Jump to content

Featured Replies

JVR was better than good, he was easily the best forward on ground, and after having to play the second ruck for large parts of the game I was impressed with his engine going up against Ceglar and then taking mark after mark.  So unused to seeing a Melbourne player take contested marks (he took 6).  He also was able to spoil to advantage and followed up.  This game was just a good example of why Weideman is absolute toast - this kid is the real deal. 

Other stand outs tonight were Dunstan - he was pivotal to the win, even if Laurie got some cream on the outside and was good with it.  Dunstan is a cut above - and deserves another go, good on him. 

Still gushing about JVR, what a game. 

 

Laurie, JVR, Hunt, Dunstan and Chandler all put their hands up for selection.

At the very least, Oliver is out for Dunstan. Laurie and Chandler should be in for Spargo and Bedford. Hunt should be in for Bowey. If we change our forward structure, JVR comes in for Sparrow or ANB.

Will be interesting how many changes Goodwin does make.

My guess would be not more than 3.

 

Not many would have predicted how well Bowey would play in 2021 (although it was obvious after just one game that he was the real deal). If we're going to debut JVR or Laurie, we should do it soon.

 

Hunt has to come in for Sparrow after that performance IMV.  Bowey needs a rest for Laurie who was superb tonight.

Hunt was the instigator of our come back from about half way through the third and has earned a recall.  While all others were handballing to players two to five feet away bringing more pressure.... or trying to pinpoint passes from the back pocket under shizen conditions when we were still slightly behind, Hunt said "stuff this...im gonna get it, break lines and roost it deep into our forward half".

In addition he intercepted brilliantly on a number of occasions a kick behind play just back of the square and didnt hesistate to shoot low raking kicks into the hot spots putting the puddy cats under immense pressure in 1 v 1s giving our forwards a decent chance.

Baker & Mitch also did the same on a few occasions.

Thought Mitch actually had a decent game without really hitting the scoreboard but very tough conditions.

Weid also presented well after half time i reckon.

Edited by Demon Dynasty


Laurie can play...very solid kid, got the Leigh Mathews thighs means he can stay balanced over the ball.

Must be the Hokey-Cokey Round.  We had one foot in the grave.

Wouldn't promote Dunstan. His disposal was poor.  Possibly, Laurie or Chandler for Oliver.  Generally in the third quarter all disposal was poor and no-one really pressed for the Seniors.

Would promote JVR to give him a taste of the big time,  Weed and MBrown have been tried as forwards and found wanting.

The boys didn't really try in the third quarter.  Often a Casey player was contesting for a bobbling ball against 3 or 4 Cats and his team-mates were all waiting 3 metres out, to see what happened.  When a couple of Cats were running the ball  through the wing to HFF, the Casey boys were just escorting them a few metres in-field.  No-one was sprinting back to help the defence.  Reminds me of MFC 2003.

Didn't see the first half :(

 

Jesus that was some performance by Bailey Laurie. I've never seen a kid that young just so ridiculously clean and handle the ball like it was dry weather. Honestly would drop Spargo for Bailey. His work rate also was extremely high. We certainly have a good one here..

JVR took 6 contested marks in one of the wettest and shocking conditions you'll see at Geelong. Calling it now but the kid will be a star at AFL level.

Thought Dunstan was really exceptional.  He obviously comes straight in for Oliver next week. Sparrow considers himself very lucky there...

1 minute ago, redandbluemakepurple said:

Must be the Hokey-Cokey Round.  We had one foot in the grave.

Wouldn't promote Dunstan. His disposal was poor.  Possibly, Laurie or Chandler for Oliver.  Generally in the third quarter all disposal was poor and no-one really pressed for the Seniors.

Would promote JVR to give him a taste of the big time,  Weed and MBrown have been tried as forwards and found wanting.

The boys didn't really try in the third quarter.  Often a Casey player was contesting for a bobbling ball against 3 or 4 Cats and his team-mates were all waiting 3 metres out, to see what happened.  When a couple of Cats were running the ball  through the wing to HFF, the Casey boys were just escorting them a few metres in-field.  No-one was sprinting back to help the defence.  Reminds me of MFC 2003.

Didn't see the first half :(

You clearly didn't watch the last quarter either.


25 minutes ago, wizardinoz said:

How did Rivers go?

Pretty meh game for mine.  Hunt kicked the door down big time in the second half.

Wow that is some comeback I had written us off, Laurie Hunt, JVR, Chandler and Dunstan all came good at the same time. Looking forward to seeing Hunt, Laurie and Dunstan and maybe JVR playing in Alice Sunday week. That was a gutsy come from behind win, we have a great team at Casey.

1 minute ago, redandbluemakepurple said:

No, I did see the last quarter which was a good effort. 

Having said that when the final siren blew, the Cats had still kicked 8 in a row in the middle of the game due to an apparent lack of effort or possibly a poor game style.  If you accept second-class efforts with high-points in between, you may as well support the Saints or the Bombers; they will eventually slaughter another team unexpectedly.

 

Bro relax, we won.


Only watched the last quarter and a half but I wasn't too crash hot on the way Weid was going about it, thoughts?

Edited by layzie

The conditions on the night meant it would be difficult for anyone to really "shine". Having said that I'm starting to see what Jason Taylor saw in "Bill"


Yeh, great,  bring in another bloke four foot two

None stood out

JVR continuing to audition and looking good for 2023.

Chandler... two purple patches with little between

Weid.. struggled but not disgraced

Hunt... a definite maybe

Rivers... needs to learn how to impose himself skills wise

Dunstan.. okay

Baker... papers stamped

Laurie...need to see more of his defensive side

Tomlinson...lumbering but it was wet

Woewodin..ask me in 2023

Of the above I think Hunt and perhaps Weid or Chandler are possible selections for the red centre

PS This game showed how low we are on ruck stocks

  • Author

It's great to see Laurie and Roo boy play well but I doubt any of them will debut. Weideman still must be in front of van Rooyen even though he's playing good football and Dunstan will come in for Clarry that's why we picked him up. I think Bedford is a certainty to be dropped been poor but the rest of the out of form players that have been mentioned will be given another chance to redeem themselves.

Edited by WERRIDEE

 
2 hours ago, layzie said:

Reckon Laurie is a sneaky outside chance for debut?

Laurie I believe has already played one game for Melbourne this year.

  • Author
5 minutes ago, Thehardtackler said:

Laurie I believe has already played one game for Melbourne this year.

Incorrect


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 103 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 375 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies