagine that the protagonists are sitting amicably together sipping single malt and smoking cigars laughing at the peasants outside who are waiting with baited breath for their pronouncements. Quote
Superunknown 4,246 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 2 minutes ago, Macca said: Maybe tl_nl (too long _ not listening) Can you imagine one of the Tribunal members putting up his hand (like a stop sign) and saying that? 10 or 15 minutes you could understand but an hour would put some of our pollies to shame 30 mins in lawyerus interruptis chair’s hand goes up ”sorry but ya fken what?” 1 Quote
Demonland 74,449 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 5 minutes ago, At the break of Gawn said: Absolute farce if he gets off. You can’t be knocking out blokes who then miss weeks and walk away scot free. This already happens most weeks. Quote
layzie 34,528 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 14 minutes ago, Superunknown said: Too long, didn’t live? I thought it was Too Long Demonland Quote
daisycutter 30,021 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Quote
deebunked 285 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 For heavens sake just let Cripps play . Carlton is done. Who cares? What has all this 'lawyer -ing and legal interpretation got to do with anything. This sports elite garbage happened several weeks ago with Buddy and the swans still beat us. Let Cripps play. We'll lick em in the morrow! Quote
Mr Steve 3,820 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 Just now, Demonland said: That post went up on the AFL blog and has now been removed. 1 Quote
Redleg 42,179 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 The door has been opened. Apparently the Tribunal said he was contesting the ball but should have been more careful. They didn’t say he bumped. I smell a rat. Why wouldn’t they have simply found he bumped? Is this a set up to get him off at the last stop, so it looks like they fought hard to suspend him. We will see. 1 Quote
Demons11 7,149 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 1 minute ago, Redleg said: The door has been opened. Apparently the Tribunal said he was contesting the ball but should have been more careful. They didn’t say he bumped. I smell a rat. Why wouldn’t they have simply found he bumped? Is this a set up to get him off at the last stop, so it looks like they fought hard to suspend him. We will see. 1 Quote
Bitter but optimistic 22,289 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 1 minute ago, Redleg said: The door has been opened. Apparently the Tribunal said he was contesting the ball but should have been more careful. They didn’t say he bumped. I smell a rat. Why wouldn’t they have simply found he bumped? Is this a set up to get him off at the last stop, so it looks like they fought hard to suspend him. We will see. The AFL is full of rats I suspect. Quote
daisycutter 30,021 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 2 minutes ago, Redleg said: The door has been opened. Apparently the Tribunal said he was contesting the ball but should have been more careful. They didn’t say he bumped. I smell a rat. Why wouldn’t they have simply found he bumped? Is this a set up to get him off at the last stop, so it looks like they fought hard to suspend him. We will see. i was thinking along similar lines too. also said going for ball, eyes on ball Quote
Dee Zephyr 19,320 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 41 minutes ago, layzie said: The government should step in and do something about this, it's a joke. 2 Quote
Superunknown 4,246 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 1 minute ago, Bitter but optimistic said: The AFL is full of rats I suspect. Jeez that’s like saying the ocean’s full of water 1 3 Quote
Wells 11 5,503 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 If he gets off this then there’s no point in the rules re head high contact and no point in the tribunal. Quote
Demonland 74,449 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 14 minutes ago, Redleg said: The door has been opened. Apparently the Tribunal said he was contesting the ball but should have been more careful. They didn’t say he bumped. I smell a rat. Why wouldn’t they have simply found he bumped? Is this a set up to get him off at the last stop, so it looks like they fought hard to suspend him. We will see. This. Win win for the AFL. One of the Brownlow “favourite” gets off but the AFL don’t look week on head knocks because they tried. 1 Quote
monoccular 17,760 Posted August 11, 2022 Posted August 11, 2022 (edited) What an absolute sham of an "organisation" the AFL has become. Gillon can't move on soon enough. "The head is sacrosanct" except when it isn't. Chandler must be feeling totally flabbergasted and abandoned having made the perfect tackle and getting two weeks without even an appeal. Edited August 11, 2022 by monoccular 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.